No self-injurious behavior was found in HPRT-deficient mice treated with 9-ethyladenine

Animal Model Contributions to Congenital Metabolic Disease

Genetic model systems allow researchers to probe and decipher aspects of human disease, and animal models of disease are frequently specifically engineered and have been identified serendipitously as well. Animal models are useful for probing the etiology and pathophysiology of disease and are critical for effective discovery and development of novel therapeutics for rare diseases. Here we review the impact of animal model organism research in three examples of congenital metabolic disorders to highlight distinct advantages of model system research. First, we discuss phenylketonuria research where a wide variety of research fields and models came together to make impressive progress and where a nearly ideal mouse model has been central to therapeutic advancements. Second, we review advancements in Lesch-Nyhan syndrome research to illustrate the role of models that do not perfectly recapitulate human disease as well as the need for multiple models of the same disease to fully investigate human disease aspects. Finally, we highlight research on the GM2 gangliosidoses Tay-Sachs and Sandhoff disease to illustrate the important role of both engineered traditional laboratory animal models and serendipitously identified atypical models in congenital metabolic disorder research. We close with perspectives for the future for animal model research in congenital metabolic disorders.

Neurotransmitter and their metabolite concentrations in different areas of the HPRT knockout mouse brain

Lesch-Nyhan syndrome (LNS) is characterized by uric acid overproduction and severe neurobehavioral symptoms, such as recurrent self-mutilative behavior. To learn more about the pathophysiology of the disease, we quantified neurotransmitters and their metabolites in the cerebral hemisphere, cerebellum and the medulla oblongata of HPRT knockout mice, an animal model for LNS, in comparison to the corresponding wild-type. Our analyses included l-glutamate, 4-aminobutanoic acid (GABA), acetylcholine, serotonin, 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA), norepinephrine, l-normetanephrine, epinephrine and l-metanephrine and were conducted via high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). Among these neurotransmitter systems, we did not find any abnormalities in the HPRT knockout mouse brains. On one side, this might indicate that HPRT deficiency most severely affects dopamine signaling, while brain functioning based on other neurotransmitters is more or less spared. On the other hand, our findings may reflect a compensating mechanism for impaired purine salvage that protects the brain in HPRT-deficient mice but not in LNS patients.

Animal Models and Human Neuropsychiatric Disorders

Humans have long distinguished themselves from other living organisms. Therefore, to make use of animal models for neuropsychiatric disorders, it is important to acknowledge what has changed historically. Darwin argued that there was continuity in mind between humans and nonhuman species, and animal experimental psychologists and others have debated the existence of consciousness and mentality in animals ever since. Those trained in the associationist tradition sought to eliminate the concept of mind in favor of an empiricial, behavioral approach; others trained in the introspectionist tradition sought to include mental abilities as an integral part of comparative animal psychology. The waning of behaviorism and ascendance of cognitive psychology in the mid-twentieth century renewed interest in the notion of consciousness and mind in nonhuman organisms, particularly as they related to learning impairment and neurobehavioral disorders. Moreover, advances in molecular genetics and technology facilitated development of genetically modified mouse strains that could be used to examine cognitive deficits and psychopathology. However, genetic modifications to individual genes that produce behavioral dysfunction in the mouse have not always provided clear results. In part, this is likely due to the influence of genes in addition to the targeted gene, sometimes resulting in paradoxical effects. I also examine other issues created by the use of nonhuman models of human disorders, including: language, the effect of background genetic strains, genetic-environmental interactions, and the problems associated with the complex genetics needed to produce similarly complex behavioral phenotypes.

The mousetrap: what we can learn when the mouse model does not mimic the human disease

In recent years, mouse models for human metabolic diseases have become commonplace because the information gained from in vivo study of biochemical pathways is invaluable, and many metabolic diseases are relatively easy to recreate in mice through gene knockout technology in embryonic stem cells. In certain cases, however, the knockout mice may reproduce only some of the human disease phenotype, may be more severely affected than human cases, or may have no clinical phenotype at all. Under these circumstances, the disease pathology can become more complex, causing the researcher to evaluate basic differences in mouse and human biology as well as questions of genetic background, alternate pathways, and possible gene interactions. This review is a brief analysis of gene knockout models for Lesch-Nyhan syndrome, Lowe syndrome, X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy, Fabry disease, galactosemia, glycogen storage disease type II, metachromatic leukodystrophy, and Tay-Sachs disease, which produce a biochemical model of disease but often do not reproduce clinical symptoms. These mice may be useful for studying the biochemical and physiological pathways in which certain metabolites function toward embryonic and fetal development, as well as specific functions in various organs, and they may provide an inexpensive and useful model system for development of new therapeutic techniques.