Spinal trauma: new guidelines for assessment and management in the out-of-hospital environment

Comparison of three prehospital cervical spine protocols for missed injuries

Introduction

We wanted to compare 3 existing emergency medical services (EMS) immobilization protocols: the Prehospital Trauma Life Support (PHTLS, mechanism-based); the Domeier protocol (parallels the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study [NEXUS] criteria); and the Hankins’ criteria (immobilization for patients <12 or >65 years, those with altered consciousness, focal neurologic deficit, distracting injury, or midline or paraspinal tenderness).To determine the proportion of patients who would require cervical immobilization per protocol and the number of missed cervical spine injuries, had each protocol been followed with 100% compliance.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study of patients ≥18 years transported by EMS post-traumatic mechanism to an inner city emergency department. Demographic and clinical/historical data obtained by physicians were recorded prior to radiologic imaging. Medical record review ascertained cervical spine injuries. Both physicians and EMS were blinded to the objective of the study.

Results

Of 498 participants, 58% were male and mean age was 48 years. The following participants would have required cervical spine immobilization based on the respective protocol: PHTLS, 95.4% (95% CI: 93.1–96.9%); Domeier, 68.7% (95% CI: 64.5–72.6%); Hankins, 81.5% (95% CI: 77.9–84.7%). There were 18 cervical spine injuries: 12 vertebral fractures, 2 subluxations/dislocations and 4 spinal cord injuries. Compliance with each of the 3 protocols would have led to appropriate cervical spine immobilization of all injured patients. In practice, 2 injuries were missed when the PHTLS criteria were mis-applied.

Conclusion

Although physician-determined presence of cervical spine immobilization criteria cannot be generalized to the findings obtained by EMS personnel, our findings suggest that the mechanism-based PHTLS criteria may result in unnecessary cervical spine immobilization without apparent benefit to injured patients. PHTLS criteria may also be more difficult to implement due to the subjective interpretation of the severity of the mechanism, leading to non-compliance and missed injury.

A synthesis of best evidence for the restoration of upper-extremity function in people with tetraplegia

PURPOSE

Because upper-limb function represents overall function for individuals with tetraplegia, the restoration of upper-extremity function is exceedingly important for this population. The purpose of this review was to identify interventions that optimize upper-limb function after tetraplegia based on best available evidence.

METHODS

A search of MEDLINE, AMED, and PubMed with the search terms "hand function AND tetraplegia" and "upper limb function AND tetraplegia" found 384 articles. After elimination of duplicates and review of titles and abstracts, 43 studies were found to be applicable. Study quality of all applicable studies was assessed with a modified version of the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network for Cohort Studies methodology.

RESULTS

The applicable studies were organized into three categories: conventional therapies (CT), electrical stimulation therapies (ES), and surgical interventions (SI). The proportion of papers in each category that presented with sufficient methodological quality to contribute to best evidence was as follows: CT: 0/2; ES: 10/21; SI: 6/20.

CONCLUSIONS

ES therapies are beneficial as assistive technologies and as therapeutic intervention in the subacute phase of recovery. SIs are suitable for individuals who meet very specific criteria for tendon-transfer surgery. Further clinical trials are warranted for ES and SI therapies to substantiate prescription of therapeutics.

The importance of maintaining spinal precautions

Spinal injuries are devastating, often leaving the patient paralyzed or with a permanent deficit. Aspiring athletes may not be able to persue their dreams secondary to a spinal injury; families are often left without a major wage earner to support them; and individuals are dependent upon others for the fulfillment of their basic needs. Education is essential for the prevention of primary and secondary spinal injuries; nurses play a key role in both these areas.

Managing neural tissue injury in combined vertebral column-spinal cord injury

Orthopaedic, neurosurgical, and trauma nurses all care for patients who have sustained a spinal cord injury (SCI) and are challenged to address care issues related to spinal stability as well as neurologic function. Advances in the understanding of the pathobiology of SCI have given rise to a three-tiered, time-sensitive approach to intervention designed to optimize functional recovery. Immediately after injury, pharmacologic strategies dominate. They are generally intended to limit progression of the initial injury, preserve existing neurologic function, and create the nidus for future regeneration. This article reviews the current standard of care with respect to hyperacute neuroprotection after blunt SCI in adults. After a synopsis of selected concepts in the pathophysiology of injury and pharmacology, clinical trial results will be presented, followed by a discussion of the nursing implications associated with the use of high-dose methylprednisolone neuroprotective therapy.

Refractory hypotension in trauma: a case study

In the patient with blunt trauma, diagnosis of the cause of ongoing hypotension may be difficult. A number of causes may contribute to refractory hypotension, either alone or in combination. However, by following standard algorithms for the management of these patients, causes can be excluded or identified, then managed appropriately. The following case study highlights one of the diagnoses of exclusion for refractory hypotension in the blunt trauma victim. Ongoing considerations and implications for the nursing care of spinal injured patients are also discussed.