Molecular epidemiology of familial hypercholesterolaemia

Ethnicity, lipids and cardiovascular disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The prevalence of cardiovascular disease differs among ethnic groups and along geographic boundaries. At present, most of the projected increase in mortality from cardiovascular disease occurs in sub-Saharan African, Chinese and Southeast Asian populations. Ethnic disparities in the prevalence of cardiovascular disease coincide with quantitative and qualitative differences in risk factors for cardiovascular disease. High plasma cholesterol is one of the most important preventable causes of ischemic heart disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

The current review summarizes recent evidence on ethnic differences in ischemic heart disease and its correlates with genetic and acquired differences in plasma lipid and lipoprotein levels. The nature of ethnic differences in plasma lipid levels, apolipoprotein L1 en lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is outlined, and the effects of lipid-lowering therapy and future efforts and challenges regarding implementation are discussed.

SUMMARY

Ethnic differences in HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C), triglyceride levels and Lp(a) may impact ethnic differences in cardiovascular disease and result in higher residual risk during lipid-lowering therapy. Further efforts should be made to stimulate the use of statins in both high-income and low-income countries and study their effects in individuals with different ethnic backgrounds.

Familial hypercholesterolemia: the lipids or the genes?

Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a common cause of premature cardiovascular disease and is often undiagnosed in young people. Although the disease is diagnosed clinically by high LDL cholesterol levels and family history, to date there are no single internationally accepted criteria for the diagnosis of FH. Several genes have been shown to be involved in FH; yet determining the implications of the different mutations on the phenotype remains a hard task. The polygenetic nature of FH is being enhanced by the discovery of new genes that serve as modifiers. Nevertheless, the picture is still unclear and many unknown genes contributing to the phenotype are most likely involved. Because of this evolving polygenetic nature, the diagnosis of FH by genetic testing is hampered by its cost and effectiveness.

In this review, we reconsider the clinical versus genetic nomenclature of FH in the literature. After we describe each of the genetic causes of FH, we summarize the known correlation with phenotypic measures so far for each genetic defect. We then discuss studies from different populations on the genetic and clinical diagnoses of FH to draw helpful conclusions on cost-effectiveness and suggestions for diagnosis.

Haplotype analyses, mechanism and evolution of common double mutants in the human LDL receptor gene

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), an autosomal dominant inherited disorder resulting in increased levels of circulating plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL), tendon xanthomas and premature coronary artery disease (CAD), is caused by defects in the LDL receptor gene (LDLR). Three widespread LDLR alterations not causing FH (c.1061-8T>C, c.2177C>T and c.829G>A) and one mutation (c.12G>A) with narrow geographical distribution and thought to cause disease were investigated. In an attempt to improve knowledge on their origin, spread and possible selective effects, estimations of the ages of these variants (t generations) and haplotype analysis were performed by genotyping 86 healthy individuals and 98 FH patients in Spain for five LDLR SNPs: c.81T>C, c.1413G>A, c.1725C>T, c.1959T>C, and c.2232G>A; most patients carried two of these LDLR variants simultaneously. It was found that both the c.1061-8T>C (t = 54) and c.2177C>T alterations (t = 62) arose at about the same time (54 and 62 generations ago, respectively) in the CGCTG haplotype, while the c.12G>A mutation (t = 70) appeared in a CGCCG haplotype carrying an earlier c.829G>A alteration (t = 83). The estimated ages of selectively neutral alterations could explain their distribution by migrations. The origin of the c.12G>A mutation could be in the Iberian Peninsula; despite its estimated age, a low selective pressure could explain its conservation in Spain from where it could have spread to China and Mexico, since the sixteenth century through the Spanish/Portuguese colonial expeditions.

Silent exonic mutations in the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene that cause familial hypercholesterolemia by affecting mRNA splicing

In a large group of patients with the clinical phenotype of familial hypercholesterolemia, such as elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and premature atherosclerosis, but without functional mutations in the genes coding for the LDL receptor and apolipoprotein B, we examined the effect of 128 seemingly neutral exonic and intronic DNA variants, discovered by routine sequencing of these genes. Two variants, G186G and R385R, were found to be associated with altered splicing. The nucleotide change leading to G186G resulted in the generation of new 3'-splice donor site in exon 4 and R385R was associated with a new 5'-splice acceptor site in exon 9 of the LDL receptor gene. Splicing of these alternate splice sites leads to an in-frame 75-base pair deletion in a stable mRNA of exon 4 in case of G186G and R385R resulted in a 31-base pair frame-shift deletion in exon 9 and non-sense-mediated mRNA decay.

Genetic heterogeneity of autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia in Mexico

BACKGROUND

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and familial defective apolipoprotein B-100 (FDB) are relatively common lipid disorders caused by mutations of the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) and apolipoprotein B (apoB) genes, respectively. A third locus on chromosome 1p34.1-p32 was recently linked to FH and the responsible gene has been identified [protein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9)].

METHODS

We assessed the contribution of the LDLR, apoB, and PCSK9 genes as cause of FH in Mexico. Forty six unrelated probands, as well as 68 affected and 60 healthy relatives, were included.

RESULTS

All index cases were diagnosed as having heterozygous autosomal dominant FH. Seventeen of the 46 index cases had LDLR gene mutations, four of which were novel (Fs92ter108, C268R, Q718X, and Fs736ter743); and only one patient had an apoB mutation (R3500Q). We sequenced the PCSK9 gene in the remainder of the 28 probands with no identified LDLR or APOB gene defects; however, no PCSK9 mutations were found, including one large kindred with positive linkage to the 1p34.1-32 locus (multipoint LOD score of 3.3) and two small pedigrees. Linkage was excluded from these three loci in at least four kindreds suggesting that other yet uncharacterized genes are involved.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results underline substantial genetic heterogeneity for FH in the Mexican population.

Population genetic screening programmes: principles, techniques, practices, and policies

This paper examines the professional and scientific views on the principles, techniques, practices, and policies that impact on the population genetic screening programmes in Europe. This paper focuses on the issues surrounding potential screening programmes, which require further discussion before their introduction. It aims to increase, among the health-care professions and health policy-makers, awareness of the potential screening programmes as an issue of increasing concern to public health. The methods comprised primarily the review of the existing professional guidelines, regulatory frameworks and other documents related to population genetic screening programmes in Europe. Then, the questions that need debate, in regard to different types of genetic screening before and after birth, were examined. Screening for conditions such as cystic fibrosis, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, familial hypercholesterolemia, fragile X syndrome, hemochromatosis, and cancer susceptibility was discussed. Special issues related to genetic screening were also examined, such as informed consent, family aspects, commercialization, the players on the scene and monitoring genetic screening programmes. Afterwards, these questions were debated by 51 experts from 15 European countries during an international workshop organized by the European Society of Human Genetics Public and Professional Policy Committee in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 19-20, November, 1999. Arguments for and against starting screening programmes have been put forward. It has been questioned whether genetic screening differs from other types of screening and testing in terms of ethical issues. The general impression on the future of genetic screening is that one wants to 'proceed with caution', with more active impetus from the side of patients' organizations and more reluctance from the policy-makers. The latter try to obviate the potential problems about the abortion and eugenics issues that might be perceived as a greater problem than it is in reality. However, it seems important to maintain a balance between a 'professional duty of care' and 'personal autonomy'.

The apolipoprotein B R3500Q gene mutation in Spanish subjects with a clinical diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and familial defective apolipoprotein B-100 (FDB) are autosomal codominant diseases characterized by elevated LDL cholesterol levels and premature coronary artery disease. Mutations of the LDL-receptor and apolipoprotein B genes, which affect the binding domains of their protein products, are the causal defects. Securing the diagnosis of these conditions by molecular assays is important because it mandates early intervention for coronary risk reduction. DNA screening for apolipoprotein B R3500Q gene mutation was performed in 913 unrelated Spanish individuals with a clinical diagnosis of FH using a modified polymerase chain reaction protocol and restriction enzyme genotyping. Thirteen FDB heterozygotes were identified (frequency of 1.4% in subjects with a clinical diagnosis of FH). The prevalence of hypercholesterolemic subjects with FDB in the general Spanish population was estimated to be as low as 2.8 x 10(-5) (95% CI, -3.1 x 10(-4) to 3.7 x 10(-4)). The ancestors of 11 out of 13 FDB carriers were from Galicia, a region of Celtic ancestry in Northwestern Spain. As the series included 100 unrelated subjects of Galician ancestry, FDB appears to be an important genetic cause of hypercholesterolemia in this region. All the R3500Q mutations were found on the same allele, assigned to haplotype XbaI-/MspI+/EcoRI-/3HVR48, suggesting that the mutant alleles are identical by descent in people from Spain, as observed in other Caucasian populations. In conclusion, the R3500Q mutation of the apolipoprotein B gene, a common cause of FH in central Europe, is infrequent in the general Spanish population, but it is common in Galicia.

Genetic components of perinatal morbidity and mortality

The authors summarize the perinatal effects of the main genetic disorder groupings. Diseases of autosomal dominant inheritance are usually less severe and postnatal life is possible. Diseases of autosomal recessive inheritance are serious in most cases, causing severe symptoms in postnatal life. Diseases of X-linked recessive inheritance manifest themselves in male embryos and may be mild or serious; the more severe forms may influence the perinatal outcome. Diseases of X-linked dominant inheritance occur less frequently and manifest themselves in both sexes: in some cases the life expectancy is not favorable. Chromosomal anomalies, unbalanced rearrangements and autosomal trisomies may cause severe multiplex malformation syndromes and mental retardation. The diseases are serious in most cases and intrauterine mortality is high. Conversely, in cases of numerical differences of the sex chromosomes perinatal mortality does not increase remarkably, except in X-monosomy. Diseases of multifactorial origin lead to isolated malformations, but many civilization diseases originate from similar causes. In a few cases, severe diseases (i.e. congenital heart defects and neural tube defects) occur which may influence the outcome of the pregnancy. In terms of teratogenic effects, taking medication or undergoing X-ray examination or infections during early pregnancy indicates only a small risk in most cases. The authors emphasize that genetic centers significantly influence the perinatal outcome of pregnancies with their complex activity and their role in prenatal diagnostics.