Chapter 20 Overcoming Resistance to Trail‐Induced Apoptosis in Prostate Cancer by Regulation of c‐FLIP

miR-125b suppresses cellular proliferation by targeting c-FLIP in gallbladder carcinoma

Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is the most common malignant tumor of the biliary tract. The incidence rate of gallbladder cancer ranks sixth among gastrointestinal types of cancer, and its incidence is increasing each year. Further clarification of the pathogenesis of GBC is essential, and identification of novel effective treatments is required. It has been previously demonstrated that high expression of the anti-apoptotic protein cellular Fas-associated death domain-like interleukin-1-converting enzyme inhibitory protein (c-FLIP) in GBC inhibited apoptosis in gallbladder cancer cells. In subsequent experiments, it was observed that microRNA (miR)-125b could target c-FLIP and inhibit the protein expression of c-FLIP by binding to the 3'untranslated regions of c-FLIP mRNA. In addition, the expression of miR-125b in GBC was significantly decreased, and the growth of gallbladder cancer cells was inhibited by the overexpression of miR-125b. The present study demonstrated that miR-125b could suppress the proliferation of gallbladder cancer cells by targeting c-FLIP. c-FLIP enriched the target gene pathway of miR-125b and may serve as a novel target for the treatment of GBC.

Mapatumumab, an Antibody Targeting TRAIL-R1, in Combination With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Patients With Advanced Solid Malignancies: Results of a Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study

Purpose

A phase I study assessed the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor effect of mapatumumab, a fully-human agonist monoclonal antibody to the tumor necrosis factor–related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor 1 (TRAIL-R1, DR4), in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin.

Patients and Methods

Patients with advanced solid malignancies received 3, 10, or 20 mg/kg of mapatumumab with standard doses of paclitaxel and carboplatin every 21 days for up to six cycles in the absence of disease progression. Additional cycles of paclitaxel and/or mapatumumab were permissible in selected cases.

Results

Twenty-seven patients (21 males), with a median age of 54 years, received mapatumumab in the following three cohorts: 3 mg/kg (n = 4), 10 mg/kg (n = 11), and 20 mg/kg (n = 12). The median number of cycles was four. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were grade 3 hypersensitivity reaction (n = 1) and neutropenic fever (n = 1), both at 10 mg/kg. Non-DLT treatment-related adverse events occurring in more than 10% of administered doses included alopecia, neutropenia, fatigue, nausea, anemia, thrombocytopenia, anorexia, and neuropathy. Paclitaxel and carboplatin exposures were similar in the presence or absence of mapatumumab. Plasma mapatumumab concentrations seemed similar to data from previous phase I monotherapy studies. Five patients (19%) achieved a confirmed radiologic partial response (including one pathologic complete response), and 12 patients (44%) had stable disease as their best response.

Conclusion

Mapatumumab is well-tolerated up to 20 mg/kg in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin. There are no apparent pharmacokinetic interactions among the drugs. Preliminary anticancer activity demonstrated clinical benefit for the majority of these patients.