Multivariate analysis of race and adverse pathologic findings after radical prostatectomy

Variation in Positive Surgical Margin Status After Radical Prostatectomy for pT2 Prostate Cancer

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated patient, hospital, and cancer-specific factors associated with positive surgical margin (PSM) variability after radical prostatectomy in pT2 prostate cancer in the United States.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 45,426 men from 1152 hospitals with pT2 prostate cancer and known margin status after radical prostatectomy were identified using the National Cancer Database (2010-2015). Data on patient, cancer, hospital factors, and surgical approach were extracted. A mixed effects logistic regression model was computed to examine factors associated with PSM and partial R² values to assess the relative contributions of patient, cancer, and hospital variables to PSM status.

RESULTS

Median PSM rate of 8.5% (interquartile range, 5.2%-13.0%). Robotic (odds ratio [OR], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-0.99) and laparoscopic (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64-0.90) surgical approach, academic institution (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.76-1.00) and high hospital surgical volume (>297 cases [OR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.70-0.99) were independently associated with a lower PSM. Black men (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.01-1.26) and adverse cancer-specific features (prostate-specific antigen [PSA], 10-20; PSA >20; cT3 stage; Gleason 7, 8, 9-10; all P > .01) were independently associated with a higher PSM. Patient-specific, hospital-specific, and cancer-specific factors had a contribution of 2.3%, 3.9%, and 15.2%, respectively, to the variation in PSM. Facility had a contribution of 23.7% to the variation in PSM.

CONCLUSION

Cancer-specific factors account for 15.2% of PSM variation with the remaining 84.8% of PSM variation due to patient, hospital, and other factors not accounted within the model. Noncancer-specific factors represent addressable factors that are important for policy-makers in efforts to improve patient outcome.

Prostate cancer treatment patterns among racial/ethnic groups in Florida

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death among men in the United States. Blacks have the highest incidence and mortality rates. Treatment differences have been observed between black and white men. Brachy monotherapy (BMT) has become popular for localized prostate cancer because of its convenience, being the least invasive, and resulting in better quality of life during and after treatment. No studies have specifically examined BMT in treating localized prostate cancer by race/ethnicity.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to (1) describe treatment patterns among men with localized prostate cancer, (2) identify factors affecting the use of BMT, and (3) examine if there was any difference in BMT use by race and ethnicity.

METHODS

Florida cancer incidence data of 1994-2003 were used to extract information on men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer along with their demographics, primary payer at diagnosis, tumor stage and treatments. Logistic regression was performed to assess the likelihood of receiving BMT.

RESULTS

The study found that surgery and radiation were the 2 major single treatments for localized prostate cancer. The percent of patients receiving BMT treatment increased from 1994 through 2003. Men with the following characteristics were more likely to receive BMT than their counterparts: Non-Hispanic white, older, married, Medicare beneficiaries and military personnel, with well-differentiated tumor, and receiving treatment in facilities with high practice volume and/or located in urban counties.

CONCLUSION

There were racial/ethnic differences in localized prostate cancer treatment. Possible reasons for the differences require further research.

Racial variation in the pattern and quality of care for prostate cancer in the USA: mind the gap

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature on racial variation in the pattern of care (PoC) and quality of care (QoC) for prostate cancer, as there are known racial disparities in the incidence and outcomes of prostate cancer. While there are some biological explanations for these differences, they do not completely explain the variation. Differences in the appropriateness and QoC delivered to men of different racial groups may contribute to disparities in outcome.

METHODS

We searched the USA National Library of Medicine PubMed system for articles pertaining to quality indicators in prostate cancer and racial disparities in QoC for prostate cancer.

RESULTS

While standards for appropriate treatment are not clearly defined, racial variation in the PoC has been reported in several studies, suggesting that African-American men may receive less aggressive treatment. There are validated QoC indicators in prostate cancer, and researchers have begun to evaluate racial variation in adherence to these quality indicators. Further quality comparisons, particularly in structural measures, may need to be performed to fully evaluate differences in QoC.

CONCLUSIONS

There is mounting evidence for racial variation in the PoC and QoC for prostate cancer, which may contribute to observed differences in outcome. While some of the sources of racial variation in quality and outcome have been identified through the development of evidence-based guidelines and validated quality indicators, opportunities exist to identify, study and attempt to resolve other components of the quality gap.

Does race affect postoperative outcomes in patients with low-risk prostate cancer who undergo radical prostatectomy?

OBJECTIVES

To assess the magnitude of racial disparities in prostate cancer outcomes following radical prostatectomy for low-risk prostate cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our database of 2407 patients who under went radical prostatectomy and isolated 2 cohorts of patients with low-risk prostate cancer. Cohort 1 was defined using liberal criteria, and cohort 2 was isolated using more stringent criteria. We then studied pre- and postoperative parameters to discern any racial differences in these 2 groups. Statistical analyses, including log-rank, chi(2), and Fisher's exact analyses, were used to ascertain the significance of such differences.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, no significant differences were found between the white and African-American patients with regard to age at diagnosis, mean prostate-specific antigen, median follow-up, or percentage of involved cores on prostate biopsy. African-American patients in cohort 1 had a greater mean body mass index than did white patients (26.9 vs 27.8, P = .026). The analysis of postoperative data demonstrated no significant difference between white and African-American patients in the risk of biochemical failure, extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle involvement, positive surgical margins, tumor volume, or risk of disease upgrading. African-American patients in cohort 2 demonstrated greater all-cause mortality compared with their white counterparts (9.4% vs 3.1%, P = .027).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with low-risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy, there exist no significant differences in surrogate measures of disease control, risk of disease upgrading, estimated tumor volume, or recurrence-free survival between whites and African-Americans.

Differences in clinicopathologic features of prostate cancer between black and white patients treated in the 1990s and 2000s

OBJECTIVES

We have previously reported on the disparity in the clinicopathologic features of prostate cancer between black and white patients at our equal-access institution during the 1990s. The goal of this study was to determine whether the worse clinicopathologic features of prostate cancer in black patients have persisted in the 2000s.

METHODS

We examined 362 men (224 black and 138 white) treated with radical prostatectomy at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in New York. We compared the clinicopathologic variables between 227 patients treated during the 1990s (group 1) and 135 treated in the 2000s (group 2).

RESULTS

In group 1, black patients were significantly younger (P < 0.001) and had a greater prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (P = 0.001), Gleason score (P = 0.005), and stage (P = 0.03) than white patients. In group 2, black patients continued to have significantly greater PSA levels (P = 0.04) and Gleason scores (P = 0.005) than white patients. Comparing only the black patients, those in group 2 had significantly lower PSA levels (P < 0.001) and stage (P = 0.03), but had worse Gleason scores (P = 0.03) than those in group 1. On multivariate analysis, black patients were significantly more likely to have a worse Gleason score (P = 0.005) than white patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data have demonstrated a narrowing of the differences in pathologic stage between black and white patients in the 2000s. However, black men have continued to have worse Gleason scores and greater PSA levels than white patients. These findings suggest that there may be different patterns of molecular alterations in black men that may contribute to the poor tumor differentiation. Additional research is underway to better characterize these underlying molecular mechanisms.

Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and disease free survival after radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

Vitamin D has been linked with prostate cancer risk in epidemiologic studies and has antiproliferative, prodifferentiation, and antimetastatic properties in experimental systems. Its hormonal activity is mediated by the vitamin D receptor. We investigated whether germ-line genetic variation in the vitamin D receptor impacts progression of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

METHODS

We analyzed BsmI and TaqI polymorphisms using archived specimens from a large series of radical prostatectomy patients at a single institution. Our series included 428 white men (WM) and 310 African-American men (AAM) who were carefully and uniformly staged and followed for 5-10 years.

RESULTS

The distribution of polymorphisms varied between WM and AAM. There was little association between genotype and extent of disease at diagnosis, Gleason score, preoperative PSA, or recurrence overall. Among WM with locally advanced disease, however, the BsmI B allele protected against recurrence in models examining gene dose (P = 0.04) and dominant effects (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall vitamin D receptor polymorphisms did not predict pathologic features of prostate cancer but may impact on risk of recurrence among men in certain risk groups. Analysis of polymorphisms may provide clues about the mechanisms through which vitamin D exerts its inhibitory effects on prostate cancer in vivo in men.

Comparison of clinical and pathological features in African-American and Caucasian patients with localized prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

To examine patient characteristics, prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels, and established preoperative and pathological prognostic factors to determine differences between Caucasian and African-American patients with localised prostate cancer, as it remains controversial whether African-American men present with more aggressive disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients (aged 53-76 years) undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) at an equal-access tertiary-care centre were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had preoperative PSA levels, a physical examination (including clinical staging), and sextant biopsy. Insurance information was also collected. The same urological oncologist determined clinical staging and performed all the RRPs, and the same genitourinary pathologist determined the Gleason grade for biopsies and surgical specimens, pathological stage, percentage of tumour involvement, and specimen weight. African-American and Caucasian patients were compared for PSA, clinical stage, pathological stage, biopsy and pathological Gleason grade, organ confinement, margin status and specimen weight. Using preoperative and pathological data, both groups were also compared for over- and under-staging and -grading. The Wilcoxon rank test with P < 0.05 was used to determine statistically significant differences.

RESULTS

African-American patients were more likely to be Medicaid or self-insured than Caucasian patients. Age, biopsy grade and clinical stage were not significantly different between the groups. African-American patients presented with a mean PSA level of 11.9 ng/mL and Caucasians with a mean of 8.5 ng/mL (P = 0.03). When clinical and biopsy data were compared with pathological data there were no differences between the groups in under/over-grading or under/over-staging. African-American patients had larger prostates per surgical specimen than their Caucasian counterparts (59.3 g vs 51.6 g, respectively; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

In a referred, equal-access system, African-American patients presented with higher serum PSA levels and had larger prostates in the surgical specimen. However, African-American patients did not present at an earlier age or with higher Gleason grade or clinical stage, nor were pathological grade and stages higher. Other pathological features were no different. African-American patients were not under- or over-staged or under- or over-graded more than their Caucasian counterparts. This retrospective study does not suggest that African-American men present with more aggressive disease.

Is Hispanic Race an Independent Risk Factor for Pathological Stage in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy?

PURPOSE

Hispanic-Americans are the most rapidly growing population in the United States. Although many studies have assessed differences in pathological stage at radical prostatectomy between white and black American men, to our knowledge none has assessed it in Hispanic men. We compared pathological stage at radical prostatectomy in contemporaneous groups of Hispanic and white American men.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 141 consecutive Hispanic and 314 consecutive white American men underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer from 1995 to 2002 at a single institution, as performed by one of us (ETG or MCB). Preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA), age at diagnosis, race, clinical stage, biopsy and specimen Gleason score, pathological stage, specimen volume and calculated specimen PSA density were collected for each patient. Data were compared using standard statistical methods.

RESULTS

Biopsy Gleason score, biopsy Gleason score distribution, specimen Gleason score, specimen Gleason distribution, pathological stage, calculated specimen PSA density, Gleason score change from biopsy to specimen and specimen prostate volume did not differ statistically between Hispanic and white men. Mean age and median preoperative PSA were statistically significantly higher in Hispanic vs white men (62.1 vs 59.5 years and 6.6 vs 5.4 ng/ml, respectively). In addition, no differences in the incidence of positive surgical margins, nonorgan confined disease, seminal vesicle invasion or positive lymph nodes were found between Hispanic and white men undergoing radical prostatectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that in contemporaneously treated groups of Hispanic and white men at the same institution pathological stage was similar between the groups. To our knowledge this is the largest comparison of surgically treated prostate cancer between these 2 groups. Further followup in terms of PSA outcome in these groups is planned.

Predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for patients with organ-confined disease using p27 expression

OBJECTIVES

It is unclear why men who undergo radical prostatectomy (RP) and are found to have pathologically organ-confined disease develop prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrences. We previously found that patients with less than 45% of cells in the prostate needle biopsy specimen (PNBx) staining positive for the cell cycle regulator p27 had a significantly increased risk of biochemical recurrence after RP. We sought to determine whether p27 staining in the PNBx specimen might serve as a molecular marker for PSA failure in the subset of patients who develop PSA recurrence despite organ-confined disease at RP.

METHODS

The PNBx specimens of 161 men treated with RP between 1991 and 2000 were examined for p27 expression using immunohistochemistry. The p27 cutpoint of less than 45% expression was used to define the high and low-risk categories. Patients were separated into two groups for analysis: organ-confined (pT2 and negative surgical margins) and non-organ-confined (pT2 with positive surgical margins, pT3, pT4, or lymph node involvement). The mean and median follow-up for patients with organ-confined and non-organ-confined disease was 47 and 43 months and 42 and 38 months, respectively. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to examine the preoperative clinical variables that were the strongest predictors of biochemical recurrence after RP among each group.

RESULTS

Among organ-confined patients, p27 expression was the only significant independent predictor of the time to biochemical recurrence after RP (hazard ratio 5.15, 95% confidence interval 1.41 to 18.83, P = 0.013). Among patients with non-organ-confined disease, the percentage of biopsy tissue with cancer, biopsy Gleason score, and PSA level were independent predictors of PSA recurrence. p27 expression was not a significant independent predictor of PSA recurrence among men with non-organ-confined disease.

CONCLUSIONS

p27 expression in the PNBx was a significant independent predictor of PSA failure for patients with pathologically organ-confined disease, but not for those with non-organ-confined disease. Patients with organ-confined disease but low p27 expression had a greater than fivefold risk of developing PSA recurrence than were men with high p27 expression, suggesting that p27 may be a molecular marker associated with micrometastatic disease at the time of RP.

Preoperative p27 status is an independent predictor of prostate specific antigen failure following radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE

p27 is an important cell cycle regulator, and decreased expression in radical prostatectomy specimens is associated with an increased risk of prostate specific antigen (PSA) failure. To our knowledge no prior study has shown that preoperative p27 status independently predicts recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The prostate needle biopsy specimens of 161 men treated with radical prostatectomy were examined for p27 expression using immunohistochemistry. Various p27 cut points were examined for their ability to separate patients into groups with different risk for time to biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy. The best p27 cut point was compared to other clinical variables (PSA, clinical stage, age, biopsy Gleason score and percent of prostate needle biopsy with cancer) on multivariate analysis to determine which variables independently predicted biochemical failure.

RESULTS

A p27 cut point of less than 45% positive staining cells resulted in significant preoperative risk stratification for time to PSA failure (HR 2.41, p = 0.010). On multivariate analysis serum PSA (HR 1.04, p = 0.011), biopsy Gleason score (HR 1.51, p = 0.011), percent of biopsy tissue with cancer (HR 10.01, p = 0.001) and less than 45% p27 positive cells (HR 2.44, p = 0.014) were all independent predictors of biochemical recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative p27 expression is an independent predictor of time to biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy. Patients with less than 45% p27 positive cells in the prostate needle biopsy specimen have almost a 2.5-fold increased risk of biochemical recurrence. To our knowledge this study is the first to show that p27 status of the prostate needle biopsy specimen can be used before radical prostatectomy to predict biochemical failure.

Defining the ideal cutpoint for determining PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Prostate-specific antigen

OBJECTIVES

To determine the ideal cutpoint for defining prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP). Although various cutpoints have been used, a recent study suggested that 0.4 ng/mL may be the most appropriate.

METHODS

A retrospective survey of 358 men undergoing RP at the West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center between 1991 and 2001 was undertaken. The 3-year and 5-year risk of PSA recurrence was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analyses using various cutpoints of postoperative PSA to define recurrence: greater than 0.1, greater than 0.2, greater than 0.3, greater than 0.4, and greater than 0.5 ng/mL. The 1 and 3-year risk of PSA progression after a detectable PSA level (PSA rising to a higher cutpoint) was evaluated for each definition of PSA recurrence using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the clinical variables that were significant independent predictors of PSA recurrence at each cutpoint.

RESULTS

For patients with a detectable postoperative PSA value from 0.11 to 0.2 ng/mL, the 1 and 3-year risk of PSA progression was 64% (95% confidence interval [CI] 46% to 82%) and 93% (95% CI 74% to 99%), respectively. For patients with a PSA value from 0.21 to 0.3 ng/mL, the 1 and 3-year risk of PSA progression was 86% (95% CI 69% to 97%) and 100% (95% CI 87% to 100%), respectively. The use of higher PSA cutpoints to define recurrence resulted in a lower 5-year risk of PSA recurrence. The 5-year risk of PSA recurrence using a greater than 0.1 ng/mL cutpoint resulted in a 43% (95% CI 36% to 50%) risk of recurrence compared with only 23% (95% CI 18% to 30%) for a greater than 0.5 ng/mL cutpoint. In multivariate analysis, PSA and biopsy Gleason score were significant independent predictors of biochemical recurrence, regardless of the definition of PSA recurrence used (P <or=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

PSA and biopsy Gleason score were significant predictors of biochemical failure, regardless of the definition of failure used. However, the definition of PSA recurrence dramatically affected the perceived success of therapy. Patients with a postoperative PSA value greater than 0.2 ng/mL are at very high risk of developing an additional rise in PSA. On the basis of this finding, a PSA value greater than 0.2 ng/mL is an appropriate cutpoint to define PSA recurrence after RP.

Clinical utility of percent prostate needle biopsy tissue with cancer cutpoints to risk stratify patients before radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES

The percentage of total prostate needle biopsy tissue with cancer was previously found to be a stronger predictor of biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy (RP) than either biopsy Gleason score or serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA). To improve our ability to predict preoperatively the risk of biochemical recurrence after RP, we sought to determine the cutpoints of the percentage of biopsy tissue with cancer to separate patients into low, intermediate, or high-risk groups. We then examined whether we could further stratify low, intermediate, and high-risk groups (on the basis of the PSA level and biopsy Gleason score) using the percentage of prostate needle biopsy tissue with cancer.

METHODS

A single pathologist reviewed the prostate needle biopsy specimens of 217 men who underwent RP between 1991 and 2001. Biopsy specimens were examined for Gleason score and the percentage of total biopsy tissue with cancer. Cutpoints were identified to define patients with differing risk of biochemical recurrence after RP. These cutpoints were applied to low, intermediate, and high-risk patients, on the basis of PSA and biopsy Gleason score, to determine whether preoperative risk stratification could be improved.

RESULTS

Using the cutpoints for the percentage of prostate needle biopsy tissue with cancer of less than 20% (low risk), 20% to less than 55% (intermediate risk), and 55% or greater (high risk), patients were separated into three groups with differing risks of biochemical failure after RP (hazard ratio 1.95, 95% confidence interval 1.37 to 2.77, P <0.001). These cutpoints further stratified patients with an intermediate (P = 0.002) or high risk (P = 0.05) of biochemical failure (on the basis of the PSA and biopsy Gleason score). However, these cutpoints provided no improvement in risk stratification for patients who were at low risk (P = 0.501) of biochemical failure (on the basis of PSA and biopsy Gleason score).

CONCLUSIONS

The percentage of total prostate needle biopsy tissue with cancer can be used to stratify patients into low, intermediate, and high-risk groups preoperatively for biochemical recurrence after RP. These cutpoints could further stratify patients preoperatively who were at intermediate or high risk of biochemical failure on the basis of PSA and biopsy Gleason score.

Impact of race on prostate-specific antigen outcome after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate

PURPOSE

To compare prostate-specific antigen (PSA) outcome after radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer in African-American and white men using previously established risk groups.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1989 and 2000, 2,036 men (n = 162 African-American men, n = 1,874 white men) underwent RP for clinically localized prostate cancer. Using pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, clinical T stage, and percentage of positive biopsy specimens, patients were stratified into low- and high-risk groups. For each risk group, PSA outcome was estimated using the actuarial method of Kaplan and Meier. Comparisons of PSA outcome between African-American and white men were made using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

The median age and PSA level for African-American and white men were 60 and 62 years old and 8.8 and 7.0 ng/mL, respectively. African-Americans had a statistically significant increase in PSA (P =.002), Gleason score (P =.003), clinical T stage (P =.004), and percentage of positive biopsy specimens (P =.04) at presentation. However, there was no statistical difference in the distribution of PSA, clinical T stage, or Gleason score between racial groups in the low- and high-risk groups. The 5-year estimate of PSA outcome was 87% in the low-risk group for all patients (P =.70) and 28% versus 32% in African-American and white patients in the high-risk group (P =.28), respectively. Longer follow-up is required to confirm if these results are maintained at 10 years.

CONCLUSION

Even though African-American men presented at a younger age and with more advanced disease compared with white men with prostate cancer, PSA outcome after RP when controlled for known clinical predictive factors was not statistically different. This study supports earlier screening in African-American men.

Clinical stage T1c prostate cancer: pathologic outcomes following radical prostatectomy in black and white men

BACKGROUND

The incidence of prostate cancer in black men is 50% to 70% higher than among age-matched white men. Black men have a twofold higher mortality rate and overall tend to have higher serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels than white men. To determine whether racial differences exist in men whose prostate cancer was diagnosed based solely on an elevated serum PSA level, we compared clinical and pathologic features in black and white men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) for clinical stage T1c prostate cancer.

METHODS

We used a prospectively collected database to identify all men undergoing RP for clinical T1c prostate cancer between July 1995 and October 2000. A total of 129 consecutive men (56 black men and 73 white men) were compared for age at diagnosis, serum PSA level, biopsy Gleason score, pathologic stage, RP specimen Gleason score, incidence of lymph node metastasis, and incidence of positive surgical margins.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences were not found by race in patients' ages, serum PSA levels, biopsy Gleason score, pathologic stage, incidence of lymph node metastases, or incidence of positive surgical margins. The RP specimen Gleason score was more heterogeneous in black men than white men (P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Racial differences in the incidence and mortality rate of prostate cancer are well known, but differences in the clinical and pathologic features between black and white men with prostate cancer identified solely based on an elevated serum PSA level with negative results on digital rectal examination (clinical stage T1c ) have been poorly studied. Our results suggest that men with clinical stage T1c prostate cancer have similar clinical and pathologic findings regardless of race. These results suggest that early-detection programs using serum PSA testing for prostate cancer in black men potentially can result in improvements in prostate cancer outcomes in this high-risk group.

Percent prostate needle biopsy tissue with cancer is more predictive of biochemical failure or adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy than prostate specific antigen or Gleason score

PURPOSE

Biopsy Gleason score, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels, and clinical stage are known to be independent predictors of adverse pathological features and biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy. We determine whether various prostate needle biopsy parameters were predictive of either adverse pathological findings or disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single pathologist reviewed the prostate needle biopsy specimens of 190 men who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1991 and 2000. Biopsy specimens were examined for Gleason score, perineural invasion, number and percent of cores with cancer, and percent of total biopsy tissue with cancer and Gleason grade 4 or 5 cancer. Multivariate analysis was used to determine the prostate needle biopsy parameters and preoperative clinical variables, including serum PSA, clinical stage, patient age and race, that were most significant for predicting positive surgical margins, nonorgan confined disease, seminal vesicle invasion and biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.

RESULTS

Of the prostate needle biopsy parameters examined percent of tissue with cancer was the strongest predictor of biochemical recurrence in the multivariate analysis (p <0.001). Percent of tissue with cancer was a stronger predictor of biochemical recurrence than either PSA (p = 0.048) or biopsy Gleason score (p = 0.053). It was also a strong independent predictor of seminal vesicle invasion (p = 0.015) and nonorgan confined disease (p = 0.024). Perineural invasion, percent and number of cores with cancer, and percent of tissue with Gleason grade 4 or 5 were not independent predictors of either adverse pathology or biochemical failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Of all the preoperative variables examined, including the standard clinical variables of serum PSA, Gleason score and clinical stage, percent of biopsy tissue with cancer was the strongest predictor of biochemical recurrence, seminal vesicle invasion and nonorgan confined disease. Consideration should be given to reporting percent of total biopsy tissue with cancer in all prostate biopsy results.

Preoperative PSA velocity and doubling time do not predict adverse pathologic features or biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES

To improve the accuracy of predicting pathologic stage and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP), we sought to determine whether preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity and doubling time predict adverse pathologic features or biochemical recurrence following RP. We also sought to determine if there were racial differences in preoperative PSA velocity and doubling time.

METHODS

A total of 331 patients underwent RP at the West Los Angeles VA Medical Center between November 1991 and March 2000. Of these patients, 86 had two or more preoperative PSA values that were at least 12 months apart. Patients were analyzed to determine whether preoperative PSA velocity or doubling time was predictive of adverse pathologic features, including positive surgical margins, capsular penetration, seminal vesicle invasion, or biochemical recurrence. Additionally, PSA velocity and doubling time were compared among white, black, Hispanic, and Asian men.

RESULTS

Preoperative PSA velocity and doubling time were not predictive of positive surgical margins, capsular penetration, or seminal vesicle invasion (P >0.30). In addition, there was no association between PSA velocity or doubling time and pathologic stage or surgical Gleason score (P >0.36). Preoperative PSA velocity (P = 0.581) and doubling time (P = 0.528) were not predictors of biochemical recurrence following RP. There were no racial differences in preoperative PSA velocity (P = 0.715) or doubling time (P = 0.662).

CONCLUSIONS

Neither preoperative PSA velocity nor doubling time was a predictor of adverse pathologic findings or biochemical recurrence after RP. In addition, there was no difference in PSA velocity or doubling time between the races studied.