Regulation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor expression and function

Basal forebrain cholinergic signalling: development, connectivity and roles in cognition

Acetylcholine plays an essential role in fundamental aspects of cognition. Studies that have mapped the activity and functional connectivity of cholinergic neurons have shown that the axons of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons innervate the pallium with far more topographical and functional organization than was historically appreciated. Together with the results of studies using new probes that allow release of acetylcholine to be detected with high spatial and temporal resolution, these findings have implicated cholinergic networks in 'binding' diverse behaviours that contribute to cognition. Here, we review recent findings on the developmental origins, connectivity and function of cholinergic neurons, and explore the participation of cholinergic signalling in the encoding of cognition-related behaviours.

Muscarinic signaling influences the patterning and phenotype of cholinergic amacrine cells in the developing chick retina

Background

Many studies in the vertebrate retina have characterized the differentiation of amacrine cells as a homogenous class of neurons, but little is known about the genes and factors that regulate the development of distinct types of amacrine cells. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to characterize the development of the cholinergic amacrine cells and identify factors that influence their development. Cholinergic amacrine cells in the embryonic chick retina were identified by using antibodies to choline acetyltransferase (ChAT).

Results

We found that as ChAT-immunoreactive cells differentiate they expressed the homeodomain transcription factors Pax6 and Islet1, and the cell-cycle inhibitor p27^kip1. As differentiation proceeds, type-II cholinergic cells, displaced to the ganglion cell layer, transiently expressed high levels of cellular retinoic acid binding protein (CRABP) and neurofilament, while type-I cells in the inner nuclear layer did not. Although there is a 1:1 ratio of type-I to type-II cells in vivo, in dissociated cell cultures the type-I cells (ChAT-positive and CRABP-negative) out-numbered the type-II cells (ChAT and CRABP-positive cells) by 2:1. The relative abundance of type-I to type-II cells was not influenced by Sonic Hedgehog (Shh), but was affected by compounds that act at muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. In addition, the abundance and mosaic patterning of type-II cholinergic amacrine cells is disrupted by interfering with muscarinic signaling.

Conclusion

We conclude that: (1) during development type-I and type-II cholinergic amacrine cells are not homotypic, (2) the phenotypic differences between these subtypes of cells is controlled by the local microenvironment, and (3) appropriate levels of muscarinic signaling between the cholinergic amacrine cells are required for proper mosaic patterning.

Depolarization affects the binding properties of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors and their interaction with proteins of the exocytic apparatus

Membrane depolarization is the signal that triggers release of neurotransmitter from nerve terminals. As a result of depolarization, voltage-dependent Ca(2+) channels open, level of intracellular Ca(2+) increases. and release of neurotransmitter commences. Previous study had shown that in rat brain synaptosomes, muscarinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptors (mAChRs) interact with soluble NSF attachment protein receptor proteins of the exocytic machinery in a voltage-dependent manner. It was suggested that this interaction might control the rapid, synchronous release of acetylcholine. The present study investigates the mechanism for such a voltage-dependent interaction. Here we show that depolarization shifts mAChRs, specifically the m2 receptor subtype, to a low affinity state toward its agonists. At resting potential, mAChRs are in a high affinity state (K(d) of approximately 20 nM) and they shift to a low affinity state (K(d) of tens of microM) upon membrane depolarization. In addition, interaction between m2 receptor subtype and the exocytic machinery increases with receptor occupancy. Both phenomena are independent of Ca(2+) influx. We propose that these results may explain control of ACh release from nerve terminals. At resting potential the exocytic machinery is clamped due to its interaction with the occupied mAChR and depolarization relieves this interaction. This, together with Ca(2+) influx, enables release of ACh to commence.

Physiological regulation of G protein-linked signaling

Heterotrimeric G proteins in vertebrates constitute a family molecular switches that transduce the activation of a populous group of cell-surface receptors to a group of diverse effector units. The receptors include the photopigments such as rhodopsin and prominent families such as the adrenergic, muscarinic acetylcholine, and chemokine receptors involved in regulating a broad spectrum of responses in humans. Signals from receptors are sensed by heterotrimeric G proteins and transduced to effectors such as adenylyl cyclases, phospholipases, and various ion channels. Physiological regulation of G protein-linked receptors allows for integration of signals that directly or indirectly effect the signaling from receptor-->G protein-->effector(s). Steroid hormones can regulate signaling via transcriptional control of the activities of the genes encoding members of G protein-linked pathways. Posttranscriptional mechanisms are under physiological control, altering the stability of preexisting mRNA and affording an additional level for regulation. Protein phosphorylation, protein prenylation, and proteolysis constitute major posttranslational mechanisms employed in the physiological regulation of G protein-linked signaling. Drawing upon mechanisms at all three levels, physiological regulation permits integration of demands placed on G protein-linked signaling.