Breast cancer radiation therapy

Five-fraction Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer: FAST-Forward to Implementation

INTRODUCTION

The phase 3 FAST-Forward trial reported outcomes for 26 and 27 Gy schedules delivered in 5 fractions over 1 week versus 40 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks in 4000 patients. We discuss concerns raised by the radiotherapy community in relation to implementing this schedule.

IPSILATERAL BREAST TUMOUR RELAPSE (IBTR)

Published estimated 5-year IBTR with 95% CI after 40 Gy in 15 fractions was 2.1% (95% CI 1.4-3.1), 1.7% (1.2-1.6) after 27 Gy and 1.4% (0.2-2.2) after 26 Gy, emphatically showing non-inferiority of the 5-fraction regimens. Subgroup analyses comparing IBTR in 26 Gy versus 40 Gy show no evidence of differential effect regarding age, grade, pathological tumour size, nodal status, tumour bed boost, adjuvant chemotherapy, HER2 status and triple negative status. The number of events in these analyses is small and results should be interpreted with caution. There was only 1 IBTR event post-mastectomy.

NORMAL TISSUE EFFECTS

The 26 Gy schedule, on the basis of similar NTE to 40 Gy in 15 fractions, is the recommended regimen for clinical implementation. There is a low absolute rate of moderate/marked NTE, these are predominantly moderate not severe change. Subgroup analyses comparing clinician-assessed moderate or marked adverse effect for 26 Gy versus 40 Gy show no evidence of differential effects according to age, breast size, surgical deficit, tumour bed boost, or adjuvant chemotherapy.

RADIOBIOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS

The design of the FAST-Forward trial does not control for time-related effects, and the ability to interpret clinical outcomes in terms of underlying biology is limited. There could conceivably be a time-effect for tumour control. A slight reduction in α/β estimate for the late normal tissue effects of test regimens might be a chance effect, but if real could reflect fewer consequential late effects due to lower rates of moist desquamation.

CONCLUSION

The 26 Gy 5-fraction daily regimen for breast radiotherapy can be implemented now.

Clinical Implications of Geometric and Dosimetric Uncertainties of Inter- and Intra-Fractional Movement during Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Breast Cancer Patients

Simple Summary

Radiotherapy is an essential treatment modality for breast cancer. Compared to conventional radiotherapy techniques, modern radiotherapy with fewer fractions and smaller target volumes requires higher accuracy. Image-guidance using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is one of the most common methods used for positional verification before treatment. This study reports geometric and dosimetric outcomes evaluated by analyzing CBCT images acquired before and during treatments. The positional change and internal movement of the patient were less than 1 cm in most cases without significant deviation in the dosimetric parameters of interest. However, there were cases involving extreme variation, which resulted in insufficient radiation delivered to the target areas and increased radiation exposure to adjacent normal organs. The results of the current study suggest that unexpected intra-fractional motion may occur, prompting for marginal adaptation in selected patients who are deemed to suffer from this kind of event.

Abstract

With the introduction of modern sophisticated radiotherapy (RT) techniques, the significance of accuracy has increased considerably. This study evaluated the necessity of pre-treatment and intra-fractional cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) by analyzing inter- and intra-fractional CBCT images of breast cancer patients receiving RT. From 57 patients, 1206 pre-treatment CBCT and 1067 intra-fractional CBCT images were collected. Geometric movements of patients were measured quantitively in both inter- and intra-fractional CBCT, and changes in dosimetric parameters were evaluated in selected patients with extreme intra-fractional movement. For right-sided breast cancer patients, left-sided breast cancer patients treated using deep-inspiration breath hold (DIBH), and left-sided breast cancer patients treated using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), median inter-fractional deviations were 0.53 (range 0.06–2.98) cm, 0.66 (range 0.08–4.41) cm, and 0.69 (range 0.04–3.80) cm, and median intra-fractional deviations were 0.14 (range 0.00–0.62) cm, 0.23 (range 0.02–0.96) cm, and 0.24 (0.00–1.15) cm, respectively. Modified plans reflecting large changes in intra-fractional position in 10 selected cases revealed insufficient target coverage in seven cases and more than 20-fold increase in the volume of heart receiving at least 25 Gy in two cases. Intra-fractional verification, as well as pre-treatment verification, might be considered in patients using DIBH or CPAP.