1
|
Loiseau E, Mesnard B, Bruneau S, De Sousa C, Bernardet S, Hervouet J, Minault D, Levy S, Le Gal A, Dion L, Blancho G, Lavoue V, Branchereau J. Uterine Transplant Optimization From a Preclinical Donor Model With Controlled Cardiocirculatory Arrest. Transplant Direct 2025; 11:e1735. [PMID: 39668893 PMCID: PMC11634325 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2024] [Revised: 08/14/2024] [Accepted: 09/15/2024] [Indexed: 12/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Uterus transplantation from deceased donors offers a promising solution to the organ shortage, but optimal preservation methods are crucial for successful outcomes. Our primary objective is to conduct an initial assessment of the contribution of oxygenated hypothermic perfusion in uterine transplantation. Methods We performed a preclinical study on a porcine model of controlled donation after circulatory death (60 min warm ischemia). Ten uterus grafts were preserved for 12 h using static cold storage or hypothermic machine perfusion (VitaSmart device, perfusion pressure at 15 mm Hg). Subsequently, they were reperfused using ex vivo normothermic machine perfusion (Liverassist, perfusion pressure at 30 mm Hg) with oxygenated autologous blood to assess early ischemia/reperfusion injury. Not only resistance index assessment and oxygenation evaluation but also immunochemistry and gene expression analysis were performed. Results This study demonstrates the feasibility of using hypothermic machine perfusion for uterine graft preservation, showing improvements in reperfusion capacity (decrease of resistance indexes; P < 0.0001) and tissue oxygenation (higher oxygen level) compared with static cold storage. Conclusions These findings provide valuable insights for further research and refinement of uterine transplantation procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Loiseau
- CRT2I UMR 1064, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, INSERM, Centre for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
- Department of Gynecology, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Benoit Mesnard
- CRT2I UMR 1064, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, INSERM, Centre for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
- Department of Gynecology, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Sarah Bruneau
- CRT2I UMR 1064, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, INSERM, Centre for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
| | - Carla De Sousa
- Department of Gynecology, Rennes University Hospital, Hôpital Sud, Rennes, France
| | - Stéphanie Bernardet
- CRT2I UMR 1064, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, INSERM, Centre for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
| | - Jeremy Hervouet
- CRT2I UMR 1064, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, INSERM, Centre for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
| | - David Minault
- CRT2I UMR 1064, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, INSERM, Centre for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
| | - Stephan Levy
- CRT2I UMR 1064, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, INSERM, Centre for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
| | - Antoine Le Gal
- Department of Radiology, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Ludivine Dion
- Department of Gynecology, Rennes University Hospital, Hôpital Sud, Rennes, France
- Irset - Inserm UMR_S 1085, Rennes, France
| | - Gilles Blancho
- CRT2I UMR 1064, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, INSERM, Centre for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
| | - Vincent Lavoue
- Department of Gynecology, Rennes University Hospital, Hôpital Sud, Rennes, France
- Irset - Inserm UMR_S 1085, Rennes, France
| | - Julien Branchereau
- CRT2I UMR 1064, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, INSERM, Centre for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
- Department of Urology and Transplantation Surgery, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Escandón JM, Bustos VP, Santamaría E, Langstein HN, Ciudad P, Hernandez-Alejandro R, Moore RG, Leckenby JI, Manrique OJ. Evolution and Transformation of Uterine Transplantation: A Systematic Review of Surgical Techniques and Outcomes. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 38:429-440. [PMID: 34535036 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uterine transplantation (UTx) is acknowledged to be on the second (2A) of five steps of development in accordance with the staging system for the evaluation of surgical innovations. Accordingly, we aimed to systematically review the available evidence of the surgical techniques and outcomes of UTx in terms of graft survival. METHODS A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed Medline, Cochrane-EBMR, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL through November 2020. RESULTS Forty studies, reporting 64 recipients and 64 donors, satisfied inclusion criteria. The surgical time and the estimated blood loss were 515 minutes and 679 mL for graft procurement via laparotomy, 210 minutes and 100 mL for laparoscopic-assisted graft harvest, and 660 minutes and 173 mL for robotic-assisted procedures, respectively. Urinary tract infections (n = 8) and injury to the urinary system (n = 6) were the most common donor complications. Using the donor's internal iliac system, two arterial anastomoses were performed in all cases. Venous outflow was accomplished through the uterine veins (UVs) in 13 cases, a combination of the UVs and the ovarian/uteroovarian veins (OVs/UOVs) in 36 cases, and solely through the OVs/UOVs in 13 cases. Ischemia time was 161 and 258 minutes when using living donors (LD) and deceased donors (DD), respectively. Forty-eight uteri were successfully transplanted or fulfilled the purpose of transplantation, 41 from LDs and 7 from DDs. Twenty-five and four live childbirths from LDs and DDs have been reported, respectively. CONCLUSION UTx is still experimental. Further series are required to recommend specific surgical techniques that best yield a successful transplant and reduce complications for donors and recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph M Escandón
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester Medical Center, New York
| | - Valeria P Bustos
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Eric Santamaría
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea Gonzalez, National Cancer Institute, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Howard N Langstein
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester Medical Center, New York
| | - Pedro Ciudad
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Burn Surgery, Arzobispo Loayza National Hospital, Lima, Peru
| | - Roberto Hernandez-Alejandro
- Department of Surgery and Division of Abdominal Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester Medical Center, New York
| | - Richard G Moore
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester Medical Center, New York
| | - Jonathan I Leckenby
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester Medical Center, New York
| | - Oscar J Manrique
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester Medical Center, New York
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pittman J, Mogensen L, Brännström M, Chan W, Morrison N. Uterus transplantation: Perspectives of Australian women with absolute uterine factor infertility regarding desirability and utility. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2020; 60:264-270. [DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2019] [Accepted: 11/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jana Pittman
- School of Medicine Blacktown Hospital Western Sydney University Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Lise Mogensen
- School of Medicine Western Sydney University Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Mats Brännström
- Gynaecological Oncology, Research Centre Sahlgrenska Hospital University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden
| | - Warren Chan
- Obstetrics & Gynaecology School of Medicine Western Sydney University Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Natalie Morrison
- Blacktown Clinical School of Medicine Western Sydney University Sydney New South Wales Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ngaage LM, Ike S, Elegbede A, Vercler CJ, Gebran S, Liang F, Rada EM, Cooney C, Brandacher G, Redett RJ, Johannesson L, Rasko YM. The changing paradigm of ethics in uterus transplantation: a systematic review. Transpl Int 2019; 33:260-269. [PMID: 31674693 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2019] [Revised: 09/03/2019] [Accepted: 10/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The first uterus transplantation was performed in 2000. As key milestones are reached (long-lasting graft survival in 2011, and first birth from a transplanted womb in 2014), the ethical debate around uterus transplant evolves. We performed a systematic review of articles on uterus transplantation. Ethical themes were extracted and categorized according to four bioethical principles. Papers were divided into time periods separated by key events in uterus transplant history: Phase I (first technical achievement, 2002-2011), Phase II (clinical achievement, 2012-2014), and Phase III (after the first childbirth, 2015-2018). Eighty-one articles were included. The majority of ethics papers were published in Phase III (65%, P < 0.0001), that is after the first birth. Eighty percent of papers discussed nonmaleficence making it the most discussed principle. The first birth acted as a pivotal point: nonmaleficence was discussed by a lower proportion of articles (P = 0.0073), as was beneficence (P = 0.0309). However, discussion of justice increased to become the most discussed principle of the time period (P = 0.0085). The ethical debate surrounding uterus transplantation has evolved around landmark events that signify scientific progress. As safety and efficacy become evident, the focus of ethical debate shifts from clinical equipoise to socioeconomic challenges and equitable access to uterus transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ledibabari M Ngaage
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Samantha Ike
- London North West University Healthcare Trust, London, UK
| | - Adekunle Elegbede
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, John Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christian J Vercler
- Plastic Surgery Section, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Selim Gebran
- Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Fan Liang
- Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Erin M Rada
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Carisa Cooney
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, John Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Gerald Brandacher
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, John Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Richard J Redett
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, John Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Liza Johannesson
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Yvonne M Rasko
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Geary M, Guinto VT, Sosa CG. Contemporary Issues in Women's Health. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2019; 145:1-3. [DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Geary
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyRotunda Hospital Dublin Ireland
| | - Valerie T. Guinto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St. Luke's Medical Center Global CityUniversity of the Philippines‐Philippine General Hospital Manila Philippines
| | - Claudio G. Sosa
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologySchool of MedicineUniversity of Uruguay Montevideo Uruguay
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dion L, Tardieu A, Collinet P, Garbin O, Ayoubi JM, Agostini A, Piver P, Aubard Y, Gauthier T, Lavoué V. Uterus transplantation and altruistic surrogacy: Are they complementary or alternative options?-A statement from the CNGOF French Uterus Transplantation Committee. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2019; 48:293-295. [PMID: 30771508 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2019] [Accepted: 02/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- L Dion
- Service de gynécologie, CHU de Rennes, Hôpital sud, 16 bd de Bulgarie, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - A Tardieu
- Département de gynécologie obstétrique, CHU Limoges, av Dominique Larrey, 87000 Limoges, France; INSERM, UMR-s850, CHU Limoges, 87000 Limoges, France
| | - P Collinet
- Clinique gynécologique, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, CHRU Lille, 59037 Lille cedex, France
| | - O Garbin
- Département de gynécologie, pôle de gynécologie obstétrique des Hôpitaux universitaire de Strasbourg, site du cmco, 67091 Strasbourg, France
| | - J M Ayoubi
- Département de gynécologie, Hôpital Foch, 92150 Suresnes, France
| | - A Agostini
- Département de gynécologie obstétrique, Gynécologie CHU de Marseille, Hôpital de la Conception, 13385 Marseille, France
| | - P Piver
- Département de gynécologie obstétrique, CHU Limoges, av Dominique Larrey, 87000 Limoges, France; INSERM, UMR-s850, CHU Limoges, 87000 Limoges, France
| | - Y Aubard
- Département de gynécologie obstétrique, CHU Limoges, av Dominique Larrey, 87000 Limoges, France; INSERM, UMR-s850, CHU Limoges, 87000 Limoges, France
| | - T Gauthier
- Département de gynécologie obstétrique, CHU Limoges, av Dominique Larrey, 87000 Limoges, France; INSERM, UMR-s850, CHU Limoges, 87000 Limoges, France
| | - V Lavoué
- Service de gynécologie, CHU de Rennes, Hôpital sud, 16 bd de Bulgarie, 35000 Rennes, France.
| |
Collapse
|