1
|
Asmis T, Berry S, Cosby R, Chan K, Coburn N, Rother M. Strategies of sequential therapies in unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2014; 21:318-28. [PMID: 25489259 DOI: 10.3747/co.21.2146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Before the emergence of first-line combination chemotherapy, the standard of care for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mcrc) was first-line monotherapy with modulated 5-fluorouracil. Several large phase iii randomized controlled trials, now completed, have assessed whether a planned sequential chemotherapy strategy-beginning with fluoropyrimidine monotherapy until treatment failure, followed by another regimen (either monotherapy or combination chemotherapy) until treatment failure-could result in the same survival benefit produced with an upfront combination chemotherapy strategy, but with less toxicity for patients. METHODS The medline and embase databases, and abstracts from meetings of the American Society for Clinical Oncology and the European Society for Medical Oncology, were searched for reports comparing a sequential strategy of chemotherapy with an upfront combination chemotherapy in adult patients with mcrc. Publications that reported efficacy or toxicity data (or both) were included. RESULTS The five eligible trials that were identified included 4532 patients. A meta-analysis of those trials demonstrates a statistically significant survival advantage for combination chemotherapy (hazard ratio: 0.92; 95% confidence interval: 0.86 to 0.99). However, the median survival advantage (3-6 weeks in most trials) is small and of questionable clinical significance. Three trials reported first-line toxicities. Upfront combination chemotherapy results in significantly more neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and sensory neuropathy. Sequential chemotherapy results in significantly more hand-foot syndrome. CONCLUSIONS Given the small survival advantage associated with upfront combination chemotherapy, planned sequential chemotherapy and upfront combination chemotherapy can both be considered treatment strategies. Treatment should be chosen on an individual basis considering patient and tumour characteristics, toxicity of each strategy, and patient preference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Asmis
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON
| | - S Berry
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON
| | - R Cosby
- Program in Evidence-Based Care, McMaster University, Juravinski Site, Hamilton, ON
| | - K Chan
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON
| | - N Coburn
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON
| | - M Rother
- Peel Regional Cancer Centre, Mississauga, ON
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stein A, Schmoll HJ. Optimum Duration of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treatment. CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS 2013. [DOI: 10.1007/s11888-013-0179-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
3
|
Stein A, Schmoll HJ. Systemic treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2013; 5:193-203. [PMID: 23634197 PMCID: PMC3630480 DOI: 10.1177/1758834012473347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients presenting with synchronous or metachronous colorectal cancer liver metastases (CLM) should be evaluated for multimodal management with curative intent. Preoperative systemic chemotherapy shows beneficial impact on adjuvant progression-free survival and also borderline on overall survival, without significantly increasing initially R0 resectable patients postoperative complication rates. Postoperative chemotherapy recommended based on the perioperative trial experience for those patients achieving at least stable disease during preoperative chemotherapy, or based on the adjuvant trials for patients receiving upfront resection. 'Borderline' resectable CLM, preoperative chemotherapy plays an important role in both in achievement of a resectable status and improvement of prognosis. Recent 4 drug combinations demonstrated response rates up to 80% even for advanced disease and are thus promising regimens for further evaluation in patients with resectable or unresectable liver-limited (+/- lung) disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Stein
- Department of Oncology, Hematology, BMT with Section Pneumology, Hubertus Wald Tumour Centre, University Cancer Centre Hamburg, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schmoll HJ, Van Cutsem E, Stein A, Valentini V, Glimelius B, Haustermans K, Nordlinger B, van de Velde CJ, Balmana J, Regula J, Nagtegaal ID, Beets-Tan RG, Arnold D, Ciardiello F, Hoff P, Kerr D, Köhne CH, Labianca R, Price T, Scheithauer W, Sobrero A, Tabernero J, Aderka D, Barroso S, Bodoky G, Douillard JY, El Ghazaly H, Gallardo J, Garin A, Glynne-Jones R, Jordan K, Meshcheryakov A, Papamichail D, Pfeiffer P, Souglakos I, Turhal S, Cervantes A. ESMO Consensus Guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. a personalized approach to clinical decision making. Ann Oncol 2012; 23:2479-2516. [PMID: 23012255 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1049] [Impact Index Per Article: 87.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common tumour type in both sexes combined in Western countries. Although screening programmes including the implementation of faecal occult blood test and colonoscopy might be able to reduce mortality by removing precursor lesions and by making diagnosis at an earlier stage, the burden of disease and mortality is still high. Improvement of diagnostic and treatment options increased staging accuracy, functional outcome for early stages as well as survival. Although high quality surgery is still the mainstay of curative treatment, the management of CRC must be a multi-modal approach performed by an experienced multi-disciplinary expert team. Optimal choice of the individual treatment modality according to disease localization and extent, tumour biology and patient factors is able to maintain quality of life, enables long-term survival and even cure in selected patients by a combination of chemotherapy and surgery. Treatment decisions must be based on the available evidence, which has been the basis for this consensus conference-based guideline delivering a clear proposal for diagnostic and treatment measures in each stage of rectal and colon cancer and the individual clinical situations. This ESMO guideline is recommended to be used as the basis for treatment and management decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H J Schmoll
- Department of Oncology/Haematology, Martin Luther University Halle, Germany.
| | - E Van Cutsem
- Digestive Oncology Unit, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A Stein
- Hubertus Wald Tumor Center, University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - V Valentini
- Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli," Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - B Glimelius
- Department of Radiology, Oncology and Radiation Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala; Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - K Haustermans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - B Nordlinger
- Department of Surgery, Assistance-Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Ambroise Paré,Boulogne; Université Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, Versailles, France
| | - C J van de Velde
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J Balmana
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Regula
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - I D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - R G Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - D Arnold
- Hubertus Wald Tumor Center, University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - F Ciardiello
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine and Surgery "F. Magrassi and A. Lanzara", Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - P Hoff
- Hospital Sírio Libanês, Sao Paulo, Brazil; Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - D Kerr
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - C H Köhne
- Department for Oncology/Haematology, Klinikum Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - R Labianca
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo, Italy
| | - T Price
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, Australia
| | - W Scheithauer
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - A Sobrero
- Oncologia Medica, Ospedale S. Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - J Tabernero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - D Aderka
- Division of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | - S Barroso
- Serviço de Oncologia Médica, Hospital do Espirito Santo de Evora, Evora, Portugal
| | - G Bodoky
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St. László Teaching Hospital, Budapest, Hungary
| | - J Y Douillard
- Service d'oncologie médicale, institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest-René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - H El Ghazaly
- Department of Oncology, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - J Gallardo
- Department of Oncology, Clínica Alemana, INTOP, Santiago, Chile
| | - A Garin
- N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - R Glynne-Jones
- Department of Radiotherapy, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| | - K Jordan
- Department of Oncology/Haematology, Martin Luther University Halle, Germany
| | - A Meshcheryakov
- N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - D Papamichail
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - P Pfeiffer
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - I Souglakos
- Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
| | - S Turhal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Marmara University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - A Cervantes
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schmoll H, Van Cutsem E, Stein A, Valentini V, Glimelius B, Haustermans K, Nordlinger B, van de Velde C, Balmana J, Regula J, Nagtegaal I, Beets-Tan R, Arnold D, Ciardiello F, Hoff P, Kerr D, Köhne C, Labianca R, Price T, Scheithauer W, Sobrero A, Tabernero J, Aderka D, Barroso S, Bodoky G, Douillard J, El Ghazaly H, Gallardo J, Garin A, Glynne-Jones R, Jordan K, Meshcheryakov A, Papamichail D, Pfeiffer P, Souglakos I, Turhal S, Cervantes A. ESMO Consensus Guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. A personalized approach to clinical decision making. Ann Oncol 2012. [DOI: 78495111110.1093/annonc/mds236' target='_blank'>'"<>78495111110.1093/annonc/mds236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [78495111110.1093/annonc/mds236','', '10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61062-9')">Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
78495111110.1093/annonc/mds236" />
|
6
|
Stein A, Glockzin G, Wienke A, Arnold D, Edelmann T, Hildebrandt B, Hollerbach S, Illerhaus G, Königsrainer A, Richter M, Schlitt HJ, Schmoll HJ. Treatment with bevacizumab and FOLFOXIRI in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: presentation of two novel trials (CHARTA and PERIMAX) and review of the literature. BMC Cancer 2012; 12:356. [PMID: 22897915 PMCID: PMC3503684 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2012] [Accepted: 07/17/2012] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND More than half of patients with colorectal cancer will develop metastatic disease either evident at the time of initial diagnosis or during their course of disease. Besides multidisciplinary management further treatment intensification is warranted to improve the still limited prognosis. METHODS/DESIGN In these two multi-centre, randomized phase II trials, conducted in Germany, 380 patients with R0-resectable colorectal liver metastases (PERIMAX) and with unresectable, metastatic colorectal cancer (CHARTA) will be recruited. Patients previously untreated for metastatic disease with either synchronous or metachronous metastases are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to resection of colorectal liver metastases followed by postoperative FOLFOX for 6 months or perioperative FOLFOXIRI and bevacizumab for 3 months pre- and postoperative and resection (PERIMAX), or to induction chemotherapy with FOLFOX and bevacizumab +/- irinotecan for a maximum of 6 months followed by maintenance treatment with fluoropyrimidine and bevacizumab. The primary objective of these trials is to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of FOLFOXIRI and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer. Primary endpoint is failure free survival rate at 18 months in the PERIMAX trial and progression free survival rate at 9 months in CHARTA. Secondary objectives include efficacy, safety and tolerability. DISCUSSION The CHARTA and PERIMAX trials are designed to evaluate the benefits and limitations of a highly active four-drug regimen in distinct treatment situations of metastatic CRC. Eligible patients are classified into resectable liver metastases to be randomized to perioperative treatment with FOLFOXIRI and bevacizumab or postoperative FOLFOX in the PERIMAX, or unresectable metastatic CRC to be randomized between FOLFOX and bevacizumab with or without irinotecan, stratified for clinical groups according to disease and patients' characteristics in the CHARTA trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical trial identifier CHARTA: NCT01321957, PERIMAX: NCT01540435.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Stein
- University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Gabriel Glockzin
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Wienke
- Department for Oncology/Hematology, Martin-Luther-University Halle, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle/Saale, Germany
| | - Dirk Arnold
- University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Bert Hildebrandt
- Charité Centrum für Tumormedizin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stephan Hollerbach
- Department for Gastroenterology, Academic Teaching Hospital, Celle, Germany
| | - Gerald Illerhaus
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Michael Richter
- Koordinierungszentrum Klinische Studien Halle, Martin-Luther-University, Halle, Germany
| | - Hans J Schlitt
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Hans-Joachim Schmoll
- Department for Oncology/Hematology, Martin-Luther-University Halle, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle/Saale, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Clarke SJ, Karapetis CS, Gibbs P, Pavlakis N, Desai J, Michael M, Tebbutt NC, Price TJ, Tabernero J. Overview of biomarkers in metastatic colorectal cancer: tumour, blood and patient-related factors. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2012; 85:121-35. [PMID: 22762963 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2012.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2012] [Revised: 05/31/2012] [Accepted: 06/07/2012] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
During the last 20 years there have been major therapeutic developments in colorectal cancer (CRC) with the introduction of multiple novel therapeutic agents into routine clinical practice. This has improved survival in both the adjuvant and advanced disease settings. However, improvements have come with substantial increases in expense to the community and potential toxicity to the patient. There has been substantial research to identify tumour factors in CRC that predict treatment response and survival outcomes. This research has identified clinically useful predictive biomarkers to aid clinical decision making, such as the presence or absence of KRAS gene mutations which can determine the benefit of using epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibiting antibodies. However, less attention has been paid to the identification and impact of predictive patient-derived factors such as age, gender and the presence of comorbid conditions or evidence of a systemic inflammatory response. In this article, the current concepts of tumour and patient-related predictive factors in CRC management are reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen J Clarke
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
In the last 15 years, significant progress in the management of colorectal cancer (CRC) has been achieved with several new agents licensed extending median overall survival for stage IV disease to about 2 years. Treatment of CRC is stage-specific, multidisciplinary, and based on patient and tumor characteristics. Although especially early stages (0-III, according to Union for International Cancer Control) are treated with curative intent, patients with limited stage IV disease (liver and/or lung or localized peritoneal metastases) might still be curable in a multimodality approach including surgery, perioperative chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Despite the broad variety of prognostic factors, treatment decisions and selection of drugs are mainly based on clinicopathologic variables for early stage CRC, extent of disease, potential resectability, patients' eligibility to receive aggressive treatments including chemotherapy, surgery, and very few molecular markers such as KRAS mutational status for advanced disease. However, a tailored approach for the treatment of CRC taking into account all mentioned factors is currently recommended by national and international guidelines and will be discussed in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Arnold
- Hubertus Wald Tumour Center, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Masi G, Fornaro L, Caparello C, Falcone A. Liver metastases from colorectal cancer: how to best complement medical treatment with surgical approaches. Future Oncol 2011; 7:1299-323. [DOI: 10.2217/fon.11.108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal liver metastases (CLM) represent a major challenge for oncologists and surgeons. In fact, in this setting, the optimal treatment of patients can achieve a long-term survival and sometimes a definitive cure of disease. In recent years, improvements in both medical therapies and surgical approaches have led to an increased rate of patients considered amenable for surgery on CLM. New perspectives in the management of CLM underline the need for a comprehensive assessment of patient and tumor characteristics, to integrate technical and prognostic issues into an individualized therapeutic strategy in different patient subgroups. The multidisciplinary evaluation from the onset and during treatment remains the key element to maximizing the benefit of more intensive treatment modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lorenzo Fornaro
- U.O. Oncologia Medica Universitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Via Roma 67, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Chiara Caparello
- U.O. Oncologia Medica Universitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Via Roma 67, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Alfredo Falcone
- U.O. Oncologia Medica Universitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Via Roma 67, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Affiliation(s)
- Hans-Joachim Schmoll
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, Oncology/Haematology, Centre for Cell and Gene Therapy, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, 06120 Halle, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Van Cutsem E, Nordlinger B, Cervantes A. Advanced colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for treatment. Ann Oncol 2010; 21 Suppl 5:v93-7. [PMID: 20555112 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdq222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 333] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- E Van Cutsem
- University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Colon cancer is treated adjuvantly with 5-flourouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin, most commonly as part of the FOLFOX regimen, which has less toxicity than the older regimen FLOX (bolus 5-FU and oxaliplatin) that has fallen out of favor. For patients who cannot tolerate oxaliplatin, 5-FU can be given as a single agent. Patients with metastatic disease may be treated with a number of regimens, including FOLFOX and FOLFIRI; however, the environment is a not a monotonous vanilla and chocolate FOLFOX and FOLFIRI. Cytotoxic agents, sequentially or in combination, are frequently combined with biologic agents to improve response in metastatic disease. Clinical investigators have focused considerable attention on how best to apply all the agents active in metastatic colon cancer, a practice in evolution. In this article, we highlight important, informative research regarding cytotoxic chemotherapy for colon cancer. We also recognize the contribution made by skilled surgeons, interventional radiologists, and radiation oncologists who will push the envelope and as well, the pharmacogenomic and molecular markers that help us to understand mechanisms of disease, predict toxicity, and refine our therapy.
Collapse
|
13
|
Comella P, Casaretti R, Avallone A, Franco L. Optimizing the management of metastatic colorectal cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2010; 75:15-26. [DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2009.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2009] [Revised: 09/02/2009] [Accepted: 09/23/2009] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
14
|
Van Cutsem E, Dicato M, Arber N, Berlin J, Cervantes A, Ciardiello F, De Gramont A, Diaz-Rubio E, Ducreux M, Geva R, Glimelius B, Jones RG, Grothey A, Gruenberger T, Haller D, Haustermans K, Labianca R, Lenz H, Minsky B, Nordlinger B, Ohtsu A, Pavlidis N, Rougier P, Schmiegel W, Van de Velde C, Schmoll H, Sobrero A, Tabernero J. Molecular markers and biological targeted therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer: expert opinion and recommendations derived from the 11th ESMO/World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer, Barcelona, 2009. Ann Oncol 2010; 21 Suppl 6:vi1-10. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdq273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
|
15
|
Fornaro L, Masi G, Loupakis F, Vasile E, Falcone A. Palliative treatment of unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2010; 11:63-77. [PMID: 20001430 DOI: 10.1517/14656560903427997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD Treatment options for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients have rapidly increased in the past years, but 50 - 70% of mCRC patients are still unlikely to undergo radical resection of metastases and are candidates for palliative therapy only. AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW Oxaliplatin and irinotecan have widened the chemotherapy alternatives available in this setting and effective targeted agents against vascular endothelial growth factor and epidermal growth factor receptor have further improved treatment efficacy. This review covers the main areas of debate in the optimal treatment of unresectable mCRC patients, focusing on the implications for everyday clinical practice and future research of the most relevant clinical trials and molecular investigations published from 1999 to 2009. WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN Insights into treatment individualization strategies are provided in the review. TAKE HOME MESSAGE 'One size fits all' can not longer be considered an adequate approach to unresectable mCRC, and treatment with both chemotherapy and biologic agents should be guided by prognostic and predictive factors in order to maximize the benefit while reducing futile toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Fornaro
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Medical Oncology Unit 2, Italy
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Price TJ, Tebbutt NC, Karapetis CS, Segelov E, Pavlakis N, Cunningham D, Sobrero AF, Haller DG, Shapiro JD. Current Opinion on Optimal Treatment Choices in First-line Therapy for Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Report From the Adelaide Colorectal Tumour Group Meeting; Stockholm, Sweden; September 2008. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2010; 9:8-14. [DOI: 10.3816/ccc.2010.n.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
|
17
|
|
18
|
|
19
|
de Leon MP, Pezzi A, Benatti P, Manenti A, Rossi G, di Gregorio C, Roncucci L. Survival, surgical management and perioperative mortality of colorectal cancer in the 21-year experience of a specialised registry. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009; 24:777-88. [PMID: 19280201 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-009-0687-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/26/2009] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS A general improvement of colorectal cancer prognosis has been observed. Reasons of this more favourable trend are diffusion of screening, advancements in molecular biology, new developments in chemotherapy and surgical techniques. Through the data of a colorectal cancer registry, we purposed to evaluate changes in surgical procedures for colorectal neoplasms and to analyse trends of perioperative mortality. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with colorectal cancer were registered from 1984 to 2004. The main surgical procedures were recorded and classified. Perioperative mortality was defined as death of patients within 1 month since the operation. RESULTS Regression analysis showed an increase over time of right and left hemicolectomy. Both colectomy and endoscopic polypectomy showed significant rise over time. In contrast, abdominoperineal operations dropped during the study period. A similar decrease was observed for palliative surgery. Perioperative mortality declined from 7-11% to 3-6% of all operations; main factors associated with perioperative mortality were presence of comorbidities, increasing age and advanced stage. CONCLUSION The better prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer was associated with changes of surgical techniques, with a tendency to prefer large operations over limited resections. Perioperative mortality showed a gradual decrease and is at present in the order of 3% to 6% of all operations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurizio Ponz de Leon
- Dipartimento di Medicina Interna, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Policlinico, Modena, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sequential Versus Combination Therapy in the Treatment of Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2009. [DOI: 10.1016/s1533-0028(11)70552-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
21
|
Sequential chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: Should we ever start with a single cytotoxic agent? CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS 2008. [DOI: 10.1007/s11888-008-0022-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
22
|
Shah U, Goldberg RM. Sequential Versus Combination Therapy in the Treatment of Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2008; 7:315-20. [DOI: 10.3816/ccc.2008.n.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
23
|
Borner M, Koeberle D, Von Moos R, Saletti P, Rauch D, Hess V, Trojan A, Helbling D, Pestalozzi B, Caspar C, Ruhstaller T, Roth A, Kappeler A, Dietrich D, Lanz D, Mingrone W. Adding cetuximab to capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research SAKK. Ann Oncol 2008; 19:1288-1292. [PMID: 18349029 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdn058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To determine the activity and tolerability of adding cetuximab to the oxaliplatin and capecitabine (XELOX) combination in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS In a multicenter two-arm phase II trial, patients were randomized to receive oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 1 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14 every 3 weeks alone or in combination with standard dose cetuximab. Treatment was limited to a maximum of six cycles. RESULTS Seventy-four patients with good performance status entered the trial. Objective partial response rates after external review and radiological confirmation were 14% and 41% in the XELOX and in the XELOX + Cetuximab arm, respectively. Stable disease has been observed in 62% and 35% of the patients, with 76% disease control in both arms. Cetuximab led to skin rash in 65% of the patients. The median overall survival was 16.5 months for arm A and 20.5 months for arm B. The median time to progression was 5.8 months for arm A and 7.2 months for arm B. CONCLUSION Differences in response rates between the treatment arms indicate that cetuximab may improve outcome with XELOX. The correct place of the cetuximab, oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine combinations in first-line treatment of MCC has to be assessed in phase III trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Borner
- Institute of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - D Koeberle
- Institute of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - R Von Moos
- Institute of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - P Saletti
- Institute of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - D Rauch
- Institute of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - V Hess
- Institute of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - A Trojan
- Institute of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - D Helbling
- Institute of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - B Pestalozzi
- Institute of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - C Caspar
- Institute of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - T Ruhstaller
- Institute of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - A Roth
- Institute of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - A Kappeler
- Institute of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - D Dietrich
- Institute of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - D Lanz
- Institute of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - W Mingrone
- Institute of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | -
- Institute of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
|