Measuring RGS protein interactions with Gq alpha

RGS10 restricts upregulation by chemokines of T cell adhesion mediated by α4β1 and αLβ2 integrins

Chemokines rapidly and transiently upregulate α4β1 and αLβ2 integrin-mediated adhesion during T lymphocyte extravasation by activating Gα-dependent inside-out signaling. To limit and terminate Gα-mediated signaling, cells can use several mechanisms, including the action of regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins, which accelerate the GTPase activity of Gα subunits. Using human T cells silenced for or overexpressing RGS10, we show in this article that RGS10 functions as an inhibitor of Gα(i)-dependent, chemokine-upregulated T cell adhesion mediated by α4β1 and αLβ2. Shear stress-dependent detachment and cell spreading analyses revealed that RGS10 action mainly targets the adhesion strengthening and spreading phases of α4β1-mediated cell attachment. Associated with these observations, chemokine-stimulated Vav1-Rac1 activation was longer sustained and of higher intensity in RGS10-silenced T cells, or inhibited in cells overexpressing RGS10. Of importance, expression of constitutively activated Rac1 forms in cells overexpressing RGS10 led to the rescue of CXCL12-stimulated adhesion to VCAM-1 to levels similar to those in control transfectants. Instead, adhesion under flow conditions, soluble binding experiment, flow cytometry, and biochemical analyses revealed that the earlier chemokine-triggered integrin activation step was mostly independent of RGS10 actions. The data strongly suggest that RGS10 opposes activation by chemokines of the Vav1-Rac1 pathway in T cells, leading to repression of adhesion strengthening mediated by α4β1. In addition to control chemokine-upregulated T cell attachment, RGS10 also limited adhesion-independent cell chemotaxis and activation of cdc42. These results identify RGS10 as a key molecule that contributes to the termination of Gα-dependent signaling during chemokine-activated α4β1- and αLβ2-dependent T cell adhesion.

Inhibition of rat granulosa cell differentiation by overexpression of Galphaq

Activation of FSH and LH receptors in undifferentiated granulosa cells (i.e., no prior exposure to FSH) results in comparable induction of progesterone production, but activation of the LH receptor is less effective than FSH in inducing aromatase and the native LH receptor. Because the LH receptor can also activate the Galphaq signaling pathway, we investigated whether activation of this pathway could be responsible for these differences. Overexpression of Galphaq inhibited FSH induction of both the estradiol and progesterone biosynthetic pathways as well as mRNA levels for cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme (P450scc), 3beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3beta-HSD), LH receptor (LHr), and P450aromatase (aromatase). This suppression was associated with a reduction (P < 0.05) in FSH-stimulated cAMP production. Lower cAMP levels were not due to reduced FSH receptor (FSHr) mRNA levels or reduced levels of Galphas. Phosphodiesterase (PDE) activity and regulator of G-protein signaling 2 (RGS2) mRNA levels were significantly (P < 0.05) increased by Galphaq, both of which could account for diminished cAMP levels. We conclude that Galphaq signaling pathway inhibits both estradiol and progesterone production comparably and thus activation of this pathway does not seem to account for differences between FSH and LH in the regulation of aromatase and the LH receptor.

Up-regulation of endogenous RGS2 mediates cross-desensitization between Gs and Gq signaling in osteoblasts

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins limit G protein signals. In this study, we investigated the role of RGS2 in the control of G protein signaling cascades in osteoblasts, the cells responsible for bone formation. Expression of RGS2 was up-regulated in primary cultures of mouse calvarial osteoblasts by parathyroid hormone-related peptide (PTHrP)-(1-34), which stimulates G(s) signaling. RGS2 was also up-regulated by extracellular ATP, which selectively activates G(q), as well as by forskolin and phorbol myristate acetate, which activate targets downstream of G(s) and G(q), respectively. To assess the role of endogenous RGS2, we characterized G(s) and G(q) signaling in osteoblasts derived from wild type and rgs2(-/-) mice. Under control conditions, nucleotide-stimulated calcium release, endothelin-stimulated accumulation of inositol phosphates, and PTHrP-stimulated cAMP accumulation were equivalent in osteoblasts isolated from wild type and rgs2(-/-) mice. Thus, basal levels of endogenous RGS2 do not appear to regulate G(s) or G(q) signaling in osteoblasts. Interestingly, forskolin treatment of wild type but not rgs2(-/-) osteoblasts suppressed both endothelin-stimulated accumulation of inositol phosphates and nucleotide-stimulated calcium release, indicating that up-regulation of RGS2 by G(s) signaling desensitizes G(q) signals. Furthermore, pretreatment with ATP suppressed PTHrP-dependent cAMP accumulation in wild type but not rgs2(-/-) osteoblasts, implying that up-regulation of RGS2 by G(q) signaling desensitizes G(s) signals. Our findings demonstrate that endogenously expressed RGS2 can limit G(s) signaling. Moreover, up-regulation of RGS2 contributes to cross-desensitization of G(s)- and G(q)-coupled signals.

Cell signalling diversity of the Gqalpha family of heterotrimeric G proteins

Many receptors for neurotransmitters and hormones rely upon members of the Gqalpha family of heterotrimeric G proteins to exert their actions on target cells. Galpha subunits of the Gq class of G proteins (Gqalpha, G11alpha, G14alpha and G15/16alpha) directly link receptors to activation of PLC-beta isoforms which, in turn, stimulate inositol lipid (i.e. calcium/PKC) signalling. Although Gqalpha family members share a capacity to activate PLC-beta, they also differ markedly in their biochemical properties and tissue distribution which predicts functional diversity. Nevertheless, established models suggest that Gqalpha family members are functionally redundant and that their cellular responses are a result of PLC-beta activation and downstream calcium/PKC signalling. Growing evidence, however, indicates that Gqalpha, G11alpha, G14alpha and G15/16alpha are functionally diverse and that many of their cellular actions are independent of inositol lipid signalling. Recent findings show that Gqalpha family members differ with regard to their linked receptors and downstream binding partners. Reported binding partners distinct from PLC-beta include novel candidate effector proteins, various regulatory proteins, and a growing list of scaffolding/adaptor proteins. Downstream of these signalling proteins, Gqalpha family members exhibit unexpected differences in the signalling pathways and the gene expression profiles they regulate. Finally, genetic studies using whole animal models demonstrate the importance of certain Gqalpha family members in cardiac, lung, brain and platelet functions among other physiological processes. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that Gqalpha, G11alpha, G14alpha and G15/16alpha regulate both overlapping and distinct signalling pathways, indicating that they are more functionally diverse than previously thought.

RGS2 interacts with Gs and adenylyl cyclase in living cells

Regulator of G Protein Signalling (RGS) proteins impede heterotrimeric G protein signalling. RGS2 decreases cAMP production and appears to interact with both adenylyl cyclase (AC) and its stimulatory G protein Gs. We showed previously that Green Fluorescent Protein-tagged RGS2 (GFP-RGS2) localizes to the nucleus in HEK 293 cells and is recruited to the plasma membrane when co-expressed with Gsalpha, or the Gs-coupled beta2-adrenergic receptor (beta2AR). Here, using confocal microscopy we show that co-expression of various AC isoforms (ACI, ACII, ACV, ACVI) also leads to GFP-RGS2 recruitment to the plasma membrane. Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET) was also used to examine physical interactions between RGS2 and components of the Gs-signalling pathway. A BRET signal was detected between fusion constructs of RGS2-Renilla luciferase (energy donor) and Gsalpha-GFP (energy acceptor) co-expressed in HEK 293 cells. BRET was also observed between GFP-RGS2 and ACII or ACVI fused to Renilla luciferase. Additionally, RGS2 was found to interact with the beta2AR. Purified RGS2 selectively bound to the third intracellular loop of the beta2AR in GST pulldown assays, and a BRET signal was observed between GFP-RGS2 and beta2AR fused to Renilla luciferase when these two proteins were co-expressed together with either ACIV or ACVI. This interaction was below the limit of detection in the absence of co-expressed AC, suggesting that the effector enzyme stabilized or promoted binding between the receptor and the RGS protein inside the cell. Taken together, these results suggest the possibility that RGS2 might bind to a receptor-G protein-effector signalling complex to regulate Gs-dependent cAMP production.

RGS2-Mediated Regulation of Gqα

Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins are GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) that attenuate signaling by heterotrimeric G proteins. In RGS2, three unique residues within the G-protein-binding (RGS) domain have been shown to direct its selective inhibition of Gqalpha function. The function of RGS2 as a regulator of Gq is also dependent on regulatory sequences in its amino-terminal domain that direct its localization to the plasma membrane. This work details various approaches that have been used to characterize the relative contribution of the RGS and regulatory domains in RGS2 to its function as a regulator of Gq signaling. Specifically, assays describing (i) the identification of alpha subunit binding partners for RGS2 (ii) the characterization of RGS2-mediated inhibition of Gq-dependent phosphatidylinositol signaling in tissue culture models, and (iii) the measurement of Gq-dependent calcium responses in vascular smooth muscle cells from RGS2-deficient mice are presented. Results from these studies have been used to demonstrate the high relative potency of RGS2 for the regulation of Gq signaling at the biochemical, cellular, and physiologic level.

Analysis of G-protein-coupled receptor kinase RGS homology domains

G-protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) specifically phosphorylate agonist-occupied G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). All seven mammalian GRKs contain an N-terminal domain that is homologous to the regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) family of proteins. The RGS domain of GRK2 has been shown to interact specifically with Galphaq family members. While the specificity and functional consequences of GRK/Galpha interaction remain somewhat poorly defined, GRK RGS homology (RH) domains likely function to provide specificity for GRK interaction with a particular Galpha subunit or GPCR/Galpha complex. Indeed, GRK2 binds Galphaq, alpha11, and alpha14, but not Galpha16, Galphas, Galphai, or Galpha(12/13), while the RGS domains of GRK5 and GRK6 do not bind Galpha(q/11), Galphas, Galphai, or Galpha(12/13). In this chapter we describe various in vitro and intact cell strategies that can be used to elucidate the function of GRK RH domains.