Letter: Oral hypoglycaemic therapy in diabetic pregnancies

Pharmacological Management of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the most common morbidities complicating pregnancy, with short- and long-term consequences to the mothers, fetuses, and newborns. Management and treatment are aimed to achieve best possible glycemic control, while avoiding hypoglycemia and ensuring maternal and fetal safety. It involves behavioral modifications, nutrition and medications, if needed; concurrent with maternal and fetal surveillance for possible adverse outcomes. This review aims to elaborate on the pharmacological options for GDM therapy. We performed an extensive literature review of different available studies, published during the last 50 years, concerning pharmacological therapy for GDM, dealing with safety and efficacy, for both fetal and maternal morbidity consequences; as well as failure and success in establishing appropriate metabolic and glucose control. Oral medication therapy is a safe and effective treatment modality for GDM and in some circumstances may serve as first-line therapy when nutritional modifications fail. When oral agents fail to establish glucose control then insulin injections should be added. Determining the best oral therapy in inconclusive, although it seems that metformin is slightly superior to glyburide, in some aspects. As for parenteral therapy, all insulins listed in this article are considered both safe and effective for treatment of hyperglycemia during pregnancy. Importantly, a better safety profile, with similar efficacy is documented for most analogues. As GDM prevalence rises, there is a need for successful monitoring and treatment for patients. Caregivers should know the possible and available therapeutic options.

Can Pregnant Diabetics be Treated with Glyburide?

Until the last decade, oral hypoglycemic agents have not been recommended in pregnancy owing to fear of their potential adverse fetal effects, including teratogenicity and neonatal hypoglycemia. However, the evidence in support of these recommendations is weak and is principally based on case series involving the use of first-generation sulfonylureas. Studies using a single-cotyledon placental model have found glyburide to only minimally cross the placenta, an observation that paved the way for a landmark randomized clinical trial that found glyburide to be as safe and effective as insulin in the management of gestational diabetes mellitus. Still, contradicting results regarding its trans-placental transfer, lack of adequate data regarding its safety during the first trimester and reports of increased neonatal morbidity raise concerns regarding the universal application of glyburide as an alternative to insulin therapy in diabetic pregnant women. Thus, there is a need for large, randomized, controlled trials with adequate power to evaluate the possibility of increased neonatal metabolic complications as well as the long-term outcome of infants born to mothers treated with glyburide and insulin. Unless future studies refute current data regarding the efficacy and safety of glyburide, we believe that, owing to its ease of administration, convenience and low cost, glyburide will become the first line of medical treatment in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus within the next few years.

Oral anti-hyperglycemic agents for the management of gestational diabetes mellitus

The purpose of this review is to provide a brief overview for understanding the management guidelines of gestational diabetes. The rationale for the use of oral antidiabetic drugs is provided based on validation by appropriately conducted research trials. Concerns over teratogenicity due to possible placental transfer, neonatal and maternal outcome, and basic pharmacologic benefits are addressed.

Glyburide for the treatment of gestational diabetes. A critical appraisal

The clinical experience with glyburide treatment of GDM has moved ahead of the science. A single randomized controlled trial of glyburide versus insulin indicates that glyburide treatment can provide a relatively safe alternative to insulin therapy. Subsequent retrospective trials have shown that up to 20% of GDM patients, especially those with substantial pretreatment hyperglycemia, are likely to require adjunctive or alternative therapy with insulin. These follow-on trials have also demonstrated that glyburide treatment, compared with insulin, actually results in lower mean glucose values and a higher percentage of "excellent glycemic control" with fewer hypoglycemic episodes. With the emerging view that glyburide treatment compared with insulin improves glycemic profiles, it should be expected to reduce the frequency of newborn obesity. Larger randomized controlled trials are necessary to clarify this question and the concerns regarding neonatal metabolic morbidity in glyburide-treated offspring.

Insulin and glyburide therapy: dosage, severity level of gestational diabetes, and pregnancy outcome

OBJECTIVE

We sought to investigate the association between glyburide dose, degree of severity in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), level of glycemic control, and pregnancy outcome in insulin- and glyburide-treated patients.

STUDY DESIGN

In a secondary analysis of our previous randomized study, 404 women were analyzed. The association among glyburide dose, severity of GDM, and selected maternal and neonatal factors was evaluated. Severity levels of GDM were stratified by fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Infants with birth weight at or above the 90th percentile were considered large-for-gestational age (LGA). Macrosomia was defined as birth weight > or =4000 g. Well-controlled was defined as mean blood glucose < or =95 mg/dL. The association between glyburide- and insulin-treated patients by severity of GDM and neonatal outcome was evaluated.

RESULTS

The dose received for the glyburide-treated patients was 2.5 mg-32%; 5 mg-23%; 10 mg-17%; 15 mg-8%; and 20 mg-20%. Patients were grouped into low (< or =10 mg) and high (>10 mg) daily dose of glyburide. A comparison between severity of the disease (fasting plasma glucose categories) and highest dose of glyburide revealed a significant difference between the low-95 FPG and the other severity categories (P = .02). Of patients in the well-controlled glycemic group, only 6% required the high dose of glyburide (>10 mg). In patients with poor glycemic control (mean blood glucose >95 mg/dL), 38% received the high dose of glyburide (P = .0001). Comparison between the high glyburide (>10 mg) and the low glyburide dosages (< or =10 mg) revealed that the rate of macrosomia was 16% vs 5% and LGA 22% vs 8%, (P = .01), respectively. No significant difference was found in composite outcome, metabolic complications, and Ponderal Index between the 2 dose groups. Stratification by disease severity revealed a significantly lower rate of LGA for both the glyburide- and insulin-treated subjects. No significant difference was found between metabolic, respiratory, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) for patients within each fasting plasma glucose severity category.

CONCLUSION

Glyburide and insulin are equally efficient for treatment of GDM in all levels of disease severity. Achieving the established level of glycemic control, not the mode of pharmacologic therapy, is the key to improving the outcome in GDM.

Oral hypoglycemic agents in pregnancy: their time has come

Oral agents are the mainstay of pharmacological treatment for non-pregnant women with type 2 diabetes. It has been proposed that, owing to the similarity between gestational and type 2 diabetes, some of these drugs could be used effectively and safely as alternatives to insulin therapy. This efficacious alternative provides the physician with more choices that, in turn, translate into more complex decision-making for the management of gestational diabetes. This article illustrates the pharmacological characteristics of oral hypoglycemic agents and placental transfer, provides evidence for the lack of association between congenital anomalies and the drugs, and reviews current studies and the clinical outcomes when these drugs are used.

Oral hypoglycemic agents and the pregnant diabetic: "from bench to bedside"

Today, the criteria for diagnosis and treatment have evolved into an evidence-based medicine approach. The need for evidence-based information is especially critical in the management of gestational diabetes, in general, and especially in the use of oral hypoglycemic agents. These agents have been categorically contraindicated for decades in the United States based on anecdotal and/or weak evidence for these recommendations. In this article, the similarities between gestational and type 2 diabetes are described and the rationale for the use of oral hypoglycemic agents for the treatment of both are discussed. The author will show how research from basic sciences (placental transfers) to clinical studies (perinatal outcome) can lead to significant evidence on which to base management recommendations.

A comparison of glyburide and insulin in women with gestational diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Women with gestational diabetes mellitus are rarely treated with a sulfonylurea drug, because of concern about teratogenicity and neonatal hypoglycemia. There is little information about the efficacy of these drugs in this group of women.

METHODS

We studied 404 women with singleton pregnancies and gestational diabetes that required treatment. The women were randomly assigned between 11 and 33 weeks of gestation to receive glyburide or insulin according to an intensified treatment protocol. The primary end point was achievement of the desired level of glycemic control. Secondary end points included maternal and neonatal complications.

RESULTS

The mean (+/-SD) pretreatment blood glucose concentration as measured at home for one week was 114+/-19 mg per deciliter (6.4+/-1.1 mmol per liter) in the glyburide group and 116+/-22 mg per deciliter (6.5+/-1.2 mmol per liter) in the insulin group (P=0.33). The mean concentrations during treatment were 105+/-16 mg per deciliter (5.9+/-0.9 mmol per liter) in the glyburide group and 105+/-18 mg per deciliter (5.9+/-1.0 mmol per liter) in the insulin group (P=0.99). Eight women in the glyburide group (4 percent) required insulin therapy. There were no significant differences between the glyburide and insulin groups in the percentage of infants who were large for gestational age (12 percent and 13 percent, respectively); who had macrosomia, defined as a birth weight of 4000 g or more (7 percent and 4 percent); who had lung complications (8 percent and 6 percent); who had hypoglycemia (9 percent and 6 percent); who were admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit (6 percent and 7 percent); or who had fetal anomalies (2 percent and 2 percent). The cord-serum insulin concentrations were similar in the two groups, and glyburide was not detected in the cord serum of any infant in the glyburide group.

CONCLUSIONS

In women with gestational diabetes, glyburide is a clinically effective alternative to insulin therapy.