Intraoperative nerve stimulation predicts postoperative potency

Intraoperative electrostimulation objectifies the assessment of functional nerve preservation after mesorectal excision

BACKGROUND

To improve nerve-sparing surgery, intraoperative electrical stimulation of pelvic autonomic nerves (INS) has been proposed in urology, gynecology, and visceral surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of INS while monitoring intravesical pressure on the accurate evaluation of pelvic autonomic nerve preservation (PANP) after mesorectal excision. It was sought to determine whether this confirmation is useful in the prediction of postoperative urinary function.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients with mesorectal exzision for rectal cancer were examined prospectively. PANP was assessed visually by the surgeon and with INS. Bladder function was evaluated by post voiding residual volume measurement, rate of recatheterization, rate of long-term urinary catheterisation, and the international prostatic symptom score with quality of life index.

RESULTS

INS confirmed bilateral preservation of parasympathetic nerves in 46 patients (74%), and in 10 patients (16%) in at least one side. In six patients (10%), INS failed to confirm PANP. Eleven patients (18%) developed urinary symptoms postoperatively. INS results had a higher sensitivity than visual assessment by the surgeon (82 vs 46%). Values for specificity ranged at 90 and 92%, respectively. Accuracy of INS in predicting PANP was higher (88 vs 83%). The correlation between urinary function and the findings on INS was good (kappa-value: 0.65), correlation between urinary function and visual assessment by the surgeon was fair (kappa-value: 0.40).

CONCLUSION

INS, while monitoring intravesical pressure, accurately predicts bladder function after mesorectal excision. It may provide further insight into pelvic autonomic nerve sparing techniques.

Recent neuroanatomical studies on the neurovascular bundle of the prostate and cavernosal nerves: clinical reflections on radical prostatectomy

The neurovascular bundle of the prostate and cavernosal nerves have been used to describe the same structure ever since the publication of the first studies on the neuroanatomy of the lower urogenital tract of men, studies that were prompted by postoperative complications arising from radical prostatectomy. In urological surgery every effort is made to preserve or restore the neurovascular bundle of the prostate to avoid erectile dysfunction (ED). However, the postoperative potency rates are yet to be satisfactory despite all advancements in radical prostatectomy technique. As the technology associated with urological surgery develops and topographical studies on neuroanatomy are cultivated, new observations seriously challenge the classical teachings on the topography of the neurovascular bundle of the prostate and the cavernosal nerves. The present review revisits the classical and most recent data on the topographical anatomy of the neurovascular bundle of the prostate and cavernosal nerves and their implications on radical prostatectomy techniques.

INTRAOPERATIVE ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL CONFIRMATION OF URINARY CONTINENCE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY

PURPOSE

To determine the actual effect of nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy (RP) on postoperative urinary continence we used intraoperative electrophysiological testing to confirm functional preservation of the neurovascular bundle (NVB).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 85 patients undergoing RP for localized prostate cancer were studied. During RP NVB preservation was assessed macroanatomically. Electrophysiological testing was then performed to confirm NVB preservation. The NVB was electrostimulated and responses were observed by monitoring intracavernous or intraurethral pressure changes. All patients were classified into 3 groups according to the degree of nerve sparing, that is a bilateral nerve sparing group, a unilateral nerve sparing group and a nonnerve sparing group, based on macroanatomical assessment as well as on electrophysiological assessment. Postoperative continence in each group was then determined. Urinary continence at baseline, and 3 and 6 months postoperatively was studied using a self-administered questionnaire.

RESULTS

With electrophysiological assessment 20.6% of macroanatomically determined NVB preservations were reclassified. Analysis of the data on groups classified accurately by electrophysiological testing showed that the bilateral nerve sparing group maintained postoperative urinary function significantly more than the unilateral nerve sparing and nonnerve sparing groups. However, when only macroanatomical assessment was considered, no significant difference among the groups was found in urinary function.

CONCLUSIONS

Electrophysiological assessment revealed that bilateral NVB preservation contributes to early recovery of urinary continence after RP. Thus, intraoperative electrophysiological assessment is useful for predicting postoperative quality of life.

Neuroprotective strategies in radical prostatectomy

In this section, authors from New York give their views on the various neuroprotective strategies for patients having a radical prostatectomy, such as the use of nerve grafts and other approaches. A joint study from Korea, the USA, Canada and the UK is presented in a paper on the importance of patient perception in the clinical assessment and management of BPH. There is also a review of robotic urological surgery. Finally, authors from New York give a review on the life of Isaac Newton. This is a new historical review in the journal, but one that will be of general interest.

Intraoperative electrical stimulation of cavernous nerves with monitoring of intracorporeal pressure to confirm nerve sparing during radical prostatectomy: Early clinical results

BACKGROUND

We performed intraoperative cavernous nerve stimulation with an intracavernous pressure (ICP) monitoring system to confirm nerve sparing during radical pelvic surgery and assessed the results.

METHODS

Nineteen cases of radical prostatectomy and three of radical cystoprostatectomy were examined. Electrical stimulation of the site where the neurovascular bundle (NVB) was determined to run was performed and changes in ICP were measured before and after prostate removal.

RESULTS

Of the 22 patients, bilateral NVBs were preserved in six patients while unilateral NVB was preserved in 16. Before dissection, all NVBs examined exhibited positive responses (ICP changes of>5 mmHg) to nerve stimulation. After removal of the prostate, positive responses were observed in 22 (79%) of 28 macroanatomically preserved NVBs. Of 16 sides on which the NVB was not preserved, there were positive responses in five (31%). In these patients, some nerve fibers were macroscopically observed lateral to the original site of NVB. Finally, bilateral or unilateral nerve sparing was confirmed electrophysiologically in 20 (91%) of the 22 patients.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative stimulation of the NVB while monitoring ICP changes is a simple and reliable method of accurately evaluating the preservation of cavernous nerves. This system may provide further insight into the mechanism of postoperative erectile dysfunction.

An operative and anatomic study to help in nerve sparing during laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE

To provide a detailed description of the steps involved in a laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in relation to the complex neurovascular anatomy of the male pelvis. AIM AND HYPOTHESIS: We aimed at delineating the neurovascular anatomy to assist in nerve preservation during laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomies.

METHODS

A team of urologists and an anatomist performed anatomic dissections of 12 male cadavers using a combination of laparoscopic equipment, magnification, and open surgical dissection. Each step involved in laparoscopic prostatectomy was reviewed in relation to the possible impact the step could have on the neurovascular bundles.

RESULTS

Dissections were performed systematically to mimic various steps of laparoscopic and robotic prostatectomy. The neurovascular bundles were identified and correlated with video images of actual surgery. This enabled us to construct computer simulations and show the actual nerves on the operative pictures. We specially unraveled the relationship between neurovascular bundles and lateral pelvic and Denonvillier's fascias, both of which enclose and hide these important structures. The course of the bundles was traced from its origin at pelvic plexus to its distal course along the urethra. We also showed the important relationship between pelvic plexus ganglions and seminal vesicles to illustrate the vulnerability of these nerves to thermal, electrical and/or crush injury during seminal vesicle and prostatic pedicle dissections. The importance of additional fine neural plexus along the posterior and antero-lateral surface of the prostate was shown by both gross anatomical and microscopic images. The distal precarious location of the bundles was illustrated by dissections showing anteriorly lifted prostate.These anatomico-operative correlations have not been published for laparoscopic and robotic prostatectomies, which differ significantly in its visual angles, magnifications and sometimes three-dimensional (3D) visualization from its open counter part.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy provides exposure and visualization of male pelvis not previously appreciated. It is only through a careful reexamination of the anatomy of the male pelvis, in the context of this new procedure, that the improvements in visualization and exposure benefit the surgeon. Our work provides a detailed map relating to operative steps to aid the surgeon in the performance of a nerve sparing robotic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Preliminary results of a monitoring system to confirm the preservation of cavernous nerves

BACKGROUND

It is important to preserve the neurovascular bundle (NVB) during nerve-sparing surgery. This article presents the preliminary results of our monitoring system for the postoperative preservation of erectile function.

METHODS

In 15 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and 20 patients undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy, intraoperative electrical stimulation along the NVB was performed to measure changes in intracavernous pressure before and after prostate removal. Seven of the radical prostatectomy patients and eight of the radical cystoprostatectomy patients underwent nerve-sparing surgery. Postoperative erectile function was evaluated in 25 patients not receiving adjuvant hormonal therapy.

RESULTS

The NVB was judged to be preserved at least on one side electrophysiologically in 14 of 15 patients. Pathologically, three patients had pT3 cancer. Postoperatively, sufficient erectile function was demonstrated using the International Index of Erectile Function 5 in three patients, nocturnal penile tumescence in three patients, and a questionnaire or an interview in three patients. The other patients were incompletely erectile. None of the 11 patients not receiving adjuvant hormonal therapy, in whom NVB was not preserved, were erectile.

CONCLUSION

If the successful criterion of nerve-sparing surgery is defined as a change in intracavernous pressure of 4 cm H2O or more being observed at least unilaterally, and the successful criteria of erectile function preservation includes being sufficiently erectile as revealed by an interview, the sensitivity of our system was 69.2% (9/13) and the specificity was 100% (12/12). Neither adverse reactions to the measurement, nor inadequacy of cancer excision accompanying NVB sparing, were observed. These results suggest that our system can predict postoperative erectile function fairly accurately.

Erectile function after radical prostatectomy: a review

OBJECTIVES

Although the high rate of erectile dysfunction (ED) following prostatectomy is well recognised, the aetiology and pathophysiology have not yet been fully elucidated. We examined the current literature as to aetiology, treatment and possible prevention of ED following prostatectomy.

METHOD

Review of the literature by a Medline search.

CONCLUSION

The most important predictors of erectile function are pre-operative erectile function and the nerve sparing nature of the procedure. The former is determined by age and vascular risk-factors whereas the latter is decided by the stage of the tumour and the skill of the surgeon. The value of intraoperative nerve mapping seems limited and the importance of nerve grafting is uncertain. Natural recovery of erection can take as long as 24 months. Patients complain about a lack of professional support. Symptomatic therapy may be applied according to the current general standards of treatment in men with ED.

Meta-analysis of rates of erectile function after treatment of localized prostate carcinoma

PURPOSE

The results of a 1997 meta-analysis of the rates of erectile function after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and radical prostatectomy have been widely used in patient and professional education materials and as a reference against which new findings are compared. With a number of recent publications, it is now possible to update this analysis and compare brachytherapy with or without EBRT with EBRT alone, standard and nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy, and cryotherapy.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review and subsequent meta-analysis of the rates of erectile dysfunction associated with the treatments of localized prostate carcinoma was conducted. A simple logistic regression analysis was used to combine the data from the 54 articles that met the selection criteria.

RESULTS

The predicted probability of maintaining erectile function after brachytherapy was 0.76, after brachytherapy plus EBRT 0.60, after EBRT 0.55, after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy 0.34, after standard radical prostatectomy 0.25, and after cryotherapy 0.13. When only studies reporting > or = 2 years follow-up were considered, the only significant change was a decline in the probability for nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. No brachytherapy studies had a follow-up of > or = 2 years. When the probabilities were adjusted for age, the spread between the RT methods and surgical approaches was greater.

CONCLUSION

The differences in the probability of maintaining erectile function after different treatments of localized prostate cancer are significant.

Intraoperative parasympathetic nerve stimulation with tumescence monitoring during total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Unilateral or bilateral division of the parasympathetic nerves during resection of rectal cancer may result in sexual erectile dysfunction. The purposes of this project were twofold: to determine the ability to demonstrate penile tumescence in response to parasympathetic nerve stimulation after rectal cancer resection and to correlate the nerve stimulation response with clinical sexual function 6 months after operation.

STUDY DESIGN

In 21 consecutive male patients with normal erectile function undergoing total mesorectal excision, cavernous nerve identification and integrity before and after pelvic dissection were assessed intraoperatively, both visually by an experienced surgeon and by using the CaverMap nerve stimulator. The minimal effective current necessary to produce a 2% increase in penile tumescence was recorded for both the left- and right-sided nerves, primarily the largest nerve trunk, S3. Postclearance stimulation data were then correlated with sexual function outcomes, specifically erection and orgasm at 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The operating surgeon's visual assessment of the pelvic autonomic nerve's integrity after pelvic dissection was deemed intact in 20 of the 21 patients (95.2%). Of the 20 patients who were evaluated with CaverMap after completion of total mesorectal excision, 17 (85%) had tumescence response after nerve stimulation on either side, and 3 patients (15%) had unilateral response only. Of the 19 patients evaluated for sexual function 6 months after surgery, 18 (94.7%) had normal function, including the 3 patients with only unilateral nerve stimulation tumescence response.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative mapping of the parasympathetic nerve trunks with the CaverMap nerve stimulator may be a valuable aid to less experienced pelvic surgeons and may help in autonomic nerve preservation during total mesorectal excision clearance.