1
|
Dreanic J, Barret M, Dhooge M, Gaudric M, Leblanc S, Abitbol V, Prat F, Chaussade S, Coriat R. Small bowel capsule endoscopy: May we delegate it to nurses? Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2018; 42:168-173. [PMID: 29239850 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2017.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2017] [Revised: 10/16/2017] [Accepted: 10/23/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
AIM Small bowel capsule endoscopy (CE) is a non-invasive and validated technique allowing the visualization of the small intestine mucosa. It generated more than 40,000 images per examination and induced a long median time of medical reading that may exceed 1 hour. In a transfer of skills' program, the CE reading might be transferred to nurses. We herein evaluate and present a feasibility study of the CE to nurses. METHODS Nurses experienced in endoscopy were trained for small bowel CE reading, selection and interpretation of pathological images. Two strategies were experienced: a partial delegation to nurses, restricted to the selection of picture and an interpretation of the selected pictures by experts in CE (strategy A) or a total delegation including the selection of pictures, their interpretation, and the realization of a report (strategy B). Nurses were volunteers to participate to the study. Strategies were compared to the reference procedure (control) and a blinded analysis of the CE by experts was performed. Selection of pictures and their interpretation were timely evaluated in all strategies. The stomach and small intestine transit times and the reading time were recorded. The accuracy of the whole CE interpretation was compared. Experts reviewed all discordant interpretations. RESULTS The extent of transit time in the stomach and the small intestine, and the identification of a normal endoscopic examination were not statistically different between strategy A and control (P=0.71). The accuracy of reports from strategy A and control was 95% (P=0.9). In one case, a nurse has not selected the pathological image, corresponding to a duodenal ulcer. The median medical time for reading was significantly shorter in strategy A than in control (9.2min [range: 4-20] vs 34.0min [range: 10-60]; P<0.01). The accuracy of reports performed by nurses in strategy B was 80% (P=0.11). In 4 cases, the medical interpretation in strategy B was discordant. The discrepancy was due to a lack of pathological images' selection of the selected pictures for the final report (n=1) and a lack of interpretation (n=3). The median time for analysis was not significantly different between strategy B and control (34.7 [range: 10-75] versus 34.0min [range: 15-60]; P=0.53). CONCLUSION In small bowel CE, a pre-selection of pathological images by a trained nurse could be integrated in a transfer of skills' program and appeared feasible. The gain of time for the gastroenterologists is significant and reduced the medical time for reading from 34 to 9minutes per examination. Meantime, an overall delegation of small bowel CE to nurses suffered for a lack of efficacy. Our study paved the way for a nurse' training program in the pre-selection and identification of CE images.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johann Dreanic
- Gastroenterology and endoscopy unit, hôpital Cochin, faculté de médecine, université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, AP-HP, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Maximilien Barret
- Gastroenterology and endoscopy unit, hôpital Cochin, faculté de médecine, université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, AP-HP, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Marion Dhooge
- Gastroenterology and endoscopy unit, hôpital Cochin, faculté de médecine, université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, AP-HP, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Marianne Gaudric
- Gastroenterology and endoscopy unit, hôpital Cochin, faculté de médecine, université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, AP-HP, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Sarah Leblanc
- Gastroenterology and endoscopy unit, hôpital Cochin, faculté de médecine, université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, AP-HP, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Vered Abitbol
- Gastroenterology and endoscopy unit, hôpital Cochin, faculté de médecine, université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, AP-HP, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Frederic Prat
- Gastroenterology and endoscopy unit, hôpital Cochin, faculté de médecine, université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, AP-HP, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Stanislas Chaussade
- Gastroenterology and endoscopy unit, hôpital Cochin, faculté de médecine, université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, AP-HP, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Romain Coriat
- Gastroenterology and endoscopy unit, hôpital Cochin, faculté de médecine, université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, AP-HP, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Argüelles-Arias F, Donat E, Fernández-Urien I, Alberca F, Argüelles-Martín F, Martínez MJ, Molina M, Varea V, Herrerías-Gutiérrez JM, Ribes-Koninckx C. Guideline for wireless capsule endoscopy in children and adolescents: A consensus document by the SEGHNP (Spanish Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition) and the SEPD (Spanish Society for Digestive Diseases). REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS 2017; 107:714-31. [PMID: 26671584 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2015.3921/2015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Capsule Endoscopy (CE) in children has limitations based mainly on age. The objective of this consensus was reviewing the scientific evidence. MATERIAL AND METHODS Some experts from the Spanish Society of Gastroenterology (SEPD) and Spanish Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (SEGHNP) were invited to answer different issues about CE in children. These sections were: a) Indications, contraindications and limitations; b) efficacy of CE in different clinical scenarios; c) CE performance; d) CE-related complications; e) Patency Capsule; and f) colon capsule endoscopy. They reviewed relevant questions on each topic. RESULTS The main indication is Crohn's disease (CD). There is no contraindication for the age and in the event that the patient not to swallow it, it should be administered under deep sedation with endoscopy and specific device. The CE is useful in CD, for the management of OGIB in children and in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (in this indication has the most effectiveness). The main complication is retention, which should be specially taken into account in cases of CD already diagnosed with malnutrition. A preparation regimen based on a low volume of polyethylene glycol (PEG) the day before plus simethicone on the same day is the best one in terms of cleanliness although does not improve the results of the CE procedure. CONCLUSIONS CE is safe and useful in children. Indications are similar to those of adults, the main one is CD to establish both a diagnosis and disease extension. Moreover, only few limitations are detected in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Fernando Alberca
- DIGESTIVO/ENDOSCOPIAS, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca. Murcia, España
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|