Reducing harm in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis

Pharmacovigilance in low- and middle-income countries: A review with particular focus on Africa

Low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) face unique challenges with regard to the establishment of robust pharmacovigilance systems capable of generating data to inform healthcare policy and practice. These include the limited integration and reliability of pharmacovigilance systems across LMIC despite recent efforts to harmonize pharmacovigilance rules and regulations in several regional economic communities. There are particular challenges relating to the need to translate reporting tools into numerous local languages and the low numbers of healthcare providers relative to number of patients, with very short consultation times. Additional factors frequent in LMIC include high uptake of herbal and traditional medication, mostly by self-medication; disruptive political conflicts jeopardizing fragile systems; and little or no access to drug utilization data, which makes it difficult to reliably estimate the true risks of medicines use. Pharmacovigilance activities are hindered by the scarcity of well-trained personnel with little or no budgetary support from national governments; high turnover of pharmacovigilance staff whose training involves a substantial amount of resources; and little awareness of pharmacovigilance among healthcare workers, decision makers and consumers. Furthermore, little collaboration between public health programmes and national medicines regulatory authorities coupled with limited investment in pharmacovigilance activities, especially during mass drug administration for neglected tropical diseases and mass vaccinations, produces major challenges in establishing a culture where pharmacovigilance is systematically embedded. Very low spontaneous reporting rates with poor quality reports hinders robust signal detection analyses. This review summarises the specific challenges and areas of progress in pharmacovigilance in LMIC with special focus on the situation in Africa.

Quality of drug-resistant tuberculosis care: Gaps and solutions

Drug-resistant forms of tuberculosis (DR-TB) are a significant cause of global morbidity and mortality and the treatment of DR-TB is characterized by long and toxic regimens that result in low rates of cure. There are few formal studies documenting the quality of DR-TB treatment services provided globally, but the limited data that do exist show there is a quality crisis in the field. This paper reviews current issues impacting quality of care in DR-TB, including within the areas of patient-centeredness, safety, effectiveness and equity. Specific issues affecting DR-TB quality of care include: 1) the use of regimens with limited efficacy, significant toxicity, and high pill burden; 2) standardized treatment without drug susceptibility testing; 3) non-quality assured medications and drug stock outs; 4) lack of access to newer and repurposed drugs; 5) high rates of adverse events coupled with minimal monitoring and management; 6) care provided by multiple providers in the private sector; 7) depression, anxiety, and stress; and 8) stigma and discrimination. The paper discusses potential ways to improve quality in each of these areas and concludes that many of these issues arise from the traditional "public health approach" to TB and will only transformed when a human-rights based approach is put into practice.

Adverse Drug Reaction Onsets in Uganda's VigiBase®: Delayed International Visibility, Data Quality and Illustrative Signal Detection Analyses

Introduction

Developing countries can improve their pharmacovigilance systems by analysing their own medication safety data.

Objective

The aims of this study were to characterize Uganda’s reported adverse drug reaction (ADR) onsets in 2012–2015 that were registered on VigiBase^® by 31 December 2017, to document delays in international visibility and the influence of covariates on this delay from ADR onsets in 2013 + 2014, to examine data quality, and to illustrate analytical approaches for safety data, particularly for patients receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART).

Methods

International delay was defined as elapsed time from complete ADR onset date to entry date on VigiBase^®, with covariates examined using Cox proportional hazards regression. Simple random sampling was used to locate the paper-based ADR forms for data quality assurance. Disproportionality for signal detection focused on serious singleton ADR onsets in patients receiving ART.

Results

Uganda’s VigiBase^® had 1018 patient entries with complete ADR onset dates: 260 in 2012, 293 in 2013, 305 in 2014 and 160 in 2015. Only 16% (154/953) of ADR onsets in 2012–2015 were in patients aged < 20 years for whom randomly sampled ADR forms were less fully completed; 87% (889/1018) comprised a singleton sign/symptom; half were serious. Median delay from ADR onset to international visibility was 11 months for ADR onsets in 2013 + 2014, and longest for healthcare professionals other than pharmacists and physicians. Disproportionality for serious ADR onsets in patients receiving ART included anaemia with zidovudine, renal impairment with tenofovir, Stevens–Johnson syndrome with nevirapine and skin rash with efavirenz.

Conclusions

Barely one ADR onset per day was registered on VigiBase^® from those submitted to Uganda’s National Pharmacovigilance Centre during 2012–2014; only one in six was from patients aged < 20 years. Paediatric pharmacovigilance requires more emphasis in Uganda. Delays from reported ADR onset to international visibility on VigiBase^® need to reduce dramatically. Quality assurance revealed rectifiable data entry deficits. Signal detection performed well for patients receiving ART.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40290-018-0253-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.