Therapy of myasthenia gravis

Gut bacterial microbiota in patients with myasthenia gravis: results from the MYBIOM study

Background:

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune neuromuscular disease, with gut microbiota considered to be a pathogenetic factor. Previous pilot studies have found differences in the gut microbiota of patients with MG and healthy individuals. To determine whether gut microbiota has a pathogenetic role in MG, we compared the gut microbiota of patients with MG with that of patients with non-inflammatory and inflammatory neurological disorders of the peripheral nervous system (primary endpoint) and healthy volunteers (secondary endpoint).

Methods:

Faecal samples were collected from patients with MG (n = 41), non-inflammatory neurological disorder (NIND, n = 18), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP, n = 6) and healthy volunteers (n = 12). DNA was isolated from these samples, and the variable regions of the 16S rRNA gene were sequenced and statistically analysed.

Results:

No differences were found in alpha- and beta-diversity indices computed between the MG, NIND and CIDP groups, indicating an unaltered bacterial diversity and structure of the microbial community. However, the alpha-diversity indices, namely Shannon, Chao 1 and abundance-based coverage estimators, were significantly reduced between the MG group and healthy volunteers. Deltaproteobacteria and Faecalibacterium were abundant within the faecal microbiota of patients with MG compared with controls with non-inflammatory diseases.

Conclusion:

Although the overall diversity and structure of the gut microbiota did not differ between the MG, NIND and CIDP groups, the significant difference in the abundance of Deltaproteobacteria and Faecalibacterium supports the possible role of gut microbiota as a contributor to pathogenesis of MG. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and to develop possible treatment strategies.

Pure red cell aplasia and myasthenia gravis: a patient having both autoimmune conditions in the absence of thymoma

This is a patient who was presented initially with symptoms of malaise, tiredness and exertional dyspnoea and found to have a severe normocytic normochromic anaemia with low reticulocyte counts. Bone marrow confirmed the diagnosis of pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) and at the time serology for recent parvovirus infection was positive. He was successfully treated with transfusions and intravenous Ig. Six years later, he had a mild relapse of his PRCA and subsequently developed severe dysphagia and dysarthria which were fatigable. Positive antiacetylcholine receptor antibodies confirmed the diagnosis of myasthenia gravis. The two conditions are both known to be associated with thymoma. Imaging and resection of the thymus gland showed only the presence of a thymic cyst. Treatment with pyrdistogmine and intravenous Ig have kept the patient asymptomatic and in remission. The rare association of the two autoimmune conditions associated in the same patient without thymoma is discussed.

Current and future immunotherapy targets in autoimmune neurology

Randomized controlled treatment trials of autoimmune neurologic disorders are generally lacking and data pertaining to treatment are mostly derived from expert opinion, large case series, and anecdotal reports. The treatment of autoimmune neurologic disorders comprises oncologic therapy (where appropriate) and immunotherapy. In this chapter, we first describe the standard acute and chronic immunotherapies and provide a practical overview of their use in the clinic (mechanisms of action, dosing, monitoring, and side effects). Novel approaches to treatment of autoimmune neurologic disorders, through new drug discovery or repurposing, are dependent on improved mechanistic understanding of immunopathology. Such approaches, with emphasis on monoclonal antibodies, are discussed using the paradigm of three autoimmune neurologic disorders whose immunopathogenesis is better understood, specifically myasthenia gravis, neuromyelitis optica, and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. It is important to realize that the treatment strategy and management plan must be individualized for each patient. In general these are influenced by the following: clinical severity, antibody type, presence or absence of cancer, and prior treatment response, if known.

Future perspectives in target-specific immunotherapies of myasthenia gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease caused by complement-fixing antibodies against acetylcholine receptors (AChR); antigen-specific CD4+ T cells, regulatory T cells (Tregs) and T helper (Th) 17+ cells are essential in antibody production. Target-specific therapeutic interventions should therefore be directed against antibodies, B cells, complement and molecules associated with T cell signaling. Even though the progress in the immunopathogenesis of the disease probably exceeds any other autoimmune disorder, MG is still treated with traditional drugs or procedures that exert a non-antigen specific immunosuppression or immunomodulation. Novel biological agents currently on the market, directed against the following molecular pathways, are relevant and specific therapeutic targets that can be tested in MG: (a) T cell intracellular signaling molecules, such as anti-CD52, anti-interleukin (IL) 2 receptors, anti- costimulatory molecules, and anti-Janus tyrosine kinases (JAK1, JAK3) that block the intracellular cascade associated with T-cell activation; (b) B cells and their trophic factors, directed against key B-cell molecules; (c) complement C3 or C5, intercepting the destructive effect of complement-fixing antibodies; (d) cytokines and cytokine receptors, such as those targeting IL-6 which promotes antibody production and IL-17, or the p40 subunit of IL-12/1L-23 that affect regulatory T cells; and (e) T and B cell transmigration molecules associated with lymphocyte egress from the lymphoid organs. All drugs against these molecular pathways require testing in controlled trials, although some have already been tried in small case series. Construction of recombinant AChR antibodies that block binding of the pathogenic antibodies, thereby eliminating complement and antibody-depended-cell-mediated cytotoxicity, are additional novel molecular tools that require exploration in experimental MG.

Novel future therapeutic options in myasthenia gravis

BACKGROUND

Myasthenia Gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease caused by complement-fixing antibodies against the acetylcholine receptors (AChR). Antigen-specific CD4+ T cells, Tregs and Th17+ are also necessary. Consequently, antibodies, B cells, molecules associated with signalling pathways on T helper cells, cytokines and complement are targets for more specific treatment options.

OBJECTIVES

Because available immunosuppressive therapies cause unacceptable side effects after long-term use or are not always effective in inducing remission, novel biological agents directed against the following targets might be options for future therapies in MG: 1) T cell Intracellular Signaling Pathways associated with T cell activation, such as monoclonal antibodies against CD52, Interleukin 2-receptor (IL-2 R), co-stimulatory molecules or compounds inhibiting Janus tyrosine kinases JAK1, JAK3; 2) B cells, against key B cell-surface molecules or trophic factors B cell activation factor (BAFF) and a proliferating inducing ligand (APRIL); 3) Complement, against C3 or C5 that intercept membranolytic attack complex formation; 4) Cytokines and cytokine receptors, including IL-6, IL-17, the p40 subunit of IL12/1L-23, and GM-CSF; and 5) Lymphocyte migration molecules. Construction of recombinant AChR antibodies that block the binding of the pathogenic antibodies, can be a future molecular tool.

CONCLUSION

New biological agents are in the offing for future therapies in MG. Their efficacy needs to be secured with vigorously controlled clinical trials and weighted against excessive cost and rare complications.