Inclusion body myositis

Interpreting a Delayed Workup of Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are a widely heterogeneous group of muscle diseases and encompass multiple clinicopathologic entities. Our case presentation describes a 70-year-old male who presented with progressively worsening dyspnea, along with worsening proximal muscle weakness in the bilateral lower extremities. Extensive clinical evaluation revealed a creatine kinase level of 105 IU/L, severe and chronic widespread myopathy seen on electromyography (EMG), and asymmetric but widespread muscle atrophy with fibro-fatty replacement seen on ultrasonography. Muscle biopsy specimen from the left deltoid was suboptimal but demonstrated characteristics that could be consistent with several clinicopathologic diagnoses, including sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM), immune-mediated necrotizing myositis (IMNM), antisynthetase syndrome (AS), and direct toxin-induced myopathy. Electron microscopy revealed tubulofilamentous inclusion associated with autophagic debris, finally rendering an accurate diagnosis. This case summary highlights the testing workflow required to diagnose a patient with an inflammatory myopathy and outlines the difficulty in establishing a diagnosis when the workup for an inflammatory myopathy is delayed and the muscle biopsy is suboptimal.

Electrical impedance myography as a biomarker of inclusion body myositis: A cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the value of electrical impedance myography (EIM) in inclusion body myositis (IBM).

METHODS

Patients with clinically defined IBM and healthy controls (HC) of similar age group were recruited. Each participant underwent manual muscle testing (MMT), 6-min walk test (6MWT), handgrip dynamometry, and IBM-functional rating scale assessment (IBM-FRS). EIM measurements were obtained from bilateral deltoid, biceps, forearm-flexors, quadriceps, tibialis anterior, and medial gastrocnemius.

RESULTS

Fourteen IBM patients and 12 HCs with mean age 68.6 ± 6 and 67.4 ± 5.4 years were included in the final analysis. Averaged phase value at 50 kHz (EIM50) and ratio of phase value at 50 kHz/200 kHz (EIMPR) from six-muscles were significantly lower in IBM patients when compared to HC (5.23 ± 1.34 vs 7.88 ± 1.9, p-value 0.002, and 0.55 ± 0.09 vs. 0.68 ± 0.09, p-value 0.004, respectively). A strong correlation was noted between IBM-FRS, 6MWT, disease-duration and the averaged value of EIM50 and EIMPR in the IBM patients (Spearman |rho|>0.7, p-values < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

EIM can differentiate between IBM patients and HCs and EIM parameters correlate with clinical outcome measures.

SIGNIFICANCE

EIM may be a potential objective biomarker for IBM. A longitudinal validation study is warranted.