Self-use of rapid tests for malaria diagnosis

Assessment of the prozone effect in malaria rapid diagnostic tests

Background

The prozone effect (or high doses-hook phenomenon) consists of false-negative or false-low results in immunological tests, due to an excess of either antigens or antibodies. Although frequently cited as a cause of false-negative results in malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), especially at high parasite densities of Plasmodium falciparum, it has been poorly documented. In this study, a panel of malaria RDTs was challenged with clinical samples with P. falciparum hyperparasitaemia (> 5% infected red blood cells).

Methods

Twenty-two RDT brands were tested with seven samples, both undiluted and upon 10 ×, 50 × and 100 × dilutions in NaCl 0.9%. The P. falciparum targets included histidine-rich protein-2 (HRP-2, n = 17) and P. falciparum-specific parasite lactate dehydrogenase (Pf-pLDH, n = 5). Test lines intensities were recorded in the following categories: negative, faint, weak, medium or strong. The prozone effect was defined as an increase in test line intensity of at least one category after dilution, if observed upon duplicate testing and by two readers.

Results

Sixteen of the 17 HRP-2 based RDTs were affected by prozone: the prozone effect was observed in at least one RDT sample/brand combination for 16/17 HRP-2 based RDTs in 6/7 samples, but not for any of the Pf-pLDH tests. The HRP-2 line intensities of the undiluted sample/brand combinations with prozone effect (n = 51) included a single negative (1.9%) and 29 faint and weak readings (56.9%). The other target lens (P. vivax-pLDH, pan-specific pLDH and aldolase) did not show a prozone effect.

Conclusion

This study confirms the prozone effect as a cause of false-negative HRP-2 RDTs in samples with hyperparasitaemia.

Malaria

Malaria is increasing worldwide due to the emergence and spread of drug resistant strains. This poses major health and economic problems for the population living in endemic areas and increases the risk of infections in travelers. The diagnosis of malaria relies on a biological proof of infection by microscopy or with a rapid test. The treatment must be initiated without delay preferably with an artemisinin containing regimen. Uncomplicated malaria can be treated with oral drugs while severe infections will be hospitalized and treated with injectables. Special attention will be given to the most susceptible groups: children and pregnant women.

Malaria self-testing by travellers: opportunities and limitations

Accurate and timely treatment of imported malaria requires rapid and reliable diagnosis. The availability of a rapid and reliable diagnostic test could improve the quality of malaria diagnosis in febrile travelers after their return to non-endemic countries. Rapid and simple immuno-chromatographic tests have been marketed for several years. Dipstick tests for malaria diagnosis are still a potentially very useful additional tool. Trained laboratory personal have in general no problems in doing the tests. Also, the dipsticks are very valuable tools for use in epidemiological field studies. However, sensitivity and specificity of dipstick tests are still below that of trained microscopists. Exclusion of malaria should never be based on a negative dipstick test alone. Self-use of dipstick tests for malaria diagnosis by travelers should not be recommended routinely as there is enough evidence that performance and interpretation of results by the traveler is uncertain. Dipstick tests can only be recommended to travelers for specific situations (i.e. long term stay, far away from medical assistance, expedition-type travel) after appropriate instruction and training, including a successful performance of the test procedure.

Diagnosis of malaria by detection of plasmodial lactate dehydrogenase with an immunodot enzyme assay

We have previously demonstrated, using polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies, that the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) of malaria parasites is immunologically distinct from the host enzyme. The polyclonal antibodies, produced against the affinity purified plasmodial LDH (pLDH) in rabbits, showed specificity to LDH of malaria parasites. In the present study, these anti-pLDH polyclonal antibodies were used to develop an immunodiagnostic test (immunodot enzyme assay of plasmodial LDH) based on the detection of parasite LDH in patient blood. The immunodot enzyme assay of plasmodial LDH was evaluated using blood samples from patients with malaria or other infections. Out of 502 microscopically positive malaria blood samples, 497 blood samples showed positive immunodot assays of pLDH while all the 423 microscopically negative cases were found negative by our test. The blood samples from other infections and non-endemic controls were negative by the immunodot enzyme assay of pLDH. This LDH based test was also found negative in blood samples of cured patients 7 days after chloroquine treatment. The test is simple to perform, can be read visually, econimal, highly specific with a sensitivity of approximately 99% and is thus suitable for accurate diagnosis of malaria in field conditions.

Rapid diagnostic techniques for malaria control

The past decade was a milestone in the development of malaria diagnostic technology. Today, a variety of simplified and rapid malaria diagnostic devices, collectively referred to as 'dipsticks', is available. This paper discusses the potential roles of these devices, and obstacles to their use, in supporting malaria control strategies.