Replication of superhelical DNAs in vitro

Replication Fork Barriers and Topological Barriers: Progression of DNA Replication Relies on DNA Topology Ahead of Forks

During replication, the topology of DNA changes continuously in response to well-known activities of DNA helicases, polymerases, and topoisomerases. However, replisomes do not always progress at a constant speed and can slow-down and even stall at precise sites. The way these changes in the rate of replisome progression affect DNA topology is not yet well understood. The interplay of DNA topology and replication in several cases where progression of replication forks reacts differently to changes in DNA topology ahead is discussed here. It is proposed, there are at least two types of replication fork barriers: those that behave also as topological barriers and those that do not. Two-Dimensional (2D) agarose gel electrophoresis is the method of choice to distinguish between these two different types of replication fork barriers.

Direct Evidence for the Formation of Precatenanes during DNA Replication

The dynamics of DNA topology during replication are still poorly understood. Bacterial plasmids are negatively supercoiled. This underwinding facilitates strand separation of the DNA duplex during replication. Leading the replisome, a DNA helicase separates the parental strands that are to be used as templates. This strand separation causes overwinding of the duplex ahead. If this overwinding persists, it would eventually impede fork progression. In bacteria, DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV act ahead of the fork to keep DNA underwound. However, the processivity of the DNA helicase might overcome DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV. It was proposed that the overwinding that builds up ahead of the fork could force it to swivel and diffuse this positive supercoiling behind the fork where topoisomerase IV would also act to maintain replicating the DNA underwound. Putative intertwining of sister duplexes in the replicated region are called precatenanes. Fork swiveling and the formation of precatenanes, however, are still questioned. Here, we used classical genetics and high resolution two-dimensional agarose gel electrophoresis to examine the torsional tension of replication intermediates of three bacterial plasmids with the fork stalled at different sites before termination. The results obtained indicated that precatenanes do form as replication progresses before termination.

The benefit of DNA supercoiling during replication

DNA topology changes dynamically during DNA replication. Supercoiling, precatenation, catenation and knotting interplay throughout the process that is finely regulated by DNA topoisomerases. In the present article, we provide an overview of theoretical and experimental approaches to understand the interplay between various manifestations of topological constraints acting on replicating DNA molecules. Data discussed reveal that DNA entanglements (supercoils and catenanes) play an active role in preventing the formation of deleterious knots.

Opposing effects of aminocoumarins and fluoroquinolones on the SOS response and adaptability in Staphylococcus aureus

OBJECTIVES

RecA is the key enzyme involved in DNA repair, recombination and induction of the SOS response and is central to the development of antibiotic resistance. Here we assessed the interaction of two different gyrase inhibitors, ciprofloxacin (a fluoroquinolone) and novobiocin (an aminocoumarin), on RecA activity and the SOS response in Staphylococcus aureus.

METHODS

The influence of different gyrase inhibitors on the SOS response of S. aureus (including recA and lexA mutants) was analysed by northern blot analysis, real-time RT-PCR, western blot analysis and promoter activity assays. Recombination as well as mutation frequencies were determined for the different antibiotic combinations.

RESULTS

We verified that ciprofloxacin leads to RecA activation and therefore induction of the SOS response. In contrast, novobiocin treatment resulted in an inhibition of recA transcription independent of LexA. When novobiocin and ciprofloxacin were added simultaneously, recA was reduced to the same level as with novobiocin alone. In combination, novobiocin also partially reduces the ciprofloxacin-mediated induction of the LexA target gene umuC (error-prone polymerase). Apart from reducing recA and umuC expression, novobiocin also inhibited the frequency of recombination, mutation and the formation of non-haemolytic variants.

CONCLUSION

In summary, aminocoumarins inhibit recA expression in S. aureus and probably delay the process of developing antibiotic resistance and gene transfer. A clinical re-evaluation of these compounds as well as designing more applicable derivatives should be considered.

Geminin overexpression prevents the completion of topoisomerase IIα chromosome decatenation, leading to aneuploidy in human mammary epithelial cells

INTRODUCTION

The nuclear enzyme topoisomerase IIα (TopoIIα) is able to cleave DNA in a reversible manner, making it a valuable target for agents such as etoposide that trap the enzyme in a covalent bond with the 5' DNA end to which it cleaves. This prevents DNA religation and triggers cell death in cancer cells. However, development of resistance to these agents limits their therapeutic use. In this study, we examined the therapeutic targeting of geminin for improving the therapeutic potential of TopoIIα agents.

METHODS

Human mammary epithelial (HME) cells and several breast cancer cell lines were used in this study. Geminin, TopoIIα and cell division cycle 7 (Cdc7) silencing were done using specific small interfering RNA. Transit or stable inducible overexpression of these proteins and casein kinase Iε (CKIε) were also used, as well as several pharmacological inhibitors that target TopoIIα, Cdc7 or CKIε. We manipulated HME cells that expressed H2B-GFP, or did not, to detect chromosome bridges. Immunoprecipitation and direct Western blot analysis were used to detect interactions between these proteins and their total expression, respectively, whereas interactions on chromosomal arms were detected using a trapped in agarose DNA immunostaining assay. TopoIIα phosphorylation by Cdc7 or CKIε was done using an in vitro kinase assay. The TopoGen decatenation kit was used to measure TopoIIα decatenation activity. Finally, a comet assay and metaphase chromosome spread were used to detect chromosome breakage and changes in chromosome condensation or numbers, respectively.

RESULTS

We found that geminin and TopoIIα interact primarily in G2/M/early G1 cells on chromosomes, that geminin recruits TopoIIα to chromosomal decatenation sites or vice versa and that geminin silencing in HME cells triggers the formation of chromosome bridges by suppressing TopoIIα access to chromosomal arms. CKIε kinase phosphorylates and positively regulates TopoIIα chromosome localization and function. CKIε kinase overexpression or Cdc7 kinase silencing, which we show phosphorylates TopoIIα in vitro, restored DNA decatenation and chromosome segregation in geminin-silenced cells before triggering cell death. In vivo, at normal concentration, geminin recruits the deSUMOylating sentrin-specific proteases SENP1 and SENP2 enzymes to deSUMOylate chromosome-bound TopoIIα and promote its release from chromosomes following completion of DNA decatenation. In cells overexpressing geminin, premature departure of TopoIIα from chromosomes is thought to be due to the fact that geminin recruits more of these deSUMOylating enzymes, or recruits them earlier, to bound TopoIIα. This triggers premature release of TopoIIα from chromosomes, which we propose induces aneuploidy in HME cells, since chromosome breakage generated through this mechanism were not sensed and/or repaired and the cell cycle was not arrested. Expression of mitosis-inducing proteins such as cyclin A and cell division kinase 1 was also increased in these cells because of the overexpression of geminin.

CONCLUSIONS

TopoIIα recruitment and its chromosome decatenation function require a normal level of geminin. Geminin silencing induces a cytokinetic checkpoint in which Cdc7 phosphorylates TopoIIα and inhibits its chromosomal recruitment and decatenation and/or segregation function. Geminin overexpression prematurely deSUMOylates TopoIIα, triggering its premature departure from chromosomes and leading to chromosomal abnormalities and the formation of aneuploid, drug-resistant cancer cells. On the basis of our findings, we propose that therapeutic targeting of geminin is essential for improving the therapeutic potential of TopoIIα agents.

Analysis of pleiotropic transcriptional profiles: a case study of DNA gyrase inhibition

Genetic and environmental perturbations often result in complex transcriptional responses involving multiple genes and regulons. In order to understand the nature of a response, one has to account for the contribution of the downstream effects to the formation of a response. Such analysis can be carried out within a statistical framework in which the individual effects are independently collected and then combined within a linear model. Here, we modeled the contribution of DNA replication, supercoiling, and repair to the transcriptional response of inhibition of the Escherichia coli gyrase. By representing the gyrase inhibition as a true pleiotropic phenomenon, we were able to demonstrate that: (1) DNA replication is required for the formation of spatial transcriptional domains; (2) the transcriptional response to the gyrase inhibition is coordinated between at least two modules involved in DNA maintenance, relaxation and damage response; (3) the genes whose transcriptional response to the gyrase inhibition does not depend on the main relaxation activity of the cell can be classified on the basis of a GC excess in their upstream and coding sequences; and (4) relaxation by topoisomerase I dominates the transcriptional response, followed by the effects of replication and RecA. We functionally tested the effect of the interaction between relaxation and repair activities, and found support for the model derived from the microarray data. We conclude that modeling compound transcriptional profiles as a combination of downstream transcriptional effects allows for a more realistic, accurate, and meaningful representation of the transcriptional activity of a genome.

Pleiotropism—a movement, or reaction, in multiple directions: although it was initially used specifically to describe the effect of a single genetic mutation on multiple characters in the offspring, the transcriptional responses of cells are often best described in terms of pleiotropy, when a single input affects multiple components inside the cell. This, in turn, presents a dilemma with the analysis and interpretation of the observed effects: which effects are directly due to the input itself and which are not? How are the effects related to each other and which are more important? And finally, can the overall transcriptional response be summarized as a combination of the effects? There is, however, a problem with recording the effects when they occur almost simultaneously in the same organism. The authors approached this by recording the effects independently, using mutants that could generate all of the effects of interest but one, and then estimating the effects and their interactions from a multivariate linear model. The authors applied this method to explain the transcriptional response of Escherichia coli to a quinolone antibacterial, a relative of Cipro (ciprofloxacin hydrochloride), and discovered unexpected interactions between DNA maintenance modules in the cell.

Plasmid R1--replication and its control

Plasmid R1 is a low-copy-number plasmid belonging to the IncFII group. The genetics, biochemistry, molecular biology, and physiology of R1 replication and its control are summarised and discussed in the present communication. Replication of R1 starts at a unique origin, oriR1, and proceeds unidirectionally according to the Theta mode. Plasmid R1 replicates during the entire cell cycle and the R1 copies in the cell are members of a pool from which a plasmid copy at random is selected for replication. However, there is an eclipse period during which a newly replicated copy does not belong to this pool. Replication of R1 is controlled by an antisense RNA, CopA, that is unstable and formed constitutively; hence, its concentration is a measure of the concentration of the plasmid. CopA-RNA interacts with its complementary target, CopT-RNA, that is located upstream of the RepA message on the repA-mRNA. CopA-RNA post-transcriptionally inhibits translation of the repA-mRNA. CopA- and CopT-RNA interact in a bimolecular reaction which results in an inverse proportionality between the relative rate of replication (replications per plasmid copy and cell cycle) and the copy number; the number of replications per cell and cell cycle, n, is independent of the actual copy number in the individual cells, the so-called +n mode of control. Single base-pair substitutions in the copA/copT region of the plasmid genome may result in mutants that are compatible with the wild type. Loss of CopA activity results in (uncontrolled) so-called runaway replication, which is lethal to the host but useful for the production of proteins from cloned genes. Plasmid R1 also has an ancillary control system, CopB, that derepresses the synthesis of repA-mRNA in cells that happen to contain lower than normal number of copies. Plasmid R1, as other plasmids, form clusters in the cell and plasmid replication is assumed to take place in the centre of the cells; this requires traffic from the cluster to the replication factories and back to the clusters. The clusters are plasmid-specific and presumably based on sequence homology.

Roles of double-strand breaks, nicks, and gaps in stimulating deletions of CTG.CAG repeats by intramolecular DNA repair

A series of plasmids harboring CTG.CAG repeats with double-strand breaks (DSB), single-strand nicks, or single-strand gaps (15 or 30 nucleotides) within the repeat regions were used to determine their capacity to induce genetic instabilities. These plasmids were introduced into Escherichia coli in the presence of a second plasmid containing a sequence that could support homologous recombination repair between the two plasmids. The transfer of a point mutation from the second to the first plasmid was used to monitor homologous recombination (gene conversion). Only DSBs increased the overall genetic instability. This instability took place by intramolecular repair, which was not dependent on RuvA. Double-strand break-induced instabilities were partially stabilized by a mutation in recF. Gaps of 30 nt formed a distinct 30 nt deletion product, whereas single strand nicks and gaps of 15 nt did not induce expansions or deletions. Formation of this deletion product required the CTG.CAG repeats to be present in the single-stranded region and was stimulated by E.coli DNA ligase, but was not dependent upon the RecFOR pathway. Models are presented to explain the intramolecular repair-induced instabilities and the formation of the 30 nt deletion product.

The Structural Basis for Substrate Specificity in DNA Topoisomerase IV

Most bacteria possess two type IIA topoisomerases, DNA gyrase and topo IV, that together help manage chromosome integrity and topology. Gyrase primarily introduces negative supercoils into DNA, an activity mediated by the C-terminal domain of its DNA binding subunit (GyrA). Although closely related to gyrase, topo IV preferentially decatenates DNA and relaxes positive supercoils. Here we report the structure of the full-length Escherichia coli ParC dimer at 3.0 A resolution. The N-terminal DNA binding region of ParC is highly similar to that of GyrA, but the ParC dimer adopts a markedly different conformation. The C-terminal domain (CTD) of ParC is revealed to be a degenerate form of the homologous GyrA CTD, and is anchored to the top of the N-terminal domains in a configuration different from that thought to occur in gyrase. Biochemical assays show that the ParC CTD controls the substrate specificity of topo IV, likely by capturing DNA segments of certain crossover geometries. This work delineates strong mechanistic parallels between topo IV and gyrase, while explaining how structural differences between the two enzyme families have led to distinct activity profiles. These findings in turn explain how the structures and functions of bacterial type IIA topoisomerases have evolved to meet specific needs of different bacterial families for the control of chromosome superstructure.

A topological view of the replicon

The replication of circular DNA faces topological obstacles that need to be overcome to allow the complete duplication and separation of newly replicated molecules. Small bacterial plasmids provide a perfect model system to study the interplay between DNA helicases, polymerases, topoisomerases and the overall architecture of partially replicated molecules. Recent studies have shown that partially replicated circular molecules have an amazing ability to form various types of structures (supercoils, precatenanes, knots and catenanes) that help to accommodate the dynamic interplay between duplex unwinding at the replication fork and DNA unlinking by topoisomerases.

DNA Double-strand Breaks Induce Deletion of CTG·CAG Repeats in an Orientation-dependent Manner in Escherichia coli

The influences of double-strand breaks (DSBs) within a triplet repeat sequence on its genetic instabilities (expansions and deletions) related to hereditary neurological diseases was investigated. Plasmids containing 43 or 70 CTG.CAG repeats or 43 CGG.CCG repeats were linearized in vitro near the center of the repeats and were transformed into parental, RecA-dependent homologous recombination-deficient, or RecBC exonuclease-deficient Escherichia coli. The resulting repair process considerably increased deletion of the repeating sequence compared to the circular DNA controls. Unexpectedly, the orientation of the insert relative to the unidirectional ColE1 origin of replication affected the amount of instability generated during the repair of the DSB. When the CTG strand was the template for lagging-strand synthesis, instability was increased, most markedly in the recA- strain. Results indicated that RecA and/or RecBC might play a role in DSB repair within the triplet repeat. Altering the length, orientation, and sequence composition of the triplet repeat suggested an important role of DNA secondary structures during repair intermediates. Hence, we hypothesize that ColE1 origin-dependent replication was involved during the repair of the DSB. A model is presented to explain the mechanisms of the observed genetic instabilities.

Roles of topoisomerases in maintaining steady-state DNA supercoiling in Escherichia coli

DNA supercoiling is essential for bacterial cell survival. We demonstrated that DNA topoisomerase IV, acting in concert with topoisomerase I and gyrase, makes an important contribution to the steady-state level of supercoiling in Escherichia coli. Following inhibition of gyrase, topoisomerase IV alone relaxed plasmid DNA to a final supercoiling density (sigma) of -0.015 at an initial rate of 0.8 links min(-1). Topoisomerase I relaxed DNA at a faster rate, 5 links min(-1), but only to a sigma of -0.05. Inhibition of topoisomerase IV in wild-type cells increased supercoiling to approximately the same level as in a mutant lacking topoisomerase I activity (to sigma = -0.08). The role of topoisomerase IV was revealed by two functional assays. Removal of both topoisomerase I and topoisomerase IV caused the DNA to become hyper-negatively supercoiled (sigma = -0.09), greatly stimulating transcription from the supercoiling sensitive leu-500 promoter and increasing the number of supercoils trapped by lambda integrase site-specific recombination.

A cruciform-dumbbell model for inverted dimer formation mediated by inverted repeats

Small inverted repeats (small palindromes) on plasmids have been shown to mediate a recombinational rearrangement event in Escherichia coli leading to the formation of inverted dimers (giant palindromes). This recombinational rearrangement event is efficient and independent of RecA and RecBCD. In this report, we propose a cruciform-dumbbell model to explain the inverted dimer formation mediated by inverted repeats. In this model, the inverted repeats promote the formation of a DNA cruciform which is processed by an endonuclease into a linear DNA with two hairpin loops at its ends. Upon DNA replication, this linear dumbbell-like DNA is then converted to the inverted dimer. In support of this model, linear dumbbell DNA molecules with unidirectional origin of DNA replication (ColE1 ori ) have been constructed and shown to transform E.coli efficiently resulting in the formation of the inverted dimer. The ability of linear dumbbell DNA to transform E.coli suggests that the terminal loops may be important in bypassing the requirement of DNA supercoiling for initiation of replication of the ColE1 ori.

Dominant lethal mutations in the dnaB helicase gene of Salmonella typhimurium

A class of dominant lethal mutations in the dnaB (replicative helicase) gene of Salmonella typhimurium is described. The mutated genes, when present on multicopy plasmids, interfered with colony formation by Escherichia coli host strains with a functional chromosomal dnaB gene. The lethal phenotype was expressed specifically in supE (glutamine-inserting) host strains and not in Sup+ strains, because the mutant genes, by design, also possessed an amber mutation derived from a glutamine codon. Mutations located at 11 sites by deletion mapping and DNA sequence analysis varied in the temperature dependence and severity of their lethal effects. None of the mutations complemented a dnaB(Ts) host strain at high temperature (42 degrees C). Therefore, these nonfunctional DnaB proteins must engage some component(s) of the DNA replication machinery and inhibit replication. These mutations are predicted to confer limited, specific defects in either the catalytic activity of DnaB or the ability of DnaB to interact with one of its ligands such as DNA, nucleotide, or another replication protein. The variety of mutant sites and detailed phenotypes represented in this group of mutations may indicate the operation of more than one specific mechanism of lethality.

Nucleotide sequences required for a ColE1-type plasmid to replicate in Escherichia coli cells with or without RNase H

To elucidate the replication mechanism of a ColE1-type plasmid in RNase H-deficient (rnh-) strains of Escherichia coli, we constructed plasmid derivatives that deleted the whole, or a part, of the 5'-AAAAA-3' sequence (positions -3 to +2) that acts as the origin of replication in vivo and in vitro in the presence of RNase H. The activity of plasmid replication in rnh+ cells was found to be reduced by alterations of the AAAAA sequence. The activity could be restored when the derivatives, retaining the upstream sequence down to -8, regained a sequence containing at least two A residues in the region from -3 to +2. By contrast, replication in rnh- cells was maintained at high levels even when the deletion included the AAAAA sequence and extended up to position -7. The activity in rnh- cells decreased as deletions proceeded to -8 and further up to -17, and was abolished completely by further upward deletions. We concluded that in rnh- cells the plasmid replicates by a mechanism that operates only when RNase H is inactive. This RNase H-sensitive replication in rnh- cells seems to require the RNA-DNA hybrid formation that is also required for RNase H-dependent replication in rnh+ cells. The hybrid formation probably contributes by unwinding a portion of DNA from which replication can be initiated.