Clinical usefulness of assays for complexed prostate-specific antigen

Interchangeability and Diagnostic Accuracy of Two Assays for Total and Free Prostate-Specific Antigen: Two not Always Related Items

The variation between different PSA assays seems to influence the interpretation of individual PSA values and the clinical decisions about prostate cancer. One reason for this variability could be the different reactivity of antibodies for the various molecular forms of serum PSA; as a result, samples containing the same amount of tPSA but different proportions of fPSA can produce very different values. In this study, serum samples were collected prospectively from 152 consecutive patients referred to 2 institutions (Regional Hospital, Venice, 90 subjects; San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, 62 subjects) for PSA elevation and/or symptoms. Serum samples were assessed according to the manufacturers’ instructions on the following 2 analyzers: the Immulite 2000 assay (Diagnostic Products Corporation, Los Angeles, USA), which measures tPSA and fPSA, and the ADVIA Centaur (Bayer Diagnostics, Tarrytown, USA), which assays tPSA and cPSA. cPSA values were transformed into fPSA by the equation fPSA=tPSA-cPSA. When taking Immulite tPSA and f/tPSA values as 100%, ADVIA Centaur values were 92.6% and 122%, respectively, which means that 20% of patients would be classified differently according to the traditional biopsy cutoff. In conclusion, there are considerable differences between the 2 methods, which could affect clinical decisions.

Complexed prostate-specific antigen for the diagnosis of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES

To determine the validity of using complexed prostate-specific antigen (cPSA) levels for diagnosing biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

With linear regression modelling, we determined threshold cPSA levels for biochemical recurrence in patients after RP for clinically localized prostate cancer. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratio tests of each threshold for diagnosing biochemical recurrence using total PSA (tPSA) as the reference standard.

RESULTS

In the regression models, tPSA and cPSA were highly correlated (r = 0.99). For the diagnosis of biochemical recurrence, tPSA thresholds of 0.20 and 0.40 ng/mL corresponded to cPSA thresholds of 0.12 ng/mL (95% confidence interval 0.08-0.17) and 0.29 (0.22-0.28) ng/mL, respectively. For the detection of biochemical recurrence, a cPSA threshold of 0.12 ng/mL had a sensitivity of 96%, specificity of 88%, positive predictive value of 89%, negative predictive value of 88%, positive likelihood ratio of 8, and negative likelihood ratio of 0.05; the respective values for a cPSA threshold of 0.29 ng/mL were 96%, 96%, 96%, 96%, 24 and 0.04.

CONCLUSIONS

cPSA has high validity for the diagnosis of biochemical recurrence after RP. Pending external validation, cPSA might be useful for biochemical surveillance after RP.

Complexed prostate specific antigen (PSA) reduces unnecessary prostate biopsies in the 2.6-4.0 ng/mL range of total PSA

OBJECTIVE

To compare the performance of complexed prostate-specific antigen (cPSA) to total PSA (tPSA) and percentage free PSA (f/tPSA) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer for the tPSA range 2.6-4.0 ng/mL.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Consecutive men scheduled for prostate biopsy were enrolled prospectively at 14 different sites in two multicentre studies in Europe and the USA. Serum obtained before biopsy was tested with the ACS:180 and Immuno 1 tPSA and cPSA assays (Bayer Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NY, USA) and the Access fPSA and tPSA assays (Beckman, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were generated to compare the diagnostic performance of tPSA, cPSA and f/tPSA.

RESULTS

Of 316 men with a tPSA of 2.6-4.0 ng/mL, 82 (26%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer on biopsy. ROC analysis of all 316 men showed an area under the curve (AUC) for cPSA of 0.63, significantly greater than the AUC for tPSA of 0.56 (P = 0.008). At a sensitivity of 95%, threshold values of 2.3 ng/mL for cPSA and 2.73 ng/mL for tPSA provided specificities of 20.1% and 9.8%, respectively. f/tPSA was only available for 205 of the 316 (65%) men and the AUC for cPSA was 0.63, and did not significantly differ from the f/tPSA AUC of 0.64 (P = 0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

As a single test, cPSA provides improved specificity over tPSA and comparable specificity to f/tPSA for detecting prostate cancer, and may reduce the number of unnecessary prostate biopsies in the 2.6-4.0 ng/mL tPSA range.

Mass spectrometry-based clinical proteomics

In recent years, mass spectrometry (MS) has been recognized as a 'Gold Standard' tool for the identification and analysis of individual proteins in expression proteomics studies. Moreover, MS has proven useful for the analysis of nucleic acids for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping purposes. With the increased usage of MS as a standard tool for life science applications and the advancement of MS instrumentation, sample preparation and bioinformatics, MS technology has entered novel screening and discovery application areas that are beyond the traditional protein identification and characterization applications. The areas of clinical diagnostics and predictive medicine are just two prime examples of these fields. Predictive markers or biomarkers for early diagnosis of diseases are of growing importance for the human healthcare community. The goal of using MS in clinical proteomics is to generate protein profiles (mass to charge [m/z] ratio versus signal intensity) from readily available body fluids like serum, saliva and urine to detect changes in protein levels that reflect changes in the disease states. Whereas the results originating from individual protein markers may be intriguing, data resulting from the analysis of complex, multiple biomarker patterns may be unequivocal. These biomarker patterns are hidden in complex mass spectra and are not always obvious to the human eye. Sophisticated bioinformatics algorithms have to be applied to determine these unique biomarker patterns. Here, we review the latest developments concerning the use of MS for the discovery of biomarker patterns and for the identification of individual biomarkers in the field of clinical proteomics applications.

Determination of non-alpha1-antichymotrypsin-complexed prostate-specific antigen as an indirect measurement of free prostate-specific antigen: analytical performance and diagnostic accuracy

BACKGROUND

A new assay measures prostate-specific antigen (PSA) not complexed to alpha(1)-antichymotrypsin (nACT-PSA) after removing PSA complexed to ACT by use of anti-ACT antibodies. We evaluated nACT-PSA and its ratio to total PSA (tPSA) as alternatives to free PSA (fPSA) and its ratio to tPSA in differentiating prostate cancer (PCa) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in patients with tPSA of 2-20 micro g/L.

METHODS

PSA in serum of 183 untreated patients with PCa and 132 patients with BPH was measured retrospectively on the chemiluminescence immunoassay analyzer LIAISON(R) (Byk-Sangtec Diagnostica) with the LIAISON tPSA and LIAISON fPSA assays. The nACT-PSA fraction was determined with a prototype assay measuring the residual PSA after precipitation of ACT-PSA with an ACT-precipitating reagent.

RESULTS

nACT-PSA was higher than fPSA in samples with fPSA concentrations <1 microg/L but lower in samples with >1 microg/L fPSA. The median ratios of fPSA/tPSA and of nACT-PSA/tPSA were significantly different between patients with BPH and PCa (19.4% vs 12.2% and 17.4% vs 13.0%, respectively). Within the tPSA ranges tested (2-20, 2-10, and 4-10 microg/L), areas under the ROC curves for the fPSA/tPSA ratios were significantly larger than those for nACT-PSA/tPSA. In the tPSA ranges <10 microg/L, the areas under the ROC curves for fPSA/tPSA were significantly larger than those for tPSA, whereas the areas for nACT-PSA/tPSA were not. At decision limits for 95% sensitivity and specificity, both ratios significantly increased specificity and sensitivity, respectively, compared with tPSA, but the fPSA/tPSA ratio showed higher values.

CONCLUSIONS

nACT-PSA and its ratio to tPSA provide lower diagnostic sensitivity and specificity than fPSA/tPSA. The fPSA/tPSA ratio represents the state-of-the-art method for differentiating between PCa and BPH.