Acucise endopyelotomy

Management of secondary pelviureteric junction obstruction

Pelviureteric junction obstruction (PUJO) of the kidney can lead to a number of different clinical manifestations, which often require surgical intervention. Although the success of pyeloplasty and endopyelotomy are good, there are still a number of patients who fail primary treatment and develop secondary PUJO. These treatment failures can be a challenging cohort to manage. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview on the surgical options available to the urologist for managing secondary PUJO as well as providing some guidance on assessing factors that will influence management decisions.

The use of the acucise technique for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A trade-off between efficacy and invasiveness?

Open pyeloplasty is traditionally the recommended treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. In the past decades, several less invasive procedures emerged with the advantages of lower morbidity and better patient tolerance. In 1993, an electrosurgical cutting balloon device called the Acucise (Applied Medical Resources Corp., Laguna Hills, CA) was introduced. It was presented as a straightforward, safe procedure that can be performed in a complete retrograde fashion under fluoroscopic guidance. Despite these advantages; however, it is not yet a generally excepted procedure. This is mainly due to the fact that specific patient selection is needed, and success rates are comparable with other already established endoscopic procedures. Considering the large variety of minimally invasive procedures available, treatment of choice must be based on several factors such as success rate, morbidity, cost, and surgeon's experience. Acucise is considered a good alternative for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in selected patients. However, the efficacy is significantly lower than the reference standard.

Retrograde endopyelotomy: a comparison between laser and Acucise balloon cutting catheter

Endopyelotomy and laparoscopic pyeloplasty are the preferred modalities for treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction because of their minimally invasive nature. There are continuous efforts for improving endopyelotomy techniques and outcome. Retrograde access represents the natural evolution of endopyelotomy. The Acucise cutting balloon catheter (Applied Medical Resources Corp., Laguna Hills, CA) and ureteroscopic endopyelotomy using holmium laser are the most widely accepted techniques. The Acucise catheter was developed to simplify retrograde endopyelotomy and made it possible for all urologists, regardless of their endourologic skills. The Acucise catheter depends on incision and dilatation of the ureteropelvic junction under fluoroscopic guidance, whereas ureteroscopy allows visual control of the site, depth, and extent of the incision; the holmium laser is a perfect method for a clean precise incision. Review of the English literature showed that the Acucise technique was more widely performed, though laser had better (but not statistically significant) safety and efficacy profiles.

Early results of a new open surgical technique for treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction

OBJECTIVE

Here we report our initial experience with a new open surgical technique for treating uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO).

METHODS

One centimeter distal to the site of the uretero-pelvic junction (UPJ) stenosis, a longitudinal incision of about 15 mm was made over the lateral side of the ureter. The renal pelvis was evacuated. Simultaneously, an oblique incision was made over the posterior and anterior walls of the renal pelvis. The most dependent point over the renal pelvis was sutured to the distal end of the ureterotomy incision. The anterior edge of the pyelotomy incision was anastomosed to the anterior edge of the ureterotomy incision and the posterior edge was anastomosed to the posterior edge of the ureterotomy incision. When the pyeloplasty was completed, the UPJ, accompanied by the proximal 1 cm of the ureter and excessive parts of the renal pelvis, was excised.

RESULTS

In 21 (92%) out of 23 patients, the surgical technique was successful.

CONCLUSIONS

This technique results in predictably good outcomes and has the advantages of the dismembered method. It seems to be a valuable alternative treatment for UPJO.

The use of endoluminal ultrasonography for preventing significant bleeding during endopyelotomy: evaluation of helical computed tomography vs endoluminal ultrasonography for detecting crossing vessels

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate, in a prospective study, the efficiency of helical computed tomography (CT) and endoluminal ultrasonography (ELUS) for detecting significant crossing vessels, a major cause of bleeding complications when treating patients with pelvi-ureteric junction (PUJ) obstruction, and to compare our results using ELUS with those of an earlier multicentre study (not using ELUS), to see whether the complication rate decreased.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included 27 patients with a PUJ who had isotope renography, intravenous urography, helical CT and ELUS before surgery. Depending on the findings of ELUS, patients were treated with a pure lateral Acucise incision (Applied Medical, Irvine, CA, USA) an Acucise with changed cutting direction, or (later) a laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

RESULTS

ELUS detected 15% more crossing vessels than helical CT; 16 patients had Acucise (seven lateral, nine other cutting direction), eight were treated with a laparoscopic pyeloplasty and three with other procedures. By contrast with earlier reports and as a consequence of using ELUS, there was no bleeding, vs 16% in the study not using ELUS. The success rate of 73% of the endourological approach is comparable with previous reports.

CONCLUSION

ELUS is more sensitive in detecting relevant crossing vessels than helical CT and therefore the use of ELUS can better prevent bleeding complications. ELUS can also improve the success rate by helping in selecting the correct treatment. Because it is minimally invasive and safe, ELUS combined with Acucise (or other possible endourological techniques, like holmium laser incision) should be the first choice of treatment for PUJ stenosis.

Acucise endopyelotomy: A technique with limited efficacy for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults

AIM

To retrospectively evaluate the ef fi cacy of Acucise endopyelotomy in a series of patients with primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO).

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with a symptomatic primary UPJO underwent Acucise endopyelotomy. Patients with high-grade hydronephrosis and/or poor renal function were excluded. Patients were followed by ultrasound imaging, intravenous urography, diuretic renography, and clinical review.

RESULTS

The overall success rate was 58% (14/24 patients), with a median follow up of 32 months. Of the ten patients in whom Acucise endopyelotomy failed, seven underwent open pyeloplasty, one required nephrectomy, and two received a permanent ureteral stent. A poor outcome was noted in patients without perioperative extravasation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience with Acucise endopyelotomy indicates that the success rate is lower than initially reported. Larger studies are needed to clarify the role of Acucise endopyelotomy in comparison with other techniques.

Renal imaging: what the urologist wants to know

Preoperative imaging in renal surgery is of utmost importance in contemporary surgical practice. From a diagnostic standpoint, imaging discovers many renal tumors incidentally before they become symptomatic. These tumors often are amenable to partial renal resection or minimally invasive surgical approaches. In general, surgical interventions for renal abnormalities have evolved to a less invasive endourologic or laparoscopic approach. Selection of the appropriate surgical intervention for renal tumors, collecting system tumors, and hydronephrosis depends heavily on the anatomy of the renal pathology. Thus, renal imaging is crucial in clinical decision-making. This article reviews the contribution of imaging to the surgical management of renal tumors, upper tract urothelial tumors, and ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Retrograde Acucise Endopyelotomy: Is It Worth Its Cost?

PURPOSE

To identify patients with ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction who will benefit from endoscopic Acucise incision of the stenosis and to compare the open Hynes-Anderson pyeloplasty with this minimally invasive technique.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a prospective trial, 22 patients with primary and secondary UPJ obstruction were treated by Acucise endopyelotomy, and 18 patients were treated by Hynes-Anderson pyeloplasty. Preoperative and postoperative renal scans were used to determine the degree of obstruction and intravenous urography, ultrasound scanning, or both to assess the degree of dilation.

RESULTS

There was a vast difference in the cure rate of the two groups: Hynes-Anderson pyeloplasty cured 94.5% of the patients, while in the Acucise group, the cure rate was only 32%. There was some improvement in another 22% of the patients, but the renal scan curve remained obstructed. The remaining 45% of patients failed to show any improvement.

CONCLUSION

Acucise endopyelotomy will improve or cure only patients with good renal function and mild dilation of the pelvicaliceal system. Patients with severe dilation should be treated by Hynes-Anderson pyeloplasty.

Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: Determining Durability of Endourological Intervention

PURPOSE

We evaluated the durability of endourological intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction and established guidelines for postoperative surveillance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Since 1989, 150 patients have undergone endourological intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction, of whom 127 (53 men and 74 women) 13 to 79 years old (mean age 40.4) underwent postoperative evaluation at our center. These 127 patients are the study group reported. Endourological management consisted of hot wire balloon endopyelotomy in 25 patients, percutaneous endopyelotomy in 67 and ureteroscopic laser endopyelotomy in 35. Success in this study was strictly defined as symptomatic relief plus radiographic resolution on excretory urogram and/or diuretic renogram. Statistical analysis was performed to assess mean time to failure and develop Kaplan-Meier re-stenosis-free survival estimates.

RESULTS

Followup was 1 to 128 months (mean 22). Time to failure was 0.9 to 32.4 months (mean +/- SD 10.3 +/- 9.4). Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to re-stenosis (failure) were 6 months in 12% of patients, 12 in 22%, 18 in 24%, 24 in 27%, 30 in 32% and 36 in 37%. After 3 years no further failures were observed and Kaplan-Meier estimates remained unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term probability of success, which is estimated to be 63.3% in this series, is somewhat lower than that reported in the literature. It likely is a result of longer followup and a more strict definition of success that includes functional and symptomatic relief. Our data suggest that while most failures become evident within the first 12 months, failure can develop as late as 3 years after intervention. As such, patients should be followed at least that long to ensure a durable result.

Robotic pyeloplasty

In addition to the classic open surgery, a variety of minimally invasive therapeutic options have been developed for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction, including an endoscopic antegrade or retrograde ureteropelvic junction obstruction visually controlled incision or radioscopically controlled Acucise (Applied Medical, Laguna Hills, CA), which does not share the high success rate that results from open-surgical dismembered pyeloplasty. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty, which duplicates the open technique and differs only by the mode of access, has proven to have positive results when performed by experts, but remains a demanding technique that requires a long learning curve. Providing a three-dimensional vision, an unprecedented control of the endocorporeal instruments, and an ergonomic surgeon's position, robots may allow urologists with limited laparoscopic experience to rapidly master the endocorporeal management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. They likely will propel minimally invasive urology forward in the next several years.

Ureteral access sheath facilitates inspection of incision of ureteropelvic junction

PURPOSE

The Acucise (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, California) electrocautery balloon is a highly successful device used in managing congenital and secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Correct orientation of the cutting wire is essential during insertion of the Acucise catheter to avoid injury to crossing vessels. Moreover, confirmation of the lateral ureteropelvic junction incision is typically verified by fluoroscopic identification of extravasated contrast material. We describe a technique of facilitated passage of the Acucise balloon through a ureteral access sheath followed by ureteroscopic visualization of the incision, affording the opportunity to improve the incision with the holmium laser if necessary.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After retrograde pyelography and guidewire placement, a 12/14Fr, 35 cm. ureteral access sheath is fluoroscopically introduced to the proximal ureter. The Acucise balloon is advanced across the ureteropelvic junction and the balloon is partially inflated to confirm proper placement. Following lateral Acucise incision, flexible ureteroscopy allows direct visualization of the ureteropelvic junction, confirming a through-and-through incision. Completion of a partial incision can be performed if needed with a 200 micro holmium laser fiber followed by routine stent placement.

RESULTS

During the last 8 months we have used the Acucise device through a ureteral access sheath to treat congenital or secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction in 8 patients. All incisions demonstrated extravasation of contrast material on retrograde pyelography, and 6 incisions (75%) were noted to be transmural by flexible ureteroscopic inspection. Two patients (25%) with only a partial incision despite contrast extravasation underwent extended incision using the holmium laser. Short-term followup demonstrated patency of the ureteropelvic junction in 7 of the 8 patients (87.5%) with 1 eventually requiring a secondary open pyeloplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

The ureteral access sheath greatly facilitates placement of the Acucise device and allows rapid ureteroscopic confirmation of the incision. Insertion and removal of the ureteral access sheath and flexible ureteroscope do not compromise or significantly increase the duration of the procedure. Moreover, flexible ureteroscopic visualization allows confirmation of a complete transmural incision and potentially increases success rates of this minimally invasive approach to ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Continued followup is necessary to confirm the long-term benefits of this procedure.

Transplant ureter stricture: Acucise endoureterotomy and balloon dilation are effective

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eight patients with ureteral stricture after renal transplantation underwent minimally invasive treatment with Acucise incision or balloon dilation. Acucise endoureterotomy was used to treat four patients with strictures at the ureterovesical anastomosis, and balloon dilation was used to treat four patients with a ureteroureterostomy stricture. Success was defined as an acceptable serum creatinine concentration in the absence of hydronephrosis with at least 1 year of follow-up.

RESULTS

Acucise endoureterotomy for ureterovesical anastomosis stricture was successful in two of three patients (67%) with a mean follow-up of 20 months. One patient had an indeterminate outcome. Balloon dilation of strictured ureteroureterostomy was successful in three of four patients (75%) with a mean follow-up of 23.7 months. Three of the four patients with previously failed open revision were treated successfully with endourologic techniques. The two patients in whom treatment failed had strictures >/=1.5 cm and manifested comorbidities including diabetes mellitus.

CONCLUSION

As our results are comparable to those of other published series, endourologic management of transplant ureteral stenosis is a reasonable strategy.

Management of failed primary intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: 12-year, single-center experience

OBJECTIVES

To compare contemporary endourologic and open surgical management of failed primary intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction, specifically in regard to immediate and long-term results and complications.

METHODS

Since 1989, 48 patients have undergone management of failed primary intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Of these, 42 patients (21 females and 21 males; age range 16 to 68 years, mean age 34.9) underwent follow-up evaluations. These 42 patients constitute the present study group. The mode of secondary intervention was determined by individual upper tract anatomy, concurrent medical conditions, and informed patient preference. Secondary intervention included open operative repair (n = 20) or percutaneous (n = 11), ureteroscopic (n = 5), or retrograde cautery wire balloon (n = 6) endopyelotomy. Success was defined as symptomatic relief and improved calicectasis on radiographic evaluation at latest follow-up.

RESULTS

Follow-up ranged from 6 to 148 months (mean 47.7). Endourologic intervention was associated with a mean hospital stay of 2.3 nights and a complication rate of 13.6%. The long-term success rate of these endoscopic approaches was 59.1% overall, including a 71.4% success rate after a failed open operative procedure and a 37.5% success rate after a failed endourologic procedure. In contrast, open operative salvage was associated with a mean stay of 4.3 nights and a 15% complication rate. The success of open operative salvage was 95% overall, including 94.1% after failed endourologic intervention and 100% after failed open operative intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Endourologic intervention for failed primary management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction is associated with a short hospital stay and low rate of complications. Such intervention provides acceptable success rates in the setting of prior failed open operative intervention. However, when endourologic salvage was used for prior failed endourologic intervention, the success rates were limited. This suggests that intrinsic factors such as crossing vessels or periureteral fibrosis may play a role in limiting the utility of such procedures in this setting. In contrast, open operative salvage after any prior failed intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction provides excellent functional results without any increase in morbidity, with, in this contemporary series, an acceptably short hospital stay. These data should help urologists and patients make well-informed treatment decisions.

Treatment of iatrogenic postoperative ureteral strictures with Acucise endoureterotomy

OBJECTIVES

To determine factors influencing the outcome of Acucise endoureterotomy in patients with iatrogenic postoperative ureteral strictures after different open surgical procedures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Acucise endoureterotomy was performed in 18 patients with ureteral strictures after pyeloplasty (n = 5), renal transplantation (n = 5), ureteroenteric anastomosis (n = 3), calicoureterostomy (n = 1), ureterocystoneostomy (n = 1), hysterectomy (n = 1), ureterorenoscopy (n = 1) and transurethral resection of the ureteral orifice (n = 1). Success was determined as relief of clinical symptoms, improvement of renal function or improvement of radiographic findings.

RESULTS

The overall success rate was 61% (mean follow-up: 21.5 months). Six out of 18 patients showed relevant side effects. Neither the localization of the stricture nor the duration of postoperative ureteral stenting but the length of the stricture had influence on the postoperative outcome. Decreased renal function to less than 25% of the total function was always associated with failure of the treatment. The time period between the ureteral injury and the appearance of the ureteral stricture had influence on the outcome of the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Acucise endoureterotomy is effective in the treatment of postoperative ureteral strictures, but only in selected cases. The selection criteria are the time period from the primary operation to the appearance of the stricture (>6 months), the length of the stricture (<1.5 cm) and the renal function (>25% of the total function). In other cases, open surgical treatment of the ureteral stricture may provide better results.

Long-term results of endopyeloureterotomy using the transpelvic extraureteral approach

OBJECTIVES

To review our clinical results to confirm the long-term efficacy of the operative technique of endopyeloureterotomy using the transpelvic extraureteral approach that we developed.

METHODS

We treated 123 patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction or upper ureteral stenosis by percutaneous endopyeloureterotomy using the transpelvic extraureteral approach between 1988 and 1999. All were followed up for at least 1 year (mean 58 months). Sixty-eight patients were male and 55 female between the ages of 3 and 78 years (mean 36). We evaluated the efficacy of our procedure preoperatively and then regularly every 6 to 12 months postoperatively using excretory urography and technetium-99m DTPA renography.

RESULTS

Our results showed that 115 (90.6%) of 127 procedures relieved the obstruction without any severe complications. In the 107 cases of ureteropelvic junction obstruction, we alleviated the stricture in 96 (90%). In the 20 cases of upper ureteral stenosis, our procedure alleviated the stricture in 19 (95%). In the 47 cases of a stenotic segment of 2 cm or more in length, 43 of our procedures led to a significant improvement (91.5%). Long-term follow-up of the 123 patients revealed late recurrence in 5 patients, despite the initial success.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous endopyeloureterotomy using the transpelvic extraureteral approach should be considered the first choice of treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction and upper third ureteral stenosis, even if the stenotic segment is 2 or more cm long.

The role of Acucise endopyelotomy in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction

OBJECTIVE

Open surgical pyeloplasty has been the gold standard for the correction of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). Endourological management of UPJO has gained increased acceptance, with reported success rates of 57-87%. It has been suggested that Acucise endopyelotomy (AE) should be the procedure of choice for patients with UPJO. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of AE in the treatment of UPJO and the factors contributing to surgical outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-two patients (34 primary, 8 secondary UPJO) underwent AE between June 1995 and December 1999. Presenting symptoms were; pain 34 (80.9%), UTI 10 (23.8%) and haematuria 5 (11.9%). Preoperative evaluation included ultrasound and/or intravenous urogram with diuretic renography. Hydronephrosis was graded in 36 patients. Of these 4, 14, 9 and 9 had grade I, II, III and IV hydronephrosis, respectively. Twenty-four patients were stented prior to endopyelotomy and one required nephrostomy. Overall (true) success was defined as clinically pain free and radiologically no evidence of obstruction on diuretic scan.

RESULTS

The average operating time was 45 min and mean hospital stay was 2.7 days. Mean follow-up was 27 months (range 6-55). The objective success rate was 52% and the subjective success rate was 64%. A total of 19 patients (45.2%) had long lasting clinical and radiographic treatment success. Three (7%) patients required nephrectomy and five (12%) underwent open pyeloplasty. Success rate for grade I/II hydronephrosis was 55.5% and only 27.7% with grade III/IV hydronephrosis. Normal renograms were found in 12 (48%) of those with perioperative extravasation compared to three (25%) without. Only one of the eight patients with secondary UPJO had a normal post-operative renogram. Size or type of stent used had no effect on surgical outcome. The substandard results were noted in patients with grade III/IV hydronephrosis, poor pre-operative renal function, secondary UPJO and without perioperative extravasation.

CONCLUSIONS

Acucise endopyelotomy is a safe and minimally invasive procedure for the management of UPJO. Although the results of AE are suboptimal, its lower degree of invasiveness makes it reasonable choice for first-line treatment. Careful selection of patients will improve the results of AE, although multicentre randomized trials are needed to make a valued comparison with other techniques.

The role of endourology in ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Endopyelotomy has benefited from abundant confirmatory investigations, and significant progress in different technical modalities has occurred. Retrograde techniques, including the Acucise (Applied Medical, Laguna Hills, CA) cutting balloon and the ureteroscopic Holmium laser incision, are becoming preferred approaches while the other modalities retain their specific indications. Long-term results and potential complications have been carefully studied and reported. Better identification of risk factors has prompted precise preoperative investigations and allowed for careful patient selection, leading to improved results. These results approach those of open pyeloplasty, but with minimal morbidity.