Saccadic adaptation in neurological disorders

Saccadic adaptation to a systematically varying disturbance

Saccadic adaptation maintains the correct mapping between eye movements and their targets, yet the dynamics of saccadic gain changes in the presence of systematically varying disturbances has not been extensively studied. Here we assessed changes in the gain of saccade amplitudes induced by continuous and periodic postsaccadic visual feedback. Observers made saccades following a sequence of target steps either along the horizontal meridian (Two-way adaptation) or with unconstrained saccade directions (Global adaptation). An intrasaccadic step-following a sinusoidal variation as a function of the trial number (with 3 different frequencies tested in separate blocks)-consistently displaced the target along its vector. The oculomotor system responded to the resulting feedback error by modifying saccade amplitudes in a periodic fashion with similar frequency of variation but lagging the disturbance by a few tens of trials. This periodic response was superimposed on a drift toward stronger hypometria with similar asymptotes and decay rates across stimulus conditions. The magnitude of the periodic response decreased with increasing frequency and was smaller and more delayed for Global than Two-way adaptation. These results suggest that-in addition to the well-characterized return-to-baseline response observed in protocols using constant visual feedback-the oculomotor system attempts to minimize the feedback error by integrating its variation across trials. This process resembles a convolution with an internal response function, whose structure would be determined by coefficients of the learning model. Our protocol reveals this fast learning process in single short experimental sessions, qualifying it for the study of sensorimotor learning in health and disease.

[Saccadic system plasticity mechanisms in Parkinson disease patients]

INTRODUCTION

Voluntary or reactive saccades predominate in rapid eye movements. Their goal is to preserve an active and optimal visual perception of the environment. Saccades cannot be guided once launched. Oculomotor plasticity, or saccadic adaptation, is still partially unknown, in particular the role played by the basal ganglia. New neuro-ophthalmological rehabilitation techniques require understanding the neurophysiological basis and demonstrating the neuronal structures involved in this plasticity.

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed the reactive saccade adaptation in patients with idiopathic Parkinson disease, as a model of basal ganglia dysfunction. We predicted that saccadic adaptation would be preserved in this pathology.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Five patients with mild idiopathic hemi-Parkinson disease were included, as well as four age-matched controls. Reactive saccade adaptation was studied using the double-step target paradigm, in patients with OFF-Dopa treatment and in controls.

RESULTS

Group analysis demonstrated that patients had a lower level of adaptation than the controls (p<0.05). Individually, two patients did not adapt for bilateral saccades and one for ipsilateral (compared to Parkinson motor clinical syndrome) saccades. Two additional patients adapted on both sides but with a deficit in contralateral saccades when compared to the control group.

DISCUSSION

These preliminary results suggest basal ganglia involvement in reactive saccadic adaptation, which remains to be clarified.

The influence of the consistency of postsaccadic visual errors on saccadic adaptation

The saccadic system is a prime example of motor control without continuous visual feedback. These systems suffer from a strong vulnerability against disturbances. The mechanism of saccadic adaptation allows adjustment of saccades to alterations arising not only from anatomical changes but also from external changes. The weighting of errors according to their reliability provides a strong benefit for an optimized control system. Thus the consistency of visual error should influence the characteristics of adaptation. In the typical adaptation paradigm a visual error is introduced by stepping the target during the saccade by a given amount. In this paradigm, the retinal error varies with the accuracy of the saccade and the step size. To study the influence of error consistency we use a variant of the adaptation paradigm which allows to specify a constant error size. Intrasaccadic target step sizes were calculated with respect to the predicted landing position of each individual saccade. The consistency of the visual error was varied by introducing different levels of noise to the intrasaccadic target step. Different mean intrasaccadic target step sizes were examined: positive target step, negative target step, and a condition in which the mean of the error distribution was clamped to the fovea. In all three conditions saccadic adaptation was strongest when the error was consistent and became weaker as the error became more variable. These results show that saccadic adaptation takes not only the average error but also the consistency of the error into account.

Visual target selection and motor planning define attentional enhancement at perceptual processing stages

Extracting information from the visual field can be achieved by covertly orienting attention to different regions, or by making saccades to bring areas of interest onto the fovea. While much research has shown a link between covert attention and saccade preparation, the nature of that link remains a matter of dispute. Covert presaccadic orienting could result from target selection or from planning a motor act toward an object. We examined the contribution of visual target selection and motor preparation to attentional orienting in humans by dissociating these two habitually aligned processes with saccadic adaptation. Adaptation introduces a discrepancy between the visual target evoking a saccade and the motor metrics of that saccade, which, unbeknownst to the participant, brings the eyes to a different spatial location. We examined attentional orienting by recording event-related potentials (ERPs) to task-irrelevant visual probes flashed during saccade preparation at four equidistant locations including the visual target location and the upcoming motor endpoint. ERPs as early as 130–170 ms post-probe were modulated by attention at both the visual target and motor endpoint locations. These results indicate that both target selection and motor preparation determine the focus of spatial attention, resulting in enhanced processing of stimuli at early visual-perceptual stages.