Dentin permeability to phosphoric acid: effect of treatment with bonding resin

Qualitative analysis of the margins of restorations made with different filling resins

PURPOSE

In this study the comparative results obtained from examinations of two different restorative composites with different cavities filling method are presented. Micro-CT was used for the evaluation of the marginal integrity and quality of composite fillings in connection with microstructural investigations made by both optical and scanning electron microscopy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The examinations of dental tooth filings in bulk-fill technique were based on micro-CT and microscopy observations. Two different restorative composites were selected for the study, namely SonicFill- bulk fill and conventional Filtek Z550.

RESULTS

The experiment has shown that micro-CT screening analysis for identification of individual components of tooth and fillings systems gives a high quality of images. Thanks to that it was possible to analyze and identify the porosity in the fillings. But the microscopy analysis has shown more information about the internal structure and quality of bonding between composite and enamel/dentin. The SonicFill gives better quality and bonding to structure of teeth than Filtek.

CONCLUSIONS

SonicFill's filling have more homogenous structure than Filtec. It has a greater share of reinforcement in the form of polygonal particles, in Filtek particles have a shape close to spherical. Sonic Fill gives a better adhesion to tooth.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The evaluation of clinical relevance in this research is crucial to simplify the transfer of knowledge from research by materials engineering into practice in dentistry.

Detection of acid diffusion through bovine dentine after adhesive application

AIM

Acidic diffusion through bovine dentine was investigated by measuring pH changes on dentine surfaces after applying three adhesive systems.

METHODOLOGY

Coronal incisor bovine dentine discs, 0.5 mm thick, were prepared from dentine close to the pulp chamber. A single-bottle adhesive system-Single Bond, a self-etching primer system-Clearfil SE Bond and an 'all-in-one' adhesive system-AQ Bond were used. The labial dentine surfaces were conditioned as follows: Single Bond groups: (SB-1) 35% phosphoric acid etchant was applied and left in place; (SB-2) the etchant was applied for 15 s and rinsed off for 10 s; (SB-3) application of adhesive agent and light curing following step SB-2; Clearfil SE Bond groups: (SE-1) SE primer was applied for 20 s and dried; (SE-2) application of adhesive agent and light curing following step SE-1; AQ Bond groups: (AQ-1) AQ Bond adhesive was applied for 20 s and dried, applied for additional 5 s and dried again; (AQ-2) light curing following step AQ-1. The pH change on the pulpal dentine surface was measured using a pH-imaging microscope.

RESULTS

All the Single Bond groups revealed a lower pH on the pulpal surface (pH 6.25, 6.59 and 6.64 for SB-1, SB-2 and SB-3, respectively) compared with intact dentine. Clearfil SE Bond and AQ Bond groups showed no significant deference in pH value from intact dentine.

CONCLUSIONS

Acid diffusion from phosphoric acid etching was observed when placed on 0.5 mm-thick dentine discs; however, there was only limited evidence of acid diffusion from SE primer and AQ Bond.

Bond strengths of luting cements to potassium oxalate-treated dentin

Potassium oxalate is gaining popularity as a dentin treatment to prevent the development of dentin sensitivity. Because treated dentin surfaces are covered with calcium oxalate crystals, the bond strength of cements to oxalate-treated dentin required investigation. This study determined the tensile bond strengths of glass-ionomer, polycarboxylate, and zinc phosphate cements used to cement castings to dentin treated with either water or potassium oxalate. The results indicate that oxalate-treated dentin did not affect the bond strength of glass-ionomer or polycarboxylate cements, but produced a large decrease in the bond strength of zinc phosphate cement.

Keeping the pulp alive: the pharmacology and toxicology of agents applied to dentine

Materials applied to teeth release chemicals which may diffuse through dentine to either harm or help the dental pulp. Chemical threats are minimized by material choice or by using relatively impermeable lining or base materials which are themselves of low chemical toxicity. The most probable long-term threat to the pulp in the restored tooth is bacterial, through leakage around restorations. This may be prevented by the use of treatment sequences designed to develop an effective seal. Pulpal inflammation is treated primarily by removal of the irritant cause; inflammation may also be suppressed in the very short term by corticosteroids, and its resolution aided in the longer term by zinc oxide-eugenol preparations.

Clinical considerations of microleakage

Most dental materials permit the microleakage of bacteria and bacterial products from oral fluids to reach dentin. Thus, an understanding of the clinical consequences of microleakage demands that we analyze the permeability characteristics of dentin. The more dentin surface that is exposed during tooth preparation, the greater the potential for microleakage. Thicker dentin is less permeable than thin dentin. Dentin over pulp horns is more permeable than central dentin. Similarly, the dentin making up axial walls is more permeable than dentin forming the pulpal floor of cavities. Coronal dentin is much more permeable than root dentin. In addition to the number of tubules per unit area, tubule diameter, and the location of the dentin in a tooth, another extremely important variable is the presence or absence of a smear layer. When smear layers are created, grinding debris are forced into each tubule to form a smear plug. Smear plugs are usually 1- to 2-microns long but may be 10-microns long. They are much longer than the smear layer thickness and they reduce dentin permeability more than the overlying smear layer. Smear layers constitute a natural cavity liner that reduces the permeability of dentin far more than any cavity varnish. However, its presence limits the strength of dentin bonding agents because of the relatively low cohesive forces holding the smear layer together and to dentin. If it is removed, the bond strengths of dentin adhesive resins increases, but removal also increases the potential liability for pulpal inflammation if the bond is not uniformly perfect.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of etching glass-ionomer cements on bond strength to composite resin

The use of glass-ionomer cement in restorative dentistry has seen a revival because of its capacity for being etched and bonded to composite resin. Past investigators compared an etched cement surface with an unetched surface that was set against a smooth surface. Clinically, however, a glassy smooth surface is not produced when the cement is used as a base. Using Scotchbond bonding resin, we developed this two-part study to evaluate the tensile bond strengths of P-30TM composite resin to several glass-ionomer cements that were (a) unetched but allowed to set in air and (b) etched for 30 s with orthophosphoric acid, and to compare them with the cohesive strength of the respective cement. Using a silver nitrate staining technique, we also evaluated the microleakage of class V cavities restored with SiluxTM composite resin under a base of etched or unetched Ketac Bond cement. Although there were significant differences among three cements between their cohesive strength and the resin bond strength after the two surface treatments (p less than 0.01), the bond to the unetched surface was generally similar to that of the etched surface of the cement. The remaining groups showed no statistical difference. The microleakage was similar in the two groups. SEM micrographs showed a rough topography of the unetched cement that resembled that of the etched surface. This in vitro study suggests that acid-etching a glass-ionomer base for resin-bonding may not be necessary for specific materials. Further clinical evaluation is recommended to validate this observation intra-orally.