Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Women with gastrointestinal symptoms: implications for nursing research and practice

Irritable bowel syndrome and functional bowel disorder are diagnoses used to describe chronic GI symptoms for which no overt pathological condition can be identified. Symptoms are more common in women and are frequently followed in gastroenterology clinics. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the research linking GI symptoms and reproductive cycling and to discuss implications for practice. GIGl symptoms such as stomach pain and nausea are highest during menses compared with other cycle phases; also, stool consistency is loosest at menses. This pattern is present in control subjects. In women with irritable bowel syndrome the same pattern is seen but with higher symptom intensity. Although animal studies have demonstrated that estrogen and progesterone modulate contractile function of some GI segments. In humans, symptoms are highest when these hormones are at the lowest levels. Thus, symptoms in women may be related to decreasing ovarian hormone levels or to other circulating hormones or factors which vary with the menstrual cycle. Additionally, other factors such as stress aggravate symptoms. Therapeutics directed toward increasing patient awareness of cyclic patterns in symptom complaints, for example, via the use of daily symptom diaries may be a useful adjunct to dietary, pharmacological, and other therapies.

The role of psychological factors in gastrointestinal conditions. A review pertinent to DSM-IV

The authors reviewed the literature to assess the relationship between psychological factors and gastrointestinal conditions. The conditions that were found to be more relevant and worthy of future investigation were nonulcerative dyspepsia, inflammatory bowel disease (regional enteritis), and irritable bowel syndrome. The pertinent findings suggest that an important link exists between psychological factors and gastroenterological disorders, which supports the need for modification of the DSM-III-R's diagnostic category, "Psychological Factors Affecting Physical Condition." In concert with a subcommittee addressing other organ systems and psychological factors, the authors conclude that a diagnostic approach with greater utility would be useful for both researchers and clinicians. A conceptual framework as proposed in DSM-IV could also advance knowledge of psychological factors and their contribution or role in the etiology, perpetuation, and exacerbation of certain gastrointestinal conditions.