Resistant hypertension: an unmet treatment need

Arterial Hypertension-clinical trials update 2023

Arterial hypertension is associated with increased morbidity and mortality and research in the field is highly dynamic. This summary reviews the most important clinical trials published in 2022 and early 2023. Findings on new pharmacological approaches to treat resistant hypertension are presented and new knowledge about the optimal timing of the antihypertensive medication intake is discussed. It is focused on optimal blood pressure treatment targets and the problem of treatment and guideline inertia is acknowledged. Information about pregnancy-related hypertension is presented and blood pressure control following percutaneous thrombectomy after ischemic stroke is discussed. Finally, novel clinical data on device-based approaches to treat hypertension are summarized. The hypertension trials update summarizes the most important clincal trials on hypertension research in 2022 and early 2023. CTD - chlorthalidone, CV - cardiovascular, HCT - hydrochlorothiazide, SBP - systolic blood pressure, RDN - renal denervation *depicts systolic blood pressure only.

Latest Knowledge on the Role of Vitamin D in Hypertension

Hypertension is the third leading cause of the global disease burden, and while populations live longer, adopt more sedentary lifestyles, and become less economically concerned, the prevalence of hypertension is expected to increase. Pathologically elevated blood pressure (BP) is the strongest risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and related disability, thus making it imperative to treat this disease. Effective standard pharmacological treatments, i.e., diuretics, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blocker (ARBs), beta-adrenergic receptor blockers (BARBs), and calcium channel blockers (CCBs), are available. Vitamin D (vitD) is known best for its role in bone and mineral homeostasis. Studies with vitamin D receptor (VDR) knockout mice show an increased renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) activity and increased hypertension, suggesting a key role for vitD as a potential antihypertensive agent. Similar studies in humans displayed ambiguous and mixed results. No direct antihypertensive effect was shown, nor a significant impact on the human RAAS. Interestingly, human studies supplementing vitD with other antihypertensive agents reported more promising results. VitD is considered a safe supplement, proposing its great potential as antihypertensive supplement. The aim of this review is to examine the current knowledge about vitD and its role in the treatment of hypertension.

Clinical efficacy and safety of spironolactone in patients with resistant hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We conducted a meta-analysis to summarize all available evidence from randomized controlled trial studies regarding the clinical efficacy and safety of spironolactone in patients with resistant hypertension (RH) and provided a quantitative assessment.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases through December 8, 2019, was performed. Randomized controlled trials randomized controlled trials meeting inclusion criteria were included to assess the effect of the addition of spironolactone on office blood pressure (BP), 24-hour ambulatory BP or adverse events in RH patients.

RESULTS

Twelve trials, which enrolled a total of 1655 patients, were included in this meta-analysis. In comparison with placebo, spironolactone significantly reduced office BP (office SBP, weighted mean difference [WMD] = -20.14, 95% CI = -31.17 to -9.12, P < .001; office DBP WMD = -5.73, 95% CI = -8.13 to -3.33, P < .001) and 24-hour ambulatory BP (ASBP, WMD = -10.31, 95% CI = -12.86 to -7.76, P < .001; ADBP, WMD = -3.94, 95% CI = -5.50 to -2.37, P < .001). Compared with alternative drugs, spironolactone treatment in RH patients significantly decreased 24-hour ambulatory BP (ASBP, WMD = -6.98, 95% CI = -12.66 to -1.30, P < .05; ADBP, WMD = -3.03, 95% CI = -5.21 to -0.85, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis fully evaluated the antihypertensive effect of spironolactone compared with placebo, alternative drugs, renal nerve denervation and no treatment. Spironolactone can result in a substantial BP reduction in patients with RH at 3 months.

Management of primary aldosteronism and mineralocorticoid receptor-associated hypertension

Resistant hypertension is associated with a poor prognosis due to organ damage caused by prolonged suboptimal blood pressure control. The concomitant use of mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonists with other antihypertensives has been shown to improve blood pressure control in some patients with resistant hypertension, and such patients are considered to have MR-associated hypertension. MR-associated hypertension is classified into two subtypes: one with a high plasma aldosterone level, which includes primary aldosteronism (PA), and the other with a normal aldosterone level. In patients with unilateral PA, adrenalectomy may be the first-choice procedure, while in patients with bilateral PA, MR antagonists are selected. In addition, in patients with other types of MR-associated hypertension with high aldosterone levels, MR antagonists may be selected as a first-line therapy. In patients with normal aldosterone levels, ARBs or ACE inhibitors are used as a first-line therapy, and MR antagonists may be used as an add-on agent. Since MR antagonist therapy may have efficacy as a first-line or add-on agent in these patients, it is important to recognize this type of hypertension. Further studies are needed to elucidate the pathogenesis and management of MR-associated hypertension in more detail to improve the clinical outcomes of patients with MR-associated hypertension.

The comparative effectiveness of fourth-line drugs in resistant hypertension: An application in electronic health record data

PURPOSE

To examine the utility of electronic health records from a routine care setting in assessing comparative effectiveness of fourth-line anti-hypertensive drugs to treat resistant hypertension.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink: a repository of electronic health records from UK primary care. We identified patients newly prescribed fourth-line anti-hypertensive drugs (aldosterone antagonist , beta-blocker, or alpha-blocker). Using propensity score-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models, we compared the incidence of the primary outcome (composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, and myocardial infarction) between patients on different fourth-line drugs. AA was the reference drug in all comparisons. Secondary outcomes were individual components of the primary outcome, blood pressure changes, and heart failure. We used a negative control outcome, Herpes Zoster, to detect unmeasured confounding.

RESULTS

Overall, 8639 patients were included. In propensity score-adjusted analyses, the hazard ratio for the primary outcome was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.55-1.19) for beta-blockers and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.46-0.96) for alpha-blockers versus AA. Findings for individual cardiovascular outcomes trended in a more plausible direction, albeit imprecise. A trend for a protective effect for Herpes Zoster across both comparisons was seen.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher rate of all-cause death in the AA group was likely due to unmeasured confounding in our analysis of the composite primary outcome, supported by our negative outcome analysis. Results for cardiovascular outcomes were plausible, but imprecise due to small cohort sizes and a low number of observed outcomes.

2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension

: Document reviewers: Guy De Backer (ESC Review Co-ordinator) (Belgium), Anthony M. Heagerty (ESH Review Co-ordinator) (UK), Stefan Agewall (Norway), Murielle Bochud (Switzerland), Claudio Borghi (Italy), Pierre Boutouyrie (France), Jana Brguljan (Slovenia), Héctor Bueno (Spain), Enrico G. Caiani (Italy), Bo Carlberg (Sweden), Neil Chapman (UK), Renata Cifkova (Czech Republic), John G. F. Cleland (UK), Jean-Philippe Collet (France), Ioan Mircea Coman (Romania), Peter W. de Leeuw (The Netherlands), Victoria Delgado (The Netherlands), Paul Dendale (Belgium), Hans-Christoph Diener (Germany), Maria Dorobantu (Romania), Robert Fagard (Belgium), Csaba Farsang (Hungary), Marc Ferrini (France), Ian M. Graham (Ireland), Guido Grassi (Italy), Hermann Haller (Germany), F. D. Richard Hobbs (UK), Bojan Jelakovic (Croatia), Catriona Jennings (UK), Hugo A. Katus (Germany), Abraham A. Kroon (The Netherlands), Christophe Leclercq (France), Dragan Lovic (Serbia), Empar Lurbe (Spain), Athanasios J. Manolis (Greece), Theresa A. McDonagh (UK), Franz Messerli (Switzerland), Maria Lorenza Muiesan (Italy), Uwe Nixdorff (Germany), Michael Hecht Olsen (Denmark), Gianfranco Parati (Italy), Joep Perk (Sweden), Massimo Francesco Piepoli (Italy), Jorge Polonia (Portugal), Piotr Ponikowski (Poland), Dimitrios J. Richter (Greece), Stefano F. Rimoldi (Switzerland), Marco Roffi (Switzerland), Naveed Sattar (UK), Petar M. Seferovic (Serbia), Iain A. Simpson (UK), Miguel Sousa-Uva (Portugal), Alice V. Stanton (Ireland), Philippe van de Borne (Belgium), Panos Vardas (Greece), Massimo Volpe (Italy), Sven Wassmann (Germany), Stephan Windecker (Switzerland), Jose Luis Zamorano (Spain).The disclosure forms of all experts involved in the development of these Guidelines are available on the ESC website www.escardio.org/guidelines.

A meta-analysis of add-on use of spironolactone in patients with resistant hypertension

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy of add-on use of spironolactone in patients with resistant hypertension has been investigated in several small studies. We performed this meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy of add-on use of spironolactone in these patients.

METHODS

We searched Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central for all published studies evaluating add-on use of spironolactone in patients with resistant hypertension. Only randomized controlled trials determining antihypertensive effects of spironolactone were considered.

RESULTS

The antihypertensive effects were assessed in 869 patients included in 4 trials with a mean follow-up of 12±3weeks. The reduction of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) in patients treated with spironolactone was greater than placebo (weighted mean differences (WMD) for SBP -16.67mmHg (95% confidence interval (CI), -27.54, -5.80), p<0.01; WMD for DBP -6.11mmHg (95% CI, -9.34, -2.88), p<0.001), respectively. The rates of serious adverse effects or patient withdrawals from the trials tended to be higher in patients treated with spironolactone than placebo (WMD for odds ratio 2.11 (95% CI, 0.98, 4.53), p=0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis provides the evidence that add-on use of spironolactone in patients with resistant hypertension is effective in lowering SBP and DBP, suggesting an add-on use of spironolactone as fourth line therapy in patients with resistant hypertension.

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors and Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are a novel class of drugs that have been extensively investigated for the treatment of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). These drugs reduce hyperglycemia by blocking renal glucose reabsorption, thereby promoting increased renal glucose excretion. Beyond glycemic control, these drugs have other beneficial effects on cardiovascular (CV) risk factors. The present review discusses the potential role of SGLT2 inhibitors in treating CV complications (acute and chronic) associated with T2DM.

FUNDING

AstraZeneca Pharma India Ltd.

Spironolactone versus placebo, bisoprolol, and doxazosin to determine the optimal treatment for drug-resistant hypertension (PATHWAY-2): a randomised, double-blind, crossover trial

BACKGROUND

Optimal drug treatment for patients with resistant hypertension is undefined. We aimed to test the hypotheses that resistant hypertension is most often caused by excessive sodium retention, and that spironolactone would therefore be superior to non-diuretic add-on drugs at lowering blood pressure.

METHODS

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial, we enrolled patients aged 18-79 years with seated clinic systolic blood pressure 140 mm Hg or greater (or ≥135 mm Hg for patients with diabetes) and home systolic blood pressure (18 readings over 4 days) 130 mm Hg or greater, despite treatment for at least 3 months with maximally tolerated doses of three drugs, from 12 secondary and two primary care sites in the UK. Patients rotated, in a preassigned, randomised order, through 12 weeks of once daily treatment with each of spironolactone (25-50 mg), bisoprolol (5-10 mg), doxazosin modified release (4-8 mg), and placebo, in addition to their baseline blood pressure drugs. Random assignment was done via a central computer system. Investigators and patients were masked to the identity of drugs, and to their sequence allocation. The dose was doubled after 6 weeks of each cycle. The hierarchical primary endpoints were the difference in averaged home systolic blood pressure between spironolactone and placebo, followed (if significant) by the difference in home systolic blood pressure between spironolactone and the average of the other two active drugs, followed by the difference in home systolic blood pressure between spironolactone and each of the other two drugs. Analysis was by intention to treat. The trial is registered with EudraCT number 2008-007149-30, and ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02369081.

FINDINGS

Between May 15, 2009, and July 8, 2014, we screened 436 patients, of whom 335 were randomly assigned. After 21 were excluded, 285 patients received spironolactone, 282 doxazosin, 285 bisoprolol, and 274 placebo; 230 patients completed all treatment cycles. The average reduction in home systolic blood pressure by spironolactone was superior to placebo (-8·70 mm Hg [95% CI -9·72 to -7·69]; p<0·0001), superior to the mean of the other two active treatments (doxazosin and bisoprolol; -4·26 [-5·13 to -3·38]; p<0·0001), and superior when compared with the individual treatments; versus doxazosin (-4·03 [-5·04 to -3·02]; p<0·0001) and versus bisoprolol (-4·48 [-5·50 to -3·46]; p<0·0001). Spironolactone was the most effective blood pressure-lowering treatment, throughout the distribution of baseline plasma renin; but its margin of superiority and likelihood of being the best drug for the individual patient were many-fold greater in the lower than higher ends of the distribution. All treatments were well tolerated. In six of the 285 patients who received spironolactone, serum potassium exceeded 6·0 mmol/L on one occasion.

INTERPRETATION

Spironolactone was the most effective add-on drug for the treatment of resistant hypertension. The superiority of spironolactone supports a primary role of sodium retention in this condition.

FUNDING

The British Heart Foundation and National Institute for Health Research.

Effects of PDE type 5 inhibitors on left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in resistant hypertension

Resistant hypertension (RHTN) is a multifactorial disease characterized by blood pressure (BP) levels above goal (140/90 mmHg) in spite of the concurrent use of three or more antihypertensive drugs of different classes. Moreover, it is well known that RHTN subjects have high prevalence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD), which leads to increased risk of heart failure progression. This review gathers data from studies evaluating the effects of phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors (administration of acute sildenafil and short-term tadalafil) on diastolic function, biochemical and hemodynamic parameters in patients with RHTN. Acute study with sildenafil treatment found that inhibition of PDE-5 improved hemodynamic parameters and diastolic relaxation. In addition, short-term study with the use of tadalafil demonstrated improvement of LVDD, cGMP and BNP-32 levels, regardless of BP reduction. No endothelial function changes were observed in the studies. The findings of acute and short-term studies revealed potential therapeutic effects of IPDE-5 drugs on LVDD in RHTN patients.

Darusentan, a selective endothelin A receptor antagonist, for the oral treatment of resistant hypertension

Resistant hypertension is defined as failure to lower blood pressure to target when a patient adheres to the maximum tolerated doses of three antihypertensive drugs including a diuretic. Notwithstanding the wide availability of several antihypertensive agents and the continued recommendation of dietary and lifestyle modifications, the prevalence of resistant hypertension remains high and is expected to increase thus underscoring the need for potential new treatment modalities in resistant hypertension. Endothelin-1 is a long-lasting potent vasoconstrictor and plays a key role in cardiovascular haemostasis. Endothelin mediates its biological activity in humans through the endothelin A and B receptors. The clinical experience and the evidence for therapy with darusentan in resistant systemic hypertension are reviewed. The leading journals that publish basic science and clinical research in the area of cardiovascular diseases and PubMed were scanned. While results from early clinical studies suggested that darusentan might emerge as new treatment option in patients with resistant hypertension, results from recent studies suggests that darusentan appears unlikely to find its way in the armamentarium for treatment of resistant hypertension.