beta-Blockers, autoimmunity, and rashes

Lichen planus and other lichenoid dermatoses: Kids are not just little people

Lichenoid dermatoses, a group of inflammatory skin conditions with characteristic clinical and histopathologic findings, range from common to rare. Classic lichen planus typically presents as pruritic, polygonal, violaceous flat-topped papules and plaques; many variants in morphology and location also exist. Other lichenoid dermatoses share similar clinical presentations and histopathologic findings. These include lichenoid drug eruption, lichen planus-like keratosis, lichen striatus, lichen nitidus, and keratosis lichenoides chronica. Epidemiologic characteristics vary among each lichenoid disorder. While classic lichen planus is considered a disease of adults, other lichenoid dermatoses may be more common in younger populations. The literature contains an array of reports on the variations in presentation and successful management of lichen planus and lichenoid dermatoses among diverse populations. Familiarity with the characteristics of each lichenoid dermatosis, rare or common within each patient population, is key to accomplishing timely recognition and effective management.

Lichen planus-like drug eruptions due to β-blockers: a case report and literature review

Lichen planus-like drug eruptions (LDE) can appear similar or identical to idiopathic lichen planus. We present a 45-year-old man with a widespread, violaceous, papular, generalized exanthema with histologic features of a lichenoid reaction, which subsequently resolved with the cessation of labetatol. We found 29 cases of previously reported β-adrenoceptor antagonist (β-blocker)-associated LDE. This is a relatively rare complication that may present as classic lichenoid papules indistinguishable from lichen planus and has a predilection for the limbs, chest, back, and oral mucosa. Histologically, there is a lichenoid infiltrate often with eosinophils. LDE may be due to drug cross-reactivity or as a result of a suppressed skin adrenergic system. Multiple potential medications in case studies and the inability to differentiate LDE from idiopathic lichen planus in cross-sectional association studies make any conclusive analysis difficult.

Adverse dermatologic effects of cardiovascular drug therapy: part I

Cardiovascular disease is common, affecting an increasing number of persons as the population ages. To combat this growing health problem, physicians use a multitude of medications in the treatment of their patients. Although pharmacologic therapy greatly enhances quality of life for a majority of patients, there is always the potential for an unfavorable reaction. For example, cardiovascular drugs can induce a vast array of adverse dermatologic responses. This article reviews the various cutaneous reaction patterns that can occur as a result of treatment with Class I and II antiarrhythmic agents.

Adverse dermatologic reactions from antiarrhythmic drug therapy

Undesirable cutaneous reactions to drugs may occur early or late in the course of treatment. The ingestion of drugs may also aggravate existing dermatologic conditions. The adverse dermatologic reactions from antiarrhythmic drug therapy are reviewed. The exact incidence of dermatologic side effects from cardiovascular drugs has been difficult to estimate because of sporadic reporting. In this review, the cutaneous side effects are discussed according to drug class and the type of dermatologic reaction.

Grinspan's syndrome: a drug-induced phenomenon?

Three cases of apparently drug-induced Grinspan's syndrome involving the triad of oral lichen planus, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension are reported. Because drug therapy for diabetes mellitus and hypertension is capable of producing lichenoid reactions of the oral mucosa, the question arises as to whether Grinspan's syndrome is an iatrogenically induced syndrome.

Desquamative gingivitis: preliminary observations with tetracycline treatment

Fourteen patients admitted to our clinic were found to have desquamative gingivitis. They were treated with doxycycline monohydrate, a semisynthetic tetracycline, for 6 to 8 weeks. The gingival lesions were recorded photographically and were classified according to severity by means of a four-graded mucosal index system. Biopsies for histologic and immunohistochemical examination were taken initially. Symptoms and clinical changes of the mucosa were recorded during the treatment period. Initial and final mucosal index scores were compared. A statistically significant improvement was obtained after tetracycline treatment.