Continued improvement in pressure-flow parameters in men receiving finasteride for 2 years. Finasteride Urodynamics Study Group

[S2e guideline of the German urologists: Conservative and pharmacologic treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia]

This report summarizes the relevant aspects of the S2e guideline of the German Urologists for the conservative and pharmacological treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Recommendations are given regarding watchful waiting, behavioral therapy, phytotherapy and pharmacological mono- and combination therapy. The influence of the different therapeutic options on bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) is described in detail.

Efficacy of Additional Dutasteride on Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Patients with Alpha-1 Blocker-Resistant Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the effects of dutasteride on urination and quality of life (QOL) in patients diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who showed poor improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) with alpha-1 blockers.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 108 patients with BPH who took dutasteride for more than 3 months from October 2009 to October 2011. The patients showed poor improvement in LUTS despite administration of alpha-1 blockers for more than 3 months; all had an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of eight or greater. We investigated changes in prostate-specific antigen and prostate volume and performed uroflowmetry and medical interviews to assess IPSS-QOL score and BPH impact index (BII).

RESULTS

Mean prostate volume was 52.8 ± 22.2 mL, and the mean period of dutasteride administration was 284 ± 118 days. Prostate volume decreased 24.1% from baseline to 6 months after administration. Voiding symptoms and storage symptoms showed improvements with longer administration periods, but only nocturia showed no clear improvement. There was a 0.9-point decrease in BII after 6 months. There was no statistically significant association between the rate of prostate volume reduction and improvement in voiding and storage symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Additional administration of dutasteride to patients with alpha-1 blocker-resistant BPH led to improvements in all voiding and storage symptoms except nocturia, and showed no correlation between the prostate volume reduction rates and improvement in LUTS.

Finasteride for benign prostatic hyperplasia

BACKGROUND

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), a non-malignant enlargement of the prostate in aging men, can cause bothersome urinary symptoms (intermittency, weak stream, straining, urgency, frequency, incomplete emptying). Finasteride, a five-alpha reductase inhibitor (5ARI), blocks the conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestosterone, reduces prostate size, and is commonly used to treat symptoms associated with BPH.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the clinical effectiveness and harms of finasteride versus placebo and active controls in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Library (which includes CDSR (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews), DARE (Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects), HTA (Heath Technology Assessments), and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and which includes EMBASE and MEDLINE), LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information) and Google Scholar for randomized, controlled trials (RCTs). We also handsearched systematic reviews, references, and clinical-practice guidelines.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized trials in the English language with placebo and/or active arms with a duration of at least 6 months.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

JT extracted the data, which included patient characteristics, outcomes, and harms. Our primary outcome was change in a validated, urinary symptom-scale score, such as the AUA/IPSS. A clinically meaningful change was defined as 4 points. We also categorized outcomes by trial lengths of ≤ 1 year (short term) and > 1 year (long term).

MAIN RESULTS

Finasteride consistently improved urinary symptom scores more than placebo in trials of > 1 year duration, and significantly lowered the risk of BPH progression (acute urinary retention, risk of surgical intervention, ≥ 4 point increase in the AUASI/IPSS). In comparison to alpha-blocker monotherapy, finasteride was less effective than either doxazosin or terazosin, but equally effective compared to tamsulosin. Both doxazosin and terazosin were significantly more likely than finasteride to improve peak urine flow and nocturia, versus finasteride. Versus tamsulosin, peak urine flow and QoL improved equally well versus finasteride. However, finasteride was associated with a lower risk of surgical intervention compared to doxazosin, but not to terazosin, while finasteride and doxazosin were no different for risk of acute urinary retention. Two small trials reported no difference in urinary symptom scores between finasteride and tamsulosin. Finasteride + doxazosin and doxazosin monotherapy improved urinary symptoms equally well (≥ 4 point improvement).For finasteride, there was an increased risk of ejaculation disorder, impotence, and lowered libido, versus placebo. Versus doxazosin, finasteride had a lower risk of asthenia, dizziness, and postural hypotension, and versus terazosin, finasteride had a significant, lower risk of asthenia, dizziness, and postural hypotension.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Finasteride improves long-term urinary symptoms versus placebo, but is less effective than doxazosin. Long-term combination therapy with alpha blockers (doxazosin, terazosin) improves symptoms significantly better than finasteride monotherapy. Finasteride + doxazosin improves symptoms equally - and clinically - to doxazosin alone. In comparison to doxazosin, finasteride + doxazosin appears to improve urinary symptoms only in men with medium (25 to < 40 mL) or large prostates (≥ 40 mL), but not in men with small prostates (25 mL).Comparing short to long-term therapy, finasteride does not improve symptoms significantly better than placebo at the short term, but in the long term it does, although the magnitude of differences was very small (from < 1.0 point to 2.2 points). Doxazosin improves symptoms better than finasteride both short and long term, with the magnitude of differences ∼2.0 points and 1.0 point, respectively. Finasteride + doxazosin improves scores versus finasteride alone at both short and long term, with mean differences ∼2.0 points for both time points. Finasteride + doxazosin versus doxazosin improves scores equally for short and long term.Drug-related adverse effects for finasteride are rare; nevertheless, men taking finasteride are at increased risk for impotence, erectile dysfunction, decreased libido, and ejaculation disorder, versus placebo. Versus doxazosin, which has higher rates of dizziness, postural hypotension, and asthenia, men taking finasteride are at increased risk for impotence, erectile dysfunction, decreased libido, and ejaculation disorder. Finasteride significantly reduces asthenia, postural hypotension, and dizziness versus terazosin. Finasteride significantly lowers the risk of asthenia, dizziness, ejaculation disorder, and postural hypotension, versus finasteride + terazosin.

Therapeutic options in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

Current theraputic options for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are reviewed. Therapeutic options for mild lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), as defined by the American Urological Association, are generally treated medically. Moderate to severe LUTS can be treated medically or with surgical therapy. Current medical and surgical treatments for LUTS secondary to BPH are reviewed and evolving treatments are explored.

[Treatment of LUTS in BPS. When and when not to administer pills?]

Benign prostatic syndrome (BPS) is considered a diagnosis of exclusion and needs a thorough work-up. One of the pitfalls for a tailored medical treatment scheme is the objective evaluation of benign prostatic obstruction. Characteristics of the various medical therapy options and the multifactorial origin of LUTS in BPH patients imply an individualized approach. LUTS involving mostly urine storage disorders and a small prostate are suitably managed with alpha(1)-receptor antagonists, which may be combined with antimuscarinics if OAB symptoms predominate. Long-term treatment addressing clinical progression may favor combination therapy of alpha(1)-receptor antagonists with 5alpha-reductase inhibitors if prostate size is sufficient. Age, symptom severity at baseline, a large prostate volume, or a high PSA value are indicative of progression. However, combination therapy aggravates side effects, and thus a risk-benefit analysis is essential. The potential of any medication for BPS to treat obstruction is rather low. If deobstruction is the main aim of therapy, medical treatment is not suitable.

Anti-nociceptive and anti-inflammatory properties of 5alpha-reductase inhibitor finasteride in experimental animals

Finasteride is a potent drug which has been prescribed for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) for more than 20 years. Recent studies indicate that finasteride, as 5alpha-reductase inhibitor, can influence some central effects such as analgesia, neurosteroidogeneses and behavior. The purpose of this study was to investigate the analgesic effect of finasteride, to determine whether finasteride interact with morphine analgesia in tail-flick test and to examine the anti-inflammatory effect of this drug. Adult male Wistar rats (280-330 g) were used for the both of experiments. Tests were assessed on groups of 6 animals. The first control group (O) received water (1 ml/kg, p.o.), the second control group (OO) received the vehicle (olive oil, 1 ml/kg, p.o.) and the third group (F) received finasteride (0.5 mg/kg, p.o.) suspended in olive oil, every morning for 30 days. After 30 days of treatment, tail-flick test and formalin-induced foot paw edema test were performed. Finasteride increased the average latency in seconds in comparison to both controls (10.06 vs. 9.16 and 8.66 s). It was 9.83% higher depression of pain in group F in comparison to O and 16.17% in comparison to OO, but the anti-nociceptive effect of finasteride at applied dose didn't significantly differ compared to both controls (p > 0.05). Chronic pre-treatment with finasteride didn't interact with analgesic effect of morphine compared to O (p > 0.05), but compared to OO finasteride fastened, increased and prolonged the analgesic effect of morphine at all measuring intervals, achiving statistical significance in 60 min (p < 0.01). Finasteride also exhibited significant anti-inflammatory action (p < 0.05) in comparison to OO, but It was not significantly different from the control O. Finasteride didn't exert analgesic action, it increased morphine antinociception and showed chronic anti-inflammatory effect to some extent. This might be a useful contribution to highlight the pathogenesis of BPH. There is the need for further studies in order to confirm these results with more details.

Combination therapy for the pharmacological management of benign prostatic hyperplasia: rationale and treatment options

The management of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) continues to evolve, with new techniques and forms of medical management being introduced and traditional surgical techniques being used less frequently. Medical management of BPH has evolved from nonspecific alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists to uroselective alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists and 5-alpha reductase inhibitors. Traditionally, alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists have been used for relief of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) as a result of BPH and are known for their quick onset of action. 5-alpha Reductase inhibitors have proven useful for the prevention of BPH progression as measured by prostate volume, disease progression, incidence of acute urinary retention and the need for subsequent BPH-related surgery. Recent studies have shown that the combination of an alpha-adrenoceptor antagonist and a 5-alpha reductase inhibitor has significantly better efficacy than either drug alone or placebo. Currently, alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists are used in the acute setting or for short-term relief of LUTS. The combination of an alpha-adrenoceptor antagonist and a 5-alpha reductase inhibitor is used for the longer term management of BPH symptoms and to prevent progression of BPH and perhaps avoid surgical intervention.

Fact or fiction: what do the benign prostatic hyperplasia data tell us?

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common benign neoplasm in men. Our understanding of this condition has improved greatly over the years and recent advances have changed our approach to management. At the end of the 19th century, prostatic enlargement was treated effectively by bilateral orchidectomy. Unsurprisingly, this treatment option never gained widespread popularity. Less than 10 years ago, surgery and watchful waiting were the only considered treatment options for BPH. We now have a number of medical therapies and minimally invasive treatment options available that can effectively manage lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction. However, with increased choice comes the increased need for clarity in selection and application of these various treatment options. In the current environment of evidence-based clinical practice, awareness and interpretation of data from the numerous studies is paramount. The lessons learned from these trials should be reflected clearly in our practice, with clinical management based on fact, not fiction. In this review, we critically assess the available data and understanding of the management of BPH.

The role of 5-α-reductase inhibition as monotherapy in view of the MTOPS data

Medical treatment for the symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) consists of a blockers and 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors. Data suggest that 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors can prevent progression of BPH and reduce the risk of BPH-related surgery, especially in men with large-volume prostates. Results from the largest randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled trial, the Medical Therapy of Prostatic Symptoms trial, have been presented. These results support the notion of using 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors for the prevention of BPH progression and BPH-related surgery. Furthermore, long-term 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor monotherapy, although slow in onset, is a viable therapy for symptom relief in men with mild to moderate symptoms.

[Finasteride: 10 years of clinical use. Systematic review of the literature]

INTRODUCTION

After ten years of clinical use of Finasteride in patients with BPH, we carried out a systematic review of the literature including the assessment of their quality and grading the level of evidence for clinical recommendations.

METHODS

Using Medline, Embase, Healthstar and Cochrane Library from 1990 until 2002, we select all the studies referring patients between 50 to 85 with symptoms of BPH, metrics of flow, prostatic volume, postmictional residue, detrusor pressure, adverse effects, cost-effectiveness and quality of life.

RESULTS

We found out 135 references, of which 36 accomplish the inclusion criteria. Of those, 3 have got level I of evidence, 12 level II, 6 level III and 10 level IV. Three are economic studies and two evaluate the quality of life.

DISCUSSION

With a high level of evidence and after ten years of clinical use, Finasteride shows its effectiveness in reducing the symptoms of patients with prostate bigger than 40 ml and/or PSA of more than 1.4 ngr/ml, with scarce adverse effects with a clear improvement of quality of life. Therefore, it is recommended (grade A) for clinical use.

CONCLUSIONS

Finasteride, through prostate volume reduction, modify natural evolution of BPH, decreasing the risk of acute urine retention and surgery.

Hormonal treatment of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: pros and cons

The recognition that dihydrotestosterone is a "major player" in the development of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) provided an impetus for the development of a 5a-reductase inhibitor, finasteride. During the past 5 years, a number of publications have noted that alpha blockers appear more efficacious than finasteride. This article reviews the role of hormones (particularly finasteride) in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms caused by BPH. These observations indicate that finasteride has a role in the management of larger prostates. Long-term use reduces the development of urinary retention and need for invasive procedures such as transurethral prostatectomy. The major adverse impact of finasteride is its effect on the patient's libido and sexual function. This is a less morbid problem for the elderly than the potential syncope associated with the use of alpha blockers. A greater understanding of the interaction of hormones on prostate receptors will provide newer tools for the treatment of BPH.

Effects of finasteride and bicalutamide on prostatic blood flow in the rat

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether finasteride and bicalutamide, both currently used in the clinical management of patients with prostate diseases because they have anti-androgenic properties, have any effects on prostatic blood flow in a rat prostate model, as androgens are known to be involved in the regulation of prostatic blood flow and angiogenesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Both finasteride and bicalutamide were supplied as oral suspensions in water and given daily to rats for 7 days by tube feeding. Blood flows to the ventral and dorsal prostates, and to the kidneys, were measured using the radioactive microsphere technique. In the bicalutamide experiments, some rats were treated with the Leydig cell toxin ethane dimethane sulphonate (EDS), to obtain a castration-like effect, and one group of these rats received testosterone.

RESULTS

Finasteride induced a clear decrease in blood flow to the ventral and dorsal prostates after 7 days of treatment, with no significant changes in blood pressure or kidney blood flow. Bicalutamide inhibited the testosterone-induced increment of prostatic blood flow observed in EDS-treated animals.

CONCLUSIONS

Finasteride, a blocker of 5alpha-reductase, decreases prostate blood flow after 7 days of administration. The response was slower than that after castration, but was of similar magnitude. Blood flow was also decreased after treatment with the androgen-receptor inhibitor bicalutamide. These observations suggest that prostatic blood flow is increased by dihydrotestosterone, and that the androgen receptor is responsible for mediating this effect.