Late postoperative results in 1000 work related lumbar spine conditions

Chiropractic Distraction Spinal Manipulation on Postsurgical Continued Low Back and Radicular Pain Patients: A Retrospective Case Series

PURPOSE

The purpose of this case series is to report on changes in pain levels experienced by 69 postsurgical continued pain patients who received Cox Technic Flexion Distraction (CTFD).

METHODS

Fifteen doctors of chiropractic collected retrospective data from the records of the postsurgical continued pain patients seen in their clinic from February to July 2012 who were treated with CTFD, which is a type of chiropractic distraction spinal manipulation. Informed consent was obtained from all patients who met the inclusion criteria for this study. Data recorded included subjective patient pain levels at the end of the treatments provided and at 24 months following the last treatment.

RESULTS

Fifty-four (81%) of the patients showed greater than 50% reduction in pain levels at the end of the last treatment, and 13 (19%) showed less than 50% improvement of pain levels at the end of active care (mean, 49 days and 11 treatments). At 24-month follow-up, of 56 patients available, 44 (78.6%) had continued pain relief of greater than 50% and 10 (18%) reported 50% or less relief. The mean percentage of relief at the end of active care was 71.6 (SD, 23.2) and at 24 months was 70 (SD, 25). At 24 months after active care, 24 patients (43%) had not sought further care, and 32 required further treatment consisting of chiropractic manipulation for 17 (53%), physical therapy, exercise, injections, and medication for 9 (28%), and further surgery for 5 (16%).

CONCLUSION

Greater than 50% pain relief following CTFD chiropractic distraction spinal manipulation was seen in 81% of postsurgical patients receiving a mean of 11 visits over a 49-day period of active care.

The Prolo Scale: history, evolution and psychometric properties

BACKGROUND

The Prolo Scale (PS) is a widely accepted assessment tool for lumbar spinal surgery results. Nevertheless, in the literature there is a dearth of consensus about its application, interpretation and accuracy. The purpose of this review is to investigate the evolution of the PS from its introduction in 1986 to the present, including an analysis of different versions of the scale and research on the existing studies investigating its psychometric properties.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library and PEDro databases were searched. Studies in English, Italian, French, Spanish and German published from 1986 to December 2012 were analyzed.

RESULTS

The original lumbar surgery outcome scale consisted of two Likert-type scales (economic and functional). There are three more versions of the scale: Schnee proposed one consisting of 10 items, Brantigan made one with 20 items and introduced 2 more subscales (pain and medication), and Davis adapted the scale for the cervical spine. PS is often mentioned without any specific reference to the version used; therefore, a homogeneous comparison of studies is difficult to achieve. Several authors agree on the need to embrace a multidimensional measuring system to evaluate low back pain (LBP), but there is still no consensus regarding the most reliable tool. To date, PS has been mostly used as secondary outcome measure in association with validated primary measures for LBP.

CONCLUSIONS

The Prolo Scale has been adopted for clinical examination for 20 years because it is easy to administer and useful to compare significant amounts of data from surgical studies carried out at different times. Although several authors demonstrated the scale sensitivity among a battery of tests, no thorough validation study was found in the current literature.

Psychosocial predictors and correlates for chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) - a systematic review

Chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) is a serious problem. Incidence as high as 50% has been reported, depending on type of surgery undergone. Because the etiology of chronic pain is grounded in the bio-psychosocial model, physical, psychological, and social factors are implicated in the development of CPSP. Biomedical factors such as pre-operative pain, severe acute post-operative pain, modes of anesthesia, and surgical approaches have been extensively examined, therefore this systematic review focuses on psychosocial elements. A systematic search was performed using the PubMed, PsychINFO, Embase, and Cochrane Databases. Fifty relevant publications were selected from this search, in which psychosocial predictors for and correlates to CPSP were identified. The level of evidence was assessed for each study, and corresponding score points were awarded for ease of comparison. The grade of association with CPSP for each predictor/correlate was then determined. Depression, psychological vulnerability, stress, and late return to work showed likely correlation with CPSP (grade of association=1). Other factors were determined to have either unlikely (grade of association=3) or inconclusive (grade of association=2) correlations. In addition, results were examined in light of the type of surgery undergone. This review is intended as a first step to develop an instrument for identifying patients at high risk for CPSP, to optimize clinical pain management.

Weight loss in overweight and obese patients following successful lumbar decompression

BACKGROUND

Neurogenic claudication secondary to lumbar stenosis is often cited by overweight and obese patients as a factor limiting their ability to lose weight. Many patients believe that they will be able to increase their activity and subsequently lose weight following relief of symptoms. The objective of this study was to evaluate weight loss in overweight and obese patients who obtained substantial pain relief after lumbar decompression surgery for spinal stenosis.

METHODS

Changes in the body weight and body mass index of overweight and obese patients after lumbar decompression surgery were assessed at a mean of 34.4 months postoperatively. Sixty-three patients (thirty-seven men and twenty-six women with a mean age of 53.4 years) were included in the study. Preoperative and postoperative body weight and body mass indices were calculated, and Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) Symptom Severity and Physical Function scores were obtained.

RESULTS

The ZCQ Symptom Severity and Physical Function scores significantly improved, by a mean of 56.4% and 53.0%, respectively. At the time of follow-up, both the mean body weight and the mean body mass index significantly increased, by 2.48 kg and 0.83 kg/m(2), respectively. Overall, 35% of the patients gained >or=5% of their preoperative body weight, 6% of the patients lost >or=5% of their preoperative body weight, and 59% remained within 5% of their preoperative body weight.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of overweight and obese patients maintain or increase their body weight and body mass index following successful lumbar decompression surgery. Substantial relief of symptoms and functional improvements do not appear to help overweight or obese patients to lose weight. This suggests that obesity is an independent disease and not simply a function of symptomatic spinal stenosis, and patients should be counseled regarding these expectations.

Predicting outcome in the surgical treatment of lumbar radiculopathy using the Pain Drawing Score, McGill Short Form Pain Questionnaire, and risk factors including psychosocial issues and axial joint pain

BACKGROUND

The surgical decompression of a symptomatic lumbar nerve root is generally regarded as effective treatment for radiculopathy. Nevertheless this straightforward surgical procedure is not universally successful, and the results are often independent of technical factors.

PURPOSE

To identify tools and risk factors that would permit the preoperative determination of the probability for an acceptable surgical result.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective consecutive nonrandomized study evaluating the short-term result (average 12 months follow-up) of the surgical decompression of a single spinal nerve.

PATIENT SAMPLE

110 adult patients who had failed conservative treatment were carefully selected after identification of predominate symptoms secondary to disc herniation, synovial cyst, or foramenal stenosis due to spondylosis.

OUTCOME MEASURES

A combination of 6 measurement tools were used: the visual analogue scale (VAS); the McGill Sensory Score; the McGill Affective Score; the Prolo Economic Score; the Prolo Functional Score; and the Modified Ransford Pain Drawing Score.

METHODS

Preoperatively and at each post-op visit the patients completed the entire battery of outcome tools. Comorbidities were identified preoperatively as risk factors. Patient assessment of outcome was determined in two ways: a 50% or greater reduction in VAS; or using a 4 step scale combining the Prolo scores. Surgeon assessment of outcome was determined subjectively using clinical criteria.

RESULTS

All 6 measurement tools showed statistically significant improvement postoperatively. The change in pain drawing score has not been previously demonstrated in the literature. Correlation testing showed association between compensation claim, psychiatric factor, and high preoperative pain drawing score on several post-op measurements. Stepwise regression analysis revealed preoperative axial joint pain to be a determinant of outcome in addition to the psychosocial issues. Although the distribution of outcome grades was different between surgeon and patient assessment, relative risk analysis showed that the factors predicting outcome were identical, and the rank order of importance in these risk factors was almost identical. Using patient assessment of outcome there was no probability of a good or excellent outcome in the presence of either psychiatric factor or personal injury claim, and only a 23% chance with a compensation case. Axial joint pain is obviously not treatable by nerve root decompression, and if present will also be an important negative risk factor, reducing the probability to 27%. The evaluation of the preoperative pain drawing using a Modified Ransford Score is not useful as a predictor of psychiatric factor nor should it be used as a substitute for psychological evaluation. Nevertheless a preoperative score >or=3 or higher reduced the probability of an excellent or good outcome (as determined by patient assessment using combined Prolo scores) to 55%. Additionally a high preoperative McGill Sensory score >or=17 or a high preoperative McGill Affective Score >or=7 also had profound negative effects, reducing the probability of acceptable outcome to 50% and 42%, respectively. These threshold values for the McGill scores correspond to one standard deviation above the normal range previously validated in the literature.

CONCLUSION

Although psychosocial issues (psychiatric factor, personal injury litigation, compensation claim) are well known to affect outcome, the strength and magnitude of their negative effects was surprising. The short form McGill Pain Questionnaire can be used not only as an outcome tool, but also as a predictor of result. The pain drawing has similar utility, but it should not be used as a substitute for psychiatric evaluation. The numerous issues exerting profound effects on the outcome of a relatively simple operation suggest that specific attention be directed at them when evaluating more complex surgical procedures. Although large randomized samples might obviate this concern, it is possible that some of these factors are too powerful to be ignored.

Lumbar instrumented fusion compared with cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic back pain after previous surgery for disc herniation: A prospective randomized controlled study

The effectiveness of lumbar fusion for chronic low back pain after surgery for disc herniation has not been evaluated in a randomized controlled trial. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of lumbar fusion with posterior transpedicular screws and cognitive intervention and exercises. Sixty patients aged 25-60 years with low back pain lasting longer than 1 year after previous surgery for disc herniation were randomly allocated to the two treatment groups. Experienced back surgeons performed transpedicular fusion. Cognitive intervention consisted of a lecture intended to give the patient an understanding that ordinary physical activity would not harm the disc and a recommendation to use the back and bend it. This was reinforced by three daily physical exercise sessions for 3 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Outcome data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. Ninety-seven percent of the patients, including seven of eight patients who had either not attended treatment (n=5) or changed groups (n=2), completed 1-year follow-up. ODI was significantly improved from 47 to 38 after fusion and from 45 to 32 after cognitive intervention and exercises. The mean difference between treatments after adjustment for gender was -7.3 (95% CI -17.3 to 2.7, p=0.15). The success rate was 50% in the fusion group and 48% in the cognitive intervention/exercise group. For patients with chronic low back pain after previous surgery for disc herniation, lumbar fusion failed to show any benefit over cognitive intervention and exercises.

Bilateral implantation of low-profile interbody fusion cages: subsidence, lordosis, and fusion analysis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The use of interbody fusion cages as a treatment for degenerative disc disease has become widespread. Low-profile cages have been developed to allow a closer fit when implanting bilateral cages in patients with smaller vertebral bodies. Some surgeons feel the open design also allows better bone contact and visualization. This is particularly true when two low-profile cages are used adjacent to one another. Because of the open design of low-profile interbody fusion cages, there has been concern regarding such issues as subsidence, lordosis and fusion rates.

PURPOSE

This retrospective review of paired bilateral reduced profile interbody fusion cages was completed to assess changes in subsidence, lordosis and fusion. As a secondary goal, patient outcomes were measured to determine overall health since surgery and the patient's satisfaction with the spine surgery, in an attempt to assess the effect of the outcome variables cited supra.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective evaluation of patients who underwent anterior lumbar interbody fusion with low-profile interbody fusion cages.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Seventy-one consecutive patients who underwent bilateral implantation of low-profile interbody fusion cages were evaluated.

OUTCOME MEASURES

A patient self-evaluation, which included a Short Form (SF)-36 and questions regarding patient satisfaction were administered to patients who were at least 1 year postoperative. Subsidence and lordosis measurements were completed. Fusion was assessed by the operating surgeon.

METHODS

Low-profile interbody fusion cages (BAK/Proximity, Centerpulse Spine-Tech, Inc., Minneapolis, MN) were implanted bilaterally in at least one level from L3-L4 to L5-S1. Most patients had degenerative disc disease with leg and back pain that was not responsive to conservative treatment and demonstrated segmental instability or collapse. A small percentage of patients had either a degenerative spondylolisthesis (7.0%) or an isthmic spondylolisthesis (4.2%). Autograft harvested from the iliac crest was used in all cases. Demographic, surgical and follow-up data were retrospectively collected from patient charts. A clinical outcome questionnaire that included an SF-36 as well as questions regarding patient satisfaction was either mailed to each patient who was at least 1 year postsurgery or given to patients to complete at their 1-year visit. Patients were routinely followed radiographically before surgery, immediately after surgery and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery. Fusion was assessed by the operating surgeon using lateral radiographs often in conjunction with a thin-slice computed tomography (CT) scan. Criteria for a successful fusion were lack of motion, anterior bridging bone and lack of lucencies on flexion/extension X-rays and/or contiguous bone through the cage using a thin-cut sagittal CT scan. Lateral X-rays on each patient were also measured for subsidence and lordosis changes.

RESULTS

A total of 71 patients (45 men, 26 women) with a mean age of 43.4 years (range, 25 to 74) were evaluated. Thirty-six percent of the patients were smokers, and 96% were worker's compensation patients. Thirty-two percent of the patients had previous lumbar surgery. A total of 100 operative levels were evaluated. There were 45 one-level, 23 two-level and three three-level cases. Forty-nine percent were level L5-S1, 43% were L4-L5 and 8% were L3-L4. The mean duration of symptoms was 31.5 months. Mean surgical time, mean blood loss and mean hospital stay were 139 minutes, 186 cc and 3.34 days, respectively. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications attributable to the construct and no cases of cage migration or collapse. Patients who were at least 1-year postsurgery and had follow-up X-rays or had undergone a CT scan at this time point were evaluated for fusion status. Sixty-three patients were assessed for fusion. Fifty-four (86%) of these patients were determined to have a solid fusion. Mean time to fusion was 10 months. Fusion was assessed as solid only if all operative levels were fully fused. Mean subsidence of the anterior region was 1.97 mm, whereas the mean subsidence of the posterior region was 0.82 mm. Lordosis was unchanged at all surgical levels with mean lordosis in L3-L4 decreasing only slightly from 13 degrees before surgery to 12 degrees after surgery. L4-L5 and L5-S1 showed only slight increases in lordosis changing from 17 to 18 degrees at L4-L5 and from 17 to 19 degrees at L5-S1. These changes were not statistically significant. The clinical outcome questionnaires had a return rate of 68%. Of the 48 patients who completed the questionnaire, 75% responded that they were happy with the surgical results and would definitely recommend the surgery to a friend. Sixty-seven percent agreed that surgery met their expectations or that surgery improved their condition enough that they would go through it again for the same outcome. The results of the SF-36 portion of the survey revealed that the physical and mental composite scores were within normal range of the US population that has experienced back pain or sciatica.

CONCLUSION

Bilateral implantation of low-profile cages in this patient population led to satisfactory outcomes. Subsidence and changes in lordosis were minimal. Fusion rates were good, especially for one-level cases. Patient satisfaction was relatively high, considering the population consisted of 96% worker's compensation cases. With proper surgical technique, bilateral low-profile cages can be used effectively to treat patients with degenerative disc disease.

Randomized clinical trial of lumbar instrumented fusion and cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration

STUDY DESIGN

Single blind randomized study.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness of lumbar instrumented fusion with cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

To the authors' best knowledge, only one randomized study has evaluated the effectiveness of lumbar fusion. The Swedish Lumbar Spine Study reported that lumbar fusion was better than continuing physiotherapy and care by the family physician.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-four patients aged 25-60 years with low back pain lasting longer than 1 year and evidence of disc degeneration at L4-L5 and/or L5-S1 at radiographic examination were randomized to either lumbar fusion with posterior transpedicular screws and postoperative physiotherapy, or cognitive intervention and exercises. The cognitive intervention consisted of a lecture to give the patient an understanding that ordinary physical activity would not harm the disc and a recommendation to use the back and bend it. This was reinforced by three daily physical exercise sessions for 3 weeks. The main outcome measure was the Oswestry Disability Index.

RESULTS

At the 1-year follow-up visit, 97% of the patients, including 6 patients who had either not attended treatment or changed groups, were examined. The Oswestry Disability Index was significantly reduced from 41 to 26 after surgery, compared with 42 to 30 after cognitive intervention and exercises. The mean difference between groups was 2.3 (-6.7 to 11.4) (P = 0.33). Improvements inback pain, use of analgesics, emotional distress, life satisfaction, and return to work were not different. Fear-avoidance beliefs and fingertip-floor distance were reduced more after nonoperative treatment, and lower limb pain was reduced more after surgery. The success rate according to an independent observer was 70% after surgery and 76% after cognitive intervention and exercises. The early complication rate in the surgical group was 18%.

CONCLUSION

The main outcome measure showed equal improvement in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration randomized to cognitive intervention and exercises, or lumbar fusion.

Evaluating the complex chronic pain patient

The evaluation of the complex chronic pain patient should be different than for the patient with a simple pain problem. The former requires a team approach. It is important that the neurosurgeon contemplating a pain-relieving operation get the best information that is likely to have an impact on outcome. This should include the following: 1. Some way to extract the appropriate information contained in the patient's medical records. 2. Physical factors that have a negative impact on prognosis. 3. Psychologic information, including return-to-work decisions, medication use issues, meaning of prior successes, negative environmental factors, codependency issues, secondary gains and their impact, presence of pain games, negatively acting financial considerations, impact of depression, presence of poor role models, impact of pain on general functioning, and the patient's future plans. Consider that just like a successful operation is a symphony of relatively simple harmonious parts, so, too, is the assessment of the complex chronic pain patient. The complexity of the patient and her or his predicament should not impair your ability to understand her or his real needs. The appropriate assessment of the patient requires that issues other than the pain itself be factored into the decisions about interventions. In the end, it is not appropriate to suggest afterward that psychosocial factors were the major cause for a poor result when nothing had been done about the same factors that had been present before the procedure.

Back surgery: Modern medical pitfall

Medical iatrogenesis is at an all-time high with increasing deaths, disability, and costs compounded by unnecessary and ineffective surgeries despite the warnings from WHO, the US Public Health Service, and the Institute of Medicine. One area in particular, failed back surgeries, has drawn increasing attention by researchers due to disproved medical theories and surgical treatments. Paradoxically, while spinal manipulative therapy has been shown to achieve better results for this epidemic of low back pain in particular, medical and insurance programs often limit or boycott this inexpensive and effective treatment, indicating the solution to lowering medical costs and iatrogenesis now rests with political and economic factors primarily.