Non-heart-beating donors for renal transplantation

Myocardial viability twenty-four hours after orthotopic heart transplantation from non-heart-beating donors

OBJECTIVES

Using a new preservation strategy, we investigated the performance of hearts from non-heart-beating donors during an observation period of 24 hours after orthotopic heart transplantation in a pig model.

METHODS

In the control group (n = 6) beating donor hearts were harvested with Bretschneider's HTK solution and transplanted orthotopically without reperfusion modifications. In the non-heart-beating donor group (n = 6) hearts were perfused with leukocyte-depleted blood cardioplegia after 30 minutes of normothermic ischemia. Blood cardioplegia was supplemented with a sodium-hydrogen exchange inhibitor and adenosine. After transplantation, a second controlled reperfusion with blood cardioplegia was performed.

RESULTS

Preload recruitable stroke work of the left ventricle 24 hours after transplantation in the control versus non-heart-beating donor group was 108% +/- 24% versus 103% +/- 18% of baseline values. Myocardial blood flow of the left and right ventricle was increased to 146% +/- 32% and 176% +/- 51% in the control group versus 176% +/- 29% and 194% +/- 27% in the non-heart-beating donor group. Myocardial oxygen consumption was 11.2 +/- 2.1 versus 12.8 +/- 2.2 mL/100 g per minute at baseline and 11.6 +/- 2.6 versus 13.2 +/- 3.1 mL/100 g per minute after 24 hours (not significant). Histologic examination with Luxol fast blue staining revealed that 2.6% +/- 4.8% of myocytes in the control group versus 1.8% +/- 1.9% in the non-heart-beating donor group were damaged irreversibly.

CONCLUSIONS

Recovery of donor hearts from non-heart-beating donors is comparable with recovery of organs harvested from heart-beating donors if the above-mentioned preservation technique is used. These results could encourage the use of marginal donor hearts and help to expand the limited donor pool.

Outcome of transplantation using kidneys from controlled (Maastricht category 3) non-heart-beating donors

BACKGROUND

Many renal transplant centres are reluctant to use kidneys from non-heart-beating (NHB) donors because of the high incidence of primary non-function and delayed graft function reported in the literature. Here, we report our favourable experience of using kidneys from Maastricht category 3 donors (controlled NHB donors).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 1996 to June 2002, 42 renal transplants using kidneys from 25 controlled NHB donors were undertaken at our centre. The rates of primary non-function, delayed graft function (DGF), rejection and long-term graft and patient survival were compared with those of 84 recipients of grafts from heart-beating (HB donors) transplanted contemporaneously.

RESULTS

Primary non-function did not occur in recipients of grafts from NHB donors but was seen in two grafts from HB donors. DGF occurred in 21 of 42 (50%) kidneys from NHB donors and 14 of 84 (17%) kidneys from HBD donars (p < 0.001). The acute rejection rates in the two groups were similar (33% for grafts from NHB donors vs. 40% from HB donors). By 1 month after transplantation, there was no significant difference in serum creatinine concentration between the two groups. Over a median follow-up period of 32 months (range 2-75 months), the actuarial graft survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 yr after transplantation were 84, 80 and 74% for recipients of kidneys from NHB donors, compared with 89, 85 and 80% for kidneys from HB donors.

CONCLUSION

Controlled NHB donors are a valuable and under-used source of kidneys for renal transplantation. The outcome for recipients of kidney allografts from category 3 NHB donors is similar to that seen in recipients of grafts from conventional HB cadaveric donors.