Complex renal reconstruction

The predictive value of helical computed tomography for collecting-system entry during nephron-sparing surgery

OBJECTIVES

To assess the ability of helical computed tomography (CT) including multiplanar reformatting and volume rendering (3D CT) to predict collecting system entry at surgery, as helical CT can be used to delineate renal tumour and normal renal anatomy before nephron-sparing surgery (NSS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Knowledge of the possibility of collecting system entry during surgery might either dissuade some surgeons from NSS in elective situations or influence the operative approach or ablative technology in cases where NSS is imperative, or prepare the surgeon for the possibility of collecting system repair. We reviewed all 3D CT (349 scans) obtained before NSS at our institution over three consecutive years. Tumour size, central tumour extension, and presence of calyceal involvement were prospectively recorded at the time of 3D rendering. Collecting system entry was analysed for these three CT variables, and for three clinical variables (tumour side, size and surgical approach) collected retrospectively from the medical records. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values.

RESULTS

Of 344 patients, 170 had collecting system entry reported at surgery. There were statistically significant associations between collecting system entry and central tumour location by CT (sensitivity 58.8%, specificity 80.5%, P < 0.001), calyceal involvement at CT (sensitivity 53.5%, specificity 78.2%, P < 0.001), and tumour size on CT of > 4 cm (sensitivity 39.4%, specificity 74.7%, P = 0.005). There were no significant associations with side or type of surgery (P > 0.83).

CONCLUSION

Helical CT is a reliable predictor of calyceal entry at surgery.

Tumours of the ureter and renal pelvis treated with resection and renal autotransplantation: a study with up to 20 years of follow-up

OBJECTIVE

To report long-term follow-up data from patients treated with resection of urothelial neoplasms of the upper urinary tract combined with autotransplantation of the kidney.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a clinical and histopathological review of 23 patients who had 25 autotransplantations, they were followed for 7-20 years or until death. Nine patients had either a solitary kidney or bilateral renal pelvic tumours (group A) and 14 had a normal contralateral kidney (group B).

RESULTS

Seven operations were unsuccessful, ending in nephrectomy. Of the nine patients in group A two with high-grade renal pelvic tumours survived with no dialysis and recurrences for 127 and 238 months, respectively. Three patients required haemodialysis 0-3 times weekly for 27, 85 and 108 months, respectively. Three patients with low-grade disease developed invasive recurrences in the autotransplanted kidney after 16, 27 and 90 months, respectively, and later died from the disease. One patient died in an accident after 14 months. Of the 14 patients in group B, one developed a deeply invasive recurrence in the autotransplanted kidney after 86 months, despite frequent controls.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with a normal contralateral kidney resection and renal autotransplantation is not indicated and might even be harmful, compared to standard nephroureterectomy. The operation might be beneficial in patients with solitary kidneys but other treatments should first be considered, including open or endoscopic resection, and nephroureterectomy and haemodialysis.

LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY, EX VIVO EXCISION AND AUTOTRANSPLANTATION FOR COMPLEX RENAL TUMORS

PURPOSE

In many patients partial nephrectomy is the preferred alternative to radical nephrectomy for upper urinary tract cancers. We describe the use of laparoscopic nephrectomy, ex vivo excision and reconstruction, and autotransplantation to expand the realm of minimally invasive, nephron sparing surgery to the most complex renal tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In our cohort undergoing renal surgery 2 patients had a solitary kidney with renal tumors not considered amenable to in situ partial nephrectomy. After transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy ex vivo tumor excision and renorrhaphy were performed. The kidney was transplanted to the ipsilateral iliac vessels through the Gibson extraction incision.

RESULTS

Indications for surgery were high grade urothelial carcinoma within a caliceal diverticulum and a central 5 cm renal cell carcinoma. Mean nephrectomy, cold ischemic and transplantation times were 4.5, 2 and 3.7 hours, respectively. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were noted. Hospitalization was 12 and 6 days, respectively. At 20 and 12 months of followup each patient remained off dialysis without evidence of recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite experience with conventional nephron sparing surgery some cases may be more appropriate for ex vivo excision and reconstruction. In these situations the minimally invasive approach provides a kidney suitable for renal autotransplantation, while simultaneously decreasing patient morbidity. This novel approach to complex renal tumors is feasible when one applies principles of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and possesses experience with renal transplantation.

Laparoscopic nephrectomy and autotransplantation for severe iatrogenic ureteral injuries

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic nephrectomy with autotransplantation in cases of severe proximal ureteral damage. Many patients with complex proximal ureteral injuries have good functional renal parenchyma and wish to salvage their kidney. Autotransplantation is a viable alternative to nephrectomy in these frustrating situations.

METHODS

Two patients, aged 32 and 36 years, underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy and autotransplantation for treatment of severe proximal ureteral injuries. The injuries included a ureteropelvic junction avulsion and a proximal ureteral avulsion, respectively. Both patients had good functional renal parenchyma. A transperitoneal laparoscopic approach was used, and the kidney was removed by way of a Gibson incision.

RESULTS

The procedures were successful, with immediate return of renal function in both patients. A pyeloureterostomy to the native distal ipsilateral ureter was required in one and a direct ureterovesical anastomosis was performed in the other. In the 2 patients, the warm ischemia time was 4.5 and 4 minutes, the transplant operative time 175 and 150 minutes, and the estimated blood loss 150 and 75 mL, respectively. No intraoperative complications occurred. At follow-up, the kidneys were functional, and the patients had returned to their normal activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic nephrectomy with autotransplantation is an excellent alternative to nephrectomy or bowel interposition in patients with proximal ureteral loss, irrespective of the contralateral renal function. This procedure is associated with acceptable morbidity and preserves the renal function. This approach is desirable in those patients who have had complications from other surgical procedures and are otherwise facing the loss of a normally functioning kidney.