Effect of ultrasound screening on the rate of first operative procedures for developmental hip dysplasia in Germany

ECAD study: Evaluating agreement degree among paediatricians in hip dysplasia assessment by the Graf ultrasound method

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is the most common musculoskeletal anomaly of childhood. This study analyses paediatrician's concordance performing hip ultrasound according to Graf's method. An analytical cross-sectional study is designed. Patients' hips are evaluated by Graf's ultrasound method at 4-6 and 12-16 weeks of age. Demographic characteristics, pregnancy history, factors related to DDH, hip type, and α and β angles are collected. To assess the agreement degree of hip diagnosis and hip types Kappa index (I. kappa) is used. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) evaluates the concordance of α and β angles. A p value < 0.05 is considered statistically significant. All results are represented with their 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Four hundred sixty-seven neonates are recruited and meet the inclusion criteria. A total of 3182 images were analysed. Agreement between paediatricians according to hip diagnosis and different types ranges from moderate to almost perfect I. kappa 0.6-1.0 (95% CI 0.5-0.7; 95% CI 1.0-1.0). α angle ICC for paediatricians is between 0.75 and 0.88 (95% CI 0.61-0.86; 95% CI 0.80-0.92). β angle value agreement degree among paediatricians at both visits is moderate. The Graf method is the most popular ultrasound technique for hip assessment. In our setting, paediatricians carry out children follow-up; therefore, they should perform universal screening. In this study agreement degree between paediatricians varies between substantial and almost perfect. Conclusion: The Graf ultrasound procedure performed by paediatricians is a reliable test and can be used for DDH screening. What is Known • Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is the most common congenital musculoskeletal anomaly of childhood. Early diagnosis and treatment improve DDH prognosis. Lack of detection can cause complications such as lameness, early osteoarthritis and need for hip replacement at an early age. What is New • Today, the best screening method is still subject of debate. But it seems that with selective screening many pathological hips go unnoticed. Universal screening implementation may be a challenge in some countries. But the question is if this could be carried out by paediatricians as part of healthy child follow-up.

Six years of experience with the nationwide newborn ultrasonographic hip screening program in Turkey: a considerable change in the type of surgical interventions in developmental dysplasia of the hip

This study aims to assess whether or not the nationwide newborn ultrasonographic hip screening program has influenced the rate of different types of surgical interventions performed in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in children in Turkey. A retrospective analysis of the nationwide data obtained from the National Registry System between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020, was carried out. The rate of minor and major surgical interventions was calculated by dividing the total number of primary closed/open reductions with or without tenotomies and the total number of primary pelvic or periacetabular osteotomies with or without femoral osteotomies by the total number of live births in the country per year, respectively. The rates of primary minor surgical interventions were found to be 0.47/1000 in 2015, 0.71/1000 in 2016, 1.07/1000 in 2017, 1.00/1000 in 2018, 1.06/1000 in 2019, and 0.89/1000 in 2020. The rates of primary major surgical intervention were found to be 0.74/1000 in 2015, 0.40/1000 in 2016, 0.33/1000 in 2017, 0.31/1000 in 2018, 0.32/1000 in 2019, and 0.21/1000 in 2020. The introduction of the nationwide newborn hip screening program has significantly changed the surgical treatment modalities in children with DDH. A nearly twofold increase in the rate of primary closed/open reduction and hip spica casting and nearly three quarters decrease in the rate of primary bony procedures were observed within 6 years.

Chondro-osseous border in baby hip ultrasonography for developmental dysplasia of the hip: an indispensable litmus paper for the accuracy of scientific publications

PURPOSE

The aim of our study was to use the chondro-osseous border (COB) as an indispensable assessment criterion to evaluate the quality of baby hip ultrasonography (US) images in the literature pertaining to the application of Graf's technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our literature review search yielded 144 articles. Of these, 41 contained images that were stated to be based on the application of Graf's technique. Two reviewers, a radiologist and an orthopaedic surgeon, both course instructors for the use of baby hip US for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), independently evaluated the articles to assess the diagnostic validity of the published images on the basis of a single criterion: the identification of the COB.

RESULTS

Of the 41 articles which were analyzed, 15 contained images without a COB, which corresponds to 36% (roughly, one out of three). Articles from countries where universal screening is performed (Germany, Italy, Switzerland, Mongolia) were all correct. All the articles from Turkey, a country which has made significant contribution with published material about Graf's technique over many years, and most of the articles from China (80%), where Graf's technique has become popular in recent years, contained correct images.

CONCLUSION

Published literature lacks strict criteria for the publication of correct images corresponding to Graf's technique in baby hip US. This fact raises concerns about the quality of published material (and, as a corollary, the quality of clinical application of the technique) and should have ramifications on scientific journal policies regarding the publication of such manuscripts.

Mid-term Follow-Up after Closed Reduction in Developmental Dysplastic Hips

PURPOSE

Closed reduction and subsequent spica casting is the gold standard for treatment of unstable or dislocated developmental dysplastic hips (DDHs). There are few data on mid-term results after treatment of DDH, especially on closed reduction.

METHODS

Thirty-one consecutive patients with unstable or dislocated hips (n = 36) that were treated by fluoroscopic, contrast agent-supported closed reduction and spica casting were included and evaluated clinically and radiologically 2 and 5 years after treatment.

RESULTS

After 2 and 5 years, there were no significant differences between healthy and successfully treated hips that were detectable with respect to acetabular coverage (AC) angle, center-edge angle, and clinical stability of the hip. There was a significant difference at the 2-year follow-up between healthy hips and hips that needed to undergo secondary open reduction surgery (n = 4) with respect to the AC angle (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Closed reduction in DDHs results in acceptable clinical and radiological results in the mid-term follow-up. It remains unclear why some patients with subsequent sonographically matured hips show secondary deterioration and recurrence of dysplasia.

Ultrasonographic screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip: the Graf method revisited

Until the 1980s, the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) was based on clinical examination and radiographic imaging. In 1980, Reinhard Graf developed his own ultrasonographic method for the examination of the infant hip joint. Graf's method evaluates the osseous and cartilaginous coverage of the femoral head by the acetabulum in the infantile hip joint by measuring the angles α and β. The validity of Graf method is that with these measurements the hip joint is further classified by Graf classification into types I to IV that guide treatment. Currently, Graf method is considered the gold standard examination for the diagnosis of DDH in many European countries. This review article aims to discuss the incidence, risk factors and pathophysiology of DDH, and to emphasize on the Graf method for the evaluation, classification, prevention and further management of this entity.

Screening of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in Europe: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a prevalent orthopaedic disorder in children, and screening methods vary across regions due to local health policies. The purpose of this review is to systematise the different ultrasound screening strategies for detecting DDH in newborns in Europe.

METHODS

Eligible studies from the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases, published between 1 January 2018 and 18 March 2023, were included. The inclusion criteria specified a European origin, a focus on newborn human patients, and information on ultrasound for DDH detection.

RESULTS

In total, 45 studies were included, covering 18 countries. Among them, six nations (Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Poland, Slovenia, the Czech Republic, and Germany) perform universal ultrasound screening. The timing of the first ultrasound varies, with Austria and the Czech Republic within the 1st week, Bosnia and Herzegovina on the day of birth, Poland between 1 and 12 weeks, and Germany before the 6th week. The Graf method is the most popular ultrasound technique used.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no consensus on the optimal DDH detection approach in Europe. Varied screening methods stem from epidemiological, cultural, and economic differences among countries.

The effect of selective ultrasound screening on the incidence of late presentation of developmental hip dysplasia-a meta-analysis

Different screening strategies for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) exist. Despite screening efforts, cases of late presentation continue to occur, often necessitating surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis assess the effect of newborn selective ultrasound screening for DDH on the incidence of late presentation in infants and children, compared to a universal ultrasound strategy. A systematic search across Medline and EMBASE databases was performed between January 1950 and February 2021. A consensus-based evaluation of abstracts led to retrieval of relevant full text, original articles or systematic reviews in English only. These were assessed according to agreed eligibility criteria, and their reference lists were reviewed to identify additional eligible publications. Following final consensus on included publications, data was extracted, analysed and reported as per PRISMA and Prospero (CRD42021241957) guidelines. The 16 eligible studies consisted of 2 randomised controlled trials and 14 cohort studies, published between 1989 and 2014, with a total of 511,403 participants. In total, 121,470 (23.8%) received a neonatal hip ultrasound, of whom 58,086 and 63,384 were part of a selective or a universal ultrasound screening strategy, respectively. The difference in the proportion of late presentation between the universal and selective strategies was 0.0904 per 1,000 (P = 0.047). The time effect, i.e. the difference between early and late presentation defined respectively, as less than and more than 3 months of age, regardless of screening strategy, was not significant (P = 0.272). Although there was variability in study design and reporting, the quality of the evidence, based on the critical appraisal skills programme appraisal tools, was generally good. Compared to universal ultrasound screening for DDH, selective screening resulted in a slightly higher rate of late presentation. Uniformity in design and reporting of DDH studies and a cost-effectiveness analysis are needed.

Selective sonographic screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip - increasing trends in late diagnosis

There are concerns that selective sonographic screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) may be suboptimal. Our aim was to test this hypothesis by identifying trends in presentation and surgical treatment in patients with DDH. This is a retrospective review of children born between 1997-2018 who were treated surgically for DDH at our sub- regional paediatric orthopaedic unit. Demographic data, risk factors, age of diagnosis and surgical treatments were analysed. Late diagnosis was defined as greater than 4 months. 103 children (14 male, 89 female) underwent surgery. 93 hips were operated for dislocation and 21 for dysplasia. 13 patients presented with bilateral hip dislocations. The median age at diagnosis was 10 months (95% CI: 4-15). 62/103 (60.2%) were diagnosed late (after 4 months) and the median age for diagnosis in this group was 18.5 months (95% CI: 16-20.5). Significantly more patients were referred late (p=0.0077). The presence of risk factors (breech presentation or family history) was associated with early diagnosis. Over the duration of our study the operation rate per 1000 live births gradually increased, and on Poisson regression analysis there was a statistically significant increasing trend towards late diagnosis in recent years (p=0.0237), which necessitated more aggressive surgical management. In the UK, the current selective sonographic screening programme for DDH has shown a deterioration over the years of this study and this questions its current effectiveness. It appears that the majority of irreducible hip dislocations are diagnosed late, with an increased need for surgical management.

Intra- and interobserver variability of novel magnetic resonance imaging parameters for hip screening and treatment outcomes at age 5 years

BACKGROUND

The outcome measure of neonatal hip screening is usually the radiographic acetabular index.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) without sedation and compare the utility of outcome parameters measured from MRI images.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The invitation for MRI scanning at 5 years of age was incorporated into follow-up for babies who had more than one ultrasound examination during treatment or surveillance.

RESULTS

Diagnostic images were obtained in 132 of 134 children. The mean osseous acetabular index (standard deviation [SD]) was 16.6 (3.3) degrees for the right hip and 17.8 (3.2) for the left; the values for the cartilaginous acetabular index were 3.1 (3) and 3.4 (3.2). The mean downslope of a tangent to the lateral bony acetabular roof was 10.4 (4.5) and 9.0 (4.3) with respect to Hilgenreiner's line and that of a line drawn through the apex to the margin of the acetabulum was 3.7 (4.6) and 3.9 (4.7). Intra- and interobserver variation was greater for measures specific to the lateral acetabular roof than for ossific and cartilaginous indices. There was significant negative correlation between the downslope of the tangent to the lateral roof index and the age at onset of treatment on both sides, but no significant correlation for ossific or cartilaginous acetabular indices or apex-marginal index.

CONCLUSION

MRI without sedation at 5 years of age is feasible as an outcome measure for hip screening programmes. Parameters specific to the lateral acetabulum may better reflect acetabular sufficiency, despite having greater observer variation than cartilaginous and ossific acetabular indices.

The International Hip Dysplasia Institute (IHDI) classification is more informative than the Tönnis classification

BACKGROUND

A new, supposedly more reproducible radiographic classification, set to replace the Tönnis classification of hip dislocations, was proposed in 2015: the International Hip Dysplasia Institute (IHDI) classification.

PURPOSE

To compare the IHDI classification with the Tönnis classification when evaluating the severity of hip dislocations as well as their respective inter- and intra-observer reliability.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Since January 2000, Swedish-born children with a hip dislocation were prospectively registered. From this registry, radiographs of 97 hips in 79 patients (91% girls; median age = 7 months), born in 2000-2009, were analyzed. Two observers, one consultant and one resident, classified each hip both by IHDI and Tönnis twice.

RESULTS

The IHDI classification had a more even distribution of grades with the majority in grade 2-3. The Tönnis classification graded the majority (77%) of the patients as grade 2 and equally among the other grades. There was moderate inter-observer agreement using both methods calculated with Kappa, 0.61 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.44-0.79) for Tönnis and 0.62 (95% CI = 0.49-0.74) for IHDI. The resident calculated Tönnis with weak intra-observer reliability of 0.57 (95% CI = 0.40-0.74) compared to high intra-observer reliability of 0.86 (95% CI = 0.74-0.98) for the consultant. Both observers graded IHDI with high intra-observer reliability.

CONCLUSION

IHDI is more discriminative than the Tönnis classification when evaluating the severity of a hip dislocation in infants.

The management of developmental dysplasia of the hip in children aged under three months : a consensus study from the British Society for Children's Orthopaedic Surgery

AIMS

A national screening programme has existed in the UK for the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) since 1969. However, every aspect of screening and treatment remains controversial. Screening programmes throughout the world vary enormously, and in the UK there is significant variation in screening practice and treatment pathways. We report the results of an attempt by the British Society for Children's Orthopaedic Surgery (BSCOS) to identify a nationwide consensus for the management of DDH in order to unify treatment and suggest an approach for screening.

METHODS

A Delphi consensus study was performed among the membership of BSCOS. Statements were generated by a steering group regarding aspects of the management of DDH in children aged under three months, namely screening and surveillance (15 questions), the technique of ultrasound scanning (eight questions), the initiation of treatment (19 questions), care during treatment with a splint (ten questions), and on quality, governance, and research (eight questions). A two-round Delphi process was used and a consensus document was produced at the final meeting of the steering group.

RESULTS

A total of 60 statements were graded by 128 clinicians in the first round and 132 in the second round. Consensus was reached on 30 out of 60 statements in the first round and an additional 12 in the seond. This was summarized in a consensus statement and distilled into a flowchart to guide clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

We identified agreement in an area of medicine that has a long history of controversy and varied practice. None of the areas of consensus are based on high-quality evidence. This document is thus a framework to guide clinical practice and on which high-quality clinical trials can be developed.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(2):209-214.

Children's Hip Predictive (CHiP) Score: A Triage Tool for Hip Dislocation in Children Referred With Suspected Hip Dysplasia

BACKGROUND

A fundamental tenent of treating developmental dysplasia of the hip is to identify patients with dislocated hips early so as to avoid the long-term sequelae of late diagnosis. The aim of this study was to develop a readily useable triage tool for patients with suspected hip dislocation, based on the clinical history and examination findings of the referring practitioner.

METHODS

All primary care referrals (n=934) over a 3-year period for suspected developmental dysplasia of the hip to a tertiary pediatric center were evaluated. Defined parameters with respect to history and clinical examination were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression was used to establish predictors of hip dislocation, and from this a predictive model was derived which incorporated significant predictors of dislocation. An illustrative nomogram translated this predictive model into a usable numerical scoring system called the Children's Hip Prediction score, which estimates probability of hip dislocation.

RESULTS

There were 97 dislocated hips in 85 patients. The final predictive model included age, sex, family history, breech, gait concerns, decreased abduction, leg length discrepancy, and medical/neurological syndrome. The area under receiver operating curve for the model is 0.761. A Children's Hip Prediction score of≥5 corresponds to a sensitivity of 76.3% and a score of≥15 has a specificity of 97.8%, corresponding to an odds ratio of 27.3 for increased risk of dislocation.

CONCLUSION

We found that a novel clinical prediction score, based on readily available history and examination parameters strongly predicted risk of dislocations in hip dysplasia referral. It is hoped that this tool could be utilized to optimize resource allocation and may be of particular benefit in less well-resourced health care systems.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Residual dysplasia of the hip after successful ultrasound-monitored treatment: how does an infant's hip evolve?

Despite that normal values for the hip joint are reached at the end of ultrasound-monitored-treatment, the development of the acetabulum can be compromised during the growth phase. The acetabular index (AI) measured on a pelvic radiograph has been proven to be a reliable parameter. The aim of this study is to gain a better understanding of the dynamics of once-treated, residually dysplastic hips. This should be achieved by radiographically following these hips up to a milestone-examination at the end of preschool age. A total of 120 hips of consecutive 60 infants were included in this examination, each presenting with a residual developmental dysplasia of the hips (DDH) after successful ultrasound-monitored harness treatment. Radiographic follow-up was assessed retrospectively around 18 months, 3 years and 6 years of age, and the AI was measured. The age-dependent Tönnis classification was applied. The hips were assigned normal, mildly or severely dysplastic. Dependent t -test for paired samples indicated a highly significant improvement of the AI-values, including from the first to the second and from the second to the third follow-up. The percentage distribution into the Tönnis classification changed remarkably: in the first follow-up, 36 of the 120 hips were evaluated 'severely dysplastic', in the third follow-up only 1. On the other hand, three hips underwent acetabuloplasty. Even after normal values have been achieved at the end of ultrasound-monitored treatment, there remains a risk of residual dysplasia of the hips. Particularly, when the first radiographic examination shows nonphysiological findings, further close-meshed follow-up is recommended. Level of evidence: retrospective study of therapeutic outcome, consecutive patients, level II.

Progress in screening strategies for neonatal developmental dysplasia of the hip

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is the most common congenital disease of the musculoskeletal system in newborns and encompasses a disease spectrum ranging from a stable hip with a mildly dysplastic acetabulum to complete hip dislocation. Systematic screening for infant DDH has been performed for several decades all over the world and has contributed greatly to the early detection, diagnosis and treatment of DDH. However, some cases of delayed diagnosis still occur among the screened population, or conversely, overdiagnosis or overtreatment occasionally occurs. Furthermore, screening strategies for DDH are still controversial. The aim of our study was to analyze the current literature on DDH screening, paying particular attention to DDH screening strategies and their effectiveness. We searched the DDH screening literature from 1958 to 2021 in MEDLINE and other databases using PubMed. In this study, we reviewed the history of DDH screening and the progress of screening strategies and discussed the controversies regarding clinical and ultrasound screening methods with particular emphasis on the current opinions. Given the existing scientific evidence and changes in newborn DDH screening practices, universal ultrasound screening seems to be the best option for preventing late-detected cases and can be recommended as a favorable prevention strategy.

Incidence of Neonatal Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip and Late Detection Rates Based on Screening Strategy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

Universal ultrasonographic screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) has gained increasing popularity despite the lack of benefit in terms of reducing the rates of late-detected cases (age ≥12 weeks) in randomized clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE

To report the reported incidence of DDH in the English scientific literature and compare rates of late-detected cases in settings with different DDH screening strategies.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched on November 25 and 27, 2021. No time filters were used in the search.

STUDY SELECTION

All observational studies reporting the incidence of early-detected or late-detected (age ≥12 weeks) DDH were included. Non-English reports were excluded if the abstract did not include enough information to be included for analysis.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

The number of newborns screened and the detection rates were extracted. Meta-analysis calculated the pooled incidence of DDH per 1000 newborns with 95% CIs using a random- or fixed-effects model. This study is reported according to the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcome measures were early detection, early treatment, late detection, and operative treatment incidences.

RESULTS

A total of 1899 studies were identified, 203 full texts were assessed, and 76 studies with 16 901 079 infants were included in final analyses. The early detection rate was 8.4 (95% CI, 4.8-14.8) infants with DDH per 1000 newborns with clinical screening, 4.4 (95% CI, 2.4-8.0) infants with DDH per 1000 newborns with selective ultrasonographic screening, and 23.0 (95% CI, 15.7-33.4) infants with DDH per 1000 newborns with universal ultrasonographic screening. Rates for nonoperative treatment were 5.5 (95% CI, 2.1-14) treatments per 1000 newborns with clinical screening, 3.1 (95% CI, 2.0-4.8) treatments per 1000 newborns with selective ultrasonographic screening, and 9.8 (95% CI, 6.7-14.4) treatments per 1000 newborns with universal ultrasonographic screening. The incidence of late-detected DDH was 0.5 (95% CI, 0.2-1.5) infants with DDH per 1000 newborns with clinical screening, 0.6 (95% CI, 0.3-1.3) infants with DDH per 1000 newborns with selective ultrasonographic screening, and 0.2 (95% CI, 0.0-0.8) infants with DDH per 1000 newborns with universal ultrasonographic screening. The corresponding incidences of operative treatment were 0.2 (95% CI, 0.0-0.9) operations per 1000 newborns with clinical screening, 0.5 (95% CI, 0.4-0.7) operations per 1000 newborns with selective ultrasonographic screening, and 0.4 (95% CI, 0.2-0.7) operations per 1000 newborns with universal ultrasonographic screening.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This meta-analysis found that early detection rates and nonoperative treatments were higher with universal screening. The late detection and operative treatment rates with universal screening were similar to those among selectively and clinically screened newborns. Based on these results, universal screening may cause initial overtreatment without reducing the rates of late detection and operative treatment.

Clinical examination and patients' history are not suitable for neonatal hip screening

Purpose

To assess the percentage of missed developmental dysplasia of the hip, which escape the German criteria for newborn hip high-risk screening, we analyzed our data gained from the general neonatal sonographic hip screening performed at our department. The aim of the study was to determine the number of potentially belatedly treated developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Methods

The data from 1145 standardized newborn hip ultrasound examinations according to the Graf technique were analyzed retrospectively comparing findings for general neonatal sonographic hip screening and high-risk screening subgroups.

Results

We diagnosed developmental dysplasia of the hip in 18 of the 1145 newborns via ultrasound. A total of 10 out of 18 developmental dysplasia of the hip would have been missed by high-risk screening, which corresponds to a proportion of 55.6% false-negative results. The sensitivity of high-risk screening was only 44.4% and specificity, 78.3%. The positive predictive value was 3.2%. Family history as a screening criterion yielded false-negative results in 77.8% and false-positive results in 16.8%. In all, 83.3% of the children who were born with developmental dysplasia of the hip but not from breech position as a risk factor were false negative. The clinical examination was false negative in 88.9% and false positive in 0.6%.

Conclusion

High-risk screening detected less than every second developmental dysplasia of the hip, rendering the first month as the most effective treatment window unavailable for inapparent dysplastic hips, potentially resulting in the need for more invasive treatment. Due to the high sensitivity of ultrasound in the detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip, we recommend to replace the current German high-risk screening guidelines with a general newborn screening for all neonates using Graf ultrasound in the first week of life.

Level of evidence

Level II.

Cold Weather as a Risk Factor for Late Diagnosis and Surgery for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

BACKGROUND

Newborn hip screening aims to prevent the late diagnosis of and subsequent surgical procedures for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Weather may affect how parents swaddle their babies in early life, but weather has never been formally regarded as a risk factor in hip screening. This study investigates the association between the incidence of surgically treated DDH and the outdoor temperature.

METHODS

Surgical procedures for late-diagnosed DDH were investigated in 12 birth-year cohorts (1999 to 2010) using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. The number of children who underwent a DDH-related surgical procedure between 6 months and 5 years of age per total live births was evaluated as an outcome of hip screening. Trend and regression analyses were used to determine the association between the incidence of surgically treated DDH and birth year, birth month, and the temperature during the birth month and first 3 months of life.

RESULTS

The mean incidence of surgically treated DDH was 0.48 per 1,000 live births (1,296 surgically treated patients per 2,712,002 live births). The incidence of surgically treated DDH among babies born in winter months (0.70 per 1,000) was significantly higher than that among babies born in summer months (0.32 per 1,000), and it was significantly correlated with mean temperature in the first 3 months of life (r2 = 0.91; p < 0.0001) and birth month (r2 = 0.68; p < 0.001). Multivariable regression revealed that external temperature in the first 3 months of life was the most significant factor (β = -0.034 [95% confidence interval, -0.042 to -0.022]; p < 0.001) for the incidence of surgically treated DDH (adjusted r2 = 0.485). The trend of seasonal differences remained the same throughout the study years following implementation of the hip-screening policy.

CONCLUSIONS

As the incidence of surgically treated DDH is the ultimate outcome of newborn hip screening, cold weather should be regarded as a risk factor and should be incorporated into future screening programs. Weather patterns of different geographical areas should be studied to determine if children born in the winter are at an increased risk for requiring a surgical procedure for DDH, and newborn hip-screening programs should be revised accordingly.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Four decades of developmental dysplastic hip screening according to Graf: What have we learned?

PURPOSE

Sonographic hip examination according to Graf is widely accepted standard for diagnosing developmental dysplastic hips (DDH) but it is criticized for alleged intra- and interobserver variations. This review was conducted to evaluate whether objective quality criteria according to the Graf method are fulfilled within scientific literature.

METHODS

A systematic literature search on Pubmed was performed using the search string: [(DDH) OR (Hip dysplasia)] AND (Graf). Studies suitable by title, abstract, manuscript, containing an image of sonographic hip examination and online accessibility were included into analysis.

RESULTS

131 studies were included into final analysis. Only 68 (51.9%) presented correct sonographic images according Graf's criteria. 98 (74.8%) studies plotted alpha-angles (angle between bony roof line and base line) but only 85 (64.8%) studies beta-angles (angle between cartilage roof line and base line). Studies were contributed from 25 countries.

CONCLUSION

Assumingly, skepticism regarding the Graf method is based on user errors and insufficient application of the Graf quality assessment algorithm resulting in high intra- and interobserver variations. When performed correctly, the Graf method is of high diagnostic value.

Development of a DDH Care Pathway for India: A Study Methodology to Guide Similar Efforts in Other Countries and for Other Conditions

PURPOSE

In India and other Global South countries, developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is often diagnosed after walking age, leading to more invasive surgeries and long-term disability. DDH care pathways aim to enhance early detection and must be tailored to meet a country's needs and diverse practice settings. We describe a multi-phase methodology for context-specific DDH care pathway development, demonstrating its use in India.

METHODS

In Phase I, Orthopaedic surgeons, Pediatricians/Neonatologists, and Radiologists in India were surveyed regarding DDH screening. Seven relevant Indian organizations partnered together and assembled a multidisciplinary working group, which then met fortnightly to establish an evidence base and prepare for the subsequent consensus-building phase. During Phase II, panelists participated in a modified Delphi process to reach consensus on a list of DDH screening statements. Phase III applied the statements to develop the care pathway.

RESULTS

The Delphi process concluded after a preliminary survey and two Delphi rounds, reaching consensus on 47 statements, which were condensed into 35. The developed care pathway for India features periodic clinical hip examinations integrated with the country's immunization schedule and selective imaging screening, providing flexibility in the timing and modality of imaging.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

In Global South countries, there is a need for DDH care pathways specific to local contexts. Successful care pathway development requires accounting for cultural differences in healthcare and strategies to facilitate engagement and to address country-specific barriers. This methodology was feasible in India and can be applied to other conditions and/or countries wishing to establish care pathways.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Narrative Review on the Role of Imaging in DDH

BACKGROUND

Developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH) represents a spectrum from acetabular dysplasia to fixed dislocation, giving disability through premature osteoarthritis. Most DDH cases continue to present without any known risk factors such as breech presentation, female sex, and family history. Incidence and population-based outcomes of DDH are difficult to reliably establish due to many DDH definitions and classifications using different types of examinations.

PURPOSE

This review takes a historical perspective on the role of imaging in DDH.

METHODS

Pelvic radiographs (X-Ray) were amongst the first medical images identifying DDH, but these have a limited role in infancy due to absent ossification. In the 1980s, ultrasound led to a large expansion in infant DDH screening. Unfortunately, even for well-trained users, DDH indices on ultrasound generally lack reproducibility, and have led to overdiagnosis of mild DDH. CT and MRI more thoroughly evaluate the 3D hip deformity in DDH, but are costly, less available and involve radiation dose and/or anaesthesia.

RESULTS

Recently 3D ultrasound has been used to characterize the 3D deformity of DDH more fully, with improved inter-observer reliability, particularly amongst novice users. 3D ultrasound is also well suited to automated image analysis, but high-resolution 3D probes are costly and not widely available.

CONCLUSION

Combining the latest handheld portable ultrasound probes and artificial intelligence analysis could lead to an inexpensive tool permitting practical mass population screening for DDH. Overall, our understanding of DDH is heavily influenced by the imaging tools used to visualize it and changing quickly with modern technology.

The infants who have mature hip on ultrasonography but have risk factors of developmental dysplasia of the hip are required radiographic examination

Objectives

This study aims to evaluate the short-term results of infants who were radiologically diagnosed with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), but in whom hip development was normal ultrasonographically.

Patients and methods

Between January 2018 and September 2020, a total of 15 infants (2 males, 13 females; median age: 5 months; range, 4 to 6 months) who were diagnosed with DDH radiologically and treated were retrospectively analyzed. Hip ultrasonography was used for early diagnosis, treatment, and for follow-up in infants up to six months of age. While the ultrasonographic findings were normal, radiography was performed in infants between four to six months of age who were at risk for DDH.

Results

Fifteen patients (22 hips) were diagnosed with DDH radiologically and treated. Radiologic dysplasia continued in seven hips of five patients during short-term follow-up.

Conclusion

These results suggest that ultrasonographic hip maturation may not be consistent with normal hip development in infants, particularly in those who are at risk for DDH. In infants with DDH which is confirmed by radiography (less than 6 months of age), the diagnosis may be missed on ultrasonographic examination.

Ultrasound of the neonatal hip as a screening tool for DDH: how to screen and differences in screening programs between European countries

Developmental dysplasia of the hip comprises a broad spectrum of abnormalities in hip development, of variable severity. Besides physical examination, ultrasound is the preferred imaging modality for screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in children aged younger than six months. The Graf method is the most widely used ultrasound technique for infant hips; a stepwise approach will be shown in this article. Furthermore, the process of dynamic ultrasound imaging will be explained as well as the use of transinguinal ultrasound in infants wearing a spica cast. There is no consensus on the best way to screen for developmental dysplasia of the hip, which is probably the reason why different screening programs exist throughout Europe, as will be discussed in this article. The use of universal versus selective ultrasound remains a controversy, as does the timing. Is it better to perform sonography in all newborn infants like in Germany and Austria? Or should we examine only the infants with clinical hip instability or risk factors (breech position, positive family history), like in the UK and the Netherlands? This article reviews the epidemiology, static and dynamic ultrasound techniques in screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip, and differences in screening programs throughout Europe. Set aside the uncertainties about whom and when to screen, it needs to be emphasized that ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip is important, since the disease is initially occult and easier to treat when identified early. In this way, the radiologist can aid in preventing serious disability of the hip.

Screening of Newborns and Infants for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH) is a common disorder of childhood and has a good prognosis when treated at an early age. In spite of being a significant concern, many children with DDH are not picked early and present late at walking age. In our country, it is presumed to be due to absence of a national policy for screening of DDH. Screening programmes including the combination of clinical and radiological methods in different ways have been suggested. However, the exact method of screening is controversial.

PURPOSE

To analyze effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of various screening methods for DDH.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

This review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Medline database was explored for original case series and randomized clinical trials. Inclusion criteria were English language, screening for DDH in neonates, sample size more than 500, and studies with minimum duration of one year.

RESULTS

Thirty-four studies were selected to write the manuscript. This included 23 studies looking for effectiveness of a screening programme and 11 studies comparing various outcomes of different screening strategies. A trend favoring universal ultrasound screening was observed.

CONCLUSION

The literature supports universal ultrasound screening and has proved its cost-effectiveness. However, considering the logistic and financial challenges in our country, immediate implementation of universal ultrasound screening seems impractical. In the absence of any current guidelines for screening for DDH in India, we suggest professional organizations involved in the care of children and public health policy-makers to come together to develop national screening guidelines for DDH.

Early detection of developmental dysplasia of hip by ultrasound

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of early universal ultrasound (US) screening of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective study of universal hip screening of all mature neonates was conducted from 2012 to 2013, at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Szeged; 1636 newborns (3272 hips) had clinical examinations and hip ultrasound by the Graf method within the1st 3 days of life. Prevalence of DDH, risk factors, sensitivity and specificity of clinical examinations were evaluated.

RESULTS

At the 1st US, 70 of the examined 3272 hips (2.14%) were found to be positive. According to Graf categories, the following distribution was observed: type II C, 21 hips (30.0%); D, 24 hips (34.28%); III, 24 hips (34.28%); IV, 1 hip (1.44%). Regarding the risk factors, female gender, breech presentation and positive family history proved to be significant. Interestingly, 28 (50.90%) of the 55 newborns with DDH had neither positive physical signs nor any risk factors, except being female. The physical examination was calculated for sensitivity (20.0%) and specificity (98.34%).

CONCLUSIONS

In our 1-year period study, 50.9% of the newborns with DDH had neither any positive physical signs nor any risk factors, except being a female. In contrast, early universal US screening of the hip facilitated to diagnose all cases with hip dysplasia. Hip sonography is an effective mode of prevention in orthopaedics, however further studies are needed to compare the rates of operative procedures in selective versus universal screening models.

Pulvinar and pubic cartilage measurements to refine universal ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip: Data from 1896 infant hips

PURPOSE

Screening modalities for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) and indications for treatment of mild forms remain controversial. Ultrasound (US) measurement of the pubofemoral distance (PFD > 6 mm, composed of the pubic cartilage and the pulvinar) can avoid late diagnoses of DDH. A thick pubic cartilage may nevertheless lead to false positives. The purpose of this study was to establish standard measurements of pubic cartilage and pulvinar, through universal US screening, to lower false positive results and thus any overtreatment.

METHODS

This is a single-center observational prospective study conducted from December 2016 to January 2018, on infants who underwent universal US screening for DDH. The only inclusion criterion was an adjusted age between 4 and 12 weeks when US was realized. PFD measurement was made using the Couture and Tréguier method. In addition, thicknesses of pubic cartilage and pulvinar were measured on the same US section, in millimeters.

RESULTS

Nine hundred and forty-eight patients, representing 1896 hips, were included. The average value of pubic cartilage thickness was 1.25 mm ± 0.58 mm, with an upper threshold of 2.39 mm (+1.96σ). The average value of pulvinar thickness was 2.67 mm ± 0.78 mm, with an upper threshold of 4.20 mm (+1.96σ). We found high inter-observer reproducibility in pubic cartilage measurements.

CONCLUSION

Systematic measurements of pubic cartilage and pulvinar may refine therapeutic decision by identifying false positives. Patients with increased PFD due to a thick pubic cartilage >2,39 mm, without an associated pulvinar enlargement (<4,20 mm), could be therefore only monitored and not overtreated.

Developmental dysplasia of the hip screening programme in Chile

PURPOSE

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) encompasses a wide pathological spectrum, from mild acetabular dysplasia to complete congenital hip dislocation at birth. Screening policies have been implemented in an effort to effectively identify and treat patients with DDH. Since 2009 there has been a national DDH programme in Chile. The current study evaluates the results of the programme in patients born between 2010 and 2015.

METHODS

Records of patients hospitalized from 1st January 2010 to 31st December 2019 were retrieved from national databases. Those born from 1st January 2010 to 31st December 2015 who underwent a procedure for DDH under general anaesthesia during their first five years of life were selected. Sex, first surgical procedure and age at first surgical procedure were analyzed. The incidence of DDH that required major surgical treatment was calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 961 children born from 1st January 2010 to 31st December 2015 underwent a procedure for DDH during their first five years of life. The number of major procedures was significantly lower than the number of minor procedures (269 vs 692). The incidence of major procedures was 0.18 per 1000 live births. Girls underwent a higher number of procedures than boys (831 vs 130), whereas 39.2% of the boys and 26.2% of the girls had major procedures. The mean age at the time of the first procedure was 15.35 months (sd 10.09; range 0.03 to 55.92 months).

CONCLUSION

The present study suggests that the Chilean National DDH Screening Program is an appropriate programme with substantial benefits with respect to public health.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Estimated effect of secondary screening for hip dislocation

OBJECTIVES

To quantify the effect of secondary screening for hip dislocations.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of hospital files from participants in a prospectively collected nationwide registry.

SETTING

Child healthcare centres and orthopaedic departments in Sweden.

PARTICIPANTS

Of 126 children with hip dislocation diagnosed later than 14 days age in the 2000-2009 birth cohort, 101 had complete data and were included in the study.

INTERVENTIONS

The entire birth cohort was subject to clinical screening for hip instability at 6-8 weeks, 6 months and 10-12 months age. Children diagnosed through this screening were compared with children presenting due to symptoms, which was used as a surrogate variable representing a situation without secondary screening.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Age at diagnosis and disease severity of late presenting hip dislocations.

RESULTS

Children diagnosed through secondary screening were 11 months younger (median: 47 weeks) compared with those presenting with symptoms (p<0.001). Children diagnosed through secondary screening had 11% risk of having a high (severe) dislocation, compared with 38% for those diagnosed due to symptoms; absolute risk reduction 27% (95% CI: 9.7% to 45%), relative risk 0.28 (95% CI: 0.11 to 0.70). Children presenting due to symptoms had OR 5.1 (95% CI: 1.7 to 15) of having a high dislocation, and OR 11 (95% CI: 4.1 to 31) of presenting at age 1 year or older, compared with the secondary screening group. The secondary screening was able to identify half of the children (55%, 95% CI: 45% to 66%) not diagnosed through primary screening.

CONCLUSIONS

Secondary screening at child healthcare centres may have substantially lowered the age at diagnosis in half of all children with late presenting hip dislocation not diagnosed through primary screening, with the risk of having a high dislocation decreased almost to one-quarter in such cases.

Recommendations for early diagnosis of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH): working group intersociety consensus document

This consensus document has been prepared by a multidisciplinary group of experts (Paediatricians, Radiologists, Paediatric Orthopaedics) and it is mainly aimed at paediatricians, hospitals and primary care providers. We provide recommendations for the early diagnosis and treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) and indications on its management.

Implementation of a nationwide universal ultrasound screening programme for developmental dysplasia of the neonatal hip in Mongolia

PURPOSE

Mongolia is the first Asian country to launch universal ultrasound screening for newborns with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The aims of this study were to determine the coverage and treatment rate of this programme.

METHODS

Data from birth statistics and ultrasound hip screening from 29 hospitals were retrospectively reviewed (2010 to 2016, pre-nationwide phase; and 2017 to 2019, nationwide programme). DDH was diagnosed using the Graf-technique and treated according to 'ABCD', a modified Graf classification (Group A: Graf Type 1, mature; B: 2a, physiologically immature; C: 2c to 3, early DDH; D: 4, dislocated). Group B children were followed with monthly ultrasound. Group C and D children were treated with a flexion and abduction orthosis (Tübingen). Screeners used a web-based platform to upload images for quality surveillance.

RESULTS

Between 2017 and 2019, 230 079 live births were registered and 176 388 newborns screened. The nationwide screening coverage rate in newborns increased from 73.6% in 2017 to 82.1% in 2019. Group A (148 510 children, 84.2%) was discharged, while Group B (25 820, 14.6%) was followed. Among children in Group B, 284 cases worsened to Group C and were, therefore, treated with a Tübingen orthosis. The remaining 2058 (1.2%) of newborns with DDH were treated with a Tübingen orthosis, including 1999 newborns in Group C and 59 in Group D. Since 2017, a total of 142 860 (81.0%) hip sonograms were uploaded to the platform.

CONCLUSION

A simplified diagnostic and therapeutic framework for ultrasound DDH screening for newborns was successfully deployed in Mongolia, a developing country, providing high surveillance coverage and appropriate treatment.Level of evidence: IV.

Evaluation of primary care 6- to 8-week hip check for diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip: a 15-year observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

The current 6- to 8-week Newborn and Infant Physical Examination (NIPE) clinical assessment is a current standard hip-screening test in the community (England) to detect developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).

AIM

To assess the value of the primary care 6- to 8-week clinical hip examination for the diagnosis of DDH.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A single-centre 15-year observational cohort study at a district general hospital between 1 January 1996 and 31 December 2010.

METHOD

Those referred by the GP or community practitioner with suspected instability or abnormality of the hip joint (DDH), were clinically and sonographically examined in a specialist hip-screening clinic. Modified Graf Type III and IV, and radiological irreducible hip dislocation were considered to be 'pathological' hips. Screening failures were defined as those who had not been identified by this primary care screening assessment (but had irreducible hip dislocation). Secondary univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to determine which clinical findings are predictive of instability.

RESULTS

Over the study period, there were 70 071 infants who underwent the 6- to 8-week clinical hip assessment. In the specialist hip-screening clinic, six (from the 170 referred) were diagnosed with pathological DDH. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the 6- to 8-week clinical hip assessment were 16.7%, 99.8%, 3.5%, and 100.0%, respectively. A multivariable model showed a positive Ortolani manoeuvre to be the sole independent predictor of instability at 6 to 8 weeks.

CONCLUSION

This 15-year study highlights the limitations of a hip check at 6 to 8 weeks. These findings support the reassessment of the national guidelines for this aspect of the NIPE DDH screening programme.

The Ponseti Method Decreased the Surgical Incidence in Children with Congenital Clubfoot: A Population-Based, 8 Birth-Year Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

With the introduction of the Ponseti method for congenital clubfoot, the relapse rate and the surgical rate have been remarkably reduced. However, data from population studies for patients up to 10 years of age are still lacking. This study aimed to survey the relapse and surgery rates in the first 10 years of life in children with congenital clubfoot before and after introduction of the Ponseti method in Taiwan using the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD).

METHODS

We retrieved clubfoot cases and related surgical procedures determined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) 754.51 from the 1999-2016 NHIRD. Foot and ankle surgical procedures coded as ICD-9 754.51 for patients who were older than 6 months of age were regarded as surgical procedures for relapsed or residual deformities. The rate of clubfoot release when the patients were 0.5 to 1 year of age and extensive surgical procedures in the first 10 years of life were assessed among 8 birth-year cohorts (1999 to 2006) with a 10-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Among 622 children with idiopathic congenital clubfoot diagnosis, 301 underwent a total of 367 surgical procedures for clubfoot between 6 months and 10 years of age. Disease incidence of 0.32 per 1,000 live births remained stable in the 8 birth-year cohorts. After the Ponseti method was introduced in 2002, there was a decrease in the clubfoot release rate in the 0.5 to 1-year age group (25.8% in the 1999 to 2002 birth-year cohorts compared with 17.6% in the 2003 to 2006 birth-year cohorts) and the rate of extensive surgical procedures (41.5% in the 1999 to 2002 birth-year cohorts compared with 31.3% in the 2003 to 2006 birth-year cohorts), both determined to be significant at p < 0.05 using the chi-square test. A significant decreasing trend (p < 0.05) was revealed in the rate of clubfoot release in patients who were 0.5 to 1 year of age by polynomial correlation, with an increasing negative slope after a turning point around 2002. The Ponseti method increased the ratio of minor to extensive surgical procedures when a surgical procedure was required.

CONCLUSIONS

The Ponseti method decreased subsequent extensive surgical procedures for clubfoot, especially in the group that was 0.5 to 1 year of age.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Incidence of Late-Diagnosed Hip Dislocation After Universal Clinical Screening in Sweden

IMPORTANCE

Developmental dysplasia of the hip, including late-diagnosed hip dislocation, is the leading cause of hip arthroplasties in young adults. Early treatment is essential for a good prognosis. Before the institution of a national screening program, a minimum of 0.9 per 1000 Swedish children were affected.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the incidence of late-diagnosed hip dislocation among children who undergo clinical screening as neonates and to study antenatal and perinatal risk factors for late-diagnosed hip dislocation.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This nested case-control study included children born in Sweden from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2009. All maternity wards, maternal health units, and orthopedic departments in Sweden participated. Children with a late-diagnosed hip dislocation were matched by sex and birth year to randomly selected controls in a 1:10 ratio. Potential risk factors in pregnant women and newborns were recorded, and cases of hip dislocation were registered. Observation time ranged from 8 to 18 years, with the last data analysis in January 2019.

EXPOSURES

Clinical hip examinations neonatally and at 6 to 8 weeks, 6 months, and 10 to 12 months.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Hip dislocation diagnosed more than 14 days after birth, age at diagnosis, and severity of dislocation.

RESULTS

Among 1 013 589 live births (521 728 [51.5%] boys), 126 children (0.12 [95% CI, 0.10-0.15] per 1000 live births) had a late-diagnosed hip dislocation at a median age of 31.4 weeks (interquartile range, 16.1-67.1 weeks; 95% CI, 27.4-44.1 weeks). The incidence of late-diagnosed hip dislocation was 9 times higher among girls (113 of 491 861; 0.23 [95% CI, 0.19-0.28] per 1000 live births) than among boys (13 of 521 728; 0.02 [95% CI, 0.01-0.04] per 1000 live births). Twenty-one children (0.02 per 1000 live births) had high (severe) dislocations. Breech delivery (adjusted odds ratio, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.34-7.02), short body length at birth (adjusted odds ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76-0.98, per additional 1 cm), and being large for gestational age (adjusted odds ratio, 3.59; 95% CI, 1.30-9.95) were independent risk factors. Maternal smoking at the first visit to the maternal health care center was less common among children with hip dislocation (adjusted odds ratio, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04-0.70).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Compared with historical data, the incidence of late-diagnosed hip dislocation in Swedish-born children appears to have decreased substantially since the screening program was initiated, as have the age at detection and disease severity. Similar screening programs should also be possible to institute in upper-middle- and lower-middle-income countries.

Examining the effectiveness of examination at 6-8 weeks for developmental dysplasia: testing the safety net

OBJECTIVE

The 'GP check' at 6-8 weeks forms part of the selective surveillance system for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in the UK. It is imperative to pick up DDH within the first months of life to allow for non-invasive treatment and the avoidance of surgery. We aim to investigate the effectiveness of hip examination at 6-8 weeks.

METHODS

This is a longitudinal observational study including all infants born in our region in the 5 years following 2006. Early presentation was defined as diagnosis within 14 weeks of birth and late presentation after 14 weeks. Treatment records for early and late DDH as well as referrals for ultrasound (US) following examination at 6-8 weeks were analysed. Attendance of the examination at 6-8 weeks in those patients who went on to present with a late DDH was also analysed.

RESULTS

23 112 live births occurred during the study period. There were 141 confirmed cases of DDH. 400 referrals for US were received following examination at 6-8 weeks; 6 of these had a positive finding of DDH. 27 patients presented after 14 weeks and were classified as late presentations. 25 of these patients had attended examination at 6-8 weeks and no abnormality had been identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The sensitivity of examination at 6-8 weeks was only 19.4%, its specificity was 98% and it had a positive predictive value of 1.5%. For many years the check at 6-8 weeks has been thought of as a means to identify those children not identified as neonates; however, we found that four out of five children with DDH were not identified by the check at 6-8 weeks. Unfortunately, we conclude that the presumed safety net of the examination in its current form is not reliable.

Closed Reduction as Therapeutic Gold Standard for Treatment of Congenital Hip Dislocation

BACKGROUND

Congenital hip dislocation (luxation) has an incidence of 0.4 - 0.7% and is regarded as a prearthrotic deformity. Thus, if not being diagnosed and treated at a very early age, extensive surgical measures are inevitable in childhood and early adulthood.

METHODS

In the time between 01/2013 and 02/2019 we performed 28 600 hips sonographies in babies as part of general screening measures at U2 or U3. There were 71 instable, dysplastic or dislocated hips diagnosed that were treated by arthrographic, closed reduction. After a hip spica cast was applied, reposition was controlled by MRI, estimating the acetabular head index (ACI), the head coverage index (HCI) as well as the femoral head's sphericity or by sonography using the Graf method.

RESULTS

Overall success rate was 91.6% for primary closed reduction. Patients with primarily irreducible hips were significantly older (p < 0.003) than patients with primarily successful reducible hips. Congenital dislocated hips had significantly higher ACIs (p < 0.001) and HCIs (p = 0.03) as well as significantly less well rounded femoral heads (sphericity; p < 0.001) compared to stable hips.

CONCLUSION

Early diagnosis and treatment of congenital dislocated hips by closed reduction is essential for a sufficient and regular maturation of the hips without further surgical interventions.

Developmental dysplasia of the hip: addressing evidence gaps with a multicentre prospective international study

There is a lack of high quality evidence available to guide clinical practice in the treatment and management of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Evidence has been limited by persistent confusion on diagnostic and classification terminology, variability in surgeon decision making and a reliance on single centre, retrospective studies with small patient numbers. To address gaps in knowledge regarding screening, diagnosis and management of DDH, the International Hip Dysplasia Institute began a multicentre, international prospective study on infants with hips dislocated at rest. This review discusses the current state of screening, diagnostic and management practices in DDH and addresses important unanswered questions that will be critical in identifying best practices and optimising patient outcomes. There is insufficient evidence to support universal ultrasound screening; instead, selective screening should be performed by 6-8 weeks of age on infants with risk factors of breech presentation, family history, or history of clinical hip instability. Follow-up of infants with risk factors and normal initial screening should be considered to at least 6 months of age. Brace treatment is a sensible first-line treatment for management of dislocated hips at rest in infants < 6 months of age. Early operative reduction may be considered as there is insufficient evidence to support a protective role for the ossific nucleus in the development of avascular necrosis.

What is the incidence of late detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip in England?: a 26-year national study of children diagnosed after the age of one

AIMS

The aim of this study was to establish the incidence of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) diagnosed after one-year of age in England, stratified by age, gender, year, and region of diagnosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A descriptive observational study was performed by linking primary and secondary care information from two independent national databases of routinely collected data: the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink and Hospital Episode Statistics. The study examined all children from 1 January 1990 to 1 January 2016 who had a new first diagnostic code for DDH aged between one and eight years old.

RESULTS

The incidence of late-diagnosed DDH was 1.28 per 1000 live births. Within the study population, 754 children were identified with a diagnosis of DDH after one-year of age. Of all late diagnoses, 536 (71.1%) were detected between one to two years of age. There were 608 female patients (80.6%) and 146 male patients (19.4%), giving a female-to-male ratio of 4.2:1. Distribution was evenly spread throughout England.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of late-diagnosed DDH has not been reduced from that reported 35 years ago, prior to the introduction of the national selective screening programme for DDH. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:281-287.

Ultrasound of the infant hip: manual fixation is equivalent to Graf's technique regarding image quality-a randomized trial

Background

In Middle Europe ultrasonography is the standard method used to screen for developmental dysplasia of the hip in infants. Our aim was to determine whether manual fixation of the child is equivalent to Graf’s technique regarding image quality.

Methods

This randomized trial was conducted at a free-standing general pediatric outpatient clinic in Vienna, Austria. Healthy infants in the 1st and between the 6th and 8th week of life with no hip malalignment were included. After randomization, Group 1 was examined using Graf’s fixation device and participants in Group 2 were fixated on the examination couch by their parents. In a second step, all images underwent a blinded evaluation.

Results

A total of 117 babies (Group 1: n = 62, Group 2: n = 54, excluded: n = 1) were examined and 230 images (Group 1: n = 122, Group 2: n = 108) were evaluated, of which 225 were sonographically normal. Two images, showing a type IIa right hip and a type IIa + left hip respectively, were excluded. One participant had to be excluded as the respective images showed two pathologic hip joints. Two images in Group 1 and three in Group 2 were not evaluable. No statistical association between image quality (11 quality criteria and overall evaluability) and fixation technique (0.12 ≤ p ≤ 1.0 or constant) was found.

Conclusions

Considering sonographically normal hip joints, we found no evidence that manual fixation differed from Graf’s technique regarding image quality. In future studies, hip pathologies should be included and discomfort of infants and parents during the examination should be addressed.

Trial registration

German Clinical Trials Register, ID: DRKS00015694), registered retrospectively on October 7th, 2018.

Enhanced detection services for developmental dysplasia of the hip in Scottish children, 1997-2013

BACKGROUND

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) remains common. If detected early, DDH can usually be corrected with conservative management. Late presentations often require surgery and have worse outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

We estimated the risk of undergoing surgery for DDH by age 3 years before and after the introduction of enhanced DDH detection services.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Scotland, 1997/98-2010/11.

PATIENTS

All children.

METHODS

Using routinely collected national hospital discharge records, we examined rates of first surgery for DDH by age 3 by March 2014. Using a difference in difference analysis, we compared rates in two areas of Scotland before (to April 2002) and after (from April 2005) implementation of enhanced DDH detection services to those seen in the rest of Scotland.

RESULTS

For children born in the study period, the risk of first surgery for DDH by age 3 was 1.18 (95% CI 1.11 to 1.26) per 1000 live births (918/777 375).Prior to April 2002, the risk of surgery was 1.13 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.42) and 1.31 (95% CI 1.16 to 1.46) per 1000 live births in the intervention and non-intervention areas, respectively. In the intervention areas, from April 2005, this risk halved (RR 0.47; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.68). The risk remained unchanged in other areas (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.86 to 1.18). The ratio for the difference in change of risk was 0.46 (95% CI 0.31 to 0.70).

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of enhanced DDH detection services can produce substantial reductions in the number of children having surgical correction for DDH.

Results of universal ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip: a prospective follow-up of 28 092 consecutive infants

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to analyze the incidence of the different ultrasound phenotypes of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), and to determine their subsequent course.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A consecutive series of 28 092 neonates was screened and classified according to the Graf method as part of a nationwide surveillance programme, and then followed prospectively. Abnormal hips were followed until they became normal (Graf type I). Type IIb hips and higher grades were treated by abduction in a Tübinger orthosis until normal. Dislocated hips underwent closed or open reduction.

RESULTS

Overall, 90.2% of hips were normal at birth. Type IIa hips (8.9%) became normal at a median of six weeks (interquartile range (IQR) 6 to 9). Type IIc and IId hips (0.67%) became normal after ten weeks (IQR 7 to 13). There were 19 type lll and eight type lV hips at baseline. There were 24 closed reductions and one open reduction. No late presentations of DDH were detected within the first five years of life.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of DDH was eight per 1000 live births. The treatment rate was 1% (n = 273). The rate of first operations on the newborn hip was 0.86, and rate of open surgery was 0.04. The cumulative rate of open surgery was 0.07. The authors take the view that early identification and treatment in abduction of all dysplastic hips in early childhood reduces the rate of open reduction and secondary DDH-related surgery later in life. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1399-1404.

Universal or selective ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip? A discussion of the key issues

PURPOSE

To summarize recent developments and provide recommendations as to whether universal or selective programmes are advisable.

METHODS

A literature review was performed and preference given to studies with higher levels of evidence. All programmes reviewed included clinical screening.

RESULTS

Recent studies underline the need for high quality screening programmes to promote the early detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). A small number of cases may be missed clinically but with universal ultrasound screening programmes the late presentation rates appear to be virtually zero. Contemporary studies show treatment rates with universal screening programmes which are now lower than those with selective ultrasound. There is little agreement over the criteria used for selective programmes. Alternative outcome measures, such as the first operation rate or the percentage undergoing major (open) surgery are both lowest with universal ultrasound screening programmes. Furthermore, a significant reduction in the rate of surgery for DDH later in life was seen after the introduction of universal ultrasound screening, whereas the defined criteria for selective screening may not detect the majority of patients who require late surgery. Abduction bracing with modern orthoses is associated with a zero rate of avascular necrosis (AVN), whereas closed reduction techniques have an overall risk of 10%.

CONCLUSION

On clinical grounds, if future studies confirm that hip abduction in flexible orthoses is not associated with AVN, it may be time for a paradigm shift of screening for DDH towards a universal ultrasound protocol. The costs associated both with each type of screening programme and with the management of late presenting cases are also important but may be secondary to clinical benefit.

The influence of health policy on early diagnosis and surgical incidence of developmental dysplasia of the hip

Background

Hip screening is the standard approach for the early detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the effects of national policy on early diagnosis and later surgical incidence. The purpose of this national study is to estimate DDH incidence in the Taiwanese population through a new diagnosis definition and to examine whether a health promotion policy could reduce surgeries for DDH.

Methods and results

Six birth-year cohorts (2000–2005) were evaluated for DDH diagnosis and related surgeries using the database of the National Health Insurance Administration, which covers 99% of the population of Taiwan. Children with three or more sequential International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) diagnosis codes (754.3x) in the outpatient claim file or DDH-related surgeries were studied. The outcome of hip screening was evaluated with the ratio of early diagnosis (0–6 months) to late diagnosis (1–5 years) and the incidence of major surgeries for DDH. DDH incidence was 1.54 per thousand live births (2,255/1,462,539). After a hip screening promotion policy was implemented in 2002, ratios of early/late diagnosis increased from 1.06, 1.25, 1.38, and 1.5 to 1.75 for the years 2000 to 2005, respectively. Incidences of major surgery decreased from 0.41–0.47 per thousand before policy administration to 0.33–0.37 per thousand after policy administration.

Discussion

The DDH incidence of 1.54 per 1,000 in a geographically well-defined area offered epidemiological data for further studies in Asian populations. The results suggest that the health promotion policy is associated with an increase in early diagnosis and subsequently a decrease in surgeries for DDH.

[Treatment recommendations for protracted hip immaturity in infants : Conservative approach versus open reduction]

The healthy upright posture is a result of a continuous maturation process of the locomotor system throughout skeletal growth rendering muscle strength and stability: The hip joint in its central position plays a key role for unimpaired and pain-free gait. Nonetheless, it is also regularly affected by delayed maturation, thus being of special interest for the disease screening procedures of every newborn child. Structured screening examinations in the first 3 postnatal months will ideally detect any dysplasia, therefore simple conservative interventions will usually accelerate the maturation process. Effective hip screening programs in Austria and Germany have reduced the necessity for open surgical hip reductions to a worldwide all-time low. Perinatal risk factor awareness in doctors and parents triggers an increased sensitivity to possible immature hip structures. Nevertheless, severe hip dysplasia in toddlers is regularly presented in pediatric orthopedic centers with or without hip dislocation, mostly due to the delay of or inefficiency of treatment options. This review deals with highly effective strategies for quick treatment and provides a balanced view on conservative and surgical methods.

Values for bony acetabular roof angle and percentage femoral head cover in a selective ultrasound neonatal hip-screening programme: effect of age, sex and side

Published maturation curves for bony acetabular roof or α angle (AA) and percentage femoral head cover (FHC) with age are sparse. We aimed to determine typical values for AA and FHC in 2236 infants referred to a selective ultrasound screening programme. There was increase in the values of first measurement of AA and FHC related to the logarithm of age. Males had greater values than females (P<0.001) and right hips had greater values than left (P<0.001) for both measurements. Significant side differences have not been reported previously. Treatment decisions should be made on the basis of sex, side and age-specific data.

Hip Sonography: 20 Years Experience and Results

Hip sonography in the “Graf technique” is an important tool to detect early DDH cases and dysplastic hips in the German speaking countries, although hip sonography is still controversially discussed in the English speaking countries. The reason may be different techniques with different classification and outcome. Exact anatomical identification, measurement technique, typing, difference between instability and elasticity with a reproducible “standard plane” is absolutely necessary to make hip ultrasound (US) comparable and reliable.

US screening had reduced open reductions in Germany to 1:4000, in Austria to 0.23 per thousand. Because of the early screening and earlier less aggressive treatment, the overall costs could be reduced by 1/3 in comparison to the pre-ultrasound area.

US screening seems to prevent many, but not all operations and can be recommended as an important tool for prevention.

Diagnosing developmental dysplasia of the hip using the Graf ultrasound method: risk and protective factor analysis in 11,820 universally screened newborns

The essential role of ultrasound examinations in diagnosis and treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is widely accepted while the weighting and correlation of protective factors and perinatal risk for DDH still give rise to debate. Our aim was to investigate the impact of single and twofold combined risk and protective factors on the newborns' hip maturity, assessed with the Graf ultrasound method. Therefore, data sets of 11,820 universally screened newborns were analyzed. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were performed to correlate risk and protective factors with mature or immature but appropriate for age and pathologic hip types. Thereby, female gender (OR 4.07 (95% CI 3.01-5.51), p < 0.001), breech presentation (4.98 (3.71-6.71), p < 0.001), and positive family anamnesis (5.05 (3.49-7.31), p < 0.001) as well as the combination of female gender with high birth weight (3.51 (2.45-5.03), p < 0.001) could be identified as independent predictive risk factors. Only low birth weight (0.27 (0.11-0.66), p = 0.004) could be identified as a single protective factor, while no combination of protective factors was significant.

CONCLUSION

The significance and the informative value of risk and protective factor combinations, e.g., for selective ultrasound surveys, are limited. Early universal ultrasound screening using the Graf method is advised to timely detect hip immaturity and pathologies and to provide the optimal approach for mature or immature but appropriate for age and pathologic hips. What is Known: • Ultrasound screening is essential for diagnosis and treatment of DDH in time while the weighting and correlation of protective factors and perinatal risk and their role for the ultrasound screening protocol still give rise to debate. What is New: • The effects of single risk and protective factors for DDH do not cumulate or counteract, resulting in a limited value of a selective screening protocol based on risk and protective factors. • A universal screening protocol using the Graf ultrasound method is recommended.

[An ultrasonographic study of the correlation between developmental dysplasia of the hip and congenital muscular torticollis in children]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the significance of early screening of pediatric developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and congenital muscular torticollis (CMT) using ultrasonography and establish a simultaneous screening model for pediatric DDH and CMT.

METHODS

From January, 2013 to January, 2016, a total of 5060 pediatric patients with suspected DDH and CMT underwent ultrasonic examinations. The diagnostic results of the two diseases were classified into different clinical types, and Chi-square test was used to analyze the one-way relationship between different types of DDH and CMT; correspondence analysis was used for multivariate analysis of the variables. Chi-square test was used to analyze the difference between the detection rates in suspected CMT patients and the normal population.

RESULTS

GrafIIa type DDH was associated with mass-type CMT in the children (χ²=331.800, P<0.001). DDH of GrafIIb, GrafIIc, Graf III, and Graf IV types were related with non-tumor type of CMT. The children with a suspected diagnosis of CMT showed a significantly higher detection rate of DDH than the normal subjects (χ²=321.889, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

DDH is closely related with CMT. Early simultaneous screening of DDH and CMT can help to improve the early diagnosis rate of CMT in children.

Pavlik harness treatment for pathological developmental dysplasia of the hip: meeting the standard?

In the UK, the Pavlik harness is generally the accepted treatment technique for the treatment of neonatal and infant pathological developmental dysplasia of the hip. In 2013, the success rate of the Pavlik harness became an outcome measure from the British Society of Children's Orthopaedic Surgery for appraisal and revalidation with the GMC for paediatric orthopaedic surgery. The standard set requires an 80% success rate, with less than 20% requiring surgery. This study evaluated the outcomes of Pavlik harness treatment in neonates/infants with 'pathological hips' diagnosed by ultrasound imaging in a district general hospital setting. In a 10-year prospective observational longitudinal cohort study, modified Graf type III and IV hips (excluding those presenting with irreducible hip dislocation) were classified as pathological and splinted. A total of 2826 neonates/infants underwent ultrasound assessment in the paediatric orthopaedic 'screening clinic'. Neonates and infants were referred as 'at-risk' or as clinically unstable by the Paediatric Department and by general practitioners. Thirty-one Graf type III and 95 Graf type IV hips were identified and treated with a Pavlik harness. One Graf type III (30/31=success rate 96.8%) and three clinically unstable Graf type IV hips progressed to irreducible hip dislocations (92/95=96.8%). The success rate of the Pavlik harness in Graf type III and IV dysplasia was 96.8%, with 3.2% requiring surgery because of progression of the condition, confirming acceptable results for this technique in a district general hospital setting.