Microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia with the Dornier Urowave: results of a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, sham-controlled trial

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy with the CoreTherm®Concept in men with prostates larger than 100 grams - a consecutive case series

OBJECTIVE

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) is well described for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with prostates between 30 and 100 grams. We aimed to describe the results in men with prostates larger than 100 grams.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively recorded age, prostate size, occurrence of urinary retention, and Danish Prostate Symptom Score (DAN-PSS) prior to treatment in men with prostates exceeding 100 grams. Following treatment, we assessed satisfaction, DAN-PSS, and the results of uroflowmetry and postvoid residual urine.

RESULTS

We included 50 consecutive patients with prostates over 100 g. The median age was 78 years, and the median prostate size was 126 g (range 101-230). Forty-four men were treated due to urinary retention and 6 due to lower urinary tract symptoms. Treatments were performed under local anesthesia. The median duration was 15 minutes (range 8-32 minutes) and the median destruction was 25% of the prostatic volume (range 11-26%). Eight patients had destruction of <20%. No side effects were noted. Forty-nine patients completed 6-month follow-up. The 41/49 (84%) men who had tissue destruction of ≥20% reported to be satisfied. The median DAN-PSS score was 3 (range 0-18), the median Qmax was 12 mL/s (range 5.1-23.1 mL/s) and the median postvoid residual volume was 89 mL (range 0-331 mL). Symptoms were unchanged in the 8/49 (16%) men who had <20% tissue destruction.

CONCLUSIONS

TUMT represents a useful alternative to surgery in men with infravesical obstruction and a prostate of more than 100 grams.

Minimally invasive treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a Cochrane network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the comparative effectiveness and ranking of minimally invasive treatments (MITs) for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched multiple databases up to 24 February 2021. We included randomized controlled trials assessing the following treatments: convective radiofrequency water vapour thermal therapy (WVTT; or Rezūm); prostatic arterial embolization (PAE); prostatic urethral lift (PUL; or Urolift); temporary implantable nitinol device (TIND); and transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) compared to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or sham surgery. We performed a frequentist network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We included 27 trials involving 3017 men. The overall certainty of the evidence of most outcomes according to GRADE was low to very low. Compared to TURP, we found that PUL and PAE may result in little to no difference in urological symptoms, while WVTT, TUMT and TIND may result in worse urological symptoms. MITs may result in little to no difference in quality of life, compared to TURP. MITs may result in a large reduction in major adverse events compared to TURP. We were uncertain about the effects of PAE and PUL on retreatment compared to TURP, however, TUMT may result in higher retreatment rates. We were very uncertain of the effects of MITs on erectile function and ejaculatory function. Among MITs, PUL and PAE had the highest likelihood of being the most efficacious for urinary symptoms and quality of life, TUMT for major adverse events, WVTT and TIND for erectile function and PUL for ejaculatory function. Excluding WVTT and TIND, for which there were only studies with short-term (3-month) follow-up, PUL had the highest likelihood of being the most efficacious for retreatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive treatments may result in similar or worse effects concerning urinary symptoms and quality of life compared to TURP at short-term follow-up.

Minimally invasive treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A variety of minimally invasive treatments are available as an alternative to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for management of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). However, it is unclear which treatments provide better results.

OBJECTIVES

Our primary objective was to assess the comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with BPH through a network meta-analysis. Our secondary objective was to obtain an estimate of relative ranking of these minimally invasive treatments, according to their effects.

SEARCH METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search of multiple databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and LILACS), trials registries, other sources of grey literature, and conference proceedings, up to 24 February 2021. We had no restrictions on language of publication or publication status.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included parallel-group randomized controlled trials assessing the effects of the following minimally invasive treatments, compared to TURP or sham treatment, on men with moderate to severe LUTS due to BPH: convective radiofrequency water vapor therapy (CRFWVT); prostatic arterial embolization (PAE); prostatic urethral lift (PUL); temporary implantable nitinol device (TIND); and transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model for pair-wise comparisons and a frequentist network meta-analysis for combined estimates. We interpreted them according to Cochrane methods. We planned subgroup analyses by age, prostate volume, and severity of baseline symptoms. We used risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to express dichotomous data and mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs to express continuous data. We used the GRADE approach to rate the certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 27 trials involving 3017 men, mostly over age 50, with severe LUTS due to BPH. The overall certainty of evidence was low to very low due to concerns regarding bias, imprecision, inconsistency (heterogeneity), and incoherence. Based on the network meta-analysis, results for our main outcomes were as follows. Urologic symptoms (19 studies, 1847 participants): PUL and PAE may result in little to no difference in urologic symptoms scores (MD of International Prostate Symptoms Score [IPSS]) compared to TURP (3 to 12 months; MD range 0 to 35; higher scores indicate worse symptoms; PUL: 1.47, 95% CI -4.00 to 6.93; PAE: 1.55, 95% CI -1.23 to 4.33; low-certainty evidence). CRFWVT, TUMT, and TIND may result in worse urologic symptoms scores compared to TURP at short-term follow-up, but the CIs include little to no difference (CRFWVT: 3.6, 95% CI -4.25 to 11.46; TUMT: 3.98, 95% CI 0.85 to 7.10; TIND: 7.5, 95% CI -0.68 to 15.69; low-certainty evidence). Quality of life (QoL) (13 studies, 1459 participants): All interventions may result in little to no difference in the QoL scores, compared to TURP (3 to 12 months; MD of IPSS-QoL score; MD range 0 to 6; higher scores indicate worse symptoms; PUL: 0.06, 95% CI -1.17 to 1.30; PAE: 0.09, 95% CI -0.57 to 0.75; CRFWVT: 0.37, 95% CI -1.45 to 2.20; TUMT: 0.65, 95% CI -0.48 to 1.78; TIND: 0.87, 95% CI -1.04 to 2.79; low-certainty evidence). Major adverse events (15 studies, 1573 participants): TUMT probably results in a large reduction of major adverse events compared to TURP (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.43; moderate-certainty evidence). PUL, CRFWVT, TIND and PAE may also result in a large reduction in major adverse events, but CIs include substantial benefits and harms at three months to 36 months; PUL: RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.04 to 2.22; CRFWVT: RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.01 to 18.62; TIND: RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.01 to 24.46; PAE: RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.68; low-certainty evidence). Retreatment (10 studies, 799 participants): We are uncertain about the effects of PAE and PUL on retreatment compared to TURP (12 to 60 months; PUL: RR 2.39, 95% CI 0.51 to 11.1; PAE: RR 4.39, 95% CI 1.25 to 15.44; very low-certainty evidence). TUMT may result in higher retreatment rates (RR 9.71, 95% CI 2.35 to 40.13; low-certainty evidence). Erectile function (six studies, 640 participants): We are very uncertain of the effects of minimally invasive treatments on erectile function (MD of International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF-5]; range 5 to 25; higher scores indicates better function; CRFWVT: 6.49, 95% CI -8.13 to 21.12; TIND: 5.19, 95% CI -9.36 to 19.74; PUL: 3.00, 95% CI -5.45 to 11.44; PAE: -0.03, 95% CI -6.38, 6.32; very low-certainty evidence). Ejaculatory dysfunction (eight studies, 461 participants): We are uncertain of the effects of PUL, PAE and TUMT on ejaculatory dysfunction compared to TURP (3 to 12 months; PUL: RR 0.05, 95 % CI 0.00 to 1.06; PAE: RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.92; TUMT: RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.68; low-certainty evidence). TURP is the reference treatment with the highest likelihood of being the most efficacious for urinary symptoms, QoL and retreatment, but the least favorable in terms of major adverse events, erectile function and ejaculatory function. Among minimally invasive procedures, PUL and PAE have the highest likelihood of being the most efficacious for urinary symptoms and QoL, TUMT for major adverse events, PUL for retreatment, CRFWVT and TIND for erectile function and PUL for ejaculatory function.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive treatments may result in similar or worse effects concerning urinary symptoms and QoL compared to TURP at short-term follow-up. They may result in fewer major adverse events, especially in the case of PUL and PAE; resulting in better rankings for symptoms scores. PUL may result in fewer retreatments compared to other interventions, especially TUMT, which had the highest retreatment rates at long-term follow-up. We are very uncertain about the effects of these interventions on erectile function. There was limited long-term data, especially for CRFWVT and TIND. Future high-quality studies with more extended follow-up, comparing different, active treatment modalities, and adequately reporting critical outcomes relevant to patients, including those related to sexual function, could provide more information on the relative effectiveness of these interventions.

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia

BACKGROUND

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has been the gold-standard treatment for alleviating urinary symptoms and improving urinary flow in men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). However, the morbidity of TURP approaches 20%, and less invasive techniques have been developed for treating BPH. Transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) is an alternative, minimally-invasive treatment that delivers microwave energy to produce coagulation necrosis in prostatic tissue. This is an update of a review last published in 2012.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of transurethral microwave thermotherapy for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

SEARCH METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search using multiple databases (the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and LILACS), trials registries, other sources of grey literature, and conference proceedings published up to 31 May 2021, with no restrictions by language or publication status.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included parallel-group randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster-RCTs of participants with BPH who underwent TUMT.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion at each stage and undertook data extraction and risk of bias and GRADE assessments of the certainty of the evidence (CoE). We considered review outcomes measured up to 12 months after randomization as short-term and beyond 12 months as long-term. Our main outcomes included: urologic symptoms scores, quality of life, major adverse events, retreatment, and ejaculatory and erectile function.

MAIN RESULTS

In this update, we identified no new RCTs, but we included data from studies excluded in the previous version of this review. We included 16 trials with 1919 participants, with a median age of 69 and moderate lower urinary tract symptoms. The certainty of the evidence for most comparisons was moderate-to-low, due to an overall high risk of bias across studies and imprecision (few participants and events). TUMT versus TURP Based on data from four studies with 306 participants, when compared to TURP, TUMT probably results in little to no difference in urologic symptom scores measured by the International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS) on a scale from 0 to 35, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms at short-term follow-up (mean difference (MD) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.03 to 2.03; moderate certainty). There is likely to be little to no difference in the quality of life (MD -0.10, 95% CI -0.67 to 0.47; 1 study, 136 participants, moderate certainty). TUMT likely results in fewer major adverse events (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.43; 6 studies, 525 participants, moderate certainty); based on 168 cases per 1000 men in the TURP group, this corresponds to 135 fewer (153 to 96 fewer) per 1000 men in the TUMT group. TUMT, however, probably results in a large increase in the need for retreatment (risk ratio (RR) 7.07, 95% CI 1.94 to 25.82; 5 studies, 337 participants, moderate certainty) (usually by repeated TUMT or TURP); based on zero cases per 1000 men in the TURP group, this corresponds to 90 more (40 to 150 more) per 1000 men in the TUMT group. There may be little to no difference in erectile function between these interventions (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.63; 5 studies, 337 participants; low certainty). However, TUMT may result in fewer cases of ejaculatory dysfunction compared to TURP (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.53; 4 studies, 241 participants; low certainty). TUMT versus sham Based on data from four studies with 483 participants we found that, when compared to sham, TUMT probably reduces urologic symptom scores using the IPSS at short-term follow-up (MD -5.40, 95% CI -6.97 to -3.84; moderate certainty). TUMT may cause little to no difference in the quality of life (MD -0.95, 95% CI -1.14 to -0.77; 2 studies, 347 participants; low certainty) as measured by the IPSS quality-of-life question on a scale from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating a worse quality of life. We are very uncertain about the effects on major adverse events, since most studies reported no events or isolated lesions of the urinary tract. TUMT may also reduce the need for retreatment compared to sham (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.88; 2 studies, 82 participants, low certainty); based on 194 retreatments per 1000 men in the sham group, this corresponds to 141 fewer (178 to 23 fewer) per 1000 men in the TUMT group. We are very uncertain of the effects on erectile and ejaculatory function (very low certainty), since we found isolated reports of impotence and ejaculatory disorders (anejaculation and hematospermia). There were no data available for the comparisons of TUMT versus convective radiofrequency water vapor therapy, prostatic urethral lift, prostatic arterial embolization or temporary implantable nitinol device.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

TUMT provides a similar reduction in urinary symptoms compared to the standard treatment (TURP), with fewer major adverse events and fewer cases of ejaculatory dysfunction at short-term follow-up. However, TUMT probably results in a large increase in retreatment rates. Study limitations and imprecision reduced the confidence we can place in these results. Furthermore, most studies were performed over 20 years ago. Given the emergence of newer minimally-invasive treatments, high-quality head-to-head trials with longer follow-up are needed to clarify their relative effectiveness. Patients' values and preferences, their comorbidities and the effects of other available minimally-invasive procedures, among other factors, can guide clinicians when choosing the optimal treatment for this condition.

Placebo Medication and Sham Surgery Responses in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Treatments: Implications for Clinical Trials

Placebo medications and sham surgeries have long been thought to be inert treatments. These groups served as a threshold to which an active treatment should be compared in a randomized trial to determine the true efficacy of the active treatment. However, surprising changes in subjective symptom scores and objective measures of voiding have been demonstrated in numerous placebo medication or sham surgery arms of trials. The exact mechanisms by which these inactive treatments augment patient outcomes are not clearly defined and multiple theories have been proposed to explain the often pronounced response. It appears that urologic outcomes are particularly prone to these effects and the astute physician should keep these responses in mind when interpreting any trial on a new therapy.

Minimally invasive devices for treating lower urinary tract symptoms in benign prostate hyperplasia: technology update

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) represents a spectrum of related lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). The cost of currently recommended medications and the discontinuation rate due to side effects are significant drawbacks limiting their long-term use in clinical practice. Interventional procedures, considered as the definitive treatment for BPH, carry a significant risk of treatment-related complications in frail patients. These issues have contributed to the emergence of new approaches as alternative options to standard therapies. This paper reviews the recent literature regarding the experimental treatments under investigation and presents the currently available experimental devices and techniques used under local anesthesia for the treatment of LUTS/BPH in the vast majority of cases. Devices for delivery of thermal treatment (microwaves, radiofrequency, high-intensity focused ultrasound, and the Rezum system), mechanical devices (prostatic stent and urethral lift), fractionation of prostatic tissue (histotripsy and aquablation), prostate artery embolization, and intraprostatic drugs are discussed. Evidence for the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of these "minimally invasive procedures" is analyzed.

The impact of minimally invasive surgeries for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia on male sexual function: a systematic review

A systematic review of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies was conducted to evaluate data for the effects of minimally invasive procedures for treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) on male sexual function. The studies searched were trials that enrolled men with symptomatic BPH who were treated with laser surgeries, transurethral microwave therapy (TUMT), transurethral needle ablation of the prostate (TUNA), transurethral ethanol ablation of the prostate (TEAP) and high-intensity frequency ultrasound (HIFU), in comparison with traditional transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or sham operations. A total of 72 studies were identified, of which 33 met the inclusion criteria. Of the 33 studies, 21 were concerned with laser surgeries, six with TUMT, four with TUNA and two with TEAP containing information regarding male sexual function. No study is available regarding the effect of HIFU for BPH on male sexual function. Our analysis shows that minimally invasive surgeries for BPH have comparable effects to those of TURP on male erectile function. Collectively, less than 15.4% or 15.2% of patients will have either decrease or increase, respectively, of erectile function after laser procedures, TUMT and TUNA. As observed with TURP, a high incidence of ejaculatory dysfunction (EjD) is common after treatment of BPH with holmium, potassium-titanyl-phosphate and thulium laser therapies (> 33.6%). TUMT, TUNA and neodymium:yttrium aluminum garnet visual laser ablation or interstitial laser coagulation for BPH has less incidence of EjD, but these procedures are considered less effective for BPH treatment when compared with TURP.

Prostatic artery embolization as a primary treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia: preliminary results in two patients

Symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) typically occurs in the sixth and seventh decades, and the most frequent obstructive urinary symptoms are hesitancy, decreased urinary stream, sensation of incomplete emptying, nocturia, frequency, and urgency. Various medications, specifically 5-α-reductase inhibitors and selective α-blockers, can decrease the severity of the symptoms secondary to BPH, but prostatectomy is still considered to be the traditional method of management. We report the preliminary results for two patients with acute urinary retention due to BPH, successfully treated by prostate artery embolization (PAE). The patients were investigated using the International Prostate Symptom Score, by digital rectal examination, urodynamic testing, prostate biopsy, transrectal ultrasound (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Uroflowmetry and postvoid residual urine volume complemented the investigation at 30, 90, and 180 days after PAE. The procedure was performed under local anesthesia; embolization of the prostate arteries was performed with a microcatheter and 300- to 500-μm microspheres using complete stasis as the end point. One patient was subjected to bilateral PAE and the other to unilateral PAE; they urinated spontaneously after removal of the urethral catheter, 15 and 10 days after the procedure, respectively. At 6-month follow-up, US and MRI revealed a prostate reduction of 39.7% and 47.8%, respectively, for the bilateral PAE and 25.5 and 27.8%, respectively, for the patient submitted to unilateral PAE. The early results, at 6-month follow-up, for the two patients with BPH show a promising potential alternative for treatment with PAE.

Microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia

BACKGROUND

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has been the gold-standard treatment for alleviating urinary symptoms and improving urinary flow in men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). However, the morbidity of TURP approaches 20%, and less invasive techniques have been developed for treating BPH. Preliminary data suggest that microwave thermotherapy, which delivers microwave energy to produce coagulation necrosis in prostatic tissue, is a safe, effective treatment for BPH.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the therapeutic efficacy and safety of microwave thermotherapy techniques for treating men with symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Randomized controlled trials were identified from the Cochrane Collaboration Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, bibliographies of retrieved articles and reviews, and by contacting expert relevant trialists and microwave manufacturers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomized controlled trials evaluating transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) for men with symptomatic BPH were eligible for this review. Comparison groups could include transurethral resection of the prostate, minimally invasive prostatectomy techniques, sham thermotherapy procedures, and medications. Outcome measures included urinary symptoms, urinary function, prostate volume, mortality, morbidity, and retreatment. Two reviewers independently identified potentially relevant abstracts and then assessed the full papers for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently abstracted study design, baseline characteristics and outcomes data and assessed methodological quality using a standard form. We attempted to obtain missing data from authors and/or sponsors.

MAIN RESULTS

Fourteen studies involving 1493 patients met inclusion criteria, including six comparisons of microwave thermotherapy with TURP, seven comparisons with sham thermotherapy procedures, and one comparison with an alpha blocker. Study durations ranged from 3 to 60 months. The mean age of subjects was 66.8 years, and the baseline symptom scores and urinary flow rates, which did not differ across treatment groups, demonstrated moderately severe lower urinary tract symptoms. The pooled mean urinary symptom scores decreased by 65% with TUMT and by 77% with TURP. The weighted mean difference (WMD) (95% confidence interval) for the symptom score was -1.36 (-2.25 to -0.46), favoring TURP. The pooled mean peak urinary flow increased by 70% with TUMT and by 119% with TURP. The WMD for peak urinary flow was 5.08 (3.88 to 6.28) mL/s, favoring TURP. Compared to TURP, TUMT was associated with decreased risks for retrograde ejaculation, treatment for strictures, hematuria, blood transfusions, and the transurethral resection syndrome, but increased risks for dysuria, urinary retention, and retreatment for BPH symptoms. Microwave thermotherapy improved symptom scores (IPSS WMD -4.75, 95% CI -3.89 to -5.60) and peak urinary flow (WMD 1.67 mL/s, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.34) compared with sham procedures. Microwave thermotherapy also improved symptom scores (IPSS WMD -4.20, 95% CI -3.15 to -5.25) and peak urinary flow (WMD 2.30 mL/s, 95% CI 1.47 to 3.13) in the one comparison with alpha blockers. No studies evaluated the effects of symptom duration, patient characteristics, prostate-specific antigen levels, or prostate volume on treatment response.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Microwave thermotherapy techniques are effective alternatives to TURP and alpha-blockers for treating symptomatic BPH for men with no history of urinary retention or previous prostate procedures and prostate volumes between 30 to 100 mL. However, TURP provided greater symptom score and urinary flow improvements and reduced the need for subsequent BPH treatments compared to TUMT. Small sample sizes and differences in study design limit comparison between devices with different designs and energy levels. The effects of symptom duration, patient characteristics, or prostate volume on treatment response are unknown.

A Temporary Intraurethral Prostatic Stent Relieves Prostatic Obstruction Following Transurethral Microwave Thermotherapy

PURPOSE

The Spanner, a novel prostatic stent, was evaluated for safety, efficacy and patient tolerance when used to relieve prostatic obstruction following transurethral microwave thermotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Following transurethral microwave thermotherapy and routine post-procedure Foley catheterization at 1 of 9 clinical sites 186 patients meeting study criteria were randomized to receive a Spanner (100) or the standard of care (86). Baseline evaluations included post-void residual urine, uroflowmetry, International Prostate Symptom Score and International Prostate Symptom Score quality of life question. These evaluations were repeated at visits 1, 2, 4, 5 and 8 weeks after randomization (Spanner insertion) with the addition of the Spanner satisfaction questionnaire, ease of use assessment and adverse events recording. The Spanner was removed after 4 weeks, at which time the Spanner and standard of care groups underwent cystourethroscopy.

RESULTS

At the 1 and 2-week visits the Spanner group showed significantly greater improvements from baseline in post-void residual urine, uroflowmetry and International Prostate Symptom Score compared to the standard of care group. The Spanner group experienced significantly greater improvements in quality of life at the 5 and 8-week visits. Patient satisfaction with the Spanner exceeded 86%. Cystourethroscopy findings in the Spanner and standard of care groups were comparable and adverse events associated with previous stents were rare.

CONCLUSIONS

The Spanner is a safe, effective and well tolerated temporary stent for severe prostatic obstruction resulting from therapy induced edema after transurethral microwave thermotherapy. It may be a needed addition to the armamentarium for managing bladder outlet obstruction in a broad group of urological patients.

Fast liquid ablation system for prostatic hyperplasia: a new minimally invasive thermal treatment

PURPOSE

We determined patient tolerance and the sequence of histopathological changes of thermal injury and healing of the prostate after treatment with a novel, rapid, high temperature, liquid filled, flexible balloon thermotherapy system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 17 patients scheduled for prostatic surgery received preoperative high temperature water balloon thermotherapy. In 13 patients intraprostatic, urethral and rectal temperatures were continuously monitored and determined using stereotactic thermal mapping with the patient under spinal anesthesia. The remaining 4 patients had lidocaine gel as the only method of pain control. Patient discomfort was recorded at all times during the procedure. After treatment a prostatic stent was left in place until surgery or spontaneous voiding. Serial sections of the resected prostates were evaluated pathologically with mapping.

RESULTS

Treatment was well tolerated by all patients. Prostates were enucleated (in 12 patients) or entirely removed (in 5) at a mean of 35 days (range 15 to 173) after thermotherapy. The predominant pathological findings in the early phase were uniform periurethral hemorrhagic necrosis, extensive urothelial denudation and varying degrees of inflammation. The mean radial depth of necrosis (from the urethra to the viable tissue border) was 0.9 cm (range 0.6 to 1.5) involving a mean of 16% of the prostatic adenoma (range 7.8% to 32%). In the late (resolution) phase necrotic tissue had been replaced by scar tissue (fibrosis and hyalinization) with a mean radial depth of 0.13 cm (range 0.01 to 0.24), and the urothelium had largely regrown along the urethra.

CONCLUSIONS

The fast liquid ablation system for hyperplasia is a new minimally invasive treatment that induces considerable thermal injury to the prostate with uniform necrosis and subsequent sloughing of dead tissue, allowing enlargement of the urethral lumen.

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) remains the gold standard for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). In general, while this procedure is safe, patients require a spinal, epidural, or general anesthesia and often several days of hospital stay; the potential morbidity and mortality limits the use of TURP in high-risk patients. Pharmacotherapy has been recommended as a first-line therapy for all patients with mild to moderate symptoms. Patients are often times enthusiastic if they are offered a one-time method to treat lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to BPH, provided that the method offers reduced risk and allows an efficacy equal to that of medical therapy. One such method is transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT). TUMT involves the insertion of a specially designed urinary catheter with a microwave antenna, which heats the prostate and destroys hyperplastic prostate tissue. TUMT allows the avoidance of general or regional anesthesia, and results in minimal blood loss and fluid absorption. In this review, the authors discussed the current indications and outcome of TUMT, including the history of the procedure, the mechanism of action, the indications for TUMT, the pre-operative considerations, the patient selection, the results in terms of efficacy, by comparing TUMT vs. Sham, TUMT vs. Alpha-blocker and TUMT vs. TURP. Finally, the complications are presented, as well as other uses and future directions of the procedure. The authors concluded that TUMT is a safe and effective minimally invasive alternative to treatment of symptomatic BPH.

Minimally invasive therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia

Currently, 3 categories of treatment are available for men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): (1) medicine, such as alpha-blockers and finasteride; (2) minimally invasive treatment, such as transurethral microwave thermotherapy and interstitial ablation using either radiofrequency or laser; and (3) surgical therapy. The 1990s have seen an explosion of transurethral technology to treat symptoms caused by bladder outlet obstruction secondary to BPH. Unlike surgical debulking procedures, the minimally invasive therapies attempt to treat patients without general or regional anesthesia, and even ambulatory procedures are performed in the office. Because of the demographics of patients with BPH, it is hoped that these minimally invasive options will relieve symptoms without any surgical complications and the side effects and compliance issues associated with medical therapy. It is important that urologists have a clear understanding of the clinical usefulness of these devices, so that the overall role of such treatment may be determined by science rather than marketing. Clinically, the degree of symptom score, peak flow, and quality-of-life improvement seen with all the minimally invasive techniques are similar. The techniques may differ in their ability to reach the maximum number of responders and achieve an acceptable duration of response, and the need for analgesia/sedation associated with each technique. This study will define the minimally invasive therapies and present the differences in catheter design and technique. The pathologic basis for these therapeutic options and the advantages and disadvantages of each will be discussed. Urologists must decide which therapy can be used in their office practice. The maximum numbers of responders and enhanced durability of the treatment can be achieved based on realistic expectations, proper selection of patients, and complete information on the potential of these devices.

Microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia with the Dornier Urowave: response durability and variables potentially predicting response

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical efficacy and durability of transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The clinical variables useful in predicting outcome were identified.

METHODS

From October 1996 to March 2000, 58 patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia were treated with TUMT using the Urowave device. Treatment outcome was evaluated by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality-of-life assessment score, and urodynamic investigation. The patients were divided into those having a good and poor response on the basis of the degree of IPSS decrease at 3 months.

RESULTS

The mean IPSS significantly decreased from 19.2 at baseline to 13.3 at 3 months (P <0.0001). The mean quality-of-life score changed from 4.6 at baseline to 2.9 at 3 months (P <0.0001). No statistically significant differences in peak flow rate, postvoid residual volume, Schäfer's obstruction scale, or detrusor pressure at peak flow were noted before or after TUMT. The pretreatment IPSS of the good response group was significantly higher than that of the poor response group (P=0.017). A more significant difference was obtained for the obstructive score (P = 0.002), and no difference was observed in the irritative score (P = 0.631). The Schäfer grading scale score of the good response group was significantly smaller than that of the poor response group (P = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

TUMT with the Urowave was effective in eliminating symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia, but did not markedly improve the objective voiding parameters. Patients with urodynamically less obstructive symptoms but subjectively more obstructive symptoms are therefore probably good candidates for TUMT.

Targeted transurethral microwave thermotherapy versus alpha-blockade in benign prostatic hyperplasia: outcomes at 18 months

OBJECTIVES

To compare directly the efficacy, safety, and durability of targeted transurethral microwave thermotherapy with that of alpha-blocker treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

METHODS

In a randomized, controlled clinical trial, 52 patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia received terazosin treatment and 51 underwent microwave treatment under topical anesthesia. The patient evaluation included the International Prostate Symptom Score, peak flow rate, and quality-of-life score before microwave treatment or initiation of terazosin treatment and at periodic intervals thereafter up to 18 months.

RESULTS

The mean International Prostate Symptom Score, peak flow rate, and quality-of-life score all improved significantly in both groups by 6 months. However, the magnitude of improvement was significantly greater in the microwave group than in the terazosin group. The significant between-group differences observed at 6 months in the mean International Prostate Symptom Score, peak flow rate, and quality-of-life score were fully maintained at 18 months, at which time the improvements in these three outcome measures were significantly greater (P <0.0005), by 35%, 22%, and 43%, respectively, in the microwave group than in the terazosin group. The actuarial rate of treatment failure at 18 months was significantly greater by sevenfold in the terazosin group. Adverse events were generally infrequent and readily manageable in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the initial onset of terazosin action was more rapid, the longer term clinical outcomes of targeted microwave treatment were markedly superior. The more favorable results in patients who underwent microwave treatment were maintained for at least 18 months.

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy: an alternative to medical management in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia?

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) is being increasingly considered as an alternative to medical management with alpha-blockers or finasteride in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). Enduring clinical benefits have been demonstrated after a single 1-hour microwave treatment session under topical anesthesia, and the associated morbidity is low. Optimal results are obtained with the delivery of high thermal doses and accurate targeting of microwave energy. Extensive evidence from randomized clinical trials supports the safety and efficacy of both microwave treatment and medical management, but randomized trial data have only recently become available directly comparing these two approaches to BPH treatment. These data indicate that greater long-term improvements in symptoms, peak urinary flow rates, and quality of life are attained with microwave treatment than with alpha-blockade. Furthermore, the actuarial rate of treatment failure is markedly lower in patients undergoing microwave v alpha-blocker treatment. However, the onset of action of alpha-blocker treatment is more rapid. The principal limitations of alpha-blockade are side effects and lack of efficacy leading to treatment failure in some patients. The maximal effects of finasteride are modest and require a period of months to be manifested, although the side effect profile and tolerability of this agent are favorable. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant alpha-blocker therapy can accelerate symptom and flow rate improvement after TUMT. In contrast to medical management, microwave treatment is highly versatile, allowing patients over a broad range of baseline symptom severities and prostate sizes to be treated with a high probability of success.

Transurethral hot-water balloon thermoablation for benign prostatic hyperplasia: patient tolerance and pathologic findings

OBJECTIVES

To determine the patient tolerance and thermal ablation pattern in human prostatic tissue after treatment with a hot water, catheter-based system.

METHODS

Twenty-seven men scheduled for surgery for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia or adenocarcinoma of the prostate underwent water-induced thermotherapy. The patients were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups. Lidocaine gel was the sole means of pain control. The patients and an observer recorded patient discomfort during therapy. A Foley catheter was left in place until surgery (n = 13) or successful voiding (n = 14). Prostates were subsequently enucleated or removed, whole mounted, and examined.

RESULTS

Patients reported mild treatment discomfort, the level of which did not correlate with the extent of necrosis, balloon diameter, or water temperature (all P >0. 05). Distal penile burning was the most commonly reported discomfort. All 14 patients successfully voided within 12 days of treatment. Prostates were enucleated (n = 24) or removed (n = 3) at a mean of 27 days (range 4 to 120) after thermotherapy, except for a single adenectomy 17 months after therapy. Pathologic findings included periurethral hemorrhagic necrosis, with focal or extensive urothelial denudation and mild inflammation. The mean maximal depth of necrosis from the urethral lumen was 7, 9, 10.33, and 11 mm in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The extent of necrosis was similar in all groups (P = 0.11), regardless of the water temperature; conversely, the balloon diameter correlated with the depth of necrosis (P = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

This system of tissue ablation appears to be well tolerated, and it produced consistent pathologic results.

Temporary intraurethral prostatic bridge-catheter compared with neoadjuvant and adjuvant alpha-blockade to improve early results of high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy

OBJECTIVES

The maximal effect of transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) occurs 3 to 6 months after treatment. In the acute period after TUMT, little change in symptoms, quality of life (QOL), and peak urinary flow rate (Qmax) is observed versus baseline. Some men may also develop acute urinary retention secondary to thermally induced edema. Recent reports suggest that early results of TUMT may be improved with concomitant use of either a temporary intraurethral prostatic bridge-catheter (PBC) or neoadjuvant and adjuvant alpha-blocker therapy. This report compares the results of these two adjunctive modalities directly.

METHODS

This nonrandomized retrospective comparison of results in 186 patients with LUTS of BPH is based on findings of three recently reported prospective clinical trials. All patients underwent targeted high-energy TUMT. Ninety-one patients received no further treatment (TUMT alone group), 54 an indwelling PBC for up to 1 month (TUMT + PBC group), and 41 neoadjuvant and adjuvant tamsulosin (0.4 mg daily) treatment (TUMT + tamsulosin group). The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), QOL score, and Qmax were determined at baseline and 2 weeks after TUMT.

RESULTS

All three study groups experienced statistically significant improvements in mean IPSS and QOL score at 2 weeks versus baseline (P <0.0005). Nevertheless, the magnitude of improvement was greater in the TUMT + PBC group than the other two groups and greater in the TUMT + tamsulosin group than the TUMT alone group. A high proportion of the TUMT + PBC group (87.8%) attained a 50% or more IPSS improvement, compared with 4.5% of the TUMT alone group and none of the TUMT + tamsulosin group, and a similar pattern of between-group differences was noted with respect to the proportion of patients having 50% or more improvement in QOL score. The TUMT + PBC group was the only group to achieve significant Qmax improvement at 2 weeks compared with baseline. In the TUMT alone group, urinary retention 1 week or longer in duration occurred in 10 (11%) of 91 patients compared with 1 (2.4%) of 41 in the TUMT + tamsulosin group and none in the TUMT + PBC group. Early PBC removal was required in 11% of the TUMT + PBC group as a consequence of urinary retention secondary to clot formation or PBC migration.

CONCLUSIONS

Both PBC placement and neoadjuvant and adjuvant alpha-blocker treatment are effective in alleviating symptoms and improving QOL during the acute period after TUMT. PBC usage also resulted in substantial early Qmax improvement. Either of these adjunctive modalities may be appropriate to consider in the treatment of TUMT patients during the early postprocedure recovery period.

Neoadjuvant and adjuvant alpha-blockade improves early results of high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy for lower urinary tract symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized, prospective clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

Improved long-term results with respect to symptoms, voiding function, and quality of life (QOL) in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are achieved with targeted high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) compared with alpha-blocker treatment alone. However, maximal improvement after TUMT is not attained until 3 to 6 months after treatment. Measures to provide earlier symptom relief and improved voiding function and QOL would add to the clinical utility of TUMT. The objective of the present study was to determine whether neoadjuvant and adjuvant alpha-blockade is capable of accelerating a post-TUMT decrease in LUTS of patients with BPH.

METHODS

In this randomized, prospective study of 81 patients with LUTS of BPH, 41 underwent TUMT with neoadjuvant and adjuvant tamsulosin (0.4 mg daily) treatment, and 40 had TUMT alone. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), peak urinary flow rate (Qmax), and QOL score were determined before treatment and at periodic intervals thereafter up to 12 weeks after TUMT.

RESULTS

Mean IPSS values in the TUMT plus tamsulosin group at 2 weeks (14.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 13.1 to 14.9) and 6 weeks (8.6; 95% CI 7.7 to 9.5) were 15% and 24% lower, respectively, than those at 2 weeks (16.5, 95% CI 15.6 to 17.4) and 6 weeks (11.3, 95% CI 10.4 to 12.2) in the TUMT-alone group (P<0.0005). However, by the final evaluation at 12 weeks, no significant difference between the groups in mean IPSS was evident. A similar temporal pattern of difference between the two study groups was also observed in QOL score. No significant between-group difference in mean Qmax was evident after TUMT. Urinary retention 1 week or more in duration occurred in 5 (12%) of 40 TUMT-alone group patients compared with 1 (2%) of 41 TUMT plus tamsulosin group patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant and adjuvant alpha-blocker treatment results in significantly greater early symptom reduction and QOL score improvement after TUMT, adding to the clinical utility of this minimally invasive treatment modality. In addition, post-TUMT complications such as urinary retention may be reduced.

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy: what role should it play versus medical management in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia?

Both transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) and medical management by alpha-blockade or 5-alpha-reductase inhibition are increasingly being considered as alternatives to surgery for treatment of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). We review current evidence supporting the effectiveness and safety of TUMT and medical management. Factors for consideration in appropriately selecting patients for TUMT versus medical management are suggested. Available data indicate that TUMT confers greater long-term benefits than medical management as judged by symptom score and peak urinary flow rate improvements. TUMT-associated morbidity is comparatively low. Alpha-blockade affords more rapid relief than TUMT for patients with BPH; however, other strategies such as the use of temporary intraurethral endoprostheses during the acute post-TUMT recovery period may diminish or abolish the differences in time-course of symptom and flow rate improvement between TUMT and alpha-blockade. 5-Alpha-reductase inhibition with finasteride offers a favorable side-effect profile, although the magnitude of symptom and flow rate improvements is modest, and maximal effects of finasteride do not become manifest until after several months of treatment. As TUMT continues to evolve, increasing attention is being accorded the delivery of high thermal doses and precise targeting of the thermal energy delivered. The development of alpha-blockers with a more favorable side-effect profile continues to be a major focus of investigation. The potential clinical utility of combination therapy with TUMT and alpha-blockade is currently under investigation.

Transurethral needle ablation for benign prostatic hyperplasia: 12-month results of a prospective, multicenter U.S. study

OBJECTIVES

To report the safety and efficacy of the transurethral needle ablation (TUNA) procedure for the treatment of clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODS

One hundred thirty patients with BPH were enrolled in two identical protocols and treated by the TUNA procedure. Entry criteria included an American Urological Association symptom index (AUA SI) of 13 points or higher and a peak flow rate of 12 mL/s or less. Patients were followed up for 12 months. Efficacy parameters included the AUA SI, AUA problem index, BPH impact index (BPH II), quality of life (QOL) score, and peak flow rate. At each visit, side effects were elicited. Follow-up data are available for 93 patients at 12 months. All patients were given intraurethral lidocaine augmented by oral and/or parenteral sedation. No patient received spinal or general anesthesia.

RESULTS

All patients tolerated the procedure well, and there were no deaths. Forty-one percent of patients (n = 53) had a catheter placed immediately after the procedure. At 12 months, the AUA SI had decreased from 23.7 to 11.9 (P < 0.0001) and the BPH II from 7.5 to 2.5 (P < 0.0001), whereas the peak flow rate had increased from 8.7 to 14.6 mL/s (P < 0.0001). Irritative voiding symptoms were noted in 20 patients (16%) at some point during follow-up. Two patients reported erectile dysfunction, and 1 reported retrograde ejaculation.

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective study of 130 patients with clinical BPH and lower urinary tract symptoms, TUNA provided substantive and lasting improvement according to AUA SI, BPH II, and QOL scores as well as peak flow rate over 1 year. The TUNA procedure was well tolerated, with few major side effects and complications noted. Longer follow-up is needed to document the maintenance of clinical benefit beyond 12 months.

The so-called "placebo effect" in benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment trials represents partially a conditional regression to the mean induced by censoring

OBJECTIVES

To study the variability of assessment instruments (symptom questionnaires and flow rate recordings) in healthy volunteers during repeat administration in short intervals. To study the effect of inclusion criteria-based censoring of patients during screening for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treatment trials on the outcome of subsequent tests.

METHODS

One hundred forty-five male volunteers without known prostatic diseases with a mean age of 52 years (range 23 to 83) were given the American Urological Association (AUA) Symptom Index (SI), BPH Impact Index (II). Quality of Life (QOL) score, and a flow rate recording twice 10 to 20 days apart without any healthcare intervention. Data were collected and analyzed after typical BPH trial criteria were applied to the first test, and patients who did not "qualify" were censored.

RESULTS

Good correlation exists between two closely spaced administrations of the AUA SI, BPH II, QOL score, and flow rate recordings in healthy male volunteers with correlation coefficients between 0.73 and 0.89. Censoring patients and excluding them from the analysis of the second test based on typical BPH trial criteria induces a regression to the mean phenomenon, which results in an artificial improvement in these outcome parameters. The magnitude of the improvement increases as the selection and censoring criteria tighten. The mean differences between the first and second test range from 1.4 to 1.7 mL/s for the peak flow rate, from -1.0 to -1.4 for the AUA SI, and from -0.4 to -0.8 for the BPH II. All these differences induced solely by censoring with resulting regression to the mean are statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Censoring of patients based on inclusion and exclusion criteria is typical for BPH treatment trials. One of the under-recognized effects of censoring is a regression to the mean, which leads to an apparent improvement in the outcome parameters assessed. In both placebo or sham-controlled trials, as well as in clinical series without controls, one must keep this effect and its relative magnitude in mind, and interpret the data from such trials with appropriate caution.