Endocrine Aspects of Impotence

Routine endocrine screening in impotence

Routine hormonal screening (serum testosterone and prolactin) of 300 men presenting with a primary complaint of impotence resulted in detection of endocrine dysfunction in 5 men (1.7%). Four patients had hypogonadism, and 1 patient had a prolactin-secreting pituitary adenoma. The cost of screening these men for endocrine dysfunction was $34,722.00. Despite this cost and the low yield of endocrine disease detection, routine determination of serum testosterone and prolactin provides useful information to the clinician evaluating impotent men and when abnormal, indicates the need for thorough endocrine evaluation.

Cost-effective evaluation of impotence

Two hundred consecutive men presenting with a chief complaint of impotence have been evaluated with a protocol involving one or two outpatient visits. The initial evaluation for all patients consisted of a history taken in a conventional manner and supplemented by a patient-completed sexual function questionnaire, physical examination, serum testosterone and prolactin, and two-night nocturnal penile tumescence studies. Following the initial evaluation the patients were placed in one of three categories: (1) organic impotence, (2) functional impotence, (3) ambiguous impotence (mixed functional and organic impotence or organic impotence of undetermined etiology). Patients in the latter group underwent additional testing including penile vascular studies, two-hour oral glucose tolerance test, and psychiatric consultation. With this protocol, patients can be efficiently and effectively evaluated as outpatients with costs ranging from +250 to +450.

Endocrine dysfunction in impotence: incidence, significance and cost-effective screening

A comprehensive evaluation of impotence includes assessment of the functional integrity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis. However, little is known about the incidence or significance of hormonal abnormalities in an unselected group of men with erectile failure. A systematic multidisciplinary, multidimensional assessment of 256 impotent men showed clearly an organic etiology in 35.9 per cent, psychogenic in 38.3 per cent and mixed or uncertain in 25.8 per cent. The incidence of hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis abnormalities in the entire group was 17.5 per cent but in only 12.1 per cent did they contribute clearly to erectile dysfunction. A cost-effective screening of the endocrine system in impotent men includes a thorough history and physical examination, and a serum testosterone determination. More sophisticated and expensive investigations should be reserved for patients with a history of drug use known to induce hormonal abnormalities or with somatic evidence of hypogonadism and a depressed serum testosterone level.