Why neoadjuvant androgen deprivation prior to radical prostatectomy is unnecessary

Prostate changes related to therapy: with special reference to hormone therapy

Hormone and radiation therapy have traditionally been used in prostate cancer (PCa). Morphological effects are often identified in needle biopsies and surgical specimens. A range of histological changes are seen in the non-neoplastic prostate and in the pre-neoplastic and neoplastic areas. Other ablative therapies, including cryotherapy, and emerging focal therapies, such as high-intensity focused ultrasound, photodynamic therapy and interstitial laser thermotherapy, may induce changes on the prostate. As new compounds are developed for prostate cancer treatment, it is important to document their effects on benign and neoplastic prostate tissue.

Multimodal treatment strategies combining neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and/or chemotherapy with radical prostatectomy in high-risk localised prostate cancer

By combining the readily available clinical parameters of tumour stage, Gleason score of the diagnostic biopsy specimen and serum prostate-specific antigen level, men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer can be assessed as to their risk of treatment failure after radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy. For men considered to be at high-risk of treatment failure after local therapy alone, multimodal treatment strategies may result in improved cancer-control outcomes. This strategy has proven effective in the setting of clinical stage T3 - T4 tumours in which the combination of radiotherapy followed by hormonal therapy has improved patient survival. The benefit of neoadjuvant or adjuvant hormonal and/or chemotherapy followed by radical prostatectomy in this setting is unclear but is the subject of ongoing or planned Phase III clinical trials. These studies will help examine the role of multimodal treatment strategies in these high-risk patients.

Patient, surgeon, and treatment characteristics associated with homologous blood transfusion requirement during radical retropubic prostatectomy: multivariate nomogram to assist patient counseling

OBJECTIVES

To identify the preoperative patient, treatment, and surgeon factors associated with the administration of homologous blood transfusion during or after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) to be able to better inform patients regarding the probability of transfusion. Homologous blood transfusion is sometimes required during or after RRP, but predictive models for estimating transfusion probability using patient and surgical characteristics are lacking.

METHODS

Data were prospectively collected regarding patient characteristics, cancer severity, surgeon experience, anesthetic used, operative blood loss, and transfusion among 1123 consecutive RRP cases. Multivariate regression analysis identified baseline factors associated with a homologous transfusion requirement and generated a model for predicting the likelihood of perioperative homologous transfusion.

RESULTS

Homologous transfusion was administered in 3.8% of subjects; the mean estimated blood loss was 953 mL. Multivariable regression analysis identified prostate size (P <0.0001, odds ratio [OR] 1.74), use of general anesthesia (P = 0.01, OR 2.22), use of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (P = 0.006, OR 3.35), and surgeon expertise (P <0.0001, OR 8.63) as independent risk factors associated with a need for perioperative homologous transfusion. The most influential factor, surgical expertise, clustered among surgeons who performed more than 15 RRPs annually, because these surgeons had lower transfusion rates and lower estimated blood loss more consistently than did surgeons who performed fewer RRPs annually.

CONCLUSIONS

Larger prostate size, use of general anesthesia, use of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, and annual surgeon case volume were independently associated with an increased probability that an individual patient would receive homologous transfusion during or after RRP. A nomogram indicating the probability of homologous transfusion based on these factors provides a benchmark of expected homologous transfusion rates according to individual patient and treatment parameters.

Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 90203: a randomized phase 3 study of radical prostatectomy alone versus estramustine and docetaxel before radical prostatectomy for patients with high-risk localized disease

The purpose of The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 90203 trial is to determine which of 2 treatment strategies is superior in treating men with high-risk, clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate (stage T1 to T3a NX M0), defined as a predicted probability < or =60% of remaining free from disease recurrence for 5 years after surgery. Patients with a > or =10-year life expectancy will be randomized to either radical prostatectomy (RP) alone versus estramustine and docetaxel before RP. Participants will be excluded if they have received prior therapy for prostate cancer (except transurethral resection of the prostate) or are judged not to be appropriate candidates for RP. Eligible patients will be stratified according to their predicted probability of remaining free from disease recurrence at 5 years after surgery (0% to 20%, 21% to 40%, and 41% to 60%) and randomized. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy will be 6 cycles (1 cycle = 21 days) of estramustine (280 mg tid, days 1 to 5) and docetaxel (70 mg/m2 on day 2). Warfarin (2 mg/day orally) will be given for prophylaxis against deep venous thrombosis. Bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection and RP will be performed within 60 days of registration/randomization for men randomized to the surgery-alone arm. For men randomized to receive preoperative chemotherapy, the surgical procedure will be performed within 60 days of completion of chemotherapy. Patients will be monitored with history review, physical examination, and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels every 3 months for the first 3 years after surgery, every 6 months for the next 3 years, and annually thereafter. Biochemical disease recurrence will be defined as a serum PSA level >0.4 ng/mL on 2 consecutive occasions > or =3 months apart after RP. The time of biochemical failure is measured from the date of randomization to the time of the first PSA level <0.4 ng/mL that is confirmed on the second serial PSA. The primary study end point is to determine if early systemic treatment with neoadjuvant estramustine and docetaxel before RP in patients with high-risk prostate cancer will decrease 5-year recurrence rates when compared with RP alone. Secondary outcomes will include (1) the safety and tolerability of neoadjuvant estramustine and docetaxel before RP; (2) the impact of this neoadjuvant strategy on pathologic tumor stage, including lymph node and surgical margin status; (3) time to clinically apparent disease recurrence; and (4) overall survival. The impact of RP with and without neoadjuvant estramustine and docetaxel on the patient's quality of life from pretreatment through year 3 will be assessed. Frozen prostate tissue will be obtained from men undergoing prostatectomy who are enrolled in either the treatment or control arms of the trial. These samples will be analyzed for their RNA expression patterns in order to build outcome prediction models. Furthermore, using array-based methods of expression analysis, the sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents and response to chemotherapy may likewise be predicted. The trial will enroll approximately 700 men during a 48-month period. Patients will be observed for 84 months after study closure. The power to detect a 36% decrease in 5-year recurrence rates is 90%.

Contemporary patterns of androgen deprivation therapy use for newly diagnosed prostate cancer

Although once reserved for the management of metastatic prostate cancer, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is being used increasingly to treat lower stages of disease. We sought to assess patterns of ADT use in a contemporary cohort of men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer. Men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer who had > or =12 months of follow-up evaluation were identified in a national disease registry of patients with prostate cancer. The patterns of ADT use, both primary and secondary, were characterized and stratified by risk according to prostate-specific antigen levels, clinical stage, and Gleason score. In a cohort of 1485 men, 46% underwent ADT at some point during their treatment: 41% as primary therapy (either sole therapy or neoadjuvant therapy), and 5% as secondary therapy. In all, 50% of men receiving initial ADT had low- or intermediate-risk disease characteristics. Among patients treated with radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy, neoadjuvant ADT was administered in 20% and 48% of patients, respectively. Secondary hormonal manipulation was observed in 5% and 7% of patients treated initially with surgery or radiation, respectively. ADT is commonly used to treat men with prostate cancer. Much of the use of ADT is in men with low- and intermediate-risk disease characteristics. The appropriateness of such therapy requires further study, including its effect, not only on disease endpoints, but also on resource utilization and health-related quality of life.

Effects of complete androgen blockade for 12 and 24 weeks on the pathological stage and resection margin status of prostate cancer

AIMS

To compare the pathological stage and surgical margin status in patients undergoing either immediate radical prostatectomy or 12 and 24 weeks of neoadjuvant hormonal treatment (NHT) in a prospective, randomised study.

METHODS

Whole mount sections of 393 radical prostatectomy specimens were evaluated: 128 patients had immediate surgery, 143 were treated for 12 weeks and 122 for 24 weeks with complete androgen blockade.

RESULTS

Histopathology revealed organ confined tumours in 40.4% of patients with clinical stage B disease in the immediate surgery group, whereas 12 and 24 weeks of NHT increased the number of organ confined tumours to 54.6% and 64.8%, respectively. Among patients with clinical stage C tumours, pathological staging found organ confined disease in 10.4%, 31.4%, and 61.2% in the immediate surgery, 12 weeks of NHT, and 24 weeks of NHT groups, respectively. Preoperative NHT caused a significant decrease in positive margins both in patients with clinical stage B and C disease. The extent of margin involvement was not influenced by preoperative treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant androgenic suppression is effective in reducing both the pathological stage and the positive margin rate in patients with stage B and C prostatic cancer undergoing radical surgery. Some beneficial effects are evident in those patients treated for 24 weeks, and it is reasonable to assume that the optimal duration of NHT is longer than three months.

Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients

PURPOSE

We analyzed the long-term progression-free probability after radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of patients with localized prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1983 to 1998, 1,000 patients (median age 62.9 years, range 37.7 to 81.4) with clinical stage T1 to T2 prostate cancer were treated with radical retropubic prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy, without other cancer related therapy before recurrence. Mean followup was 53.2 months (median 46.9, range 1 to 170).

RESULTS

Ten years after radical retropubic prostatectomy the mean probability +/- 2 standard errors that patients remained free of progression and of any further treatment was 75.0% +/- 3.7% and of metastasis 84.2% +/- 4.4%. Mean actuarial cancer specific survival rate +/- 2 standard error was 97.6% +/- 1.7%. In a multivariate analysis pretreatment prostate specific antigen level (p <0.0001), biopsy Gleason sum (p <0.0001) and clinical stage (p=0.0071) were independent prognostic factors for progression. After prostatectomy independent risk factors were Gleason sum in the prostatectomy specimen (p=0.0008), extracapsular extension (p=0.0019), seminal vesical involvement (p <0.0001), lymph node metastasis (p <0.0001) and surgical margin status (p <0.0001). Margins were positive in 12.8% of cases. At 10 years postoperatively radical retropubic prostatectomy was effective for cancer confined to the prostate (92.2% progression-free probability) and also not confined (52.8%), including 71.4% progression-free probability for patients with only extracapsular extension and 37.4% with seminal vesicle invasion without lymph node metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Radical retropubic prostatectomy provided long-term cancer control in 75% of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer and was effective in the majority of those with high risk cancer, including T2c or biopsy Gleason sum 8 to 10, or PSA greater than 20 ng./ml. Further research should address identifying patients who can safely avoid aggressive therapy.

The treatment of prostate cancer: an overview of current options

PURPOSE

The purpose of this report is to discuss the current treatment options available to the patient with prostate cancer in all stages of the disease.

OVERVIEW

With the exception of skin cancer, prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men in the United States. Most patients in the current era will present with organ-confined disease, amenable to curative treatment. Treatment for organ-confined disease includes watchful waiting, radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, and cryosurgery in selective cases. Hormone therapy is the cornerstone of treatment of patients with advanced prostate cancer. There is no curative treatment for hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The availability of several therapeutic options for localized prostate cancer warrants careful consideration when planning treatment with curative intent. Patients need to be active participants in decision making, and they must be aware of the benefits and possible complications of the different types of treatment. Patients with advanced prostate cancer need to be aware that hormone treatment will provide temporization and palliation in the majority of cases. Hormone-resistant prostate cancer is refractory to most forms of conventional and experimental therapy.

Localized prostate cancer: effect of hormone deprivation therapy measured by using combined three-dimensional 1H MR spectroscopy and MR imaging: clinicopathologic case-controlled study

PURPOSE

To determine the accuracy of combined magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and three-dimensional (3D) proton MR spectroscopic imaging in localizing prostate cancer to a sextant of the gland in patients receiving hormone deprivation therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Combined MR imaging/3D MR spectroscopic imaging examinations were performed in 16 hormone-treated patients and 48 nontreated matched control patients before radical prostatectomy and step-section histopathologic analysis. At MR imaging, cancer presence within the peripheral zone was assessed on a per sextant basis by two readers. At 3D MR spectroscopic imaging, cancer was identified by using (choline plus creatine)-to-citrate ratios at cutoff values of 2 and 3 SDs above mean normal peripheral zone values. Data were compared by using receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the ability of combined MR imaging/3D MR spectroscopic imaging to localize prostate cancer in treated versus control patients. For MR imaging alone, the sensitivity and specificity were 91% and 48% (reader 1) and 75% and 60% (reader 2) in treated patients versus 79% and 60% (reader 1) and 84% and 43% (reader 2) in control patients. For 3D MR spectroscopic imaging alone (>3 SDs cutoff), higher specificity (treated, 80%; controls, 73%) but lower sensitivity (treated, 56%; controls, 53%) was attained. In treated patients, high sensitivity or specificity (up to 92%) was achieved when either or both modalities indicated cancer.

CONCLUSION

When performed within 4 months after initiating hormone deprivation therapy, combined MR imaging/3D MR spectroscopic imaging had the same accuracy in localizing prostate cancer as in nontreated patients.

Time-dependent effects of hormone-deprivation therapy on prostate metabolism as detected by combined magnetic resonance imaging and 3D magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging

Combined MRI and 3D spectroscopic imaging (MRI/3D-MRSI) was used to study the metabolic effects of hormone-deprivation therapy in 65 prostate cancer patients, who underwent either short, intermediate, or long-term therapy, compared to 30 untreated control patients. There was a significant time-dependent loss of the prostatic metabolites choline, creatine, citrate, and polyamines during hormone-deprivation therapy, resulting in the complete loss of all observable metabolites (total metabolic atrophy) in 25% of patients on long-term therapy. The amount and time-course of metabolite loss during therapy significantly differed for healthy and malignant tissues. Citrate levels decreased faster than choline and creatine levels during therapy, resulting in an increase in the mean (choline + creatine)/citrate ratio with duration of therapy. Due to a loss of all MRSI detectable citrate, this ratio could not be used to identify cancer in 69% of patients on long-term therapy. In the absence of citrate, however, residual prostate cancer could still be detected by elevated choline levels (choline/creatine ratio > or =1.5), or the presence of only choline in the proton spectrum. The loss of citrate and the presence of total metabolic atrophy correlated roughly with decreasing serum prostatic specific antigen levels with increasing therapy. In summary, MRI/3D-MRSI provided both a measure of residual cancer and a time-course of metabolic response following hormone-deprivation therapy. Magn Reson Med 46:49-57, 2001.

Quality control of radical prostatectomy: a feasibility study

The aim of this study was to assess whether the quality of the surgical act could be an important prognostic factor for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. This study also aims to investigate whether the surgical quality can be assessed by any means. Questionnaires were collected from 23 different institutes including 232 radical prostatectomies (RPr) performed for T1T2 prostate cancer. Blood loss, duration of surgery, margin status, postoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA) and urinary incontinence were analysed and correlated with the yearly number of RPr performed. The mean values obtained for each parameter were very different in the various centres. The outcome in terms of tumour control and incontinence could not be related to a higher or lower number of RPr performed. Quality control of RPr is feasible on the basis of an analysis of a few parameters, such as surgical margins, postoperative PSA and incontinence, that might recognise urologists that perform better or poorer than a proposed average.

[N1 prostatic adenocarcinoma treated with radical surgery and immediate hormonal management]

OBJECTIVES

To study the survival in patients with prostate adenocarcinoma, lymph nodes involvement in the intraoperative pathological examination, evaluating both radical surgery and early ablation as treatment. Identification of clinical factors that can predict node involvement.

METHOD

20 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1988-1998 were included in the study. All patients clinically diagnosed with T1-2N0Mx prostate adenocarcinoma (T.N.M. 1992), single metastatic node involvement in the pathological study and early sub-albuginea orchidectomy. This group was compared to a 200-patient control group also with T1-2N0Mx prostate adenocarcinoma but with no pathologic nodular involvement. Statistical study: contingency 2Xb tables (Pearson's chi 2 or Fisher's exact test) to compare qualitative variables; Student's t test for means comparison; Kaplan-Meier for actuarial survival calculations and comparison of Log-rank survival curves. For the study of clinical variants with influence in node involvement a logistic regression model was used.

RESULTS

Mean age was 63 +/- 0.8 years. Median follow up 56 months. Mean PSA 33 +/- 4.4 ng/mL and 55% had Gleason 5-7. 16 patients were stage pT3. Specific 5-year survival was 90 +/- 8% and biochemical progression free survival 63 +/- 12%. Clinical variables with statistical significance for node involvement are: pre-surgical PSA greater than 20 ng/mL (RR = 4.6), and Gleason higher than 4 (RR = 3). The remaining variables showed no statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Gleason and PSA are the only clinical values that predict node involvement. The procedure performed obtains good results and a survival comparable to that of the control group.

Minimally invasive treatment for localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate: review of 1048 patients treated with ultrasound-guided palladium-103 brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To assess the effectiveness of palladium-103 brachytherapy in stage T1 and T2 adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The charts of 1048 patients treated between 1991 and 1999 with transperineal realtime ultrasound-guided (103)Pd (Theraseed) implants were reviewed to assess the effects on serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) values and tissue (biopsy). Of the 1048 patients, 780 had sufficient data for this report. Preoperative total androgen blockade (leuprolide and flutamide) was used selectively in patients whose prostate size was >50 cc and those whose tumors had a Gleason score of >7.

RESULTS

At 1 year, 86% of the evaluable 766 patients had stable PSA concentration <1.5 ng/mL; at 5 years, 86% of the 166 patients with data available had stable PSA values <1.5 ng/mL. Biopsies were negative in 92% of the patients studied at 2 years. Patients with pretreatment PSA values <10 ng/mL had the best outcomes, and those treated with (103)Pd plus hormone ablation achieved PSA reduction more rapidly than those treated with radioisotope monotherapy. There was one disease-related death; the principal morbidity was short-term bladder and bowel irritation without permanent sequelae. Impotence occurred in approximately 15% of patients, and incontinence occurred in 5% of those who had undergone prior transurethral resection of the prostate.

CONCLUSION

The technique used in this study proved effective in reducing PSA concentrations to <1.5 ng/mL and in producing negative biopsies 1 and 2 years postoperatively. These results are comparable to those of external-beam radiation therapy and radical prostatectomy while demonstrating a significant reduction in morbidity.

Future prospects in prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer has displayed an increase in incidence unparalleled by any other tumor in the last two decades, with a steady, more gradual increase in mortality rate. Current curative strategies are focused on the detection and treatment of early-stage (T1-2 N0 M0), clinically significant tumors.

METHODS

To this aim, refinement of surgical approaches, with appropriate adjuvant therapies, will ensure more complete cancer control, while minimizing associated morbidity. New delivery systems for radiotherapy, as well as other energy sources, are evolving, while a number of promising pharmacological agents, including angiogenesis inhibitors and drugs which alter signal transduction pathways, are currently under investigation. Early detection is also being facilitated by a more widespread implementation of screening programs. Advances in tumor markers, and imaging and biopsy techniques, will allow more accurate preoperative staging. These, coupled with improvements in prognostic markers, aid the physician and patient alike in deciding on the suitability of treatment options with better estimation of outcome. Perhaps the most exciting developments in prostate cancer will come from knowledge of the molecular mechanisms underlying carcinogenesis. The potential for the development of diagnostic and therapeutic tools is immense. The efficacy of treatment can be studied at a molecular level, and strategies for preventing or slowing the development of malignancy can be formulated. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Application of this knowledge in the form of gene and cellular therapy and in the development of novel systemic agents is beginning to enter the realm of clinical practice, and it may be in this field that means for cure and prevention of prostate cancer will eventually be found.

The role of volume-weighted mean nuclear volume in predicting disease outcome in patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

Estimates of volume-weighted mean nuclear volume (MNV) are the only means by which unbiased estimates of three-dimensional parameters can be obtained from single two-dimensional sections without any assumptions. We have reported that for prostate cancer estimates of MNV are prognostically equal or superior to morphological grading of malignancy, such as Gleason score (GS), and in particular, that MNV proved to be a meaningful predictor of prognosis for patients with clinically localized tumors. However, all previous studies were conducted on patients treated conservatively, and no authors have tested whether estimates of MNV can predict the prognosis of patients treated with radical prostatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective prognostic study of 52 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer diagnosed at three Hospitals in Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan (Shizuoka City Hospital, Shizuoka Prefectural Hospital and Shimada Municipal Hospital) and treated by radical prostatectomy was performed. Twenty of these patients were treated with hormone therapy before radical prostatectomy. Unbiased estimates of MNV were compared with clinical stage, histological grading according to GS and neo-adjuvant hormone therapy with regard to the prognostic value.

RESULTS

MNV was significantly correlated with pathological T stage, but was not significantly correlated with the presence or absence of lymph node metastasis. Univariate analysis revealed that MNV correlated significantly with progression-free survival (p = 0.0116). Multivariate analysis revealed that MNV (p = 0.0115) and GS (p = 0.0275) were two significant independent predictors of progression-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study suggest that MNV and GS are powerful independent predictors of prognosis for prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. We recommend estimates of MNV as a supportive method to the histological grading for patients with prostate cancer.

Effect of total androgen ablation on pathologic stage and resection limit status of prostate cancer. Initial results of the Italian PROSIT study

The likelihood of finding organ-confined untreated prostate cancer (PCa) by pathological examination at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP) is only 50% in patients with clinically organ-confined disease. In addition, tumour is present at the resection margin in approximately 30% of clinical T2 (clinical stage B) cases. The issue of clinical "understaging" and of resection limit positivity have led to the development of novel management practices, including "neoadjuvant" hormonal therapy (NHT). The optimal duration of NHT is unknown. We undertook the present analysis to evaluate the effect of NHT on pathologic stage of PCa and resection limit status in patients with prostate cancer and treated with total androgen ablation either for three or six months before RP. Between January 1996 and February 1998, 259 men with prostate cancer underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy and bilateral pelvic node dissection in the 26 centres participating in the Italian randomised prospective PROSIT study. Whole mount sectioning of the complete RP specimens was adopted in each centre for accurately evaluating the pathologic stage and resection limit status. By February 1998, haematoxylin and eosin stained sections from 155 RP specimens had been received and evaluated by the reviewing pathologist (RM). 64 cases had not been treated with total androgen ablation (e.g. NHT) before RP was performed, whereas 58 and 33 had been treated for three and six months, respectively. 114 patients were clinical stage B whereas 41 were clinical stage C. After three months of total androgen ablation, pathological stage B was more prevalent among patients with clinical B tumours, compared with untreated patients (57% in treated patients vs. 36% in untreated). The percentage of cancers with negative margins was statistically significantly greater in patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy than those treated with immediate surgery alone (69% vs. 42%, respectively). After six months of NHT therapy the proportion of patients with pathological stage B (67% vs. 36%, respectively) and negative margins was greater than after 3 months (92% vs. 42%, respectively). For clinical C tumours, the prevalence of pathological stage B and negative margins in the patients treated for either 3 or 6 months was not as high as in the clinical B tumours, when compared with the untreated group (pathological stage B: 31% and 33% vs. 6% in the clinical C cases, respectively. Negative margins: 56% and 67% vs. 31%, respectively). The initial results of this study suggest that total androgen ablation before RP is beneficial in men with clinical stage B because of the significant pathological downstaging and decrease in the number of positive margins in the RP specimens. These two effects are more pronounced after six months of NHT than after three months of therapy. The same degree of beneficial effects are not observed in clinical C tumours.

Progression in and survival of patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (T3) treated with radical prostatectomy as monotherapy

PURPOSE

We determine the progression and survival rates in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy without adjuvant treatment, and investigate subgroups of patients who may not benefit from this treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Radical prostatectomy was performed in 83 patients with T3 prostate cancer. The patients were divided in subgroups with T3G1 to 2 and T3G3 tumors, which were evaluated for clinical progression, local recurrence, distant metastases, biochemical progression, and overall and cancer specific survival at 5 and 10 years by Kaplan-Meier curves. The results were compared to those of 190 patients with locally confined tumors.

RESULTS

At 5 and 10 years overall survival was 75 and 60%, and cancer specific survival was 85 and 72%, respectively. At 5 and 10 years clinical progression was 41 and 69%, local recurrence 18 and 44%, and distant metastases 31 and 50%, respectively. Biochemical progression at 5 years was 71%. Patients with poorly differentiated tumors showed significantly lower survival and higher progression rates compared to those with well or moderately differentiated tumors. Progression and survival in patients with T3G1-2 tumor were not significantly different from those for patients with locally confined tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Radical prostatectomy as monotherapy in patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic prostate cancer (T3) produces acceptable results in those with well or moderately differentiated tumors. The results of progression and survival are not significantly different from those in patients with locally confined prostate cancer. However, patients with poorly differentiated tumors (T3G3) have early progression and need adjuvant treatment following surgery.

Outpatient ultrasound-guided palladium 103 brachytherapy for localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a preliminary report of 434 patients

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of palladium 103 (Pd-103) brachytherapy in Stage T1 and T2 adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

METHODS

Charts of 474 patients treated between 1991 and 1996 with transperineal real-time ultrasound-guided Pd-103 implants were reviewed to assess post-treatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and follow-up biopsy results. Of 474 patients, 434 had sufficient data for this report. The implant technique used allows precise placement of seeds and accurate dose delivery of the entire prostate. Preoperative neoadjuvant leuprolide (Lupron) and flutamide (Eulexin) were given selectively to reduce prostate size greater than 50 cc and for Gleason grade lesions greater than 7.

RESULTS

Of 434 patients, successful cancer control was demonstrated in 81% of patients by a decrease in PSA levels to less than 1.5 ng/mL at 1 year. Biopsies were negative in 88% of patients 1 year after the procedure and in 89% at 2 years. Analysis of the data suggests that patients with pretreatment PSA levels less than 10 ng/mL had the best outcomes. There were no disease-related deaths; the predominant morbidity was short-term bladder and bowel irritation without permanent sequelae. Incontinence occurred in less than 5% of patients who had undergone prior transurethral resection of the prostate. Impotence occurred in less than 15% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The technique used in this study proved effective in reducing PSA levels to less than 1.5 ng/mL and in producing negative biopsies 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Results are comparable to external-beam radiation therapy, demonstrating a significant reduction in morbidity.

Pathological changes in prostate lesions after androgen manipulation

The number of newly diagnosed cases of prostate cancer has doubled in the past four years because of the aging of the population coupled with growing awareness of the importance of early detection. The issues of clinical understaging and resection limit positivity have led to the development of novel management practices, including neoadjuvant hormonal treatment, which aims to downstage the primary tumour and decrease the positive margin rate before definitive localised treatment (radical prostatectomy or definitive radiation treatment (neoadjuvant)). There is conflicting evidence regarding pathological downstaging, with some studies suggesting benefit and others no benefit of androgen manipulation before radical prostatectomy. The problem might be related to incomplete sampling of the prostates and difficulties associated with the pathological interpretation of morphological changes. The least controversial aspect of neoadjuvant treatment is its impact on surgical margins. Most series have shown that neoadjuvant treatment in clinical T2 tumours is associated with a 20-25% decrease in positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. In patients with clinical T3 tumours, the effects of neoadjuvant treatment on positive margins are less clear. Even if some early significant advantages can be observed following hormonal treatment this may not alter the metastatic spread and overall survival rate. Only long term follow up studies evaluating biological and clinical failures, time to progression, and survival will allow definitive conclusions from this approach.