Dabrafenib in BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma: a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial

Management of In-transit Disease: Regional Therapies, Intralesional Therapies, and Systemic Therapy

In-transit (IT) melanoma represents a distinct, heterogeneous pattern of disease that arises as superficial tumors along the track between the primary site and the draining regional lymph node basin. Many therapies have been explored for treatment of this disease with the goal of maximizing delivery of the therapeutic agent to the tumor while minimizing systemic toxicities. These include regional chemotherapies, intralesional injections, checkpoint inhibitors, immunomodulators, and vaccines in various combinations or as monotherapy. Here, we review the general managemnt of patients with ITmelanoma, the range of currently available treatment options, and recommendations for specific therapies for individual patients.

Resistance to BRAF inhibitors drives melanoma sensitivity to Chk1 inhibition

BRAF inhibitor-resistant melanomas (BRAFiR) acquire (epi)genetic and functional alterations that enable them to evade alternative treatments. Identifying these alterations is critical to advancing treatment strategies. Here, we explored the effect of Chk1 inhibition (Chk1i) on BRAFiR cells, revealing higher sensitivity compared to treatment-naïve cells both in vitro and in vivo. Using FUCCI-labeling and time-lapse microscopy, we show that S phase progression is required for Chk1i-induced cytotoxicity in BRAFiR cells, but not in treatment-naïve cells. Replication stress markers, including reduced BrdU incorporation and increased phospho-RPA and γH2AX, were observed mostly in BRAFiR cells with increased sensitivity to Chk1i. Untreated BRAFiR cells exhibited upregulated DNA replication genes, reduced progressing forks and increased origin firing, suggesting intrinsic replication changes. MAPK pathway reactivation in treatment-naïve cells mimicked BRAFiR traits, increasing sensitivity to Chk1i. These findings indicate that Chk1i exploits elevated replication stress specifically in BRAFiR cells, highlighting its therapeutic potential in overcoming MAPK inhibitor resistance in BRAF600-mutant melanoma.

Targeting Hyperactive Ras Signaling in Pediatric Cancer

Somatic RAS mutations are among the most frequent drivers in pediatric and adult cancers. Somatic KRAS, NRAS, and HRAS mutations exhibit distinct tissue-specific predilections. Germline NF1 and RAS mutations in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 and other RASopathy developmental disorders have provided new insights into Ras biology. In many cases, these germline mutations are associated with increased cancer risk. Promising targeted therapeutic strategies for pediatric cancers and neoplasms with NF1 or RAS mutations include inhibition of downstream Ras effector pathways, directly inhibiting the signal output of oncogenic Ras proteins and associated pathway members, and therapeutically targeting Ras posttranslational modifications and intracellular trafficking. Acquired drug resistance to targeted drugs remains a significant challenge but, increasingly, rational drug combination approaches have shown promise in overcoming resistance. Developing predictive preclinical models of childhood cancers for drug testing is a high priority for the field of pediatric oncology.

[New systemic treatment approaches for conjunctival melanoma]

Conjunctival melanoma is a rare disease that nevertheless has a high tumor-associated mortality rate. A resection in sano with adjuvant local treatment currently represents the therapeutic gold standard and systemic treatment is used for metastasized conjunctival melanoma and/or very advanced nonresectable local findings. New knowledge on molecular changes in conjunctival melanoma shows a clear similarity to those of cutaneous melanoma. Therefore, many findings on new systemic forms of treatment for cutaneous melanoma can be transferred to conjunctival melanoma. In the clinical application BRAF/MEK inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors are already in use and good response rates have been shown in small retrospective studies and case reports. Due to the rarity of conjunctival melanoma, there are no larger prospective studies comparing different systemic therapeutic agents. In a nonrandomized retrospective comparison, a better overall survival was shown for a combination of BRAF/MEK inhibitors (progression-free 1‑year survival probability of 54.7%; overall survival of 29.1 months) compared to a combination of PD1/CTLA4 antibodies (progression-free 1‑year survival probability of 42%; overall survival of 18 months). The current recommendation is to perform genomic profiling for every conjunctival melanoma, particularly to investigate a BRAF mutation. If a BRAF mutation is present, BRAF/MEK inhibitor treatment should preferably be initiated. Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors can be used in the case of BRAF-negative mutation status or treatment failure with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Monotherapy with the CTLA4 antibody ipilimumab is not recommended due to its inferiority to PD1 antibodies. New knowledge in the genomic profiling of conjunctival melanoma could enable further targeted treatment options in the future.

Advances in sporadic brain arteriovenous malformations: Novel genetic insights, innovative animal models and emerging therapeutic approaches

Brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) are a notable cause of intracranial hemorrhage, strongly associated with severe morbidity and mortality. Contemporary treatment options include surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, and endovascular embolization, each of which has limitations. Hence, development of pharmacological interventions is urgently needed. The recent discovery of the presence of activating Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) viral oncogene homologue mutations in most sporadic bAVMs has opened the door for a more comprehensive understanding of the pathogenesis of bAVMs and has pointed to entirely novel possible therapeutic targets. Herein, we review the status quo of genetics, animal models, and therapeutic approaches in bAVMs.

Psychosocial distress and persistent adverse events in long-term survivors of stage IV melanoma - a cross-sectional questionnaire study

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies have improved survival in patients with stage IV melanoma. However, the challenges faced by long-term survivors remain unclear. The long-term toxicity and psychosocial impact of these treatments in real-world patients have yet to be reported.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire study using established screening tools, including the Hornheide Screening Instrument (HSI), the Distress Thermometer (DT) with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) problem list, and melanoma-specific questions addressing persistent adverse events, social impairments, emotional needs, and financial concerns.

RESULTS

A total of 159 patients with stage IV melanoma (≥5 years after the initial diagnosis) were enrolled, of whom 93 completed the questionnaire. Approximately one-third of DT/HSI values exceeded the threshold, indicating a need for psycho-oncological support. More than 40% of patients reported persistent treatment-related complaints. Financial and work-related impacts were rare, affecting approximately 8% and 1% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

High rates of psychosocial distress and persistent adverse events were observed, highlighting the need for cancer survivorship programs in the follow-up care of melanoma patients.

Pancreatitis associated with BRAF inhibitors: a disproportionality analysis based on the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System

BACKGROUND

The relationship between the development of pancreatitis and the use of BRAF (B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase) inhibitors remains incompletely understood, primarily due to the infrequency of such cases.

AIM

This study aimed to investigate the association between BRAF inhibitors and pancreatitis, and to describe the clinical characteristics of pancreatitis related to these agents.

METHOD

A disproportionality analysis was conducted using data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System between July 2011 and June 2024. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information component (IC) were employed to assess the association between BRAF inhibitors and pancreatitis. Additionally, subgroup analysis and time-to-onset analysis were further performed.

RESULTS

A total of 169 cases of pancreatitis were identified in association with BRAF inhibitors: 71 cases with vemurafenib, 63 with dabrafenib, and 35 with encorafenib. The median age of patients was 62 years. Vemurafenib, dabrafenib, and encorafenib all showed a positive signal for pancreatitis, with respective RORs and ICs as follows: vemurafenib (ROR 2.46, 95% CI 1.95-3.10; IC = 1.27, 95% CI 0.88-1.56), dabrafenib (ROR 1.56, 95% CI 1.22-2.00; IC = 0.63, 95% CI 0.21-0.93), and encorafenib (ROR 2.59, 95% CI 1.86-3.62; IC = 1.34, 95% CI 0.77-1.74). The shortest median time-to-onset for pancreatitis was observed with vemurafenib (6.5 days), followed by encorafenib (14.0 days) and dabrafenib (129.5 days).

CONCLUSION

This study reveals a significant reporting association between BRAF inhibitors and the development of pancreatitis, with a higher risk observed in the early stage of treatment.

BRAF Targeting Across Solid Tumors: Molecular Aspects and Clinical Applications

BRAF mutations are critical drivers in cancers such as melanoma, colorectal cancer, and non-small-cell lung cancer. The most common mutation, BRAF V600E, is a key therapeutic target. Targeted treatments with BRAF and MEK inhibitors have significantly improved progression-free and overall survival in melanoma patients. However, in cancers like metastatic colorectal cancer, BRAF mutations are associated with poor outcomes due to aggressive disease behavior and resistance to conventional chemotherapy. Despite progress, resistance to BRAF/MEK inhibitors remains a major challenge, often driven by secondary mutations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, activation of alternative pathways such as phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3Ks)/protein kinase B (AKT), or changes in the tumor microenvironment. These challenges have motivated ongoing research into combining BRAF inhibitors with immunotherapies to enhance and prolong treatment effectiveness. Future research must also account for the role of the cancer's tissue of origin, as the biological context significantly influences response to targeted therapies, highlighting the need for a deeper understanding of tumor biology, micro-environment, and genetics.

Cardiotoxicity in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors: a real-world analysis of incidence, risk factors, and reversibility

BACKGROUND

BRAF/MEK inhibitors (BRAFi/MEKi) improve outcome in patients with BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma but are associated with cardiotoxicity, leading to a decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). This study aimed to evaluate the incidence, timeline, risk factors, and reversibility of BRAFi/MEKi-induced cardiotoxicity in a real-world setting.

PATIENTS/MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with metastatic melanoma (n = 170) treated with Encorafenib/Binimetinib, Vemurafenib/Cobimetinib, or Dabrafenib/Trametinib at Aarhus and Odense University Hospital, Denmark, from 2015 to 2023 were included. Cardiac function was assessed at baseline and every 3 months during treatment with either echocardiograms or multigated acquisition scans. Cardiotoxicity was defined as a reduction of LVEF by ≥10 percentage points (pp) to an LVEF < 50% (Major cardiotoxicity) or a reduction of LVEF by ≥15 pp but remaining > 50% (Minor cardiotoxicity).

RESULTS

Cardiotoxicity occurred in 21% of patients, with 14% experiencing major cardiotoxicity. The mean time to LVEF decline was 187 days, with 92% of major cardiotoxicity cases occurring within the first year. Cardiotoxicity was reversible in 79% of patients following dose reduction, treatment pauses, heart failure therapy, or continued treatment with monitoring. Baseline atrial fibrillation (odds ratio 13.67, p = 0.008) was identified as a risk factor for major cardiotoxicity.

INTERPRETATION

BRAFi/MEKi-induced cardiotoxicity is a significant but manageable complication, often reversible with timely interventions. Routine LVEF monitoring is recommended. The majority (92%) of major cardiac events were diagnosed within the first year of treatment, which might warrant a discontinuation of routine LVEF monitoring after 1 year of BRAFi/MEKi treatment.

Cell Death Modalities in Therapy of Melanoma

Melanoma, one of the most lethal cancers, demands urgent and effective treatment strategies. However, a successful therapeutic approach requires a precise understanding of the mechanisms underlying melanoma initiation and progression. This review provides an overview of melanoma pathogenesis, identifies current pathogenic factors contributing to mortality, and explores targeted therapy and checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Furthermore, we examine melanoma classification and corresponding therapies, along with advancements in various cell death mechanisms for melanoma treatment. We also discuss the current treatment status along with some drawbacks encountered during research stages such as resistance and metastasis.

Comparative real-world outcomes of stage III melanoma patients treated with talimogene laherparepvec or interleukin 2

Background

Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) and interleukin-2 (IL-2) are both used in the intralesional treatment of melanoma skin metastases. T-VEC received regulatory approval from the European Medicines Agency and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2015, while IL-2 has been used off-label for this purpose for many years. Despite their use in clinical practice, there is a lack of comparative data on the efficacy and safety of these treatments.

Objectives

This retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of intralesional T-VEC and IL-2 in non-resectable stage III patients with melanoma treated at a single center between January 2016 and September 2024.

Methods

We identified eligible patients using the Central Malignant Melanoma Registry and the local University Hospital Pharmacy database. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated. Furthermore, best response rates and occurrence of adverse events (AEs) were compared between the T-VEC and the IL-2 group. Concomitant systemic treatment was allowed.

Results

A total of 62 patients were included, with 37 receiving T-VEC and 25 receiving IL-2 as first-line therapy. Ten patients received both therapies subsequently. The median PFS for the cohort was 5.0 months, and the median OS was 34.0 months. No significant differences in PFS (p = 0.790), OS (p = 0.894), or best response rates (p = 0.468) were found between groups. Common AEs included local injection site reactions and fever, with no severe events leading to discontinuation by a physician.

Conclusion

No significant differences in PFS, OS, or best response rates were observed between IL-2 and T-VEC treatments. The choice of therapy may be influenced by factors such as availability, physician preference, and patient-specific considerations.

Neurologic adverse events associated with BRAF and MEK inhibitor therapy in patients with malignant melanoma: a disproportionality analysis using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System

BRAF and MEK inhibitor (BRAFi + MEKi) therapy has improved the treatment of solid tumors with BRAF mutation. However, their neurologic adverse events (nAEs) have been largely unexplored. This study aimed to provide clinicians with more updated knowledge on nAEs associated with BRAFi + MEKi therapy in patients with malignant melanoma compared with nonmelanoma cancers. The United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System was queried from 2011 to 2022 to capture nAEs reported for the BRAFi + MEKi therapies, vemurafenib plus cobimetinib (V + C), dabrafenib plus trametinib (D + T), and encorafenib plus binimetinib (E + B). A disproportionality analysis was performed to calculate their reporting odds ratios (RORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a control group of antineoplastic medications. There were 2881 BRAFi + MEKi therapy-associated nAE cases, the majority of which listed malignant melanoma as the reason for use (87.5, 66.7, and 62.0% for V + C, D + T, and E + B, respectively). Several novel associations were identified; including epidural lipomatosis (ROR: 320.07, 95% CI: 123.76-827.77 for V + C), peripheral nerve lesion (ROR: 185.64, 95% CI: 73.95-466.03 for V + C), Guillain-Barre syndrome (RORs: 8.80, 2.94, and 11.79, 95% CIs: 3.65-21.22, 1.40-6.19, and 5.87-23.66 for V + C, D + T, and E + B), demyelinating polyneuropathy (RORs: 24.72 and 78.98, 95% CI: 8.16-74.86 and 24.84-251.13 for D + T and E + B), and multiple sclerosis (ROR: 5.90, 95% CI: 3.06-11.40 for D + T) in melanoma patients. nAEs in the setting of BRAFi + MEKi therapy should be a safety consideration when utilizing these medications.

Therapeutic Strategies for Drug-resistant Melanoma and Their Clinical Implications

Melanoma is a malignant tumor originating from melanocytes, characterized by its high invasiveness and metastasis, leading to poor prognosis and high mortality. Early-stage melanoma is primarily treated with surgery; however, due to its metastatic nature, surgery becomes challenging in advanced stages. Treatment strategies for advanced or metastatic melanoma include chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and targeted therapy. However, melanoma's propensity for rapid drug resistance remains a significant clinical challenge. This review summarizes the developments in the treatment of drug-resistant melanoma over the past decade and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of various therapeutic approaches and their clinical significance implications.

Pan-Cancer Molecular Biomarkers: Practical Considerations for the Surgical Pathologist

Traditional anatomic pathologic classification of cancer is based on tissue of origin and morphologic and immunohistochemical characterization of the malignant cells. With the technological improvements of massively parallel or next-generation sequencing, oncogenic drivers that are shared across different tumor types are increasingly being identified and used as pan-cancer biomarkers. This approach is reflected in the growing list of Food and Drug Administration-approved tumor-agnostic therapies, including pembrolizumab in the setting of microsatellite instability and high tumor mutational burden, larotrectinib and entrectinib for solid tumors with NTRK fusions, and combined dabrafenib-trametinib for BRAF V600E-mutated neoplasms. Several other biomarkers are currently under investigation, including fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), RET, and ROS1 fusions; ERBB2 amplification; and mutations in the AKT1/2/3, NF1, RAS pathway and (mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. As molecular assays are increasingly incorporated into routine tumor workup, the emergence of additional pan-cancer biomarkers is likely to be a matter more of "when" than "if." In this review, we first explore some of the conceptual and technical considerations at the intersection of surgical and molecular pathology, followed by a brief overview of both established and emerging molecular pan-cancer biomarkers and their diagnostic and clinical applications.

Integrating epidemiology and genomics data to estimate the prevalence of acquired cysteine drug targets in the U.S. cancer patient population

Reliable estimates for the number of cancer patients with a specific mutation can help quantify the size of the population that could potentially benefit from a targeted therapy. We adapt our previously developed approach for estimating gene-level mutation abundances to estimate mutation-specific (e.g., KRAS G12C) abundances by combining United States cancer epidemiology and genomic data. We demonstrate the approach by obtaining population-level estimates for all acquired somatic missense mutations that create a de novo cysteine residue. We find that approximately 14% of non-epidemiological informed estimates are more than twice the epidemiological informed estimate. Non-epidemiologically informed pan-cancer estimation of mutation rates may not be representative of the number of cancer patients with a specific mutation. Our study suggests that epidemiological and genomic information should be combined when estimating the population level abundance of specific pathogenic mutations.

PTPN23-dependent activation of PI3KC2α is a therapeutic vulnerability of BRAF-mutant cancers

BRAF mutations drive initiation and progression of various tumors. While BRAF inhibitors are effective in BRAF-mutant melanoma patients, intrinsic or acquired resistance to these therapies is common. Here, we identify non-receptor-type protein tyrosine phosphatase 23 (PTPN23) as an alternative effective target in BRAF-mutant cancer cells. Silencing PTPN23 selectively kills BRAF-mutant melanoma cells but not those with wild-type BRAF. Mechanistically, PTPN23, a catalytically inactive phosphatase, intriguingly induces WNK3-mediated phosphorylation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase class II alpha (PI3KC2α) at serine 329, enhancing its catalytic activity. This activation promotes production of PI(3,4)P2 and subsequent AKT2 activation at endosomes to support cell survival. Genetic or pharmacological targeting of the PTPN23-PI3KC2α-AKT2 signaling axis, alone or in combination with BRAF inhibitors, effectively inhibits the growth of BRAF-mutant melanoma and other cancers in vitro and in vivo. We also demonstrate that melanocyte-specific knockout of PTPN23 significantly inhibits BRAFV600E-driven melanomagenesis. Altogether, our findings demonstrate that targeting PTPN23/PI3KC2α offers a new and viable therapeutic strategy for BRAF-mutant cancers.

Distress and Its Determinants in 820 Consecutive Melanoma Patients

BACKGROUND

Psycho-oncological burden not only affects patients' mental health but can also decrease treatment compliance and impair outcomes. The Distress Thermometer (DT) is a widely used screening tool in real-world medical care for identifying and monitoring psychological distress. Patients with melanoma presenting in oncologic outpatient departments comprise a wide range of characteristics. Although young adults may face challenges related to pivotal life stages, such as career responsibilities or parenting, older adults often contend with mobility issues, preexisting comorbidities, or age-related physical limitations.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective evaluation of DT data from 820 patients with melanoma treated at our outpatient department between July and September 2016. These patients underwent routine DT screening and completed the associated National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Problem List. The study aimed to identify factors influencing DT values above the threshold (≥ 5), further characterizing the patients' complaints according to the NCCN Problem List.

RESULTS

A total of 820 patients with melanoma underwent psycho-oncological screening. More than 40% had DT values above the threshold. Significant factors associated with DT values over the threshold included female gender, younger age, and advanced melanoma stages III-IV. Analysis of the NCCN Problem List revealed complaints such as fear, sleep issues, tingling in hands and feet, feeling swollen, problems at work or school, concerns regarding God, and loss of faith.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate a high need for psycho-oncological support for patients with melanoma. Particular attention should be given to patients with the identified factors that are associated with exceeding the DT threshold.

A phase I, first-in-human trial of KO-947, an ERK1/2 inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

KO-947, a potent, intravenously administered, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) inhibitor, has demonstrated activity in preclinical models. This phase I trial of KO-947 evaluated maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and pharmacokinetics in patients with relapsed/refractory solid tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation study evaluated KO-947 0.45-11.3 mg/kg in three schedules. Schedules 1 (0.45-5.4 mg/kg, 1- to 2-hour infusion) and 2 (4.8-9.6 mg/kg, 4-hour infusion) were administered once weekly on a 28-day cycle. Schedule 3 (3.6-11.3 mg/kg, 4-hour infusion) was administered on days 1, 4, and 8 (and on days 11 and 15 for two patients) on a 21-day cycle. The primary objective was determination of MTD and/or recommended phase II dose. Safety analysis included adverse events of special interest (AESIs), namely ocular toxicities and infusion-related reactions (e.g. hypotension, corrected QT interval prolongation). Results from the dose-escalation portion of the phase I study are presented due to trial termination before preplanned cohort expansion cohorts.

RESULTS

All 61 enrolled patients (schedules 1/2, n = 34, schedule 3, n = 27) discontinued treatment, mostly owing to disease progression (88% and 67%). The MTD for schedule 1 was 3.6 mg/kg; the maximum administered doses for schedules 2 and 3 were 9.6 and 11.3 mg/kg, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 88% of patients in schedules 1/2, and 92% in schedule 3; most common were blurred vision (schedules 1/2, 50.0%; schedule 3, 33.3%). AESIs occurred in 50% of patients in schedules 1/2, and 82% in schedule 3. In all schedules, the best overall response was stable disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous KO-947 had a generally tolerable safety profile with minimal gastrointestinal toxicity compared with oral administration of other ERK inhibitors.

From pathogenesis to precision medicine: Transformative advances in research and treatment of ameloblastoma

Odontogenic neoplasms of the jaw are dominated by ameloblastoma (AM), a locally aggressive epithelial tumor with a significant propensity for recurrence. The World Health Organization's 2022 update to the AM classification system underscores recent progress in comprehending its underlying mechanisms and refining clinical approaches. Contemporary research has yielded significant insights into the genetic underpinnings of AM, paving the way for the development of precision-based treatment strategies. Advanced genetic profiling has revealed a significant frequency of BRAF (V-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog) V600E and SMO (Smoothened) gene alterations in AM. Importantly, therapeutic interventions specifically designed to target these genetic aberrations, including BRAF and MEK pathway blockers, have shown encouraging results in terms of both effectiveness and tolerability, as documented in individual case reports and small-scale clinical investigations. This comprehensive review summarizes the recent modifications to the World Health Organization's categorization of AMs, explores progress in elucidating their underlying molecular pathways, and evaluates emerging targeted treatment modalities. Our objective is to present a thorough synthesis of contemporary scientific discoveries and therapeutic interventions, potentially paving the way for more efficacious and individualized clinical management protocols for this complex neoplasm.

Relapse-free survival in a pediatric patient with recurrent EZH2-mutant melanoma treated with adjuvant tazemetostat

Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) is an essential epigenetic regulator of H3K27 histone methylation and is mutated or overexpressed in a wide variety of cancers. In melanoma, EZH2 overexpression contributes to excessive trimethylation of H3K27 on tumor suppressor genes and has been proposed to be a mechanism of tumor progression and metastasis. EZH2-targeted therapies have been successfully used to treat patients with follicular lymphoma and epithelioid sarcoma, but their clinical use in melanoma has not been described. Here, we describe a pediatric patient with multiply relapsed melanoma harboring an EZH2 A692V missense mutation, treated adjuvantly with the EZH2 inhibitor tazemetostat, who experienced a prolonged relapse-free survival.

Clinical Approaches for the Management of Skin Cancer: A Review of Current Progress in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis for Patients with Melanoma

Melanoma represents a significant public health challenge due to its increasing incidence and potential for metastasis. This review will explore the current clinical approaches to the management of melanoma, focusing on advancements in diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Methods for early detection and accurate staging have been enhanced by new diagnostic strategies. Treatment modalities have expanded beyond traditional surgical excision to include targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Prognostic assessment has benefited from the development of novel biomarkers and genetic profiling. This review will highlight the progress made in the multidisciplinary management of melanoma, underscoring the importance of continuous research to improve patient outcomes.

Cancer Stem Cells and the Renin-Angiotensin System in the Tumor Microenvironment of Melanoma: Implications on Current Therapies

Multiple signaling pathways are dysregulated in melanoma, notably the Ras/RAF/MAPK/ERK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways, which can be targeted therapeutically. The high immunogenicity of melanoma has been exploited using checkpoint inhibitors. Whilst targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors have improved the survival of patients with advanced melanoma, treatment resistance, their side effect profiles, and the prohibitive cost remain a challenge, and the survival outcomes remain suboptimal. Treatment resistance has been attributed to the presence of cancer stem cells (CSCs), a small subpopulation of pluripotent, highly tumorigenic cells proposed to drive cancer progression, recurrence, metastasis, and treatment resistance. CSCs reside within the tumor microenvironment (TME) regulated by the immune system, and the paracrine renin-angiotensin system, which is expressed in many cancer types, including melanoma. This narrative review discusses the role of CSCs and the paracrine renin-angiotensin system in the melanoma TME, and its implications on the current treatment of advanced melanoma with targeted therapy and immune checkpoint blockers. It also highlights the regulation of the Ras/RAF/MAPK/ERK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways by the renin-angiotensin system via pro-renin receptors, and how this may relate to CSCs and treatment resistance, underscoring the potential for improving the efficacy of targeted therapy and immunotherapy by concurrently modulating the renin-angiotensin system.

Dihydrotanshinone I enhanced BRAF mutant melanoma treatment efficacy by inhibiting the STAT3/SOX2 signaling pathway

BACKGROUND

The Food and Drug Administration has approved the Serine/threonine-protein kinase B-raf (BRAF) inhibitor and Mitogen-activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MEK) inhibitor combo as the first-line treatment for individuals with metastatic melanoma, although the majority of these patients exhibit primary or secondary drug resistance in the clinic. Dihydrotanshinone I (DHT) is a lipophilic compound extracted from the root of Salvia miltiorrhiza that has been linked to multiple antitumor activities. In this study, we investigated the effect of dihydrotanshinone I on the MAPK pathway inhibitor resistance of BRAF mutant malignant melanoma.

METHOD

After treating A375, A375R, and A2058 cells with DHT or a combination of DHT and BRAF/MEK inhibitors, WB and Real-Time RT-qPCR were used to confirm the activation of the MAPK and STAT3/SOX2 pathways. CCK-8 was used to assess cell viability, while flow cytometry was used to identify apoptosis. In addition, mice were inoculated with A375 cells to establish a model of tumour formation, and various drug groups and treatment models were utilized. The diameter and weight of tumours in each group were then measured, and IHC and HE staining were used to assess the expression of two pathways and cytotoxicity, respectively.

RESULTS

This study found that DHT directly interacts with STAT3 protein and it can stop the feedback activation of the STAT3/SOX2 pathway caused by the use of MAPK pathway inhibitors. In addition, the combination of DHT and BRAF/MEK inhibitors can inhibit the proliferation and growth of BRAF mutant melanoma cells and primary and secondary drug-resistant cells. Finally, we proved that the combined therapy of DHT and BRAF/MEK inhibitors is reliable and effective at animal and cell levels.

CONCLUSION

In BRAF mutant melanoma cells, DHT suppresses the STAT3/SOX2 signaling pathway. Combining DHT, BRAF inhibitors, and MEK inhibitors can help treat treatment-resistant BRAF mutant melanoma cells. Experimental results both in vitro and in vivo have shown that the combination of DHT and an inhibitor of the MAPK pathway is safer and more successful than using an inhibitor of the MAPK pathway alone when treating BRAF mutant melanoma.

The paradoxical activity of BRAF inhibitors: potential use in wound healing

The area of wound healing presents a promising field of interest for clinicians as well as the scientific community. A major concern for physicians is the rising number of elderly people suffering from diabetes, leprosy, tuberculosis and the associated chronic wounds. While traditional therapies target basic wound care, innovative strategies that accelerate wound healing are needed. V-RAF murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) inhibitors are anti-cancer drugs used primarily for melanoma. They also exhibit paradoxical activity, a phenomenon characterized by unintended activation of the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) signalling pathway leading to skin hyperproliferation. Studies have demonstrated that BRAF inhibitors can be repurposed to accelerate the healing of acute and chronic wounds by exploiting their paradoxical activity. This review evaluates studies on BRAF inhibitors by employing a systematic search strategy using databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. Articles were screened based on relevance to the paradoxical activity of BRAF inhibitors, their mechanisms, and applications in wound healing. Evidence from in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies demonstrates that BRAF inhibitors can enhance processes such as epithelialization and angiogenesis, essential for wound repair. This review summarizes the reports on the paradoxical activity of BRAF inhibitors, the predicted mechanisms behind the paradoxical activity, and their potential use in wound healing.

Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA in Liquid Biopsy: Current Techniques and Potential Applications in Melanoma

The treatment landscape for advanced melanoma has transformed significantly with the advent of BRAF and MEK inhibitors (BRAF/MEKi) targeting BRAFV600 mutations, as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) like anti-PD-1 monotherapy or its combinations with anti-CTLA-4 or anti-LAG-3. Despite that, many patients still do not benefit from these treatments at all or develop resistance mechanisms. Therefore, prognostic and predictive biomarkers are needed to identify patients who should switch or escalate their treatment strategies or initiate an intensive follow-up. In melanoma, liquid biopsy has shown promising results, with a potential role in predicting relapse in resected high-risk patients or in disease monitoring during the treatment of advanced disease. Several components in peripheral blood have been analyzed, such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs), cell-free DNA (cfDNA), and circulant tumoral DNA (ctDNA), which have turned out to be particularly promising. To analyze ctDNA in blood, different techniques have proven to be useful, including digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) to detect specific mutations and, more recently, next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques, which allow analyzing a broader repertoire of the mutation landscape of each patient. In this review, our goal is to update the current understanding of liquid biopsy, focusing on the use of ctDNA as a biological material in the daily clinical management of melanoma patients, in particular those with advanced disease treated with ICI.

Protocatechuic aldehyde sensitizes BRAF-mutant melanoma cells to temozolomide through inducing FANCD2 degradation

Temozolomide (TMZ)-based chemotherapy is a primary regimen for melanoma patients who have failed targeted therapy or immunotherapy. However, the low response rate of TMZ-based chemotherapy challenges the patients' prognosis. BRAFV600E mutation is the most frequently mutated site in melanoma. This study investigates the synergistic effect of protocatechuic aldehyde (PA) and temozolomide (TMZ) in killing BRAFV600E mutant melanoma cells and BRAF inhibitor-resistant melanoma cells as well as the underlying molecular mechanisms. We report that PA synergistically promoted TMZ cytotoxicity to both BRAF inhibitor-sensitive and BRAF inhibitor-resistant melanoma cells. Combination of PA and TMZ increased DNA double-strand breaks and elevated apoptosis. Mechanism study reveals that PA promoted TMZ cytotoxicity through inducing FANCD2 degradation. Our results suggest that PA is a potential compound for melanoma combinational chemotherapy, regardless of O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) status.

Advances in Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy of Malignant Melanoma

Malignant melanoma (MM) is a malignant tumor, resulting from mutations in melanocytes of the skin and mucous membranes. Its mortality rate accounts for 90% of all dermatologic tumor mortality. Traditional treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy are unable to achieve the expected results due to MM's low sensitivity, high drug resistance, and toxic side effects. As treatment advances, immunotherapy and targeted therapy have made significant breakthroughs in the treatment of MM and have demonstrated promising application prospects. However, the heterogeneity of tumor immune response causes more than half of patients to not benefit from clinical immunotherapy and targeted therapy, which delays the patient's condition and causes them to suffer adverse immune events' side effects. The combination of immunotherapy and targeted therapy can help improve therapeutic effects, delay drug resistance, and mitigate adverse effects. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current development status and research progress of immune checkpoints, targeted genes, and their inhibitors, with a view to providing a reference for the clinical treatment of MM.

Next-generation sequencing-based evaluation of the actionable landscape of genomic alterations in solid tumors: the "MOZART" prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

The identification of the most appropriate targeted therapies for advanced cancers is challenging. We performed a molecular profiling of metastatic solid tumors utilizing a comprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay to determine genomic alterations' type, frequency, actionability, and potential correlations with PD-L1 expression.

METHODS

A total of 304 adult patients with heavily pretreated metastatic cancers treated between January 2019 and March 2021 were recruited. The CLIA-/UKAS-accredit Oncofocus assay targeting 505 genes was used on newly obtained or archived biopsies. Chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used where appropriate. Results were significant for P < .05.

RESULTS

A total of 237 tumors (78%) harbored potentially actionable genomic alterations. Tumors were positive for PD-L1 in 68.9% of cases. The median number of mutant genes/tumor was 2.0 (IQR: 1.0-3.0). Only 34.5% were actionable ESCAT Tier I-II with different prevalence according to cancer type. The DNA damage repair (14%), the PI3K/AKT/mTOR (14%), and the RAS/RAF/MAPK (12%) pathways were the most frequently altered. No association was found among PD-L1, ESCAT, age, sex, and tumor mutational status. Overall, 62 patients underwent targeted treatment, with 37.1% obtaining objective responses. The same molecular-driven treatment for different cancer types could be associated with opposite clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

We highlight the clinical value of molecular profiling in metastatic solid tumors using comprehensive NGS-based panels to improve treatment algorithms in situations of uncertainty and facilitate clinical trial recruitment. However, interpreting genomic alterations in a tumor type-specific manner is critical.

HDAC and MEK inhibition synergistically suppresses HOXC6 and enhances PD-1 blockade efficacy in BRAFV600E-mutant microsatellite stable colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF)V600E-mutant microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC) constitutes a distinct CRC subgroup, traditionally perceived as minimally responsive to standard therapies. Recent clinical attempts, such as BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) monotherapy and combining BRAFi with other inhibitors, have yielded unsatisfactory efficacy. This study aims to identify a novel therapeutic strategy for this challenging subgroup.

METHODS

We first performed a large-scale drug screening using patient-derived organoid models and cell lines to pinpoint potential therapies. Subsequently, we investigated the synergistic effects of identified effective inhibitors and probed their cooperative mechanisms. Concurrently, we explored the immune characteristics of BRAFV600E MSS CRC using RNA sequencing and multiplex immunohistochemistry. Finally, we established a CT26 BRAFV637E mouse cell line and validated the efficacy of combining these inhibitors and programmed death 1 (PD-1) blockades in immunocompetent mice.

RESULTS

Drug screening identified histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor as significantly effective against BRAFV600E MSS CRC. Further research revealed that these two inhibitors have superior synergistic effects by comprehensively inhibiting the activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor, mitogen-activated protein kinase, and phosphoinositide 3-kinase-protein kinase B pathways and suppressing the key target homeobox C6 (HOXC6). HOXC6, overexpressed in BRAFV600E MSS CRC, regulates the MYC gene and contributes to treatment resistance, tumor growth, and metastasis. Moreover, the combination therapy demonstrated the ability to enhance antitumor immunity by synergistically upregulating the expression of immune activation-related genes, activating the cyclic guanosine monophosphate-adenosine monophosphate synthase/stimulator of interferon genes (cGAS/STING) pathway, and diminishing the tumor cells' DNA mismatch repair capacity. Notably, BRAFV600E MSS CRC was identified to exhibit a distinct immune microenvironment with increased PD-1+ cell infiltration and potential responsiveness to immunotherapy. Echoing the above findings, in vivo, HDAC and MEK inhibitors significantly improved PD-1 blockade efficacy, accompanied by increased CD8+ T-cell infiltration.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that combining HDAC inhibitor, MEK inhibitor, and PD-1 blockade is a potential strategy for treating BRAFV600E-mutant MSS CRC, warranting further investigation in clinical settings.

Trends in cutaneous melanoma mortality and incidence in European Union 15+ countries between 1990 and 2019

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous melanoma (CM) is the leading cause of skin cancer mortality with associated high healthcare costs. Up-to-date reporting of epidemiological trends for CM is required to project future trends, assess the burden of disease and aid evaluation of new diagnostic, therapeutic and preventative strategies.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the trends in CM mortality, incidence, mortality-to-incidence indices (MIIs) and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) over the last three decades.

METHODS

A population-based cross-sectional study of the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) database between 1990 and 2019 was performed. Nineteen high-income countries with similar health expenditure and classified as having high-quality mortality data including the United Kingdom, the United States, Australia and selected European Union countries were included. Annual age-standardized incidence rates (ASIRs), age-standardized death rates (ASDRs) and DALYs for each country were extracted. Mortality-to-incidence indexes were calculated by dividing the ASDR by the ASIR. Trends were described using Joinpoint regression analysis.

RESULTS

Almost all countries demonstrated increasing ASDR in males over the observation period with greatest percentage increase in Greece (+87%), and there was greater heterogeneity between countries in females. CM mortality was greater for males than females in all countries. Most recent Joinpoint analysis shows significantly decreasing mortality in all countries except the United Kingdom (+0.5% males between 2007 and 2019, +0.1% females between 2002 and 2019). Incidence rates increased in all countries, with evidence of plateau from 2015 onwards. While MIIs cannot be used as a proxy for survival, statistically significant decreases in MII were observed in all countries. Overall, DALYs remained static.

CONCLUSIONS

Over the past 30 years, CM mortality and incidence has increased in most EU15+ countries. There is evidence that in recent years, CM mortality is decreasing. The burden of disease as assessed using DALYs has remained mostly unchanged. Future work should not solely focus on expensive innovative therapies, but also on optimizing primary prevention.

A comprehensive review of targeting RAF kinase in cancer

RAF kinases, particularly the BRAF isoform, play a crucial role in the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway, regulating key cellular processes such as proliferation, differentiation, and survival. Dysregulation of this pathway often caused by mutations in the BRAF gene or alterations in upstream regulators like Ras and receptor tyrosine kinases contributes significantly to cancer development. Mutations, such as BRAF-V600E, are present in a variety of malignancies, with the highest prevalence in melanoma. Targeted therapies against RAF kinases have achieved substantial success, especially in BRAF-V600E-mutant melanomas, where inhibitors like vemurafenib and dabrafenib have demonstrated remarkable efficacy, leading to improved patient outcomes. These inhibitors have also shown clinical benefits in cancers such as thyroid and colorectal carcinoma, although to a lesser extent. Despite these successes, therapeutic resistance remains a major hurdle. Resistance mechanisms, including RAF dimerization, feedback reactivation of the MAPK pathway, and paradoxical activation of ERK signaling, often lead to diminished efficacy over time, resulting in disease progression or even secondary malignancies. In response, current research is focusing on novel therapeutic strategies, including combination therapies that target multiple components of the pathway simultaneously, such as MEK inhibitors used in tandem with RAF inhibitors. Additionally, next-generation RAF inhibitors are being developed to address resistance and enhance therapeutic specificity. This review discusses the clinical advancements in RAF-targeted therapies, with a focus on ongoing efforts to overcome therapeutic resistance and enhance outcomes for cancer patients. It also underscores the persistent challenges in effectively targeting RAF kinase in oncology.

Response and outcome of patients with melanoma skin metastases and immune checkpoint inhibition

It is known, that different metastatic organ systems respond differently to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). In this study, we aimed to investigate the extent to which skin/subcutaneous metastases respond to ICI or targeted therapies (TTs) and whether the response rate differs from that of distant metastases in the same patient. Patients with melanoma diagnosed between January 2021 and September 2023 with at least one skin/subcutaneous metastasis who had received therapy with ICI or TT in an advanced setting were included in the analysis. Best overall response (BOR) was classified according to the revised response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST). The BOR of skin metastases and visceral metastases to ICI and TT was compared using the chi-square test. Skin metastases treated with ICI a first-line setting showed an overall response rate (ORR) of 44.1%. In contrast, visceral metastases had a higher ORR of 51.1%. However, the difference was not statistically significant (p = .77). Regarding TT, the ORR for skin metastases was 57.1%, compared to 38.5% for visceral metastases (p = .59). Interestingly, the ORR for skin/subcutaneous metastases was notably lower with ICI compared to visceral metastases, in contrast to patients who underwent TT. Skin metastases showed a poorer response to ICI than visceral metastases. Therefore, careful monitoring is recommended to detect non-response early in patients with skin metastases as skin metastases may have a worse response than TT. A larger cohort is needed for a comprehensive analysis and confirmation of our results.

The Olive Oil Monophenolic Secoiridoid Ligstroside Aglycone Suppresses Melanoma Progression by Targeting the BRAF Signaling Pathway

Melanoma is among the most abundant malignancies in the US and worldwide. Ligstroside aglycone (LA) is a rare extra-virgin olive oil-derived monophenolic secoiridoid with diverse bioactivities. LA dose-response screening at the NCI 60 cancer cells panel identified the high sensitivity of the Malme-3M cell line, which harbors a BRAF V600E mutation. Daily oral 10 mg/kg LA exhibited potent in vivo antitumor effects against Malme-3M cells xenograft in a nude mouse model by targeting the BRAF signaling pathway. A human Clariom S microarray analysis of the collected Malme- 3M tumors identified 571 dysregulated genes, with the downregulation of pathways critical for melanoma cells growth and survival. A Western blot analysis of the collected animal tumors further validated the downregulation of the mutated BRAF-MAPK axis, as well as the GPD1 and ELOVL6 expression levels. A histopathological analysis of Malme-3M tumor sections showed extensive focal tumor necrosis in treated mice. An immunofluorescence study of tumor sections showed notable reductions in proliferation marker ki67 and the vasculogenesis marker CD31 in treated tumors. These findings promote LA as a potential nutraceutical lead for the control of the BRAF V600E mutant melanoma.

Current and emerging treatment options for BRAFV600-mutant melanoma

INTRODUCTION

BRAF mutations are the most common driver mutation in cutaneous melanoma, present in 40% of cases. Rationally designed BRAF targeted therapy (TT) has been developed in response to this, and alongside immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), forms the backbone of systemic therapy options for BRAF-mutant melanoma. Various therapeutic approaches have been studied in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant and advanced settings, and there is a wealth of information to guide clinicians managing these patients. Despite this, certain challenges remain.

AREAS COVERED

We reviewed the available literature regarding BRAF mutation types and resistance mechanisms, neoadjuvant and adjuvant approaches for patients with early-stage disease, management of advanced disease, including patients with brain metastases, as well as identified areas of further research.

EXPERT OPINION

Although there is a significant amount of literature to guide the management of BRAF-mutant melanoma, several questions remain. Thus far, the management of stage III BRAF-mutant patients following neoadjuvant ICI, treatment de-escalation in long-term TT responders in the advanced setting and the management of symptomatic brain metastases remain areas of debate. Further work on predictive and prognostic biomarkers for patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma patients will assist in clinical decision-making.

Chronic Inflammation and Cancer: Key Pathways and Targeted Therapies

Recent research has underscored the pivotal role of chronic inflammation in cancer development. Investigations have elucidated key molecular mechanisms underpinning inflammation-related cancer. Extrinsic pathway, driven by inflammatory conditions and intrinsic pathway, propelled by genetic events, emerged as critical links between inflammation and carcinogenesis. The persistent inflammation exacerbates genomic instability, providing a mechanistic link between inflammation and cancer. Targeting crucial inflammatory pathways such as NFκB, JAK-STAT, MAPK/ERK, PI3K/AKT, Wnt and TGF-β, holds promise for advancing cancer treatment modalities. Hence, understanding the key signalling pathways will highlight the intricate interplay between inflammation and cancer recognizing it as a potential target for interventions.

Cutaneous adverse events associated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim

Cutaneous adverse events (CAEs) after treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors in patients with melanoma remain incompletely characterized. To determine the association of BRAF and MEK inhibitor treatment with CAEs in patients with melanoma compared with BRAF inhibitor alone.

Method

PubMed, Cochrane, Embase and Web of Science were systematically searched for BRAF and MEK inhibitors from database inception through 10 May 2024. Randomized clinical trials reporting on CAEs in patients with melanoma being treated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors compared with patients with melanoma being treated with BRAF inhibitor monotherapy were selected. Pooled Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs were determined using random-effects analyses. The selected end points were alopecia, cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma, hyperkeratosis, keratoacanthoma, palmoplantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome, palmoplantar keratoderma, rash, photosensitivity reaction, and skin papilloma. All-grade and high-grade (≥3) CAEs were recorded.

Results

Comparing with BRAF and MEK inhibitors, treatment with BRAF inhibitors alone was associated with an increased risk of rash (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54-0.99; p = 0.039; I2 = 88%), alopecia (RR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.20-0.41; P < 0.001; I2 = 76%), hyperkeratosis (RR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.22-0.41; P < 0.001; I2 = 56%), palmoplantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome (RR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.10-0.47; P < 0.001; I2 = 81%), palmoplantar keratoderma (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.26-0.57; P < 0.001; I2 = 29%), Skin papilloma (RR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.12-0.52; P < 0.001; I2 = 77%), cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma (RR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.11-0.42; P < 0.001; I2 = 50%), and keratoacanthoma (RR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.12-0.40; P < 0.001; I2 = 0%).

Conclusion

Therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors was associated with a lower risk of CAEs, especially rash, alopecia, hyperkeratosis, palmoplantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome, palmoplantar keratoderma, skin papilloma, cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma, and keratoacanthoma, compared with BRAF inhibitor alone. The risks of photosensitivity reaction was similar between the assessed groups. The findings may help to balance between beneficial melanoma treatment and cutaneous morbidity and mortality.

Specific SOX10 enhancer elements modulate phenotype plasticity and drug resistance in melanoma

Recent studies indicate that the development of drug resistance and increased invasiveness in melanoma is largely driven by transcriptional plasticity rather than canonical coding mutations. Understanding the mechanisms behind cell identity shifts in oncogenic transformation and cancer progression is crucial for advancing our understanding of melanoma and other aggressive cancers. While distinct melanoma phenotypic states have been well characterized, the processes and transcriptional controls that enable cells to shift between these states remain largely unknown. In this study, we initially leverage the well-established zebrafish melanoma model as a high-throughput system to dissect and analyze transcriptional control elements that are hijacked by melanoma. We identify key characteristics of these elements, making them translatable to human enhancer identification despite the lack of direct sequence conservation. Building on our identification of a zebrafish sox10 enhancer necessary for melanoma initiation, we extend these findings to human melanoma, identifying two human upstream enhancer elements that are critical for full SOX10 expression. Stable biallelic deletion of these enhancers using CRISPR-Cas9 induces a distinct phenotype shift across multiple human melanoma cell lines from a melanocytic phenotype towards an undifferentiated phenotype and is also characterized by an increase in drug resistance that mirrors clinical data including an upregulation of NTRK1, a tyrosine kinase, and potential therapeutic target. These results provide new insights into the transcriptional regulation of SOX10 in human melanoma and underscore the role of individual enhancer elements and potentially NTRK1 in driving melanoma phenotype plasticity and drug resistance. Our work lays the groundwork for future gene-based and combination kinase-inhibitor therapies targeting SOX10 regulation and NTRK1 as a potential avenue for enhancing the efficacy of current melanoma treatments.

Peptide inhibitors targeting Ras and Ras-associated protein-protein interactions

Peptides represent attractive molecules for targeting protein-protein interactions, and peptide drug development has made great progress during the last decades. Ras protein, the most promising target in cancer therapy, is one of the major growth drivers in various cancers. Although many small molecule inhibitors have been reported to effectively target Ras protein and some inhibitors (such as MRTX849 and AMG 510) have been translated into clinical application, just a few peptide inhibitors have been reported. Here we summarize different types of peptide inhibitors, including monocyclic peptides, bicyclic peptides, stapled peptides, and proteomimetic inhibitors, developed in recent years; emphasize the limits and achievements; and discuss the outlook and challenges associated with future research in peptide inhibitors. This review aims to provide a reference for the discovery of Ras peptide inhibitors.

Bmal1 upregulates ATG5 expression to promote autophagy in skin cutaneous melanoma

BACKGROUND

Skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM) is a highly aggressive and malignant tumor that arises from the malignant transformation of melanocytes. In light of the limitations of existing treatment modalities, there is a pressing need to identify new drug targets for SKCM. Aryl-hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator-like (ARNTL), also known as Bmal1, is a gene that has been linked to the onset and progression of cancer. However, its role in SKCM remains understudied.

METHODS

The expression of Bmal1 mRNA and protein was detected using TCGA, GTEx, CCLE, and ULCAN databases. Moreover, survival analysis was performed to investigate the association between Bmal1 and immune invasion and gene expression in immune infiltrating cells via CIBERSORT, R programming, TIMER, Sangerbox, Kaplan-Meier. The study also explored the role of proteins associated with Bmal1 by using R programming and databases (STRING and GSEA). Both in vitro and in vivo studies were conducted to examine the potential role of Bmal1 in SKCM.

RESULTS

Compared to normal tissues, the expression level of Bmal1 was significantly reduced in SKCM. Which has been associated with its poor prognosis. Similarly, its expression in SKCM was substantially correlated with immune infiltration, while biogenic analysis indicated that it could potentially influence the tumor immune microenvironment (TME) by influencing tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs). Moreover, Bmal1 overexpression suppressed the proliferation and invasion of melanoma cells and enhanced apoptosis, migration, and cell colony formation.

CONCLUSION

This study concluded that Bmal1 is a novel biomarker that functions as both a diagnostic and prognostic indicator for the progression of SKCM.

Safety and Efficacy Analysis of Targeted and Immune Combination Therapy in Advanced Melanoma-A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

The combinations of BRAF inhibitor-based targeted therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors currently represent less common therapeutic approaches in advanced melanoma. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of currently available melanoma treatments by conducting a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Four databases were systematically searched for randomized clinical studies that included patients with advanced/metastatic melanoma receiving chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy, or combinations thereof. The primary endpoints were treatment-related adverse events (TRAE), serious adverse events (SAE) of grade ≥ 3 adverse events, therapy discontinuation, progression-free survival (PFS), as well as objective response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CRR). A total of 63 articles were eligible for our systematic review; 59 of them were included in the statistical analysis. A separate subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy outcomes, specifically in BRAF-positive patients. Triple combination therapy or triple therapy (inhibiting BRAF, MEK and PD1/PDL1 axis) showed significantly longer progression-free survival compared to BRAF + MEK combination therapies (HR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.64-0.9), but similar objective and complete response rates in BRAF-mutated melanoma. This safety analysis suggests that triple therapy is not inferior to combined immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and BRAF/MEK therapies in terms of serious adverse events and therapy discontinuation rates. However, monotherapies and BRAF/MEK combinations showed notable advantage over triple therapy in terms of treatment-related adverse events. Combination strategies including BRAF/MEK-targeted therapies with ICI therapies are effective first-line options for advanced, BRAF-mutant melanoma; however, they are associated with more frequent side effects. Therefore, future RCTs are required to evaluate and identify high-risk subpopulations where triple therapy therapies should be considered.

Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of solid tumors with BRAF mutations

The BRAF gene is an important signaling molecule in human cells that is involved in the regulation of cell growth, differentiation, and survival. When the BRAF gene mutates, it can lead to abnormal activation of the signaling pathway, which promotes cell proliferation, inhibits cell apoptosis, and ultimately contributes to the occurrence and development of cancer. BRAF mutations are widely present in various cancers, including malignant melanoma, thyroid cancer, colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, and hairy cell leukemia, among others. BRAF is an important target for the treatment of various solid tumors, and targeted combination therapies, represented by BRAF inhibitors, have become one of the main treatment modalities for a variety of BRAF-mutation-positive solid tumors. Dabrafenib plus trametinib, as the first tumor-agnostic therapy, has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients aged 6 years and older harboring a BRAF V600E mutation with unresectable or metastatic solid tumors that have progressed following prior treatment and who have no satisfactory alternative treatment options. This is also the first time a BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination has been approved for use in pediatric patients. As research into the diagnosis and treatment of BRAF mutations advances, standardizing the detection of BRAF mutations and the clinical application of BRAF inhibitors becomes increasingly important. Therefore, we have established a universal and systematic strategy for diagnosing and treating solid tumors with BRAF mutations. In this expert consensus, we (1) summarize the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of BRAF mutations in different solid tumors, (2) provide recommendations for the selection of genetic testing methods and platforms, and (3) establish a universal strategy for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with solid tumors harboring BRAF mutations.

Risk Stratification, Screening and Treatment of BRAF/MEK Inhibitors-Associated Cardiotoxicity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review article we describe the cardiovascular adverse events associated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors as well as their pathophysiologic mechanisms and provide up to date guidance for risk stratified surveillance of patients on treatment and the optimal management of emergent cardiotoxicities.

RECENT FINDINGS

Combination BRAF/MEK inhibition has become an established standard treatment option for patients with a wide variety of BRAF mutant haematological and solid organ cancers, its use is most commonly associated with stage three and metastatic melanoma. The introduction of these targeted drugs has significantly improved the prognosis of previously treatment resistant cancers. It is increasingly recognised that these drugs have a number of cardiovascular toxicities including left ventricular systolic dysfunction, hypertension and QTc interval prolongation. Whilst cardiotoxicity is largely reversible and manageable with medical therapy, it does limit the effective use of these highly active agents.

Recent Advances in Bacterium-Based Therapeutic Modalities for Melanoma Treatment

Melanoma is one of the most severe skin cancer indications with rapid progression and a high risk of metastasis. However, despite the accumulated advances in melanoma treatment including adjuvant radiation, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy, the overall melanoma treatment efficacy in the clinics is still not satisfactory. Interestingly, bacterial therapeutics have demonstrated unique properties for tumor-related therapeutic applications, such as tumor-targeted motility, tailorable cytotoxicity, and immunomodulatory capacity of the tumor microenvironment, which have emerged as a promising platform for melanoma therapy. Indeed, the recent advances in genetic engineering and nanotechnologies have boosted the application potential of bacterium-based therapeutics for treating melanoma by further enhancing their tumor-homing, cell-killing, drug delivery, and immunostimulatory capacities. This review provides a comprehensive summary of the state-of-the-art bacterium-based anti-melanoma modalities, which are categorized according to their unique functional merits, including tumor-specific cytotoxins, tumor-targeted drug delivery platforms, and immune-stimulatory agents. Furthermore, a perspective is provided discussing the potential challenges and breakthroughs in this area. The insights in this review may facilitate the development of more advanced bacterium-based therapeutic modalities for improved melanoma treatment efficacy.

Role of mitochondria and potential of mitochondria-targeted therapy in BRAF mutant cancer: A review

The classical mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway, the Ras/Raf/MEK (mitogen-activated protein kinase/ERK kinase)/ERK protein kinase cascade, is a conserved cascade that regulates cell growth, differentiation, and proliferation. The significance of BRAF in cancer was established with the discovery of cancer-activating mutations in BRAF in several human tumors in 2002. Currently, BRAF is recognized as a driver mutation that affects cancer phenotypes in different ways, making it an important therapeutic target for cancer. BRAF-selective inhibitors have shown promise in clinical trials involving patients with metastatic melanoma. However, resistance mechanisms to BRAF inhibitors therapy have resulted in short-lived therapeutic responses. Further in-depth research is imperative to explore resistance mechanisms that oppose the effectiveness of BRAF inhibitors. Metabolic reprogramming has emerging role in BRAF-mutant cancers. In particular, mitochondrial metabolism and its closely related signaling pathways mediated by mitochondria have become recognized as potential new targets for treating BRAF-mutant cancers. This review, examines the progress in understanding BRAF mutations in cancer, the clinicopathological correlation of BRAF inhibitors, and recent advances in mitochondrial metabolism, mitochondrial dynamics and mitochondrial mediated death in BRAF-mutant cancer. This review will inform future cancer research and lay the foundation for novel treatment combinations of BRAF-mutant cancers.

Cold and hot tumors: from molecular mechanisms to targeted therapy

Immunotherapy has made significant strides in cancer treatment, particularly through immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), which has shown notable clinical benefits across various tumor types. Despite the transformative impact of ICB treatment in cancer therapy, only a minority of patients exhibit a positive response to it. In patients with solid tumors, those who respond well to ICB treatment typically demonstrate an active immune profile referred to as the "hot" (immune-inflamed) phenotype. On the other hand, non-responsive patients may exhibit a distinct "cold" (immune-desert) phenotype, differing from the features of "hot" tumors. Additionally, there is a more nuanced "excluded" immune phenotype, positioned between the "cold" and "hot" categories, known as the immune "excluded" type. Effective differentiation between "cold" and "hot" tumors, and understanding tumor intrinsic factors, immune characteristics, TME, and external factors are critical for predicting tumor response and treatment results. It is widely accepted that ICB therapy exerts a more profound effect on "hot" tumors, with limited efficacy against "cold" or "altered" tumors, necessitating combinations with other therapeutic modalities to enhance immune cell infiltration into tumor tissue and convert "cold" or "altered" tumors into "hot" ones. Therefore, aligning with the traits of "cold" and "hot" tumors, this review systematically delineates the respective immune characteristics, influencing factors, and extensively discusses varied treatment approaches and drug targets based on "cold" and "hot" tumors to assess clinical efficacy.

Neoadjuvant therapy for melanoma: past, present, and future

Modern systemic therapy has dramatically improved outcomes for many patients with advanced metastatic melanoma. The success of these therapies has attracted much scientific interest while these therapies have made their way into the treatment of earlier stages of disease. Randomized trials have led to the approval of adjuvant immunotherapy and targeted therapy for resected stage III melanoma. However, most recently, these therapies have gained traction in the neoadjuvant setting. Promising early results led to randomized controlled trials that have now established neoadjuvant therapy as standard of care in advanced melanoma patients. Questions remain regarding the optimal choice of therapy, duration and timing of neoadjuvant therapy, extent of surgery, and the need for additional adjuvant therapy for patients who received neoadjuvant therapy. Herein we provide an overview of neoadjuvant therapy for melanoma and dilemmas to its broader applications.

Advances in Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapy for Melanoma

Melanoma remains one of the most common cancers diagnosed in the United States, yet there have been substantial advancements in the treatment of resectable disease. Adjuvant therapy with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and targeted therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors (BRAF/MEKi) have now become standard of care for resectable stage IIIB-IV melanoma. In this article, the authors discuss recent scientific developments pertinent to the treatment of resectable melanoma including ICB, targeted therapy with BRAF/MEKi, oncolytic viruses, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy, and cancer vaccines.

Using Artificial Intelligence to Support Informed Decision-Making on BRAF Mutation Testing

PURPOSE

Precision oncology relies on accurate and interpretable reporting of testing and mutation rates. Focusing on the BRAFV600 mutations in advanced colorectal carcinoma, non-small-cell lung carcinoma, and cutaneous melanoma, we developed a platform displaying testing and mutation rates reported in the literature, which we annotated using an artificial intelligence (AI) and natural language processing (NLP) pipeline.

METHODS

Using AI, we identified publications that likely reported a testing or mutation rate, filtered publications for cancer type, and identified sentences that likely reported rates. Rates and covariates were subsequently manually curated by three experts. The AI performance was evaluated using precision and recall metrics. We used an interactive platform to explore and present the annotated testing and mutation rates by certain study characteristics.

RESULTS

The interactive dashboard, accessible at the BRAF dimensions website, enables users to filter mutation and testing rates with relevant options (eg, country of study, study type, mutation type) and to visualize annotated rates. The AI pipeline demonstrated excellent filtering performance (>90% precision and recall for all target cancer types) and moderate performance for sentence classification (53%-99% precision; ≥75% recall). The manual annotation of testing and mutation rates revealed inter-rater disagreement (testing rate, 19%; mutation rate, 70%), indicating unclear or nonstandard reporting of rates in some publications.

CONCLUSION

Our AI-driven NLP pipeline demonstrated the potential for annotating biomarker testing and mutation rates. The difficulties we encountered highlight the need for more advanced AI-powered literature searching and data extraction, and more consistent reporting of testing rates. These improvements would reduce the risk of misinterpretation or misunderstanding of testing and mutation rates by AI-based technologies and the health care community, with beneficial impacts on clinical decision-making, research, and trial design.

Challenges and Outlooks in Precision Medicine: Expectations Versus Reality

Recent developments in technology have led to rapid advances in precision medicine, especially due to the rise of next-generation sequencing and molecular profiling. These technological advances have led to rapid advances in research, including increased tumor subtype resolution, new therapeutic agents, and mechanistic insights. Certain therapies have even been approved for molecular biomarkers across histopathological diagnoses; however, translation of research findings to the clinic still faces a number of challenges. In this review, the authors discuss several key challenges to the clinical integration of precision medicine, including the blood-brain barrier, both a lack and excess of molecular targets, and tumor heterogeneity/escape from therapy. They also highlight a few key efforts to address these challenges, including new frontiers in drug delivery, a rapidly expanding treatment repertoire, and improvements in active response monitoring. With continued improvements and developments, the authors anticipate that precision medicine will increasingly become the gold standard for clinical care.

Targeted Therapy Innovations for Melanoma

Melanoma, a malignant tumor of melanocytes, poses a significant clinical challenge due to its aggressive nature and high potential for metastasis. The advent of targeted therapy has revolutionized the treatment landscape of melanoma, particularly for tumors harboring specific genetic alterations such as BRAF V600E mutations. Despite the initial success of targeted agents, resistance inevitably arises, underscoring the need for novel therapeutic strategies. This review explores the latest advances in targeted therapy for melanoma, focusing on new molecular targets, combination therapies, and strategies to overcome resistance.