The effect of stiffness on the localization of tensile stress at the surface of bonded posterior restorations

In Vitro Performance of Class I and II Composite Restorations: A Literature Review on Nondestructive Laboratory Trials—Part I

Posterior adhesive restorations are a basic procedure in general dental practices, but their application remains poorly standardized as a result of the number of available options. An abundant number of study hypotheses corresponding to almost unlimited combinations of preparation techniques, adhesive procedures, restorative options, and materials have been described in the literature and submitted to various evaluation protocols. A literature review was thus conducted on adhesive Class I and II restorations and nondestructive in vitro tests using the PubMed/Medline database for the 1995-2010 period. The first part of this review discusses the selected literature related to photoelasticity, finite element analysis (FEM), and microleakage protocols. Based on the aforementioned evaluation methods, the following parameters proved influential: cavity dimensions and design, activation mode (light or chemical), type of curing light, layering technique, and composite structure or physical characteristics. Photoelasticity has various limitations and has been largely (and advantageously) replaced by the FEM technique. The results of microleakage studies proved to be highly inconsistent, and the further use of this technique should be strictly limited. Other study protocols for adhesive Class II restorations were also reviewed and will be addressed in part II of this article, together with a tentative relevance hierarchy of selected in vitro methods.

The effect of mouthguard design on stresses in the tooth-bone complex

PURPOSE

Mouthguards protect the tooth-bone complex from impact loads that occur during sporting activity. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of varying mouthguard thickness and stiffness on the magnitude of tensile stresses in the tooth-bone-complex.

METHODS

A two-dimensional, plane stress, finite element representation of a central maxillary incisor (CMI) is created. For validation purposes, displacements of the incisal edge of the unprotected tooth model are compared with in vivo displacements under similar loads. A protective mouthguard is then superimposed over the model with varied labial thickness (1-6 mm) and stiffness (9-900MPa) representing a range of designs available. A large horizontal static load of 500N is then applied to the anterior surface of the mouthguard and the resulting stresses in the tooth-bone complex are presented. It is suggested that this loading condition most accurately represent the situation occurring when a guarded tooth collides with a soft object (e.g. boxing glove).

RESULTS

It is generally found that mouthguard thickness and stiffness are both desirable in terms of reducing stresses. However, the protection offered by the low-stiffness guards, regardless of thickness, is minimal. Since this low-stiffness (9MPa) is representative of the most common choice of material in mouthguard fabrication, such findings may cast doubt on the ability of popular mouthguards to redistribute stress.

CONCLUSION

While few would disagree that these low-stiffness guards absorb shock during hard-object collisions (e.g. baseballs), they may not protect the tooth-bone during soft-object collisions (e.g. boxing gloves). In order to optimize their protective capabilities for a range of loads, the range of materials used in mouthguard construction may have to be reconsidered.

Effect of adhesive layer properties on stress distribution in composite restorations--a 3D finite element analysis

OBJECTIVES

Teeth, adhesively restored with resin-based materials, were modeled by 3D-finite elements analysis that showed a premature failure during polymerization shrinkage and occlusal loading.

METHODS

Simulation of Class II MOD composite restorations with a resin bonding system revealed a complex biomechanical behavior arising from the simultaneous effects of polymerization shrinkage, composite stiffness and adhesive interface strain. Due to a polymerization contraction, shrinkage stress increases with the rigidity of the composites utilised in the restoration, while the cusp movements under occlusal loading are inversely proportional to the rigidity of the composites. The adhesive layer's strain also plays a relevant role in the attenuation of the polymerization and occlusal loading stresses.

RESULTS

The choice of an appropriately compliant adhesive layer, able to partially absorb the composite deformation, limits the intensity of the stress transmitted to the remaining natural tooth tissues. For adhesives and composites of different rigidities, FEM analysis allows the determination of the optimal adhesive layer thickness leading to maximum stress release while preserving the interface integrity. Application of a thin layer of a more flexible adhesive (lower elastic modulus) leads to the same stress relief as thick layers of less flexible adhesive (higher elastic modulus).