Quality of breast-cancer care in Italian general hospitals

Diagnosis and First-Line Treatment of Breast Cancer in Italian General Hospitals

The quality of the diagnostic and therapeutic process of 1262 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients was evaluated in 63 Italian general hospitals over the period March 1983 - April 1984. Most of the patients (91 %) discovered their own lesion, which was a nodule in 83 % of the cases. Practice of breast self examination was reported by 418 (33 %) patients, only 28 % of whom did that on a regular monthly basis. A diagnostic delay > 3 months was present in 36 % of the patients. Among the preoperative work-up examinations, skeletal X-ray or bone scan was not performed in 20 % of patients, whereas other essential examinations were done in most. The Patey type of radical mastectomy was the most frequent surgical procedure; quadrantectomy was performed in only 26 % of eligible patients, more frequently in younger (34 %) than in older patients (21 %). Adjuvant chemotherapy was recommended for 11 % and 6 % of pre- and postmenopausal N— patients, and for 78 % and 47 % of pre- and postmenopausal N+ patients. Forty-three of the 63 participating hospitals reported they adhered to the guidelines defined by the Italian Breast Cancer Task Force (F.O.N.Ca.M.) but this was not associated with substantial evidence of better quality of care. Similarly, no associations emerged between several hospitals' organizational features and adherence to recommended treatment guidelines. The study is ongoing to assess the quality of postsurgical treatment and to measure its impact on patients' survival.

Lung Cancer Care in General Hospitals

Diagnostic procedure, therapeutic care and degree of follow-up delivered to 1692 lung cancer patients over 2 years (1978–79) in 31 Italian hospitals were reviewed. The data show marked deficiencies in the various indicators analysed: staging by standard methods was recorded only in 13% of patients; reliable histocytologic classification in 54% of patients. A group of commonly accepted protocols was adopted as first-line therapy only in 49% of treated cases; 19% of patients were regularly followed according to standard programs, whereas 49% had been dropped without any information in the charts. Better performance, although not satisfactory, was found in hospitals with oncologic facilities and wards compared to centers without « ad hoc » organizations. The discussion focussed on the limits of organizational measures and efforts to determine widespread improvement in care for a disease such as lung cancer for which real therapeutic gains are still hard to achieve.

Trends in Patterns of Care for Breast Cancer in Italy (1979-1987)

We reviewed care delivered to about 2,500 breast cancer patients in general hospitals over the period 1979-1987 using data from three surveys. The most important and consistent failure was in diagnostic timeliness: about one out of four patients was diagnosed six or more months after the first symptom leading to an almost doubled probability of being diagnosed with more advanced disease. Acceptance of treatment recommendations seemed less satisfactory for surgery than for adjuvant treatments. Conservative surgery still appeared to have limited acceptance for patients with small primary tumor (21 and 23% in 1983 and 1987, respectively) although, starting 1983, there was a shift from the Halsted to the Patey type of radical mastectomy. Follow-up was routine in most node-negative patients and adjuvant chemotherapy was already well established treatment for most pre-menopausal node-positive women (64, 79 and 76% in 1979, 1983 and 1987, respectively). Some form of adjuvant treatment in postmenopausal node-positive women was already present In 1983 but became more widespread in 1987 (82%): this being mostly accounted for by the increase in the use of tamoxifen (delivered alone or in combination with chemotherapy to 53% of women). Overall, our results suggest that areas of care more dependent on organization or doctors’ and patients’ education (i.e. diagnostic timeliness and accessibility) are those where deficiencies seen to be least amenable to change in the absence of concerted intervention. Among more narrowly defined clinical issues, there appeared to be some dissonance between the rapid acceptance of adjuvant treatments and the still slow pace of acceptance of less aggressive procedures by surgeons.

Patients’ Assessment of Quality of Care: A Survey of a Group of Breast Cancer Patients in Italy

Patients’ assessment of quality of care was investigated in 825 women with breast cancer treated in a group of specialized and non-specialized institutions in Italy. A 10-page mail questionnaire explored patients’ adjustment to the disease, satisfaction with care, and quality of the information on diagnosis and treatment. Most of the 428 (52 %) responders reported good or acceptable adjustment to the disease (as reflected by acceptable performance in some daily living activities), and favorable judgment about care providers, but many women complained of hospital organizational deficiencies. A contradictory picture emerged regarding the quality of information. Completeness and thoroughness appeared seriously deficient when examined objectively using a series of explicit predefined criteria, but patients’ assessments showed in most cases moderate or high satisfaction. The paper presents these results and discusses pros and cons in the use of patients’ opinions for evaluation of quality of care.

pTNM Stage Distribution in Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Survey in Northern Italy

Aims and background

The role of distribution by stage at diagnosis in breast cancer has been considered in many studies, with particular regard to evaluation of prognosis, impact of screening programs and quality of care. Nevertheless, international comparisons of descriptive data can be hampered by lack of homogeneity in staging methods. The TNM is presently the most common staging system used all over the world, although some criticism have been raised recently against its pragmatic value. The present study reports a population-based survey of pathologic TNM distribution in incident cases of female breast cancer in the Verona province, a geographical area of northern Italy covered by cancer registration.

Methods

All histologically proven incident cases of breast cancer were identified in the study period 1988-1990 and classified as for tumor size and nodal involvement according to the pathological TNM criteria. The type of surgical treatment was also registered for all cases diagnosed in 1990.

Results

one thousand two hundreds and fifty-four invasive and in situ breast cancers were observed and pT1 cases accounted for 44.4%. Nodal involvement was present in 41.5% of invasive cancers. A surgical treatment was performed in 1213 patients (96.7%). Axillary dissection was reported in 1080 cases, 820 of them (76.6%) having 10 or more lymph nodes examined. Radical mastectomy accounted for 74% of the 458 breast cancers diagnosed in 1990 and 31.6% of the eligible cases were conservatively treated.

Conclusions

Cancer registries should be encouraged to report data on stage distribution in breast cancer (and in other malignancies). This practice could improve international comparisons and give an essential contribution to studies on survival, screening programs and quality of care.

Treatment of breast cancer in two teaching hospitals: a comparison with consensus guidelines

We compared the initial treatment of 383 patients with breast cancer in two central London teaching hospitals during 1986 with the guidelines of the King's Fund Consensus Conference for breast cancer treatment held in London the same year. The majority of patients (68%) received lumpectomy and 18% received mastectomy. Lumpectomy was followed by radiotherapy for 95% of cases but 30% of mastectomy patients also received radiotherapy. Only 42% of the patients had surgical sampling of the axillary nodes. Cytotoxic chemotherapy was recorded for 27% women under 50, but also for 16% women age 50 or more. Tamoxifen was given to 58% of women aged 50 or more, but also to 26% of women under 50. We conclude that there are discrepancies between consensus guidelines and clinical practice. Further study is needed to determine whether these variations are clinically important, and whether similar variations exist elsewhere in Europe.

Who Refuses Chemotherapy? A Profile

This study presents a profile of the patient who refuses chemotherapy. It is based on data from a group of 70 such cancer patients who were compared with a matched group of 70 cancer patients who completed their treatments at five oncological institutes in Israel. Despite the differences found on the Psychological Adjustment to Physical Illness Scale and the Brief Symptom Inventory scale, the model shows that the patient who refuses chemotherapy has low confidence in the physician and low expectation of the treatment.

Conservative Treatment of breast Cancer in Italy. A Survey

The authors evaluated the diffusion of conservative treatment of breast cancer in Italian radiotherapy departments during 1984–1985. T1 and small T2 (less than 3 cm in maximal diameter) cases were particularly considered. Conservative surgery and radiotherapy of breast cancer was adopted in 88.4% of the Italian radiotherapy centers. Quadrantectomy and axillary dissection was the surgical procedure routinely adopted. Large differences emerged in radiation treatment among the different departments, particularly with regard to the irradiation of regional lymph nodes. A total of 1561 T1 and 279 T2 cases were submitted to a conservative treatment in 1984, and respectively 2185 and 334 in 1985. The 1985 versus 1984 increase in cases treated was 40% for T1 and 18% for T2.

Process and outcome of care for patients with ovarian cancer

The process and outcome of care for a group of patients with ovarian cancer treated over two years in two groups of Italian general hospitals were investigated. The quality of diagnostic and therapeutic measures did not substantially differ in specialised and non-specialised centres when selected indicators of quality of care were examined. Similarly, no differences in survival emerged for the two groups of hospitals. Overall results of the Italian series compared well with statistics of survival published by international centres for cancer, suggesting that when the yield of available treatments is limited both the process and outcome of care should be evaluated to obtain a reliable picture of quality of care. In the light of these results there are useful implications for planning future clinical trials and ways of caring.