Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves for patients with heterogeneous emphysema and intact interlobar fissures (the BeLieVeR-HIFi study): a randomised controlled trial

A 6-year experience of Zephyr endobronchial valves for severe emphysema in an Australian single-centre cohort

BACKGROUND

Endobronchial valve (EBV) insertion for lung volume reduction is a management option for patients with severe emphysema. One-way valves cause lobar deflation and improve lung function, exercise capacity and quality of life.

AIMS

To retrospectively analyse and compare the outcomes of the first 57 patients treated with EBVs between 2015 and 2021 at the Royal Adelaide Hospital to international standards.

METHODS

Clinical outcomes of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), residual volume (RV), treated lobe volume reduction (TLVR) and 6-min walk distance (6MWD) at 3, 6 and 12 months after valve insertion were reviewed against established minimally clinically important differences (MCIDs). Complications and subjective breathlessness measured by Borg scores were also reviewed.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients were included. At 12 months, 77.2% achieved TLVR. FEV1 improved by 170 mL (95% confidence interval (CI): 100-250, P < 0.001), 80 mL (95% CI: 10-150, P = 0.019) and 40 mL (95% CI: -60 to 130, P 0.66) at 3, 6 and 12 months respectively. RV improved by -610 mL (95% CI: -330 to -900, P < 0.0001) at 3 months, -640 mL (95% CI: -360 to -920, P < 0.0001) at 6 months and -360 mL (95% CI: -60 to -680, P = 0.017) at 12 months. 6MWD improved by 57.34 m (95% CI: 36.23-78.45, P < 0.0001) and 44.93 m (95% CI: 7.19-82.67, P = 0.02) at 3 and 6 months. Borg score improved by -0.53 (95% CI: 0.11 to -1.2, P = 0.11) and -0.49 (95% CI: 0.17 to -1.15, P = 0.16) at 3 and 6 months. Complication rates aligned with international standards with mucous/infection (26.3%) and pneumothorax (17.5%) as the most common. Subgroup analysis signalled improved outcomes in patients with heterogeneous emphysema.

CONCLUSION

Our study represents the first publicly funded Australian analysis of EBVs. The results align with international prospective trials demonstrating improved lung function and exercise capacity. Australians with severe emphysema and gas trapping should be referred to a multidisciplinary centre for consideration of EBVs.

Optimizing clinical outcomes for bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with Zephyr® valves

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment with Zephyr one-way valves is an effective guideline-based treatment option for patients with severe emphysema and hyperinflation. However, in some cases the treatment response is less than anticipated or there might be a loss of initial treatment effect. Reasons for the lack of response can include incorrect assessment of collateral ventilation, improper valve placement, or patient related factors. Loss of initial benefit can be due to granulation tissue formation and subsequent valve dysfunction, or there may be side effects such as excessive coughing or infectious problems. Careful follow-up after treatment with valves is important and evaluation with a CT scan and/or bronchoscopy is helpful if there is no improvement after treatment or loss of initial benefit. This paper aims to describe the most important causes and provide a strategy of how to approach and manage these patients.

Placebo Control and Blinding in Randomized Trials of Procedural Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression

Importance

Unlike medications, procedural interventions are rarely trialed against placebo prior to becoming accepted in clinical practice. When placebo-controlled trials are eventually conducted, procedural interventions may be less effective than previously believed.

Objective

To investigate the importance of including a placebo arm in trials of surgical and interventional procedures by comparing effect sizes from trials of the same procedure that do and do not include a placebo arm.

Data Sources

Searches of MEDLINE and Embase identified all placebo-controlled trials for procedural interventions in any specialty of medicine and surgery from inception to March 31, 2019. A secondary search identified randomized clinical trials assessing the same intervention, condition, and end point but without a placebo arm for paired comparison.

Study Selection

Placebo-controlled trials of anatomically site-specific procedures requiring skin incision or endoscopic techniques were eligible for inclusion; these were then matched to trials without placebo control that fell within prespecified limits of heterogeneity.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Random-effects meta-regression, with placebo and blinding as a fixed effect and intervention and end point grouping as random effects, was used to calculate the impact of placebo control for each end point. Data were analyzed from March 2019 to March 2020.

Main Outcomes and Measures

End points were examined in prespecified subgroups: patient-reported or health care professional-assessed outcomes, quality of life, pain, blood pressure, exercise-related outcomes, recurrent bleeding, and all-cause mortality.

Results

Ninety-seven end points were matched from 72 blinded, placebo-controlled trials (hereafter, blinded) and 55 unblinded trials without placebo control (hereafter, unblinded), including 111 500 individual patient end points. Unblinded trials had larger standardized effect sizes than blinded trials for exercise-related outcomes (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.89; P < .001) and quality-of-life (SMD, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.53; P = .003) and health care professional-assessed end points (SMD, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.61; P < .001). The placebo effect accounted for 88.1%, 55.2%, and 61.3% of the observed unblinded effect size for these end points, respectively. There was no significant difference between unblinded and blinded trials for patient-reported end points (SMD, 0.31; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.64; P = .07), blood pressure (SMD, 0.26; 95% CI, -0.10 to 0.62; P = .15), all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.23; 95% CI, -0.26 to 0.72; P = .36), pain (SMD, 0.03; 95% CI, -0.52 to 0.57; P = .91), or recurrent bleeding events (OR, -0.12; 95% CI, -1.11 to 0.88; P = .88).

Conclusions and Relevance

The magnitude of the placebo effect found in this systematic review and meta-regression was dependent on the end point. Placebo control in trials of procedural interventions had the greatest impact on exercise-related, quality-of-life, and health care professional-assessed end points. Randomized clinical trials of procedural interventions may consider placebo control accordingly.

Body composition impacts outcome of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction in patients with severe emphysema: a fully automated CT-based analysis

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is characterized by progressive and irreversible airflow limitation, with individual body composition influencing disease severity. Severe emphysema worsens symptoms through hyperinflation, which can be relieved by bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR). To investigate how body composition, assessed through CT scans, impacts outcomes in emphysema patients undergoing BLVR. Fully automated CT-based body composition analysis (BCA) was performed in patients with end-stage emphysema receiving BLVR with valves. Post-interventional muscle and adipose tissues were quantified, body size-adjusted, and compared to baseline parameters. Between January 2015 and December 2022, 300 patients with severe emphysema underwent endobronchial valve treatment. Significant improvements were seen in outcome parameters, which were defined as changes in pulmonary function, physical performance, and quality of life (QoL) post-treatment. Muscle volume remained stable (1.632 vs. 1.635 for muscle bone adjusted ratio (BAR) at baseline and after 6 months respectively), while bone adjusted adipose tissue volumes, especially total and pericardial adipose tissue, showed significant increase (2.86 vs. 3.00 and 0.16 vs. 0.17, respectively). Moderate to strong correlations between bone adjusted muscle volume and weaker correlations between adipose tissue volumes and outcome parameters (pulmonary function, QoL and physical performance) were observed. Particularly after 6-month, bone adjusted muscle volume changes positively corresponded to improved outcomes (ΔForced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1], r = 0.440; ΔInspiratory vital capacity [IVC], r = 0.397; Δ6Minute walking distance [6MWD], r = 0.509 and ΔCOPD assessment test [CAT], r = -0.324; all p < 0.001). Group stratification by bone adjusted muscle volume changes revealed that groups with substantial muscle gain experienced a greater clinical benefit in pulmonary function improvements, QoL and physical performance (ΔFEV1%, 5.5 vs. 39.5; ΔIVC%, 4.3 vs. 28.4; Δ6MWDm, 14 vs. 110; ΔCATpts, -2 vs. -3.5 for groups with ΔMuscle, BAR% < -10 vs. > 10, respectively). BCA results among patients divided by the minimal clinically important difference for forced expiratory volume of the first second (FEV1) showed significant differences in bone-adjusted muscle and intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) volumes and their respective changes after 6 months (ΔMuscle, BAR% -5 vs. 3.4 and ΔIMAT, BAR% -0.62 vs. 0.60 for groups with ΔFEV1 ≤ 100 mL vs > 100 mL). Altered body composition, especially increased muscle volume, is associated with functional improvements in BLVR-treated patients.

Pictorial Review of Pleural Disease: Multimodality Imaging and Differential Diagnosis

The pleura is a thin, smooth, soft-tissue structure that lines the pleural cavity and separates the lungs from the chest wall, consisting of the visceral and parietal pleurae and physiologic pleural fluid. There is a broad spectrum of normal variations and abnormalities in the pleura, including pneumothorax, pleural effusion, and pleural thickening. Pneumothorax is associated with pulmonary diseases and is caused by iatrogenic or traumatic factors. Chest radiography and US help detect pneumothorax with various signs, and CT can also help assess the causes. Pleural effusion occurs in a wide spectrum of diseases, such as heart failure, cirrhosis, asbestos-related diseases, infections, chylothorax, and malignancies. Chest US allows detection of a small pleural effusion and evaluation of echogenicity or septa in pleural effusion. Pleural thickening may manifest as unilateral or bilateral and as focal, multifocal, or diffuse. Various diseases can demonstrate pleural thickening, such as asbestos-related diseases, neoplasms, and systemic diseases. CT, MRI, and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT can help differentiate between benign and malignant lesions. Knowledge of these features can aid radiologists in suggesting diagnoses and recommending further examinations with other imaging modalities. The authors provide a comprehensive review of the clinical and multimodality imaging findings of pleural diseases and their differential diagnoses. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Lung volume reduction surgery is safe and leads to functional improvement in patients who fail or cannot undergo bronchoscopic lung volume reduction

Background

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) has supplanted surgery in the treatment of patients with advanced emphysema, but not all patients qualify for it. Our study aimed to investigate the outcomes of lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) among patients who either failed BLVR or were not candidates for it.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent LVRS for upper lobe-predominant emphysema at a single tertiary center between March 2018 and December 2022. The main outcomes measures were preoperative and postoperative respiratory parameters, perioperative morbidity, and mortality.

Results

A total of 67 LVRS recipients were evaluated, including 10 who had failed prior valve placement. The median patient age was 69 years, and 35 (52%) were male. All procedures were performed thoracoscopically, with 36 patients (53.7%) undergoing bilateral LVRS. The median hospital length of stay was 7 days (interquartile range, 6-11 days). Prolonged air leak (>7 days) occurred in 20 patients. There was one 90-day mortality from a nosocomial pneumonia (non-COVID-related) and no further deaths at 12 months. There were mean improvements of 10.07% in forced expiratory volume in 1 second and 4.74% in diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, along with a mean decrease 49.2% in residual volume (P < .001 for all). The modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale was improved by 1.84 points (P < .001).

Conclusions

LVRS can be performed safely in patients who are not candidates for BLVR and those who fail BLVR and leads to significant functional improvement. Long-term follow-up is necessary to ensure the sustainability of LVRS benefits in this patient population.

First in vivo Experiment with PulmValve Endobronchial Valve: Feasibility, Efficiency, and Safety

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves has been widely recognized for treating hyperinflation in advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and emphysema patients. The main challenges include the technical complexity of upper lobe implantation and the number of endobronchial valves required. These issues might be addressed by placing larger diameter valves in the lobar bronchus. This study evaluated the feasibility, efficiency, and safety of the new valve PulmValve (model PV-13) in porcine models.

METHODS

Six PV-13 valves were bronchoscopically implanted into the caudal lobe bronchus of six healthy pigs. The procedure time, valve deployment, and removability were recorded. Follow-up examinations included blood tests, chest CT scans, and bronchoscopy at 30 min, 14 days, 28 days, and 84 days post-procedure, with necropsy and pathological evaluations after the final follow-up examination.

RESULTS

The successful in vivo deployment and removal of PV-13 valves was established, with a median procedure time of 6.5 min. The distal lung volume reduction was evident at 30 min post-operation and was persistently monitored on day 84. No migration or malfunction of any PV-13 valves was detected, but a mild angle deviation was found in 3 cases. Coughing was observed in four pigs within the first 7 days and localized granulation tissue was observed in all pigs. No cases of pneumothorax, diffuse pneumonia, or hemoptysis were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we report the successful implantation and removal of a new valve PulmValve in a short operation time. Complete lobar atelectasis was induced without device migration, malfunction, or severe complications. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the long-term, sustained effects and potential benefits in human patients.

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction in emphysema: a review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) poses a substantial burden on the healthcare system and is currently considered the sixth leading cause of death in the United States. Emphysema, as evidenced by severe air-trapping in patients with COPD, leads to significant dyspnea and morbidity. Lung volume reduction via surgery or minimally invasive endobronchial interventions are currently available, which improve lung function and quality of life.

RECENT FINDINGS

Newer studies have noted a survival benefit in patients post bronchoscopic lung volume reduction vs. those subjected to standard of care. The presence of collateral ventilation is one of the most common impeding factors to placing endobronchial valves, and if placed, these patients might not achieve lobar atelectasis; however, there are newer modalities that are now available for patients with collateral ventilation which we have described.

SUMMARY

Combining standard of care treatment that includes smoking cessation, bronchodilators, preventive care including vaccinations, pulmonary rehabilitation, and endobronchial treatment using various interventions in decreasing hyperinflation improves quality of life and may improve survival and hence significantly reduce the burden of COPD on healthcare.

Surgical and bronchoscopic pulmonary function-improving procedures in lung emphysema

COPD is a highly prevalent, chronic and irreversible obstructive airway disease without curative treatment. Standard therapeutic strategies, both non-pharmacological and pharmacological, have only limited effects on lung function parameters of patients with severe disease. Despite optimal pharmacological treatment, many patients with severe COPD still have a high burden of dyspnoea and a poor quality of life. If these patients have severe lung emphysema, with hyperinflation as the driver of symptoms and exercise intolerance, lung volume reduction may be an effective treatment with a significant impact on lung function, exercise capacity and quality of life. Currently, different lung volume reduction approaches, both surgical and bronchoscopic, have shown encouraging results and have been implemented in COPD treatment recommendations. Nevertheless, choosing the optimal lung volume reduction strategy for an individual patient remains challenging. Moreover, there is still room for improving durability of effect and safety in all available procedures. Ongoing and innovative research is essential to push this field forwards. This review provides an overview of results and limitations of the current lung volume reduction options for patients with severe lung emphysema and hyperinflation.

Impact of bronchoscopic thermal vapor ablation on lung volume reduction in patients with emphysema: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (LVR) could significantly improve pulmonary function and quality of life in patients with emphysema. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of bronchoscopic thermal vapor ablation (BTVA) on LVR in patients with emphysema at different stage.

METHODS

A systematic search of database including PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library was conducted to determine all the studies about bronchoscopic thermal vapor ablation published through Dec 1, 2022. Related searching terms were "lung volume reduction", "bronchoscopic thermal vapor ablation", "bronchial thermal vapor ablation" "BTVA" and "emphysema", "efficacy" and"safety". We used standardized mean difference (SMD) to analyze the summary estimates for BTVA therapy.

RESULTS

We retrieved 30 records through database search, and 4 trials were selected for meta-analysis, including 112 patients with emphysema. Meta-analysis of the pooled effect showed that levels of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), residual volume (RV), total lung capacity (TLC), 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) were significantly improved in patients with emphysema following BTVA treatment between 6 months vs. baseline. Additionally, no significant changes in FEV1, RV, TLC and SGRQ occurred from 3 to 6 months of follow-up except for 6MWD. The magnitude of benefit was higher at 3 months compared to 6 months. The most common complications at 6 months were treatment-related chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations (RR: 12.49; 95% CI: 3.06 to 50.99; p < 0.001) and pneumonia (RR: 9.49; 95% CI: 2.27 to 39.69; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis provided clinically relevant information about the impact and safety of BTVA on predominantly upper lobe emphysema. Particularly, short-term significant improvement of lung function and quality of life occurred especially within the initial 3 months. Further large-scale, well-designed long-term interventional investigations are needed to clarify this issue.

Hypoxemia After Endobronchial Valve Deployment for Persistent Air Leak

Endobronchial valves (EBVs) are a novel, minimally invasive bronchoscopic management technique for persistent air leaks that fail conservative therapy. Currently, 2 EBVs are available in the United States: the Spiration Valve System (Olympus, Redmond, WA) and the Zephyr Valve (Pulmonx, Redwood, CA). These valves are Food and Drug Administration-approved to reduce hyperinflation in emphysematous patients via bronchoscopic lung-volume reduction. However, more recently, the Spiration Valve has been granted a compassionate use exemption through the Food and Drug Administration for persistent postsurgical air leaks. Despite their popularity, these devices are not free from side effects. As an anesthesiologist, it is vital to be aware of the pathophysiology of this patient population so that safe and effective anesthetics may be provided during valve placement. Here, the use of EBVs is discussed in a patient who presented with a persistent air leak after a transthoracic needle aspiration that failed treatment due to persistent hypoxemia, warranting EBV removal.

Lung volume reduction for emphysema using one-way endobronchial valves: An Australian cohort

Emphysema can be associated with gas trapping and hyperinflation, which negatively impacts on quality of life, life expectancy, and functional capacity. Lung volume reduction (LVR) surgery can reduce gas trapping and improve mortality in select patients but carries a high risk of major complications. Bronchoscopic techniques for LVR using one-way endobronchial valves (EBV) have become an established efficacious alternative to surgery. A bi-center retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with severe emphysema who underwent endoscopic lung volume reduction (ELVR) using Pulmonx Zephyr EBVs. Symptomatic patients with gas-trapping and hyperinflation on lung function testing were selected. Target-lobe selection was based on quantitative imaging analysis and ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. Successful procedures were determined from clinical review, imaging and follow-up testing. Thirty-nine patients underwent ELVR. Mean pre-procedure forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was 0.75 L, residual volume (RV) was 225% predicted and total lung capacity was 129% predicted. Most common treated-lobe was left upper lobe. Post-procedure pneumothorax occurred in 36.5% of patients with 73% requiring intercostal catheter insertion for drainage. Mean FEV1 improvement was +140 mL and 57% of patients achieved minimal clinical important difference FEV1 increase of ≥12%. Maximal mean RV change was -1010 mL with 69% of patients achieving minimal clinical important difference RV decrease of ≥350 mL. Clinician-determined success of ELVR was 78%. Procedure-related mortality was absent. LVR using EBVs is safe and can lead to significant improvements in lung function, particularly reduction of gas trapping and hyperinflation. Occurrence of pneumothorax post-procedure is a complication that must be monitored for and managed appropriately.

[Surgical or bronchoscopic lung volume reduction for emphysema therapy]

More than 20 years ago, surgical lung volume reduction (LVRS) was already established in patients with advanced emphysema as a palliative therapy option that reduces respiratory distress and improves lung function and quality of life. In addition, bronchoscopic procedures (BLVR) aimed at volume reduction have existed for just over 10 years. The advantages and disadvantages of LVRS and BLVR are discussed in this article.

Assessment of efficacy and safety of endoscopic lung volume reduction with one-way valves in patients with a very low FEV1

Introduction

Endoscopic lung volume reduction (ELVR) with one-way valves produces beneficial outcomes in patients with severe emphysema. Evidence on the efficacy remains unclear in patients with a very low forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) (≤20% predicted). We aim to compare clinical outcomes of ELVR, in relation to the FEV1 restriction.

Methods

All data originated from the German Lung Emphysema Registry (Lungenemphysem Register), which is a prospective multicentric observational study for patients with severe emphysema after lung volume reduction. Two groups were formed at baseline: FEV1 ≤20% pred and FEV1 21-45% pred. Pulmonary function tests (FEV1, residual volume, partial pressure of carbon dioxide), training capacity (6-min walk distance (6MWD)), quality of life (modified Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale (mMRC), COPD Assessment Test (CAT), St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)) and adverse events were assessed and compared at baseline and after 3 and 6 months.

Results

33 patients with FEV1 ≤20% pred and 265 patients with FEV1 21-45% pred were analysed. After ELVR, an increase in FEV1 was observed in both groups (both p<0.001). The mMRC and CAT scores, and 6MWD improved in both groups (all p<0.05). The SGRQ score improved significantly in the FEV1 21-45% pred group, and by trend in the FEV1 ≤20% pred group. Pneumothorax was the most frequent complication within the first 90 days in both groups (FEV1 ≤20% pred: 7.7% versus FEV1 21-45% pred: 22.1%; p=0.624). No deaths occurred in the FEV1 ≤20% pred group up to 6 months.

Conclusion

Our study highlights the potential efficacy of one-way valves, even in patients with very low FEV1, as these patients experienced significant improvements in FEV1, 6MWD and quality of life. No death was reported, suggesting a good safety profile, even in these high-risk patients.

From plugging air leaks to reducing lung volume: a review of the many uses of endobronchial valves

INTRODUCTION

One-way endobronchial valve treatment improves lung function, exercise capacity, and quality of live in patients with severe emphysema and hyperinflation. Other areas of therapeutic application include treatment of persistent air leak (PAL), giant emphysematous bullae, native lung hyperinflation, hemoptysis, and tuberculosis.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we will assess the clinical evidence and safety of the different applications of one-way endobronchial valves (EBV).

EXPERT OPINION

There is solid clinical evidence for the use of one-way EBV for lung volume reduction in emphysema. Treatment with one-way EBV can be considered for the treatment of PAL. The application of one-way EBV for giant bullae, post lung transplant native lung hyperinflation, hemoptysis, and tuberculosis is under investigation and more research is required to investigate the efficacy and safety of these applications.

The impact of emphysema heterogeneity on treatment response after endobronchial valve treatment

Background

Lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves can significantly improve functional outcomes in patients with advanced emphysema. The extent and spatial distribution pattern of emphysema shows considerable heterogeneity, which might affect response to endobronchial valve treatment. Our aim was to study the effect of emphysema heterogeneity on change in clinical outcomes after endobronchial valve treatment.

Methods

Data were collected from our national registry of patients who received endobronchial valve treatment between 2016 and 2020. We assessed the association between the heterogeneity index, absolute difference in destruction between the target and ipsilateral lobe, and relative change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), residual volume (RV), St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and 6-min walk distance (6MWD) at 6-week, 6-month and 12-month follow-up.

Results

In total, 236 patients were included. Heterogeneity index was significantly associated with improvements in FEV1, RV and 6MWD at all follow-up visits, and in SGRQ at the 6- and 12-month follow-up visits. The majority of patients, independent of heterogeneity index, showed clinically meaningful improvements based on minimal important difference thresholds.

Conclusions

Heterogeneity index influences the degree of clinical improvement after endobronchial valve treatment where in general a more heterogeneous distribution translates to larger improvements. However, patients with a more homogeneous distribution also showed clinically meaningful improvements. Therefore, we believe emphysema heterogeneity alone should not be used as a decisive patient selection criterion, but should be weighed in the context of all other relevant patient and target lobe characteristics when deciding on a patient's treatment eligibility.

Endobronchial Valve Replacements in Patients with Advanced Emphysema After Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction

Purpose

Up to 41% of patients with endobronchial valve implantation need revision bronchoscopies and valve replacements most likely due to valve dysfunction or lack of benefit. So far, no data is available whether valve replacements lead to the desired lobar volume reduction and therapy benefit.

Patients and Methods

We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of patients with endobronchial valve implantation and at least one valve replacement. Indications and number of revision bronchoscopies and valve replacements were evaluated. Therapy benefit regarding lung function and exercise capacity as well as development of complete lobar atelectasis was investigated and possible predictors identified.

Results

We identified 73 patients with 1-12 revision bronchoscopies and 1-5 valve replacements. The main indication for revision bronchoscopy in this group was lack of therapy benefit (44.2%). Lung function and exercise capacity showed improvements in about one-third of patients even years after the initial implantation. A total of 26% of all patients showed a complete lobar atelectasis at the end of the observation period, 56.2% had developed lung volume reduction. The logistic regression revealed the development of a previous complete lobar atelectasis as predictor for a complete lobar atelectasis at final follow-up. Oral cortisone long-term therapy was also shown as predictive factor. The probability for a final complete lobar atelectasis was 69.2% if a lobar atelectasis had developed before.

Conclusion

Valve replacements are more likely to be beneficial in patients who develop a re-aeration of a previous lobar atelectasis following valve implantation. Every decision for revision bronchoscopy must be taken carefully.

Bronchoscopic Management of COPD and Advances in Therapy

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a highly prevalent and morbid disease marked by irreversible structural changes in the lungs. Bronchoscopic therapies have significantly expanded the treatment armamentarium for patients with persistent symptoms by reducing the physiologic detriments of hyperinflation in a less invasive fashion than surgical lung volume reduction. The spectrum of bronchoscopic techniques to reduce hyperinflation includes endobronchial valves, coils, thermal ablation, and biologic sealants. Other therapies focus on reducing parasympathetic tone and mucus hypersecretion and include targeted lung denervation, bronchial rheoplasty, and cryospray techniques. In this article, we will review the variety of techniques for bronchoscopic lung volume reduction, both established and investigational, along with their respective benefits and complications and will briefly review other investigational therapies for COPD.

Improved exercise capacity results in a survival benefit after endobronchial valve treatment

BACKGROUND

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using endobronchial valves (EBV) is a treatment option for selected patients with advanced emphysema. The treatment significantly improves pulmonary function, exercise capacity, quality of life, and potentially improves survival. Our main aim was to assess whether treatment response significantly influences survival time after EBV treatment.

METHODS

We evaluated treatment response at 6-week and 1-year follow-up of all patients treated with EBVs between 2008 and 2020. Survival status was retrieved on December 1, 2021. Patients were defined as responders or non-responders based on known minimal important differences for FEV₁, residual volume (RV), RV/Total Lung Capacity (TLC) ratio, 6-min walk distance (6MWD), St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), target lobe volume reduction (TLVR), and complete lobar atelectasis. Uni- and multivariate cox regression models were used to evaluate the effect of response on survival time.

RESULTS

A total of 428 patients were included. EBV treatment resulted in significant improvements in pulmonary function, exercise capacity and quality of life. Median survival was 8.2 years after treatment. SGRQ and 6MWD response were independent predictors for improved survival time (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.50 [0.28-0.89], p = .02 and HR 0.54 [0.30-0.94], p = .03, respectively). The presence of a complete lobar atelectasis did not significantly affect survival, neither did pulmonary function improvements.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that improvement in exercise capacity and quality of life after EBV treatment are associated with a survival benefit, independent of improvements in pulmonary function, reduction in target lobe volume or the presence of complete lobar atelectasis.

[Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction]

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction is as a safe and effective therapy for patients with advanced emphysema, suffering from breathlessness despite optimal medical therapy. By reducing hyperinflation, it improves lung function, exercise capacity and quality of life. The technique includes one-way endobronchial valves, thermal vapor ablation and endobronchial coils. Patient selection is the key to a successful therapy; hence the indication should be evaluated in a multidisciplinary emphysema team meeting. The procedure can lead to a potentially life-threatening complication. Therefore, an adequate post-procedural patient management is crucial.

Impact of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves on dynamic hyperinflation: Results from the PIERCE study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Dynamic hyperinflation (DH) is a major marker of exertional dyspnoea in severe emphysema. We hypothesized that bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) using endobronchial valves (EBVs) decreases DH.

METHODS

In this prospective bi-centre study from both Toulouse and Limoges Hospitals, we assessed DH during an incremental cycle ergometry before and 3 months after EBVs treatment. The primary objective was to observe the change in inspiratory capacity (IC) at isotime. Target lobe volume reduction (TLVR) and changes in residual volume (RV), forced expiratory volume in one-second (FEV₁ ), mMRC, 6 minutes walking distance (6MWD), BODE and other dynamic measures like tele-expiratory volume (EELV) were also analysed.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients were included, of whom thirty-eight presented DH. IC and EELV at isotime significantly improved (+214 mL, p = 0.004; -713 mL, p ˂ 0.001, respectively). Mean changes were +177 mL for FEV₁ (+19%, p < 0.001), -600 mL for RV (p < 0.0001), +33 m for 6MWD (p < 0.0001), respectively. Patients who responded on RV (>430 mL decrease) and FEV₁ (>12% gain) had better improvements compared to non-responders (+368 mL vs. +2 mL; +398 mL vs. -40 mL IC isotime, respectively). On the opposite, in patients who responded on DH (>200 mL IC isotime increase), changes in TLV (-1216 mL vs. -576 mL), FEV₁ (+261 mL vs. +101 mL), FVC (+496 mL vs. +128 mL) and RV (-805 mL vs. -418 mL) were greater compared to non-responders.

CONCLUSIONS

DH decreases after EBVs treatment, and this improvement is correlated with static changes.

Dual-energy Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiography Accurately Estimates Lobar Perfusion Before Lung Volume Reduction for Severe Emphysema

PURPOSE

To assess if dual-energy computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (DECTPA) derived lobar iodine quantification can provide an accurate estimate of lobar perfusion in patients with severe emphysema, and offer an adjunct to single-photon emission CT perfusion scintigraphy (SPECT-PS) in assessing suitability for lung volume reduction (LVR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with severe emphysema (forced expiratory volume in 1 s <49% predicted) undergoing evaluation for LVR between May 2018 and April 2020 imaged with both SPECT-PS and DECTPA were included in this retrospective study. DECTPA perfused blood volume maps were automatically segmented and lobar iodine mass was estimated and compared with lobar technetium (Tc99m) distribution acquired with SPECT-PS. Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis were used for intermodality comparison between DECTPA and SPECT-PS. Univariate and adjusted multivariate linear regression were modelled to ascertain the effect sizes of possible confounders of disease severity, sex, age, and body mass index on the relationship between lobar iodine and Tc99m values. Effective radiation dose and adverse reactions were recorded.

RESULTS

In all, 123 patients (64.5±8.8 y, 71 men; mean predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s 32.1 ±12.7%,) were eligible for inclusion. There was a linear relationship between lobar perfusion values acquired using DECTPA and SPECT-PS with statistical significance ( P <0.001). Lobar relative perfusion values acquired using DECTPA and SPECT-PS had a consistent relationship both by linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis (mean bias, -0.01, mean r2 0.64; P <0.0001). Individual lobar comparisons demonstrated moderate correlation ( r =0.79, 0.78, 0.84, 0.78, 0.8 for the right upper, middle, lower, left upper, and lower lobes, respectively, P <0.0001). The relationship between lobar iodine and Tc99m values was not significantly altered after controlling for confounders including symptom and disease severity, age, sex, and body mass index.

CONCLUSIONS

DECTPA provides an accurate estimation of lobar perfusion, showing good agreement with SPECT-PS and could potentially streamline preoperative assessment for LVR.

COPD: Providing the right treatment for the right patient at the right time

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a common disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality that is both preventable and treatable. However, a major challenge in recognizing, preventing, and treating COPD is understanding its complexity. While COPD has historically been characterized as a disease defined by airflow limitation, we now understand it as a multi-component disease with many clinical phenotypes, systemic manifestations, and associated co-morbidities. Evidence is rapidly emerging in our understanding of the many factors that contribute to the pathogenesis of COPD and the identification of "early" or "pre-COPD" which should provide exciting opportunities for early treatment and disease modification. In addition to breakthroughs in our understanding of the origins of COPD, we are optimizing treatment strategies and delivery of care that are showing impressive benefits in patient-centered outcomes and healthcare utilization. This special issue of Respiratory Medicine, "COPD: Providing the Right Treatment for the Right Patient at the Right Time" is a summary of the proceedings of a conference held in Stresa, Italy in April 2022 that brought together international experts to discuss emerging evidence in COPD and Pulmonary Rehabilitation in honor of a distinguished friend and colleague, Claudio Ferdinando Donor (1948-2021). Claudio was a true pioneer in the field of pulmonary rehabilitation and the comprehensive care of individuals with COPD. He held numerous leadership roles in in the field, provide editorial stewardship of several respiratory journals, authored numerous papers, statement and guidelines in COPD and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, and provided mentorship to many in our field. Claudio's most impressive talent was his ability to organize spectacular conferences and symposia that highlighted cutting edge science and clinical medicine. It is in this spirit that this conference was conceived and planned. These proceedings are divided into 4 sections which highlight crucial areas in the field of COPD: (1) New concepts in COPD pathogenesis; (2) Enhancing outcomes in COPD; (3) Non-pharmacologic management of COPD; and (4) Optimizing delivery of care for COPD. These presentations summarize the newest evidence in the field and capture lively discussion on the exciting future of treating this prevalent and impactful disease. We thank each of the authors for their participation and applaud their efforts toward pushing the envelope in our understanding of COPD and optimizing care for these patients. We believe that this edition is a most fitting tribute to a dear colleague and friend and will prove useful to students, clinicians, and researchers as they continually strive to provide the right treatment for the right patient at the right time. It has been our pleasure and a distinct honor to serve as editors and oversee such wonderful scholarly work.

[Treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and emphysema]

We summarized the available data on therapeutic, surgical and endoscopic treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and emphysema that may be used like a bridge to lung transplantation. Treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and emphysema is expensive. Certain limitations in lung transplantation make to create new methods of treatment of severe emphysema. However, one should be ready for possible complications and carefully select patients for certain treatment to avoid false negative results. Reducing costs or developing cheaper treatments is important for the future and availability of care. The risks and complications associated with surgical treatment of emphysema can make endoscopic surgery preferable for these patients, and this undoubtedly requires further research.

Which Endoscopic Procedure to Use and in What Patient? Valves, Coils, Foam, and Heat in COPD and Asthma

Despite the latest developments in therapeutic agents targeting airway endotypes, a significant proportion of patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remain symptomatic. Endoscopic therapies have a complementary role in the management of these airway diseases. The sustained efficacy of bronchial thermoplasty (BT) among patients with asthma over 10 years has been encouraging, as it has been shown to improve symptom control and reduce hospital admissions and exacerbations. Studies suggest that BT helps ameliorate airway inflammation and reduce airway smooth muscle thickness. While studies suggest that it is as effective as biologic agents, its role in the management of severe asthma has yet to be clearly defined and GINA 2022 still suggests limiting its use to patients with characteristics of the various populations studied. Conversely, bronchoscopic lung volume reduction has shown promise among patients with advanced COPD. Rigorous patient selection is important. Patients with minimal collateral ventilation (CV) and higher heterogeneity index have shown to benefit the most from endobronchial valve (EBV) therapy. For those with ongoing CV, endobronchial coils would be more appropriate. Both therapeutic modalities have demonstrated improved quality of life, effort tolerance, and lung function indices among appropriately selected patients. The emerging evidence suggests that endoscopic procedures among airway disease still have a substantial role to play despite the development of new therapeutic options.

Reversal of collateral ventilation using endoscopic polymer foam in COPD patients undergoing endoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves: A controlled parallel group trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

We have previously described reversal of collateral ventilation (CV) in a severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patient with endoscopic polymer foam (EPF), prior to endoscopic lung volume reduction (ELVR) with valves. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of this in a larger cohort and compare outcomes with a similar cohort with no CV.

METHODS

Patients with severe COPD, with the left upper lobe (LUL) targeted for ELVR, were assessed for CV with high resolution computed tomography (HRCT). If fissure completeness was >95% they were enrolled as controls for valves alone (endobronchial valve control group [EBV-CTRL]). If fissure completeness was 80%-95%, defects were mapped to the corresponding segment, where EPF was instilled following confirmation of CV with CHARTIS. EBVs were inserted 1 month afterwards.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were enrolled into both arms. After 6 months, there were significant improvements in both groups in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1; +19.7% EPF vs. +27.7% EBV-CTRL, p < 0.05); residual volume (RV; -16.2% EPF vs. -20.1% EBV-CTRL, p = NS); SGRQ (-15.1 EPF vs. -16.6 EBV-CTRL p = NS) and 6 min walk (+25.8% EPF [77.2 m] vs. +28.4% [82.3 m] EBV-CTRL p = NS). Patients with fissural defects mapped to the lingula had better outcomes than those mapped to other segments (FEV1 +22.9% vs. +16.3% p < 0.05). There were no serious adverse reactions to EPF.

CONCLUSION

EPF successfully reverses CV in severe COPD patients with a left oblique fissure that is 80%-95% complete. Following EBV, outcomes are similar to patients with complete fissures undergoing ELVR with EBV alone. EPF therapy to reverse CV potentially increases the number of COPD patients suitable for ELVR with minimal adverse reactions.

Advances in Surgical and Mechanical Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of mortality in the United States, behind cardiovascular and malignant disorders. As the understanding of the pathogenesis has evolved, it led to targeting mechanical aspects of the disease to improve patient symptoms and quality of life. Modern management of COPD offers a variety of mechanical and surgical treatments for patients with advanced disease who do not achieve benefit from medical therapy alone. These treatments include therapies aimed at lung volume reduction, through surgical or bronchoscopic techniques. While these techniques are established and have proven benefit, others are still under development. Herein we discuss these techniques, aimed at improving clinician recognition of patients that may benefit from these interventions.

Endobronchial valves: 1st Multicenter retrospective study on the 2-step approach

BACKGROUND

Although the endobronchial valves (EBV) were successfully developed as treatment for severe emphysema, its main complication, pneumothorax, remained an important concern.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether the placement of Zephyr© endobronchial valves throughout 2 procedures instead of 1 minor the frequency of pneumothorax without lowering the benefits of such treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted in 15 pulmonology department in France. All the patients met the inclusion criteria of the recommendation set by the expert panel on the Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction (ELVR) updated in 2019. As recommended, all the scan were analyzed with the StratX© (PulmonX Corporation, Redwood city, CA) protocol, and completed by a Chartis© (PulmonX Corporation, Redwood city, CA) in case of questionable fissure. During the first procedure, all but the most proximal sub-segment of the targeted lobe were occluded. One month after, EBV were placed in the bronchus of the last subsegment. All patients were evaluated before and 3 months after the second procedure.

RESULTS

Between March 2019 and December 2020, 96 patients received EBV treatment. 12 patients (12.5%) presented a pneumothorax (3 after the 1st step and 9 after the 2nd procedure). Beside pneumothorax, the main adverse event was exacerbation (10.4%) and pneumonia (4.1%). No death were reported. Significant improvement were found for FEV1 (14.6 ± 25.3%), RV (- 0.69 ± 2.1 L), 6MWT (34.8 ± 45.9 m), BODE Score (-1.41 ± 1.41pts), and mMRC scale (-0.85 ± 0.7pts). These results are compared not only to the results previously published using the usual approach but also to our previous publication evaluating the 2-step approach. Some patients presented authentic segmental atelectasis despite infralobar treatment.

CONCLUSION

Placing EBV during 2 procedures instead of one led to a significant decrease of post treatment pneumothoraces without increasing the rate of other complications. It does not seem to alter the benefits of such therapy for severe emphysema. These results must be confirmed by launching a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled study to compare the frequency of pneumothorax and the efficacy of this new approach with the usual one-time procedure.

Clinical Impact of Compensatory Hyperinflation of the Nontreated Adjacent Lobe After Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction with Valves

Background

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) with endobronchial valves (EBV) can be a successful treatment for end-stage emphysema patients. The reduction of hyperinflation enhances ventilatory mechanics and diaphragm function. Understanding predictors for treatment success is crucial for further improvements.

Purpose

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the target lobe volume reduction (TLVR) in relation to the ipsilateral lung volume reduction (ILVR), affected by the compensatory expansion of the adjacent lobe, on the outcome after BLVR with valves.

Patients and Methods

The volumetric relationship of ILVR% to TLVR%, addressed as Reduction Ratio (R), was recorded in 82 patients and compared to changes in lung function, physical performance and quality of life. A small value for R implies a relatively low volume reduction of the ipsilateral lung (ILVR) compared to the volume reduction of the target lobe (TLVR). Additionally, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for R was calculated.

Results

Patients with a smaller Reduction Ratio (R <0.2) showed minor improvements at the 3 months follow-up compared to patients with R ≥0.2 (mean changes of 39 mL (5.8%), –395 mL (–4.9%) and 96 mL (7.1%) versus 231 mL (33%), –1235 mL (–20%) and 425 mL (29%) in the forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV₁), residual volume (RV) and inspiratory vital capacity (IVC), respectively, and –3 m and 0 points versus 20.4 m and –3.4 points in the 6-minute-walking-distance (6MWD) and COPD assessment test (CAT) score respectively). With a combined value of 0.185, a MCID for R was calculated with established anchors (FEV₁, RV, and 6MWD) for emphysema patients.

Conclusion

Extensive compensatory hyperinflation of the adjacent non-treated lobe after BLVR results in decreased ILVR, which is responsible for a lack of meaningful improvements in ventilatory mechanics and clinical outcome, despite technically successful lobe volume reduction.

Complications of Endobronchial Valve Placement for Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction: Insights From the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE)

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced emphysema experience breathlessness due to impaired respiratory mechanics and diaphragm dysfunction. Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) is a minimally invasive bronchoscopic procedure done to reduce hyperinflation and air trapping, promoting atelectasis in the targeted lobe and allowing improved respiratory mechanics. Real-world data on safety and complications outside of clinical trials of BLVR are limited.

METHODS

We queried the US Food and Drug Administrations (FDA) Manufacturers and User Device Experience database from May 2019 to June 2020 for reports involving BLVR with endobronchial valve (EBV) placement. Events were reviewed for data analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 124 cases of complications during BLVR with EBV implantation. The most-reported complication was pneumothorax (110/124, 89%), all of which required chest tube placement. A total of 54 of these cases (54/110, 49%) were complicated by persistent air leak requiring additional interventions. Repeat bronchoscopy was needed to remove the valves in 28 patients, 12 were discharged with a Heimlich valve, and 10 had an additional pleural catheter placed. The other complications of BLVR with EBV placement included respiratory failure (6/124, 5%), pneumonia (4/124, 3%), hemoptysis (2/124, 1.6%), valve migration (1/124, 1%), and pleural effusion (1/124, 1%). A total of 14 deaths were reported during that year.

CONCLUSION

Pneumothorax is the most-reported complication for BLVR with EBV placement, and in 65% of cases, pneumothorax is managed without removing valves. Importantly, 14 deaths were reported during that timeframe. Further studies are needed to estimate the true magnitude of the complications associated with BLVR.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of morbidity, mortality, and health-care use worldwide. COPD is caused by exposure to inhaled noxious particles, notably tobacco smoke and pollutants. However, the broad range of factors that increase the risk of development and progression of COPD throughout the life course are increasingly being recognised. Innovations in omics and imaging techniques have provided greater insight into disease pathobiology, which might result in advances in COPD prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Although few novel treatments have been approved for COPD in the past 5 years, advances have been made in targeting existing therapies to specific subpopulations using new biomarker-based strategies. Additionally, COVID-19 has undeniably affected individuals with COPD, who are not only at higher risk for severe disease manifestations than healthy individuals but also negatively affected by interruptions in health-care delivery and social isolation. This Seminar reviews COPD with an emphasis on recent advances in epidemiology, pathophysiology, imaging, diagnosis, and treatment.

Clinical outcomes and quantitative CT analysis after bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using valves for advanced emphysema

Background

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) using Zephyr endobronchial valve (EBV) and intrabronchial valve (IBV) has been shown to improve lung function and exercise capacity in severe emphysema. However, changes in airway structures and whether these are related to the clinical improvements remain unclear.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed on patients treated with BLVR. We compared changes in 2nd-, 3rd-, and 4th-generation bronchial structures after therapy, including wall thickness (WT), percentage of wall thickness (WT%), intraluminal area (LA), wall area (WA), and WA%. Responder and non-responder subgroup analysis according to minimum clinically important difference (MCID) which was defined as an improvement of 15% in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) and 26 m in 6 min walk distance (6MWD) was conducted.

Results

Of the 19 patients, 11 were treated with EBV and 8 with IBV. In ipsilateral non-target lobes, WT% decreased significantly in 3rd-generation bronchi at 1 month, 3, and 6 months, as well as their WA% at 1 month and 6 months. Non-responders, who were unable to achieve MCID, showed no consistent bronchial wall changes. And their LA of 3rd-generation bronchi decreased especially at 1 month. After BLVR, the target lobe volume decreased significantly until 12 months of follow-up. The volume of ipsilateral lobes could increase correspondingly and achieve the best improvements at 6 months. The contralateral lung volume showed slight amelioration but there was no statistical significance.

Conclusions

Both airway structures and lung volumes showed changes after BLVR. The 3rd- and 4th-bronchial walls tend to be thinner, which were consistent with clinical improvements. Further studies are needed to prove this conclusion and find detect potential mechanics.

Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction for Emphysema: Review and Update

In carefully selected patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, characterized by emphysema and hyperinflation, lung volume reduction is an option to reduce lung hyperinflation, improve lung function, quality of life, and exercise capacity. Currently, there are several bronchoscopic and surgical treatment options to achieve lung volume reduction. It is important to carefully phenotype these patients, to select the optimal treatment option, with consideration of possible adverse events or contraindications, and it is highly recommended to discuss these treatment strategies in a multidisciplinary team. The treatment with one-way endobronchial valves has been investigated most extensively and more data are available regarding the treatment of more "marginal cases," or subsequent lung volume reduction surgery. Other bronchoscopic lung volume reduction options include treatment with coils, thermal vapor ablation, and sclerosant agents. In this review, we aim to summarize the current clinical evidence on the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction therapies and important aspects regarding optimal patient selection.

Differentiating COPD and Asthma using Quantitative CT Imaging and Machine Learning

There are similarities and differences between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma patients in terms of computed tomography (CT) disease-related features. Our objective was to determine the optimal subset of CT imaging features for differentiating COPD and asthma using machine learning.COPD and asthma patients were recruited from Heidelberg University Hospital. CT was acquired and 93 features were extracted (VIDA Diagnostics): percentage of low-attenuating-areas below -950HU (LAA₉₅₀), LAA₉₅₀ hole count, estimated airway-wall-thickness for a 10 mm internal perimeter airway (Pi10), total-airway-count (TAC), as well as inner/outer perimeter/areas and wall thickness for each of five segmental airways, and the average of those five airways. Hybrid feature selection was used to select the optimum number of features, and support vector machine was used to classify COPD and asthma.Ninety-five participants were included (n=48 COPD; n=47 asthma); there were no differences between COPD and asthma for age (p=0.25) or FEV₁ (p=0.31). In a model including all CT features, the accuracy and F1-score was 80% and 81%, respectively. The top features were: LAA_950, LAA₉₅₀ hole count, average outer and inner airway perimeter, outer and inner airway area RB1, and TAC. In the model with only airway features, the accuracy and F1-score were 66% and 68%, respectively. The top features were: inner area RB1, wall thickness RB1, outer area LB1, TAC LB10, average outer/inner perimeter, Pi10, and TAC.In conclusions, COPD and asthma can be differentiated using machine learning with moderate-high accuracy by a subset of only 7 CT features.

Use of bronchoscopic steam thermal ablation (BTVA) in a clinically compromised patient

Background

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) techniques improve lung function and increase exercise tolerance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and BLVR treatment is included in the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) treatment guidelines for these patients. BTVA (Intervapor Uptake Medical, Tustin, CA, USA) represents a recent therapy of this group that allows to treat sublobar areas and for this reason is used clinically compromised patients, like in this case report.

Case presentation

In this paper we describe a case report of an 85-year-old male with severe respiratory failure and a diagnosis of emphysema presented with dyspnea and clinical worsening, despite the best medical therapy practiced. For comorbidity and pathology’s features he was excluded from surgical treatment options, like lung volume reduction surgical (LVRS) and from positioning of endobronchial valves (EBV) for the presence of collateral ventilation and he was addressed to BTVA. The procedure was successful for this patient.

Conclusions

This case supports recent suggestions that BTVA can be a good alternative treatment for patients properly selected.

Expeditious Resolution of Giant Bullae with Endobronchial Valves and Percutaneous Catheter Insertion

As bullae contribute to decreased lung function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, effective decompression of large bullae is important. Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction via endobronchial one-way valves is less invasive and has a lower mortality rate than lung volume reduction surgery. We report the case of a 48-year-old male who presented with giant bullae that were expeditiously resolved with endobronchial valves and percutaneous catheter insertion. Three days later, imaging revealed marked decreases in the extent of bullae and atelectasis of the contralateral lung without any complications, including air leakage or pneumothorax. Combination of endobronchial valves and percutaneous catheter insertion might be helpful to accelerate the release of large bullae and to achieve improved lung function and higher levels of physical activity in patients with COPD.

Response to exclusive right middle lobe treatment with endobronchial valves: a case report

Isolated right middle lobe (RML) lung volume reduction using endobronchial valves can lead to significant improvements in appropriately selected patients, with highly hyperinflated RML and preserved upper and lower lobeshttps://bit.ly/3rICgTn

Early Spirometry Following Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction with Endobronchial Valves

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) by endobronchial valve (EBV) implantation has been shown to improve dyspnea, pulmonary function, exercise capacity, and quality of life in highly selected patients with severe emphysema and hyperinflation. The most frequent adverse event is a pneumothorax (PTX), occurring in approximately one-fifth of the cases due to intrathoracic volume shifts. The majority of these incidents are observed within 48 h post-procedure. However, the delayed occurrence of PTX after hospital discharge is a matter of concern. There is currently no approved concept for its prevention. Particularly, it is unknown whether and when respiratory manoeuvers such as spirometry post EBV treatment are feasible and safe. As per standard operating procedure at the University Hospital Zurich, early spirometry is scheduled after BLVR and prior to the discharge of the patient in order to monitor treatment success. The aim of our retrospective study was to investigate the feasibility and safety of early spirometry. In addition, we hypothesized that early spirometry could be useful to identify patients at risk for late PTX, which may occur after hospital discharge. All patients who underwent BLVR using EBVs between January 2018 and January 2020 at our hospital were enrolled in this study. After excluding 16 patients diagnosed post-procedure with PTX and four patients for other reasons, early spirometry was performed in 61 cases. There was neither a clinically relevant PTX during or after early spirometry nor a late PTX following hospital discharge. In conclusion, we found early spirometry, conducted not sooner than three days following EBV treatment, to be feasible and safe. Furthermore, early spirometry seems to be a useful predictor for successful BLVR, and it may help to decide whether a patient can be discharged. Given the small sample size and the retrospective design of our study, a prospective study that includes routine chest imaging after early spirometry to definitively exclude PTX is needed to recommend early spirometry as part of the standard protocol following EBV treatment.

Endobronchial treatment of severe asthma and severe emphysema with hyperinflation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The field of interventional pulmonology has ushered in a wave of innovations for individuals with obstructive airways disease in whom established medical therapies have failed. Leading the charge are bronchial thermoplasty for severe refractory asthma and uni-directional valves for severe emphysema with hyperinflation: both have received regulatory approvals in the United Kingdom and United States. With the commissioning of these novel treatments comes new challenges relating to implementation, positioning within therapeutic algorithms, honing of patient selection, and establishing long-term safety and benefits beyond 5 years.

RECENT FINDINGS

This review summarises the evidence for their safety and efficacy, predictors of therapeutic response, mechanism(s) of action and emerging data supporting the durability of outcomes out to at least ten years.

SUMMARY

It is anticipated the experience of treating increasing numbers of patients, the adoption of international registries, and ongoing research evaluations will serve to optimise these therapies for future generations of patients.

Prevention of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease after bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves

INTRODUCTION

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) with endobronchial valves (EBVs) has emerged as an important treatment method for patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) are a frequent complication following BLVR with EBV. However, there is no consensus on the prevention of AECOPD.

OBJECTIVES

Our study aims to compare the outcomes of different prophylactic measures on the occurrence of AECOPD after BLVR with EBV.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study of patients who underwent BLVR with EBV at six different institutions. Emphasis was directed towards the specific practices aimed at preventing AECOPD: antibiotics, steroids, antibiotics plus steroids, or no prophylaxis. Subgroups were compared, and odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 170 patients were reviewed. The rate of AECOPD was 21.2% for the full cohort. Patients who received prophylaxis had a significantly lower rate of AECOPD compared with those who did not (16.7% vs. 46.2%; p = 0.001). The rate was lowest in patients who received antibiotics alone (9.2%). There was no significant difference in the rate of AECOPD between patients who received steroids alone or antibiotics plus steroids, compared with the other subgroups. The OR for AECOPD was 4.3 (95% CI: 1.8-10.4; p = 0.001) for patients not receiving prophylaxis and 3.9 (95% CI: 1.5-10.1; p = 0.004) for prophylaxis other than antibiotics alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of antibiotics after BLVR with EBV was associated with a lower rate of AECOPD. This was not observed with the use of steroids or in combination with antibiotics.

Overview of Interventional Pulmonology for Radiologists

Interventional pulmonology is a growing field specializing in minimally invasive procedures of the mediastinum, lungs, airways, and pleura. These procedures have both diagnostic and therapeutic indications and are performed for benign and malignant diseases. Endobronchial US has been combined with transbronchial needle aspiration to extend tissue sampling beyond the airways and into the lungs and mediastinum. Recent innovations extending the peripheral access of bronchoscopy include electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy and thinner bronchoscopes. An important indication for therapeutic bronchoscopy is the relief of central airway obstruction, which may be severe and life threatening. Techniques for restoring patency of the central airways include mechanical debulking and multiple modalities for ablation, stent placement, and balloon bronchoplasty. Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction improves quality of life in certain patients with severe emphysema and is an important less invasive alternative to lung volume reduction surgery. Bronchial thermoplasty is likewise a nonpharmacologic treatment in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma. Many of these procedures have unique selection criteria that require precise evaluations at preprocedure imaging. Postprocedure imaging is also essential in determining outcome success and the presence of complications. Radiologists should be familiar with these procedures as well as the relevant imaging features in both planning and later surveillance. Evolving techniques that may become more widely available in the near future include robotic-assisted bronchoscopy, bronchoscopic transparenchymal nodule access, transbronchial cryobiopsy, ablation of early-stage cancers, and endobronchial intratumoral chemotherapy. An invited commentary by Wayne et al is available online. ^©RSNA, 2021.

Placebo comparator group selection and use in surgical trials: the ASPIRE project including expert workshop

BACKGROUND

The use of placebo comparisons for randomised trials assessing the efficacy of surgical interventions is increasingly being considered. However, a placebo control is a complex type of comparison group in the surgical setting and, although powerful, presents many challenges.

OBJECTIVES

To provide a summary of knowledge on placebo controls in surgical trials and to summarise any recommendations for designers, evaluators and funders of placebo-controlled surgical trials.

DESIGN

To carry out a state-of-the-art workshop and produce a corresponding report involving key stakeholders throughout.

SETTING

A workshop to discuss and summarise the existing knowledge and to develop the new guidelines.

RESULTS

To assess what a placebo control entails and to assess the understanding of this tool in the context of surgery is considered, along with when placebo controls in surgery are acceptable (and when they are desirable). We have considered ethics arguments and regulatory requirements, how a placebo control should be designed, how to identify and mitigate risk for participants in these trials, and how such trials should be carried out and interpreted. The use of placebo controls is justified in randomised controlled trials of surgical interventions provided that there is a strong scientific and ethics rationale. Surgical placebos might be most appropriate when there is poor evidence for the efficacy of the procedure and a justified concern that results of a trial would be associated with a high risk of bias, particularly because of the placebo effect.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of placebo controls is justified in randomised controlled trials of surgical interventions provided that there is a strong scientific and ethics rationale. Feasibility work is recommended to optimise the design and implementation of randomised controlled trials. An outline for best practice was produced in the form of the Applying Surgical Placebo in Randomised Evaluations (ASPIRE) guidelines for those considering the use of a placebo control in a surgical randomised controlled trial.

LIMITATIONS

Although the workshop participants involved international members, the majority of participants were from the UK. Therefore, although every attempt was made to make the recommendations applicable to all health systems, the guidelines may, unconsciously, be particularly applicable to clinical practice in the UK NHS.

FUTURE WORK

Future work should evaluate the use of the ASPIRE guidelines in making decisions about the use of a placebo-controlled surgical trial. In addition, further work is required on the appropriate nomenclature to adopt in this space.

FUNDING

Funded by the Medical Research Council UK and the National Institute for Health Research as part of the Medical Research Council-National Institute for Health Research Methodology Research programme.

Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction with Valves and Coils. A Network Meta-analysis

Background: Coils and endobronchial valves are the most widely used bronchoscopic lung volume reduction devices in patients with advanced emphysema. However, the choice of each specific device depends on emphysema characteristics (homogeneous vs. heterogeneous) and presence of lobar collateral ventilation (CV). These devices have not been compared in a head-to-head study design.Objectives: To conduct a network comparative meta-analysis studying the effect of valves in patients with heterogeneous emphysema without CV, and to also study the effects of valves and coils in patients with mixed homogeneous and heterogeneous emphysema.Data Sources and Data Extraction: PubMed and Web of Science were searched for potentially includable randomized active comparator trials from inception to January 20, 2020, and data were extracted in the working sheets of Comprehensive Meta-analysis.Synthesis: Network meta-analysis was conducted in R program using package "netmeta."Results: In patients with heterogeneous emphysema without CV, both Spiration and Zephyr valves showed significant increases in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) (0.11 L [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.05 to 0.16] and 0.14 L [0.08 to 0.19], respectively) and in reducing St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores (-9.32 [-14.18 to -4.45] and -8.14 [-11.94 to -4.35], respectively) as compared with control, with no significant interintervention differences. Only Zephyr valves showed significant improvement (52.3 m [95% CI, 26.53 to 77.93]) in six-minute walk distance (6MWD). Both were ranked as equally efficacious in these patients. In the mixed homogeneous and heterogeneous emphysema group of patients, both Zephyr valves and coils showed significant increases in FEV₁ and 6MWD and reduction in SGRQ, as compared with control. Although there were no significant interintervention differences, the magnitude of improvement in these parameters was highest with Zephyr valves (e.g., 6MWD increased by 56.74 m [23.66 to 89.81] vs. 30.31 m [4.00 to 56.63]) in coils), ranking them first. In both populations, these interventions showed a statistically significant association with procedure-related pneumothorax but not with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation.Conclusions: In patients with heterogeneous emphysema without CV, both Zephyr and Spiration valves were equally efficacious in FEV₁ and SGRQ improvement. However, in the mixed patients with homogeneous and heterogeneous emphysema, Zephyr valves show relative superiority over coils especially with respect to improvement in 6MWD.