A critical appraisal of quantitative arthroscopy as an outcome measure in osteoarthritis of the knee

Comparison Between Arthroscopic and Histological International Cartilage Repair Society Scoring Systems in Porcine Cartilage Repair Model

OBJECTIVE

The arthroscopic and histological International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) scores are designed to evaluate cartilage repair quality. Arthroscopic ICRS score can give a maximum score of 12 and the histological score can give values between 0% and 100% for each of its 14 subscores. This study compares these methods in an animal cartilage repair model. This study hypothesizes that there is a significant correlation between these methods.

DESIGN

A chondral defect was made in the medial femoral condyle of 18 pigs. Five weeks later, 9 pigs were treated with a novel recombinant human type III collagen/polylactide scaffold and 9 were left untreated to heal spontaneously. After 4 months, the medial condyles were evaluated with a simulated arthroscopy using the ICRS scoring system followed by a histological ICRS scoring.

RESULTS

This porcine cartilage repair model produced repaired cartilage tissue ranging from good to poor repair tissue quality. The mean arthroscopic ICRS total score was 6.8 (SD = 2.2). Histological ICRS overall assessment subscore was 38.2 (SD = 31.1) and histological ICRS average points were 60.5 (SD = 19.5). Arthroscopic ICRS compared with histological ICRS average points or its overall assessment subscore showed moderate correlation (r = 0.49 and r = 0.50, respectively). The interrater reliability with the intraclass correlation coefficients for arthroscopic ICRS total scores, histological ICRS overall assessment subscore, and ICRS average points showed moderate to excellent reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic and histological ICRS scoring methods for repaired articular cartilage show a moderate correlation in the animal cartilage repair model.

Arthroscopic International Cartilage Repair Society Classification System Has Only Moderate Reliability in a Porcine Cartilage Repair Model

BACKGROUND

The International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) score was designed for arthroscopic use to evaluate the quality of cartilage repair.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the reliability of the ICRS scoring system using an animal cartilage repair model.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

A chondral defect with an area of 1.5 cm² was made in the medial femoral condyle of 18 domestic pigs. Five weeks later, 9 pigs were treated using a novel recombinant human type III collagen/polylactide scaffold, and 9 were left to heal spontaneously. After 4 months, the pigs were sacrificed, then 3 arthroscopic surgeons evaluated the medial femoral condyles via video-recorded simulated arthroscopy using the ICRS scoring system. The surgeons repeated the evaluation twice within a 9-month period using their recorded arthroscopy.

RESULTS

The porcine cartilage repair model produced cartilage repair tissue of poor to good quality. The mean ICRS total scores for all observations were 6.6 (SD, 2.6) in arthroscopy, 5.9 (SD, 2.7) in the first reevaluation, and 6.2 (SD, 2.8) in the second reevaluation. The interrater reliability with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the ICRS total scores (ICC, 0.46-0.60) and for each individual subscore (ICC, 0.26-0.71) showed poor to moderate reliability. The intrarater reliability with the ICC also showed poor to moderate reliability for ICRS total scores (ICC, 0.52-0.59) and for each individual subscore (ICC, 0.29-0.58). A modified Bland-Altman plot for the initial arthroscopy and for the 2 reevaluations showed an evident disagreement among the observers.

CONCLUSION

In an animal cartilage repair model, the ICRS scoring system seems to have poor to moderate reliability.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Arthroscopic assessment of cartilage repair using the ICRS scoring method has limited reliability. We need more objective methods with acceptable reliability to evaluate cartilage repair outcomes.

Assessment of Cartilage Repair Quality With the International Cartilage Repair Society Score and the Oswestry Arthroscopy Score

The International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) score and the Oswestry Arthroscopic Score (OAS) have been validated to evaluate repair tissue quality. However, the performance of these scores has not been studied in typical patients undergoing cartilage repair and who have lesions of varying sizes. In this study, we compared the performance of the ICRS and the OAS scores and analyzed the effect of lesion characteristics on the performance of these two scores. Cartilage repair quality was assessed in a total of 104 arthroscopic observations of cartilage repair sites of the knee in 62 patients after autologous chondrocyte implantation. Two observers scored the repair areas independently with the ICRS and the OAS scores. The performance of both scores was evaluated according to internal consistency and inter-rater reliability and correlation between the scores. The frequency and proportion of disagreements were analyzed according to the repair site area and the given score. The correlation between the scores was good (r = 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87-0.94). Both scores showed moderate internal consistency and inter-rater reliability. Cronbach's α was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.80-0.92) for the ICRS score and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.70-0.86) for the OAS score. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.84-0.92) for the ICRS and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.74-0.87) for the OAS scores. The frequency and proportion of disagreements were higher in larger repair sites. In arthroscopic use, both ICRS and OAS scores perform similarly, however, their reliability deteriorates as the lesion size increases. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 38:555-562, 2020.

Development of an Electromechanical Grade to Assess Human Knee Articular Cartilage Quality

Quantitative assessments of articular cartilage function are needed to aid clinical decision making. Our objectives were to develop a new electromechanical grade to assess quantitatively cartilage quality and test its reliability. Electromechanical properties were measured using a hand-held electromechanical probe on 200 human articular surfaces from cadaveric donors and osteoarthritic patients. These data were used to create a reference electromechanical property database and to compare with visual arthroscopic International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grading of cartilage degradation. The effect of patient-specific and location-specific characteristics on electromechanical properties was investigated to construct a continuous and quantitative electromechanical grade analogous to ICRS grade. The reliability of this novel grade was assessed by comparing it with ICRS grades on 37 human articular surfaces. Electromechanical properties were not affected by patient-specific characteristics for each ICRS grade, but were significantly different across the articular surface. Electromechanical properties varied linearly with ICRS grade, leading to a simple linear transformation from one scale to the other. The electromechanical grade correlated strongly with ICRS grade (r = 0.92, p < 0.0001). Additionally, the electromechanical grade detected lesions that were not found visually. This novel grade can assist the surgeon in assessing human knee cartilage by providing a quantitative and reliable grading system.

Arthroscopic optical coherence tomography provides detailed information on articular cartilage lesions in horses

Arthroscopy enables direct inspection of the articular surface, but provides no information on deeper cartilage layers. Optical coherence tomography (OCT), based on measurement of reflection and backscattering of light, is a diagnostic technique used in cardiovascular surgery and ophthalmology. It provides cross-sectional images at resolutions comparable to that of low-power microscopy. The aim of this study was to determine if OCT is feasible for advanced clinical assessment of lesions in equine articular cartilage during diagnostic arthroscopy. Diagnostic arthroscopy of 36 metacarpophalangeal joints was carried out ex vivo. Of these, 18 joints with varying degrees of cartilage damage were selected, wherein OCT arthroscopy was conducted using an OCT catheter (diameter 0.9 mm) inserted through standard instrument portals. Five sites of interest, occasionally supplemented with other locations where defects were encountered, were arthroscopically graded according to the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) classification system. The same sites were evaluated qualitatively (ICRS classification and morphological description of the lesions) and quantitatively (measurement of cartilage thickness) on OCT images. OCT provided high resolution images of cartilage enabling determination of cartilage thickness. Comparing ICRS grades determined by both arthroscopy and OCT revealed poor agreement. Furthermore, OCT visualised a spectrum of lesions, including cavitation, fibrillation, superficial and deep clefts, erosion, ulceration and fragmentation. In addition, with OCT the arthroscopically inaccessible area between the dorsal MC3 and P1 was reachable in some cases. Arthroscopically-guided OCT provided more detailed and quantitative information on the morphology of articular cartilage lesions than conventional arthroscopy. OCT could therefore improve the diagnostic value of arthroscopy in equine orthopaedic surgery.

Non-terminal animal model of post-traumatic osteoarthritis induced by acute joint injury

OBJECTIVE

Develop a non-terminal animal model of acute joint injury that demonstrates clinical and morphological evidence of early post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA).

METHODS

An osteochondral (OC) fragment was created arthroscopically in one metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint of 11 horses and the contralateral joint was sham operated. Eleven additional horses served as unoperated controls. Every 2 weeks, force plate analysis, flexion response, joint circumference, and synovial effusion scores were recorded. At weeks 0 and 16, radiographs (all horses) and arthroscopic videos (OC injured and sham joints) were graded. At week 16, synovium and cartilage biopsies were taken arthroscopically from OC injured and sham joints for histologic evaluation and the OC fragment was removed.

RESULTS

OC fragments were successfully created and horses were free of clinical lameness after fragment removal. Forelimb gait asymmetry was observed at week 2 (P = 0.0012), while joint circumference (P < 0.0001) and effusion scores (P < 0.0001) were increased in injured limbs compared to baseline from weeks 2 to 16. Positive flexion response of injured limbs was noted at multiple time points. Capsular enthesophytes were seen radiographically in injured limbs. Articular cartilage damage was demonstrated arthroscopically as mild wear-lines and histologically as superficial zone chondrocyte death accompanied by mild proliferation. Synovial hyperemia and fibrosis were present at the site of OC injury.

CONCLUSION

Acute OC injury to the MCP joint resulted in clinical, imaging, and histologic changes in cartilage and synovium characteristic of early PTOA. This model will be useful for defining biomarkers of early osteoarthritis and for monitoring response to therapy and surgery.

Preoperative MRI underestimates articular cartilage defect size compared with findings at arthroscopic knee surgery

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used as a preoperative tool to estimate the size of articular cartilage defects to optimize treatment selection. However, the reliability of MRI sizing of cartilage defects is not well understood. Hypothesis/

PURPOSE

The purpose of this investigation was to compare the size of knee articular cartilage defects on MRI to arthroscopic visualization after debridement. It was hypothesized that MRI sizing would produce measurements that were no different than those made during arthroscopic knee surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

Seventy-seven patients (age [mean ± SD], 38 ± 10.7 years) who met inclusion criteria underwent preoperative knee MRI of at least 1.5 T within 1 year of arthroscopic knee surgery for a high-grade cartilage defect. Postdebridement defect sizes were obtained from intraoperative surgery notes and compared with retrospective MRI estimates.

RESULTS

Ninety-two total cartilage defects were analyzed with an average of 1.2 high-grade defects per knee and average postdebridement defect area of 2.99 cm(2) per lesion (95% CI, 1.63-2.26 cm(2)). Preoperative MRI analysis estimated a lesion area that was an average of 1.04 cm(2) smaller (95% CI, 0.70-1.39 cm(2); P < .0001). In 74% of the lesions analyzed, defect size was larger on arthroscopic visualization than was estimated by MRI sizing. On average, MRI underestimated the defect area by 70% compared with arthroscopic visualization.

CONCLUSION

Magnetic resonance imaging underestimates the size of articular cartilage defects compared with final postdebridement size as measured during arthroscopic knee surgery. Thus, before arthroscopic surgery, orthopaedic surgeons should consider treatment strategies that are appropriate for a larger defect than predicted by preoperative MRI.

ISSUES AND ADVANCES IN THE EARLY STAGE DIAGNOSIS OF OSTEOARTHRITIS

With the progress of localized treatment procedures such as unicompartmental knee replacement, chondrocyte implantation and osteochondral grafting, it has become important to develop a means of assessing early stage cartilage and bone degradation. This review outlines the recent advances in arthroscopic tools, and discusses the major problems and issues faced in developing effective assessment methods. The central problem in joint tissue assessment is to discriminate degradation from the wide variation in normal tissue. This discrimination, however, is far from being realized by current methodologies, and is compounded by the difficulty in correlating structural features with pain and mobility in the joint. In response to these findings, an argument is provided for a new direction in quantitative tissue evaluation using an integrated chemical, structural, and functional approach, and the importance of structure–function–pain relationships.

Relationship between arthroscopic joint evaluation and the levels of Coll2-1, Coll2-1NO(2), and myeloperoxidase in the blood and synovial fluid of horses affected with osteochondrosis of the tarsocrural joint

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the levels of plasmatic and synovial Coll2-1, Coll2-1NO(2) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) in horses with osteochondral lesions of the tarsocrural joint and to investigate how these levels relate to arthroscopic findings of inflammation and degeneration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Venous blood and synovial fluid samples were collected from 63 horses presented for arthroscopic removal of osteochondral fragments in the tarsocrural joint. Prior to removal of the osteochondral fragment, an exploration of the joint was performed and an inflammatory and degenerative score was determined. The blood and synovial levels of Coll2-1, Coll2-1NO(2) and MPO were also measured. The effects of the arthroscopic evaluation (inflammatory and degenerative classes) on the blood and synovial markers were evaluated using a linear model (GLM procedure), and correlations between biochemical markers in the blood and synovial fluid and the arthroscopic evaluation (inflammatory and degenerative classes) were established (Pearson's correlations).

RESULTS

Significantly higher levels of Coll2-1 were detected in synovial fluid of higher degenerative classes. There was a significant correlation between the degenerative score and the synovial levels of Coll2-1 (r=0.27). According to the logistic regression model, there was a significant effect of the degenerative class on synovial levels of Coll2-1.

CONCLUSIONS

Coll2-1 correlates well with the degenerative state of tarsocrural joints as evaluated by arthroscopy. This marker can therefore be classified as a burden-of-disease marker in the assessment of joint disease in horses.

Arthroscopic Measurement of Cartilage Lesions of the Knee Condyle: Principles and Experimental Validation of a New Method

PURPOSE

To present a new method of arthroscopic measurement of the surface and location of condylar lesions.

METHODS

We propose measuring the height of the condylar lesion by using the lesion's arc (Δ°) obtained from the difference between the angle of flexion at the beginning of the lesion and the angle of flexion at the end of the lesion. The first goal of the study was to determine the intra and inter reliability of the lesion's arc. Experiment 1: 20 deep lesions were evaluated using the lesional arc by two arthroscopists. Experiment 2: In a second series of 20 lesions, the flexion angles of the knees were recorded using a goniometer. All 10 knees (5 in each series) were then disarticulated and the true lesion arc was checked with a goniometer to assess the validity of the scopic measurements. The second goal was to obtain the height of the lesion from the lesion's arc. The lesion arc Δ° of the condylar is converted into height (millimeters) on the basis of a table obtained from 5 standard profiles of the lateral X-ray of the knee.

RESULTS

Experiment 1: The intra observer reliability was good but the inter observer reliability was poor. Experiment 2: The intra and inter observers' reliability were good. On the anatomic control after disarticulating the knee, the confidence interval was narrower when using the goniometer.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose a simple, reliable method to measure the height of a condylar lesion with the lesion's arc during arthroscopy.

The clinical utility and diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging for identification of early and advanced knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Current diagnostic strategies for detection of structural articular cartilage abnormalities, the earliest structural signs of osteoarthritis, often do not capture the condition until it is too far advanced for the most potential benefit of noninvasive interventions.

PURPOSE

To systematically review the literature relative to the following questions: (1) Is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) a valid, sensitive, specific, accurate, and reliable instrument to identify knee articular cartilage abnormalities compared with arthroscopy? (2) Is MRI a sensitive tool that can be utilized to identify early cartilage degeneration?

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in November 2010 using PubMed MEDLINE (from 1966), CINAHL (from 1982), SPORTDiscus (from 1985), SCOPUS (from 1996), and EMBASE (from 1974) databases.

RESULTS

Fourteen level I and 13 level II studies were identified that met inclusion criteria and provided information related to diagnostic performance of MRI compared with arthroscopic evaluation. The diagnostic performance of MRI demonstrated a large range of sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies. The sensitivity for identifying articular cartilage abnormalities in the knee joint was reported between 26% and 96%. Specificity and accuracy were reported between 50% and 100% and between 49% and 94%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for identifying early osteoarthritis were reported between 0% and 86%, 48% and 95%, and 5% and 94%, respectively. As a result of inconsistencies between imaging techniques and methodological shortcomings of many of the studies, a meta-analysis was not performed, and it was difficult to fully synthesize the information to state firm conclusions about the diagnostic performance of MRI.

CONCLUSION

There is evidence in some MRI protocols that MRI is a relatively valid, sensitive, specific, accurate, and reliable clinical tool for identifying articular cartilage degeneration. Because of heterogeneity of MRI sequences, it is not possible to make definitive conclusions regarding its global clinical utility for guiding diagnosis and treatment strategies.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Traumatic sports injuries to the knee may be significant precursor events to early onset of posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Magnetic resonance imaging may aid in early identification of structural injuries to articular cartilage as evidenced by articular cartilage degeneration grading.

Reliability in arthroscopic grading of cartilage lesions: results of a prospective blinded study for evaluation of inter-observer reliability

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Arthroscopy is a well-established method for grading cartilage lesions. This study was undertaken to evaluate the inter-observer variance of grading cartilage lesions in a real life operation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four experienced arthroscopic surgeons used diagnostic arthroscopy, one after the other, to grade cartilage lesions in a total of 16 patients who had undergone knee arthroscopy.

RESULTS

In summary, a total of 14 cartilage areas in 16 patients were graded (n = 224). The Cohens (Fleiss) Kappa Index for multiple investigators was κ = 0.052 in the medial, κ = 0.300 in the central, and κ = 0.107 in the lateral surface of the patella. The indices were κ = 0.292 in the medial, κ = 0.0.255 in the central, and κ = 0.234 in the lateral surface of the trochlea. The inter-observer variance was κ = 0.193 in the MFC mean bearing zone, κ = 0.116 in the margin of the MFC, κ = 0.168 in the mean bearing zone of the TM, and κ = 0.164 in the TM margin. In the lateral compartment, the κ-Index was 0.309 in the LFC mean bearing zone, 0.111 in the margin of the LFC, 0.020 in the mean bearing zone of the TL, and 0.085 in the TL margin.

CONCLUSIONS

The inter-observer reliability of the arthroscopic grading of cartilage lesions is poor. The major problem is the relatively large variability in differentiating between intact cartilage and lesions that consist of the softening of the cartilage and the differentiation between superficial and deep cartilage lesions. In the future, objective measurements should be developed to solve this problem.

Evaluation of a Photographic Chondropathy Score (PCS) for pathological samples in a study of inflammation in tibiofemoral osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVE

Severity of structural change in knee osteoarthritis (OA) can be measured radiologically, macroscopically or microscopically. Existing methods have limitations for use in laboratory studies. We have developed a Photographic Chondropathy Score (PCS) for use with pathological samples. We have compared the ability of the different severity measures to distinguish between samples obtained at total knee replacement surgery or postmortem (PM), and to detect associations between structural severity and synovitis.

METHOD

Tibial plateaux and femoral condyles were collected from 84 patients undergoing surgery or PM. Each sample was photographed and scored. Limits of agreement and repeatability coefficients were calculated for PCS. Scores for radiological joint space narrowing (JSN) and osteophytes, histological cartilage changes (Mankin), and synovitis were assigned. Data were analysed using Mann-Whitney U tests, Spearman's correlation coefficient or logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 116 knees were analysed from 84 patients. Both medial tibial plateaux and total joint PCS showed good repeatability, internal consistency and reliability between observers. PCS, radiographic and Mankin's scores were all modestly positively correlated (r values 0.28-0.55). PCS and Mankin scores were greater in surgical than PM samples. Synovial inflammation was associated with higher PCS and radiological JSN scores (r values 0.43-0.48), irrespective of diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Macroscopic, microscopic and radiographical severity scores are complementary measures of structural severity in knee OA. Synovial inflammation was associated with increased OA structural severity, suggesting a possible role of chronic synovitis in cartilage damage.

Correlation between arthroscopic and histopathological grading systems of articular cartilage lesions in knee osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

Arthroscopic and particularly histopathological assessments have been used to evaluate alterations of knee cartilage in osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of this study was to examine the correlation between an arthroscopic method to grade the severity of chondropathies and the histological/histochemical grading system (HHGS) applied to the corresponding articular cartilage areas in knee OA.

METHODS

The articular cartilage surface was examined by chondroscopy using the Beguin and Locker severity criteria, analysing the lesions in 72 chondroscopic areas. Afterwards, samples were obtained by dividing the cartilage surface of the medial tibiofemoral compartment of three OA knee joints into equal squares and they were evaluated histologically using the HHGS. The correlation between both grading methods was assessed using the weighted Kappa coefficient (K(w)).

RESULTS

The results obtained with both scores showed good agreement (K(w): mean+/-standard deviation, 0.619+/-0.071). While the average HHGS scores of the chondral samples showed a better agreement with arthroscopic grades 0, I and II, the arthroscopic evaluation has a tendency to overestimate chondral lesions for histological grades III and IV. The intra- and inter-observer reliability of the HHGS evaluation of chondral lesions was excellent (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient: 0.909 and 0.941, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In this study, we found a good quantitative correlation between established arthroscopic severity and histopathological scoring systems, particularly in less advanced lesions. Our results suggest that the arthroscopic method is a valuable tool in clinical research to score chondropathies in the medial femorotibial compartment of the OA knee, although some limitations should not be overlooked.

Arthroscopic estimation of the extent of chondropathy

INTRODUCTION

Arthroscopy has been used to evaluate articular cartilage (AC) pathology in osteoarthritis (OA) for outcome measurement and validation of non-invasive imaging. However, many fundamental aspects of arthroscopic assessment remain un-validated.

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated arthroscopic estimates of extent of chondropathy.

METHODS

Serial arthroscopic assessments were performed in a group of 15 sheep before and after bilateral stifle medial meniscectomy (MMx). Post-mortem assessments were performed in un-MMx sheep and 4 and 16 weeks post-MMx. Arthroscopic assessments of the extent of each grade of chondropathy were compared with a non-arthroscopic hybrid assessment that incorporated biomechanical, thickness and macroscopic assessments.

RESULTS

Arthroscopy evaluated only 36% of AC and missed significant pathological changes, softening and chondro-osteophyte, occurring in peripheral regions. The patterns of change in arthroscopic assessments were similar to those of the non-arthroscopic assessment but there was a very strong tendency to over-estimate the extent of softened AC after MMx. In spite of these limitations arthroscopic assessments were responsive to change. Estimates of the extent of normal and softened AC were most responsive to change over time followed by estimates of superficial and deep fibrillation. Arthroscopy was as an excellent discriminator between normal and OA. Assessments of chondro-osteophyte and exposed bone were not responsive to change.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic estimates of extent of chondropathy are prone to substantial error. While experience and training may reduce these errors other approaches may more effectively improve performance.

Arthroscopy -- a potential "gold standard" for the diagnosis of the chondropathy of early osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to: 1. Evaluate the performance of arthroscopy for the diagnosis of chondropathy and to compare it to that of direct non-arthroscopic assessments; 2. Determine intra-observer reliability of arthroscopic assessments; 3. Evaluate the effects of the arthroscopic video quality and probing upon diagnostic performance.

DESIGN

The ovine medial meniscectomy (MMx) model of early osteoarthritis (OA) was used assuming that pre-MMx articular cartilage (AC) was "normal" and post-MMx AC "chondropathic". Video recordings of arthroscopic assessments of each stifle compartment were evaluated. Scores were given for the quality of the video and the amount of probing. The diagnostic performances of dynamic shear modulus (G), light microscopic assessment and superficial zone collagen birefringence assessments were evaluated and compared to that of arthroscopy. Intra-observer reliability of arthroscopic assessments was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Arthroscopic assessments had high sensitivity (91-100%), specificity (62-88%) and accuracy (75-93%) for the diagnosis of chondropathy 16 weeks after MMx. Arthroscopy compared favourably with the direct non-arthroscopic assessments in the lateral compartment and was found to have extremely high intra-observer reliability (kappa 0.78-1.00). The quality of arthroscopic video recordings and the amount of probing did not significantly influence accuracy or reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopy performs as well as direct non-arthroscopic assessments of AC for diagnosis of early OA. These results suggest that arthroscopy can be used as a "gold standard" for the validation of non-invasive assessments like magnetic resonance imaging and that arthroscopic diagnosis can be based on small amounts of video footage without AC probing.