Chromosome packaging by archaeal histones

Extended Archaeal Histone-Based Chromatin Structure Regulates Global Gene Expression in Thermococcus kodakarensis

Histone proteins compact and organize DNA resulting in a dynamic chromatin architecture impacting DNA accessibility and ultimately gene expression. Eukaryotic chromatin landscapes are structured through histone protein variants, epigenetic marks, the activities of chromatin-remodeling complexes, and post-translational modification of histone proteins. In most Archaea, histone-based chromatin structure is dominated by the helical polymerization of histone proteins wrapping DNA into a repetitive and closely gyred configuration. The formation of the archaeal-histone chromatin-superhelix is a regulatory force of adaptive gene expression and is likely critical for regulation of gene expression in all histone-encoding Archaea. Single amino acid substitutions in archaeal histones that block formation of tightly packed chromatin structures have profound effects on cellular fitness, but the underlying gene expression changes resultant from an altered chromatin landscape have not been resolved. Using the model organism Thermococcus kodakarensis, we genetically alter the chromatin landscape and quantify the resultant changes in gene expression, including unanticipated and significant impacts on provirus transcription. Global transcriptome changes resultant from varying chromatin landscapes reveal the regulatory importance of higher-order histone-based chromatin architectures in regulating archaeal gene expression.

The Role of Archaeal Chromatin in Transcription

Genomic organization impacts accessibility and movement of information processing systems along DNA. DNA-bound proteins dynamically dictate gene expression and provide regulatory potential to tune transcription rates to match ever-changing environmental conditions. Archaeal genomes are typically small, circular, gene dense, and organized either by histone proteins that are homologous to their eukaryotic counterparts, or small basic proteins that function analogously to bacterial nucleoid proteins. We review here how archaeal genomes are organized and how such organization impacts archaeal gene expression, focusing on conserved DNA-binding proteins within the clade and the factors that are known to impact transcription initiation and elongation within protein-bound genomes.

TFS and Spt4/5 accelerate transcription through archaeal histone-based chromatin

RNA polymerase must surmount translocation barriers for continued transcription. In Eukarya and most Archaea, DNA-bound histone proteins represent the most common and troublesome barrier to transcription elongation. Eukaryotes encode a plethora of chromatin-remodeling complexes, histone-modification enzymes and transcription elongation factors to aid transcription through nucleosomes, while archaea seemingly lack machinery to remodel/modify histone-based chromatin and thus must rely on elongation factors to accelerate transcription through chromatin-barriers. TFS (TFIIS in Eukarya) and the Spt4-Spt5 complex are universally encoded in archaeal genomes, and here we demonstrate that both elongation factors, via different mechanisms, can accelerate transcription through archaeal histone-based chromatin. Histone proteins in Thermococcus kodakarensis are sufficiently abundant to completely wrap all genomic DNA, resulting in a consistent protein barrier to transcription elongation. TFS-enhanced cleavage of RNAs in backtracked transcription complexes reactivates stalled RNAPs and dramatically accelerates transcription through histone-barriers, while Spt4-Spt5 changes to clamp-domain dynamics play a lesser-role in stabilizing transcription. Repeated attempts to delete TFS, Spt4 and Spt5 from the T. kodakarensis genome were not successful, and the essentiality of both conserved transcription elongation factors suggests that both conserved elongation factors play important roles in transcription regulation in vivo, including mechanisms to accelerate transcription through downstream protein barriers.

Archaeal DNA replication and repair: new genetic, biophysical and molecular tools for discovering and characterizing enzymes, pathways and mechanisms

DNA replication and repair are essential biological processes needed for the survival of all organisms. Although these processes are fundamentally conserved in the three domains, archaea, bacteria and eukarya, the proteins and complexes involved differ. The genetic and biophysical tools developed for archaea in the last several years have accelerated the study of DNA replication and repair in this domain. In this review, the current knowledge of DNA replication and repair processes in archaea will be summarized, with emphasis on the contribution of genetics and other recently developed biophysical and molecular tools, including capillary gel electrophoresis, next-generation sequencing and single-molecule approaches. How these new tools will continue to drive archaeal DNA replication and repair research will also be discussed.

Novel clades of the HU/IHF superfamily point to unexpected roles in the eukaryotic centrosome, chromosome partitioning, and biologic conflicts

The HU superfamily of proteins, with a unique DNA-binding mode, has been extensively studied as the primary chromosome-packaging protein of the bacterial superkingdom. Representatives also play a role in DNA-structuring during recombination events and in eukaryotic organellar genome maintenance. However, beyond these well-studied roles, little is understood of the functional diversification of this large superfamily. Using sensitive sequence and structure analysis methods we identify multiple novel clades of the HU superfamily. We present evidence that a novel eukaryotic clade prototyped by the human CCDC81 protein acquired roles beyond DNA-binding, likely in protein-protein interaction in centrosome organization and as a potential cargo-binding protein in conjunction with Dynein-VII. We also show that these eukaryotic versions were acquired via an early lateral transfer from bacteroidetes, where we predict a role in chromosome partition. This likely happened before the last eukaryotic common ancestor, pointing to potential endosymbiont contributions beyond that of the mitochondrial progenitor. Further, we show that the dramatic lineage-specific expansion of this domain in the bacteroidetes lineage primarily is linked to a functional shift related to potential recognition and preemption of genome invasive entities such as mobile elements. Remarkably, the CCDC81 clade has undergone a similar massive lineage-specific expansion within the archosaurian lineage in birds, suggesting a possible use of the HU superfamily in a similar capacity in recognition of non-self molecules even in this case.

dbHiMo: a web-based epigenomics platform for histone-modifying enzymes

Over the past two decades, epigenetics has evolved into a key concept for understanding regulation of gene expression. Among many epigenetic mechanisms, covalent modifications such as acetylation and methylation of lysine residues on core histones emerged as a major mechanism in epigenetic regulation. Here, we present the database for histone-modifying enzymes (dbHiMo; http://hme.riceblast.snu.ac.kr/) aimed at facilitating functional and comparative analysis of histone-modifying enzymes (HMEs). HMEs were identified by applying a search pipeline built upon profile hidden Markov model (HMM) to proteomes. The database incorporates 11 576 HMEs identified from 603 proteomes including 483 fungal, 32 plants and 51 metazoan species. The dbHiMo provides users with web-based personalized data browsing and analysis tools, supporting comparative and evolutionary genomics. With comprehensive data entries and associated web-based tools, our database will be a valuable resource for future epigenetics/epigenomics studies.

Database URL:http://hme.riceblast.snu.ac.kr/

Refined solution structure and backbone dynamics of the archaeal MC1 protein

The 3D structure of methanogen chromosomal protein 1 (MC1), determined with heteronuclear NMR methods, agrees with its function in terms of the shape and nature of the binding surface, whereas the 3D structure determined with homonuclear NMR does not. The structure features five loops, which show a large distribution in the ensemble of 3D structures. Evidence for the fact that this distribution signifies internal mobility on the nanosecond time scale was provided by using (15)N-relaxation and molecular dynamics simulations. Structural variations of the arm (11 residues) induced large shape anisotropy variations on the nanosecond time scale that ruled out the use of the model-free formalism to analyze the relaxation data. The backbone dynamics analysis of MC1 was achieved by comparison with 20 ns molecular dynamics trajectories. Two β-bulges showed that hydrogen bond formation correlated with ϕ and ψ dihedral angle transitions. These jumps were observed on the nanosecond time scale, in agreement with a large decrease in (15)N-NOE for Gly17 and Ile89. One water molecule bridging NH(Glu87) and CO(Val57) through hydrogen bonding contributed to these dynamics. Nanosecond slow motions observed in loops LP3 (35-42) and LP5 (67-77) reflected the lack of stable hydrogen bonds, whereas the other loops, LP1 (10-14), LP2 (22-24), and LP4 (50-53), were stabilized by several hydrogen bonds. Dynamics are often directly related to function. Our data strongly suggest that residues belonging to the flexible regions of MC1 could be involved in the interaction with DNA.

The evolutionary history of histone H3 suggests a deep eukaryotic root of chromatin modifying mechanisms

BACKGROUND

The phenotype of an organism is an outcome of both its genotype, encoding the primary sequence of proteins, and the developmental orchestration of gene expression. The substrate of gene expression in eukaryotes is the chromatin, whose fundamental units are nucleosomes composed of DNA wrapped around each two of the core histone types H2A, H2B, H3 and H4. Key regulatory steps involved in the determination of chromatin conformations are posttranslational modifications (PTM) at histone tails as well as the assembly of histone variants into nucleosomal arrays. Although the mechanistic background is fragmentary understood, it appears that the chromatin signature of metazoan cell types is inheritable over generations. Even less understood is the conservation of epigenetic mechanisms among eukaryotes and their origins.

RESULTS

In the light of recent progress in understanding the tree of eukaryotic life we discovered the origin of histone H3 by phylogenetic analyses of variants from all supergroups, which allowed the reconstruction of ancestral states. We found that H3 variants evolved frequently but independently within related species of almost all eukaryotic supergroups. Interestingly, we found all core histone types encoded in the genome of a basal dinoflagellate and H3 variants in two other species, although is was reported that dinoflagellate chromatin is not organized into nucleosomes.Most probably one or more animal/nuclearid H3.3-like variants gave rise to H3 variants of all opisthokonts (animals, choanozoa, fungi, nuclearids, Amoebozoa). H3.2 and H3.1 as well as H3.1t are derivatives of H3.3, whereas H3.2 evolved already in early branching animals, such as Trichoplax. H3.1 and H3.1t are probably restricted to mammals.We deduced a model for protoH3 of the last eukaryotic common ancestor (LECA) confirming a remarkable degree of sequence conservation in comparison to canonical human H3.1. We found evidence that multiple PTMs are conserved even in putatively early branching eukaryotic taxa (Euglenozoa/Excavata).

CONCLUSIONS

At least a basal repertoire of chromatin modifying mechanisms appears to share old common ancestry and may thus be inherent to all eukaryotes. We speculate that epigenetic principles responsive to environmental triggers may have had influenced phenotypic variation and concomitantly may potentially have had impact on eukaryotic diversification.

Transcriptional activation in the context of repression mediated by archaeal histones

Many archaea (including all the methanogens, nearly all euryarchaeotes, and some crenarchaeotes) use histones as components of the chromatin that compacts their genomes. The archaeal histones are homo- and heterodimers that pair on DNA to form tetrasomes (as the eukaryotic histones H3 and H4 do). The resulting DNA packaging is known to interfere with assembly of the archaeal transcription apparatus at promoters; the ability of transcriptional activation to function in repressive archaeal chromatin has not yet been explored in vitro. Using four of the Methanocaldococcus jannaschii (Mja) histones, we have examined activation of the model Mja rb2 transcription unit by the Mja transcriptional activator Ptr2 in this simplified-chromatin context. Using hydroxyl radical footprinting, we find that the Ptr2-specific rb2 upstream activating site is a preferred histone-localizing site that nucleates histone: DNA-binding radiating from the rb2 promoter. Nevertheless, Ptr2 competes effectively with histones for access to the rb2 promoter and most potently activates transcription in vitro at histone concentrations that extensively coat DNA and essentially silence basal transcription.

An archaeal Rad54 protein remodels DNA and stimulates DNA strand exchange by RadA

Rad54 protein is a key member of the RAD52 epistasis group required for homologous recombination in eukaryotes. Rad54 is a duplex DNA translocase that remodels both DNA and protein–DNA complexes, and functions at multiple steps in the recombination process. Here we use biochemical criteria to demonstrate the existence of this important protein in a prokaryotic organism. The Sulfolobus solfataricus Rad54 (SsoRad54) protein is a double-strand DNA-dependent ATPase that can alter the topology of duplex DNA. Like its eukaryotic homolog, it interacts directly with the S. solfataricus Rad51 homologue, SsoRadA, to stimulate DNA strand exchange. Confirmation of this protein as an authentic Rad54 homolog establishes an essential phylogenetic bridge for identifying Rad54 homologs in the archaeal and bacterial domains.

An archaeal SET domain protein exhibits distinct lysine methyltransferase activity towards DNA-associated protein MC1-α

The evolutionarily conserved SET domain proteins in eukaryotes have been shown to function as site-specific histone lysine methyltransferases, and play an important role in regulating chromatin-mediated gene transcriptional activation and silencing. Structure-based sequence analysis has revealed that SET domains are also encoded by viruses and bacteria, as well as Archaea. However, their cellular functions remain elusive. In this study, we have characterized a SET domain protein from Methanosarcina mazei strain Gö1 that we refer to as Gö1-SET. We show that Gö1-SET exists as a homodimer in solution, and functions as a lysine methyltransferase with high substrate specificity that is dependent on the amino acid sequence flanking the lysine methylation site. Particularly, Gö1-SET exhibits selective methyltransferase activity towards one of the major archaeal DNA interacting protein MC1-alpha at lysine 37. Our findings suggest that SET domain proteins such as Gö1-SET may restructure archaeal chromatin that is composed of MC1-DNA complexes, and that modulation of chromatin structure by lysine methylation may have arisen before the divergence of the archaeal and eukaryotic lineages.

Mutational analysis of genes encoding chromatin proteins in the archaeon Methanococcus voltae indicates their involvement in the regulation of gene expression

Several genes for chromatin proteins are known in Archaea. These include histones and histone-like proteins in Euryarchaeota, and a DNA binding protein, Alba, which was first detected in the crenarchaeote Sulfolobus solfataricus and is thought to be involved in transcriptional regulation. The methanogenic archaeon Methanococcus voltae harbors four genes coding for all these three types of chromatin proteins. Deletion mutants for the two histone genes ( hstAand hstB), the gene encoding the histone-like protein ( hmvA) and the gene for the Alba homologue ( albA) have now been constructed in this organism. Although all single mutants were viable, deletion of hstA resulted in slow growth. Two transcripts were detected for each of the two histone genes. These were expressed in different relative amounts, which were correlated with different growth phases. Cell extracts obtained from the different mutants exhibited altered protein patterns, as revealed by 2D gel electrophoresis, indicating that the chromatin proteins are involved in gene regulation in M. voltae.

Conserved eukaryotic histone-fold residues substituted into an archaeal histone increase DNA affinity but reduce complex flexibility

Although the archaeal and eukaryotic nucleosome core histones evolved from a common ancestor, conserved lysine residues are present at DNA-binding locations in all four eukaryotic histones that are not present in the archaeal histones. Introduction of lysine residues at the corresponding locations into an archaeal histone, HMfB, generated a variant with increased affinity for DNA that formed more compact complexes with DNA. However, these complexes no longer facilitated the circularization of short DNA molecules and had lost the flexibility to wrap DNA alternatively in either a negative or positive supercoil.

Archaeal chromatin and transcription

Archaea contain a variety of sequence-independent DNA binding proteins consistent with the evolution of several different, sometimes overlapping and exchangeable solutions to the problem of genome compaction. Some of these proteins undergo residue-specific post-translational lysine acetylation or methylation, hinting at analogues of the histone modifications that regulate eukaryotic chromatin structure and transcription. Archaeal transcription initiation most closely resembles the eukaryotic RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) system, but Archaea do not appear to have homologues of the multisubunit complexes that remodel eukaryotic chromatin and activate RNAPII initiation. In contrast, they have sequence-specific regulators that repress and perhaps activate archaeal transcription by mechanisms superficially similar to the bacterial paradigm of regulating promoter binding by RNAP. Repressors compete with archaeal TATA-box binding protein (TBP) and TFB for the TATA-box and TFB-recognition elements (BRE) of the archaeal promoter, or with archaeal RNAP for the site of transcription initiation. Transcript-specific regulation by repressors binding to sites of transcript initiation is consistent with such sites having very little sequence conservation. However, most Archaea have only one TBP and/or TFB that presumably must therefore bind to similar TATA-box and BRE sequences upstream of most genes. Repressors that function by competing with TBP and/or TFB binding must therefore also make additional contacts with transcript-specific regulatory sites adjacent or remote from the TATA-box/BRE region. The fate of the archaeal TBP and TFB following transcription initiation remains to be determined. Based on functional homology with their eukaryotic RNAPII-system counterparts, archaeal TBP and possibly also TFB should remain bound to the TATA-box/BRE region after transcription initiation. However, this seems unlikely as it might limit repressor competition at this site to only the first round of transcription initiation.

Activation of archaeal transcription by recruitment of the TATA-binding protein

The hyperthermophilic archaeon Methanococcus jannaschii encodes two putative transcription regulators, Ptr1 and Ptr2, that are members of the Lrp/AsnC family of bacterial transcription regulators. In contrast, this archaeon's RNA polymerase and core transcription factors are of eukaryotic type. Using the M. jannaschii high-temperature in vitro transcription system, we show that Ptr2 is a potent transcriptional activator, and that it conveys its stimulatory effects on its cognate eukaryal-type transcription machinery from an upstream activating region composed of two Ptr2-binding sites. Transcriptional activation is generated, at least in part, by Ptr2-mediated recruitment of the TATA-binding protein to the promoter.

Archaeal genome organization and stress responses: implications for the origin and evolution of cellular life

For DNA to be used as an informational molecule it must exist in the cell on the edge of stability because all genomic processes require local controlled melting. This presents mechanistic opportunities and problems for genomic DNA from hyperthermophilic organisms, whose unpackaged DNA could melt at optimal temperatures for growth. Hyperthermophiles are suggested to employ the novel positively supercoiling topoisomerase enzyme reverse gyrase (RG) to form positively supercoiled DNA that is intrinsically resistant to thermal denaturation. RG is presently the only archaeal gene that is uniquely found in hyperthermophiles and therefore is central to hypotheses suggesting a hypothermophilic origin of life. However, the suggestion that RG has evolved by the fusion of two pre-existing enzymes has led to hypotheses for a lower temperature for the origin of life. In addition to the action of topoisomerases, DNA packaging and the intracellular ionic environment can also manipulate DNA topology significantly. In the Euryarchaeota, nucleosomes containing minimal histones can adopt two alternate DNA topologies in a salt-dependent manner. From this we hypothesize that since internal salt concentrations are increased following an increase in temperature, the genomic effects of temperature fluctuations could also be accommodated by changes in nucleosome organization. In addition, stress-induced changes in the nucleoid proteins could also play a role in maintaining the genome in the optimal topological state in changing environments. The function of these systems could therefore be central to temperature adaptation and thus be implicated in origin of life scenarios involving hyperthermophiles.