Controlled trial of a home-care service for acute stroke patients

Admission avoidance hospital at home

BACKGROUND

Admission avoidance hospital at home provides active treatment by healthcare professionals in the patient's home for a condition that would otherwise require acute hospital inpatient care, and always for a limited time period. This is the fourth update of this review.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness and cost of managing patients with admission avoidance hospital at home compared with inpatient hospital care.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL on 24 February 2022, and checked the reference lists of eligible articles. We sought ongoing and unpublished studies by searching ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP, and by contacting providers and researchers involved in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials recruiting participants aged 18 years and over. Studies comparing admission avoidance hospital at home with acute hospital inpatient care.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We followed the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane and the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group. We performed meta-analysis for trials that compared similar interventions, reported comparable outcomes with sufficient data, and used individual patient data when available. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the body of evidence for the most important outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 20 randomised controlled trials with a total of 3100 participants; four trials recruited participants with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; two trials recruited participants recovering from a stroke; seven trials recruited participants with an acute medical condition who were mainly older; and the remaining trials recruited participants with a mix of conditions. We assessed the majority of the included studies as at low risk of selection, detection, and attrition bias, and unclear for selective reporting and performance bias. For an older population, admission avoidance hospital at home probably makes little or no difference on mortality at six months' follow-up (risk ratio (RR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68 to 1.13; P = 0.30; I2 = 0%; 5 trials, 1502 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); little or no difference on the likelihood of being readmitted to hospital after discharge from hospital at home or inpatient care within 3 to 12 months' follow-up (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.34; P = 0.11; I2 = 41%; 8 trials, 1757 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); and probably reduces the likelihood of living in residential care at six months' follow-up (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.69; P < 0.001; I2 = 67%; 4 trials, 1271 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Hospital at home probably results in little to no difference in patient's self-reported health status (2006 patients; moderate-certainty evidence). Satisfaction with health care received may be improved with admission avoidance hospital at home (1812 participants; low-certainty evidence); few studies reported the effect on caregivers. Hospital at home reduced the initial average hospital length of stay (2036 participants; low-certainty evidence), which ranged from 4.1 to 18.5 days in the hospital group and 1.2 to 5.1 days in the hospital at home group. Hospital at home length of stay ranged from an average of 3 to 20.7 days (hospital at home group only). Admission avoidance hospital at home probably reduces costs to the health service compared with hospital admission (2148 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), though by a range of different amounts and using different methods to cost resource use, and there is some evidence that it decreases overall societal costs to six months' follow-up.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Admission avoidance hospital at home, with the option of transfer to hospital, may provide an effective alternative to inpatient care for a select group of older people who have been referred for hospital admission. The intervention probably makes little or no difference to patient health outcomes; may improve satisfaction; probably reduces the likelihood of relocating to residential care; and probably decreases costs.

Moving on. A farewell from the last Editor-in-Chief who says: 'Rehabilitation is a way of thinking, not a way of doing'

What is rehabilitation? From 1994 to 2021, while I was privileged to be Editor of Clinical Rehabilitation, I explored this in editorials. I also encouraged and selected submissions that considered, in one way or another, the central features of rehabilitation. Why? Because when I started in rehabilitation, the general attitude among doctors and other healthcare professionals was that rehabilitation was pleasant but with no evidence of effectiveness. Further, they did not think a doctor had a role to play and did not think there was anything special for rehabilitation experts to know or have skills in. In this editorial, I discuss how, as editor, I used my position to support and encourage the publication of articles that produced evidence, considered the conceptual and scientific basis of rehabilitation, and ultimately answered the above question. I illustrate this with a few specific papers published in Clinical Rehabilitation. After 30 years, I have concluded that the essential feature characterising rehabilitation is its way of thinking about the patient's problems and how to solve them. Rehabilitation is holistic, person-centred, and concerned about social integration rather than disease or disability. Moreover, there is a mass of evidence showing it benefits patients.

Early supported discharge services for people with acute stroke

BACKGROUND

People with stroke conventionally receive a substantial part of their rehabilitation in hospital. Services have now been developed that offer people in hospital an early discharge with rehabilitation at home (early supported discharge: ESD).

OBJECTIVES

To establish if, in comparison with conventional care, services that offer people in hospital with stroke a policy of early discharge with rehabilitation provided in the community (ESD) can: 1) accelerate return home, 2) provide equivalent or better patient and carer outcomes, 3) be acceptable satisfactory to patients and carers, and 4) have justifiable resource implications use.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (January 2017), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2017, Issue 1) in the Cochrane Library (searched January 2017), MEDLINE in Ovid (searched January 2017), Embase in Ovid (searched January 2017), CINAHL in EBSCO (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature; 1937 to December 2016), and Web of Science (to January 2017). In an effort to identify further published, unpublished, and ongoing trials we searched six trial registries (March 2017). We also performed citation tracking of included studies, checked reference lists of relevant articles, and contacted trialists.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) recruiting stroke patients in hospital to receive either conventional care or any service intervention that has provided rehabilitation and support in a community setting with an aim of reducing the duration of hospital care.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary patient outcome was the composite end-point of death or long-term dependency recorded at the end of scheduled follow-up. Two review authors scrutinised trials, categorised them on their eligibility and extracted data. Where possible we sought standardised data from the primary trialists. We analysed the results for all trials and for subgroups of patients and services, in particular whether the intervention was provided by a co-ordinated multidisciplinary team (co-ordinated ESD team) or not. We assessed risk of bias for the included trials and used GRADE to assess the quality of the body of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 17 trials, recruiting 2422 participants, for which outcome data are currently available. Participants tended to be a selected elderly group of stroke survivors with moderate disability. The ESD group showed reductions in the length of hospital stay equivalent to approximately six days (mean difference (MD) -5.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) -3 to -8 days; P < 0.0001; moderate-grade evidence). The primary outcome was available for 16 trials (2359 participants). Overall, the odds ratios (OR) for the outcome of death or dependency at the end of scheduled follow-up (median 6 months; range 3 to 12) was OR 0.80 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.95, P = 0.01, moderate-grade evidence) which equates to five fewer adverse outcomes per 100 patients receiving ESD. The results for death (16 trials; 2116 participants) and death or requiring institutional care (12 trials; 1664 participants) were OR 1.04 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.40, P = 0.81, moderate-grade evidence) and OR 0.75 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.96, P = 0.02, moderate-grade evidence), respectively. Small improvements were also seen in participants' extended activities of daily living scores (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.14, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.25, P = 0.01, low-grade evidence) and satisfaction with services (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.38, P = 0.02, low-grade evidence). We saw no clear differences in participants' activities of daily living scores, patients subjective health status or mood, or the subjective health status, mood or satisfaction with services of carers. We found low-quality evidence that the risk of readmission to hospital was similar in the ESD and conventional care group (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.51, P = 0.59, low-grade evidence). The evidence for the apparent benefits were weaker at one- and five-year follow-up. Estimated costs from six individual trials ranged from 23% lower to 15% greater for the ESD group in comparison to usual care.In a series of pre-planned analyses, the greatest reductions in death or dependency were seen in the trials evaluating a co-ordinated ESD team with a suggestion of poorer results in those services without a co-ordinated team (subgroup interaction at P = 0.06). Stroke patients with mild to moderate disability at baseline showed greater reductions in death or dependency than those with more severe stroke (subgroup interaction at P = 0.04).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Appropriately resourced ESD services with co-ordinated multidisciplinary team input provided for a selected group of stroke patients can reduce long-term dependency and admission to institutional care as well as reducing the length of hospital stay. Results are inconclusive for services without co-ordinated multidisciplinary team input. We observed no adverse impact on the mood or subjective health status of patients or carers, nor on readmission to hospital.

Early discharge hospital at home

BACKGROUND

Early discharge hospital at home is a service that provides active treatment by healthcare professionals in the patient's home for a condition that otherwise would require acute hospital inpatient care. This is an update of a Cochrane review.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness and cost of managing patients with early discharge hospital at home compared with inpatient hospital care.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases to 9 January 2017: the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group (EPOC) register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and EconLit. We searched clinical trials registries.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing early discharge hospital at home with acute hospital inpatient care for adults. We excluded obstetric, paediatric and mental health hospital at home schemes.   DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We followed the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane and EPOC. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the body of evidence for the most important outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 32 trials (N = 4746), six of them new for this update, mainly conducted in high-income countries. We judged most of the studies to have a low or unclear risk of bias. The intervention was delivered by hospital outreach services (17 trials), community-based services (11 trials), and was co-ordinated by a hospital-based stroke team or physician in conjunction with community-based services in four trials.Studies recruiting people recovering from strokeEarly discharge hospital at home probably makes little or no difference to mortality at three to six months (risk ratio (RR) 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 1.48, N = 1114, 11 trials, moderate-certainty evidence) and may make little or no difference to the risk of hospital readmission (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.66, N = 345, 5 trials, low-certainty evidence). Hospital at home may lower the risk of living in institutional setting at six months (RR 0.63, 96% CI 0.40 to 0.98; N = 574, 4 trials, low-certainty evidence) and might slightly improve patient satisfaction (N = 795, low-certainty evidence). Hospital at home probably reduces hospital length of stay, as moderate-certainty evidence found that people assigned to hospital at home are discharged from the intervention about seven days earlier than people receiving inpatient care (95% CI 10.19 to 3.17 days earlier, N = 528, 4 trials). It is uncertain whether hospital at home has an effect on cost (very low-certainty evidence).Studies recruiting people with a mix of medical conditionsEarly discharge hospital at home probably makes little or no difference to mortality (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.49; N = 1247, 8 trials, moderate-certainty evidence). In people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) there was insufficient information to determine the effect of these two approaches on mortality (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.12, N = 496, 5 trials, low-certainty evidence). The intervention probably increases the risk of hospital readmission in a mix of medical conditions, although the results are also compatible with no difference and a relatively large increase in the risk of readmission (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.58, N = 1276, 9 trials, moderate-certainty evidence). Early discharge hospital at home may decrease the risk of readmission for people with COPD (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.13, N = 496, 5 trials low-certainty evidence). Hospital at home may lower the risk of living in an institutional setting (RR 0.69, 0.48 to 0.99; N = 484, 3 trials, low-certainty evidence). The intervention might slightly improve patient satisfaction (N = 900, low-certainty evidence). The effect of early discharge hospital at home on hospital length of stay for older patients with a mix of conditions ranged from a reduction of 20 days to a reduction of less than half a day (moderate-certainty evidence, N = 767). It is uncertain whether hospital at home has an effect on cost (very low-certainty evidence).Studies recruiting people undergoing elective surgeryThree studies did not report higher rates of mortality with hospital at home compared with inpatient care (data not pooled, N = 856, low-certainty evidence; mainly orthopaedic surgery). Hospital at home may lead to little or no difference in readmission to hospital for people who were mainly recovering from orthopaedic surgery (N = 1229, low-certainty evidence). We could not establish the effects of hospital at home on the risk of living in institutional care, due to a lack of data. The intervention might slightly improve patient satisfaction (N = 1229, low-certainty evidence). People recovering from orthopaedic surgery allocated to early discharge hospital at home were discharged from the intervention on average four days earlier than people allocated to usual inpatient care (4.44 days earlier, 95% CI 6.37 to 2.51 days earlier, , N = 411, 4 trials, moderate-certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether hospital at home has an effect on cost (very low-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Despite increasing interest in the potential of early discharge hospital at home services as a less expensive alternative to inpatient care, this review provides insufficient evidence of economic benefit (through a reduction in hospital length of stay) or improved health outcomes.

Coordinating and Planning Services for Stroke Patients in Hospital and the Community

Much published research into the rehabilitation of patients following stroke has documented the lack of coordination between the various services for stroke patients and the Ineffectiveness of the targeting of services for patients. In an attempt to improve this situation, a stroke liaison officer has been recruited from the occupational therapy profession in South Staffordshire. Her role is to coordinate and plan services for stroke patients in hospital and the community and to act as a focal point for communication for patients, relatives and carers. The article explains the background to the project and identifies those areas where the stroke liaison officer may have an impact.

Admission avoidance hospital at home

BACKGROUND

Admission avoidance hospital at home provides active treatment by healthcare professionals in the patient's home for a condition that otherwise would require acute hospital inpatient care, and always for a limited time period. This is the third update of the original review.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness and cost of managing patients with admission avoidance hospital at home compared with inpatient hospital care.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, two other databases, and two trials registers on 2 March 2016. We checked the reference lists of eligible articles. We sought unpublished studies by contacting providers and researchers who were known to be involved in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials recruiting participants aged 18 years and over. Studies comparing admission avoidance hospital at home with acute hospital inpatient care.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We followed the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane and the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group. We performed meta-analysis for trials that compared similar interventions and reported comparable outcomes with sufficient data, requested individual patient data from trialists, and relied on published data when this was not available. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the body of evidence for the most important outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 16 randomised controlled trials with a total of 1814 participants; three trials recruited participants with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, two trials recruited participants recovering from a stroke, six trials recruited participants with an acute medical condition who were mainly elderly, and the remaining trials recruited participants with a mix of conditions. We assessed the majority of the included studies as at low risk of selection, detection, and attrition bias, and unclear for selective reporting and performance bias. Admission avoidance hospital at home probably makes little or no difference on mortality at six months' follow-up (risk ratio (RR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60 to 0.99; P = 0.04; I2 = 0%; 912 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), little or no difference on the likelihood of being transferred (or readmitted) to hospital (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.23; P = 0.84; I2 = 28%; 834 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and may reduce the likelihood of living in residential care at six months' follow-up (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.57; P < 0.0001; I2 = 78%; 727 participants; low-certainty evidence). Satisfaction with healthcare received may be improved with admission avoidance hospital at home (646 participants, low-certainty evidence); few studies reported the effect on caregivers. When the costs of informal care were excluded, admission avoidance hospital at home may be less expensive than admission to an acute hospital ward (287 participants, low-certainty evidence); there was variation in the reduction of hospital length of stay, estimates ranged from a mean difference of -8.09 days (95% CI -14.34 to -1.85) in a trial recruiting older people with varied health problems, to a mean increase of 15.90 days (95% CI 8.10 to 23.70) in a study that recruited patients recovering from a stroke.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Admission avoidance hospital at home, with the option of transfer to hospital, may provide an effective alternative to inpatient care for a select group of elderly patients requiring hospital admission. However, the evidence is limited by the small randomised controlled trials included in the review, which adds a degree of imprecision to the results for the main outcomes.

Evaluation of dressing practice for stroke patients after discharge from hospital: a crossover design study

Objective: To determine whether giving dressing practice to patients at home with unresolved dressing problems following stroke reduces the problems.

Design: A randomized crossover study design was used, randomly allocating patients to receive no intervention for three months followed by three months' treatment, or the reverse.

Setting: All patients were at home, and treatment was given in the home.

Subjects: Patients at home with problems in dressing six months after acute stroke, having been discharged from hospital.

Intervention: A senior occupational therapist gave regular dressing practice to patients with their families. Specific techniques depended upon the problem.

Outcome measures: An independent assessor used the Nottingham Stroke Dressing Assessment, the Rivermead ADL, self-care section, and the Notting ham Health Profile to measure outcome.

Results: Fifteen patients were included in each group. Both groups showed statistically significant improvement during the treatment phase (Wilcoxon matched pairs test: z = 2.47, p = 0.01; z = 3.01, p = 0.002). Neither group showed any change during the non-treatment phase. Patients who received treatment in the first three months maintained their improvement (z= 0.90, p = 0.36).

Conclusion: Dressing practice given at home to patients who have residual problems in dressing six months after acute stroke leads to a sustained reduction in their problems.

Methodology of a stroke rehabilitation trial

The effectiveness of rehabilitation after stroke remains largely unproven. Attempts have been made to evalute domiciliary therapy,1 community stroke teams2 and the intensity of therapy,3 but much of the evidence is inconclusive. We have been engaged in a randomized comparison trial of day hospital and home physiotherapy for elderly stroke patients discharged from hospital. This paper describes the background to the study and the pilot work from which the methodology was determined.

The Bradford community stroke trial: eight week results

To evaluate two commonly practised methods of stroke aftercare we have conducted a randomized comparison trial of day hospital (DH) and home physiotherapy (HPT). Patients over 60 years discharged from hospital following a new stroke event were eligible. One hundred and twenty-four patients were recruited, stratified by disability measured on the Barthel Index and by length of time since stroke onset, then randomized to attend a DH twice weekly or to receive HPT. Outcome measurements included the Barthel Index, Motor Club Assessment, Frenchay Activities Index, Nottingham Health Profile and the General Health Questionnaire.

One hundred and seven patients completed an eight week course of treatment. Both the DH and the HPT treated patients showed a significant but small further improvement in functional abilities with the HPT patients being significantly more able on stairs. Social function of both groups was poor but the HPT treated patients were significantly less so. More than a third of patients in each treatment group were depressed and more than a quarter of the carers were 'stressed'. The HPT patients received significantly less physiotherapy and virtually no occupational therapy compared to the DH group.

The findings suggest that HPT is slightly more effective for stroke aftercare than DH attendance and is considerably more resource efficient.

Ottawa Panel Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Post-Stroke Rehabilitation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The purpose of this project was to create guidelines for 13 types of physical rehabilitation interventions used in the management of adult patients (>18 years of age) presenting with hemiplegia or hemiparesis following a single clinically identifiable ischemic or hemorrhagic cerebrovascular accident (CVA).

METHOD

Using Cochrane Collaboration methods, the Ottawa Methods Group identified and synthesized evidence from comparative controlled trials. The group then formed an expert panel, which developed a set of criteria for grading the strength of the evidence and the recommendation. Patient-important outcomes were determined through consensus, provided that these outcomes were assessed with a validated and reliable scale.

RESULTS

The Ottawa Panel developed 147 positive recommendations of clinical benefit concerning the use of different types of physical rehabilitation interventions involved in post-stroke rehabilitation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The Ottawa Panel recommends the use of therapeutic exercise, task-oriented training, biofeedback, gait training, balance training, constraint-induced movement therapy, treatment of shoulder subluxation, electrical stimulation, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, therapeutic ultrasound, acupuncture, and intensity and organization of rehabilitation in the management of post stroke.

Services for reducing duration of hospital care for acute stroke patients

BACKGROUND

Stroke patients conventionally receive a substantial part of their rehabilitation in hospital. Services have now been developed which offer patients in hospital an early discharge with rehabilitation at home (early supported discharge (ESD)).

OBJECTIVES

To establish the effects and costs of ESD services compared with conventional services.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the trials registers of the Cochrane Stroke Group (January 2012) and the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group, MEDLINE (2008 to 7 February 2012), EMBASE (2008 to 7 February 2012) and CINAHL (1982 to 7 February 2012). In an effort to identify further published, unpublished and ongoing trials we searched 17 trial registers (February 2012), performed citation tracking of included studies, checked reference lists of relevant articles and contacted trialists.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials recruiting stroke patients in hospital to receive either conventional care or any service intervention which has provided rehabilitation and support in a community setting with an aim of reducing the duration of hospital care.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary patient outcome was the composite end-point of death or long-term dependency recorded at the end of scheduled follow-up. Two review authors scrutinised trials and categorised them on their eligibility. We then sought standardised individual patient data from the primary trialists. We analysed the results for all trials and for subgroups of patients and services, in particular whether the intervention was provided by a co-ordinated multidisciplinary team (co-ordinated ESD team) or not.

MAIN RESULTS

Outcome data are currently available for 14 trials (1957 patients). Patients tended to be a selected elderly group with moderate disability. The ESD group showed significant reductions (P < 0.0001) in the length of hospital stay equivalent to approximately seven days. Overall, the odds ratios (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)) for death, death or institutionalisation, death or dependency at the end of scheduled follow-up were OR 0.91 (95% CI 0.67 to 1.25, P = 0.58), OR 0.78 (95% CI 0.61 to 1.00, P = 0.05) and OR 0.80 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.97, P = 0.02) respectively. The greatest benefits were seen in the trials evaluating a co-ordinated ESD team and in stroke patients with mild to moderate disability. Improvements were also seen in patients' extended activities of daily living scores (standardised mean difference 0.12, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.25, P = 0.05) and satisfaction with services (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.38, P = 0.02) but no statistically significant differences were seen in carers' subjective health status, mood or satisfaction with services. The apparent benefits were no longer statistically significant at five-year follow-up.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Appropriately resourced ESD services provided for a selected group of stroke patients can reduce long-term dependency and admission to institutional care as well as reducing the length of hospital stay. We observed no adverse impact on the mood or subjective health status of patients or carers.

WITHDRAWN: Services for helping acute stroke patients avoid hospital admission

BACKGROUND

Stroke patients are usually admitted to hospital for their acute care and rehabilitation. Services to help acute stroke patients avoid admission to hospital ('hospital-at-home') have now been developed.

OBJECTIVES

To establish the costs and effects of such services compared with conventional services.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register in March 1999 and supplemented this through discussion with colleagues and trialists.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Controlled clinical trials recruiting stroke patients who have not been admitted to hospital and compare (1) services which provided support with an aim of helping prevent admission to hospital with (20 conventional services (which could include hospital admission).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent review authors determined the eligibility and methodological quality of trials. Trialists were then contacted to obtain standardised descriptive and outcome data.

MAIN RESULTS

Four trials are included in the review, of which three currently have outcome data available (921 patients; 857 from one controlled trial, 64 from two randomised trials). There were no statistically significant differences between the patient and carer outcomes of the intervention and control groups either within individual trials or in pooled analyses. There was a trend toward greater hospital bed use and increased costs in the intervention groups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is currently no evidence from clinical trials to support a radical shift in the care of acute stroke patients from hospital-based care.

Rehabilitation for Community-Dwelling People with Stroke: Home or Centre Based? a Systematic Review

Stroke rehabilitation for people living in the community is commonly delivered either in a centre, outpatient or day hospital setting. More recently, services may be offered in the actual home of the person as home-based or domiciliary rehabilitation. There are differing reports of the benefits and barriers of home-based vs. centre-based community rehabilitation. This systematic review sought to pool data from all retrieved studies that compared the functional benefits of home-based vs. centre for community-dwelling people with stroke. A comprehensive search strategy was implemented in all major databases (Cochrane library, Medline, AMED, Embase, Ageline, Cinahl, PEDro) for randomised controlled trials investigating this question in relation to functional benefits as a primary outcome and carer, cost or other benefits as secondary outcomes. There were no language or date limits. Eleven trials were found and results pooled for the Barthel Index, the measure of functional independence used consistently across the majority of retrieved studies. There was a significant effect in favour of home-based rehabilitation at 6 weeks ( P = 0·03) and 3–6 months ( P = 0·01). The effects were less clear at 6 months, although this was using the less sensitive version of the Barthel Index ( P = 0·27 or adjusted P = 0·04). Individual studies reported cost benefits and increased carer satisfaction in favour of home-based rehabilitation. The provision of rehabilitation for people living in the community should trend towards home-based. Further research is required into adverse events and the experiences of all stakeholders.

Avoiding hospital admission through provision of hospital care at home: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data

BACKGROUND

Avoidance of admission through provision of hospital care at home is a scheme whereby health care professionals provide active treatment in the patient's home for a condition that would otherwise require inpatient treatment in an acute care hospital. We sought to compare the effectiveness of this method of caring for patients with that type of in-hospital care.

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and EconLit databases and the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group register from the earliest date in each database until January 2008. We included randomized controlled trials that evaluated a service providing an alternative to admission to an acute care hospital. We excluded trials in which the program did not offer a substitute for inpatient care. We performed meta-analyses for trials for which the study populations had similar characteristics and for which common outcomes had been measured.

RESULTS

We included 10 randomized trials (with a total of 1327 patients) in our systematic review. Seven of these trials (with a total of 969 patients) were deemed eligible for meta-analysis of individual patient data, but we were able to obtain data for only 5 of these trials (with a total of 844 patients [87%]). There was no significant difference in mortality at 3 months for patients who received hospital care at home (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-1.09, p = 0.15). However, at 6 months, mortality was significantly lower for these patients (adjusted HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.87, p = 0.005). Admissions to hospital were greater, but not significantly so, for patients receiving hospital care at home (adjusted HR 1.49, 95% CI 0.96-2.33, p = 0.08). Patients receiving hospital care at home reported greater satisfaction than those receiving inpatient care. These programs were less expensive than admission to an acute care hospital ward when the analysis was restricted to treatment actually received and when the costs of informal care were excluded.

INTERPRETATION

For selected patients, avoiding admission through provision of hospital care at home yielded similar outcomes to inpatient care, at a similar or lower cost.

Early discharge hospital at home

BACKGROUND

'Early discharge hospital at home' is a service that provides active treatment by health care professionals in the patient's home for a condition that otherwise would require acute hospital in-patient care. If hospital at home were not available then the patient would remain in an acute hospital ward.

OBJECTIVES

To determine, in the context of a systematic review and meta-analysis, the effectiveness and cost of managing patients with early discharge hospital at home compared with in-patient hospital care.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group Register , MEDLINE (1950 to 2008), EMBASE (1980 to 2008), CINAHL (1982 to 2008) and EconLit through to January 2008. We checked the reference lists of articles identified for potentially relevant articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials recruiting patients aged 18 years and over. Studies comparing early discharge hospital at home with acute hospital in-patient care. Evaluations of obstetric, paediatric and mental health hospital at home schemes are excluded from this review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data and assessed study quality. Our statistical analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. We requested individual patient data (IPD) from trialists, and relied on published data when we did not receive trial data sets or the IPD did not include the relevant outcomes. For the IPD meta-analysis, where at least one event was reported in both study groups in a trial, Cox regression models were used to calculate the log hazard ratio and its standard error for mortality and readmission separately for each data set. The calculated log hazard ratios were combined using fixed-effect inverse variance meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-six trials were included in this review [n = 3967]; 21 were eligible for the IPD meta-analysis and 13 of the 21 trials contributed data [1899/2872; 66%]. For patients recovering from a stroke and elderly patients with a mix of conditions there was insufficient evidence of a difference in mortality between groups (adjusted HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.91; N = 494; and adjusted HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.61; N = 978). Readmission rates were significantly increased for elderly patients with a mix of conditions allocated to hospital at home (adjusted HR 1.57; 95% CI 1.10 to 2.24; N = 705). For patients recovering from a stroke and elderly patients with a mix of conditions respectively, significantly fewer people allocated to hospital at home were in residential care at follow up (RR 0.63; 95% CI 0.40 to 0.98; N = 4 trials; RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.99; N =3 trials). Patients reported increased satisfaction with early discharge hospital at home. There was insufficient evidence of a difference for readmission between groups in trials recruiting patients recovering from surgery. Evidence on cost savings was mixed.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Despite increasing interest in the potential of early discharge hospital at home services as a cheaper alternative to in-patient care, this review provides insufficient objective evidence of economic benefit or improved health outcomes.

Admission avoidance hospital at home

BACKGROUND

Admission avoidance hospital at home is a service that provides active treatment by health care professionals in the patient's home for a condition that otherwise would require acute hospital in-patient care, and always for a limited time period. In particular, hospital at home has to offer a specific service to patients in their home requiring health care professionals to take an active part in the patients' care. If hospital at home were not available then the patient would be admitted to an acute hospital ward. Many countries are adopting this type of care in an attempt to reduce the demand for acute hospital admission.

OBJECTIVES

To determine, in the context of a systematic review and meta analysis, the effectiveness and cost of managing patients with admission avoidance hospital at home compared with in-patient hospital care.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The following databases were searched through to January 2008: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, EconLit and the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group (EPOC) register. We checked the reference lists of articles identified electronically for evaluations of hospital at home and obtained potentially relevant articles. Unpublished studies were sought by contacting providers and researchers who were known to be involved in this field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials recruiting patients aged 18 years and over. Studies comparing admission avoidance hospital at home with acute hospital in-patient care. The admission avoidance hospital at home interventions may admit patients directly from the community thereby avoiding physical contact with the hospital, or may admit from the emergency room.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data and assessed study quality. Our statistical analyses sought to include all randomised patients and were done on an intention to treat basis. We requested individual patient data (IPD) from trialists, and relied on published data when we did not receive trial data sets or the IPD did not include the relevant outcomes. When combining outcome data was not possible because of differences in the reporting of outcomes we have presented the data in narrative summary tables.For the IPD meta-analysis, where at least one event was reported in both study groups in a trial, Cox regression models were used to calculate the log hazard ratio and its standard error for mortality and readmission separately for each data set (where both outcomes were available). We included randomisation group (admission avoidance hospital at home versus control), age (above or below the median), and gender in the models. The calculated log hazard ratios were combined using fixed effects inverse variance meta analysis. If there were no events in one group we used the Peto odds ratio method to calculate a log odds ratio from the sum of the log-rank test 'O-E' statistics from a Kaplan Meier survival analysis. Statistical significance throughout was taken at the two-sided 5% level (p<0.05) and data are presented as the estimated effect with 95% confidence intervals. For each comparison using published data for dichotomous outcomes we calculated risk ratios using a fixed effects model to combine data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 10 RCTs (n=1333), 7 of which were eligible for the IPD. Five out of these seven trials contributed to the IPD meta-analysis (n=850/975; 87%). There was a non significant reduction in mortality at three months for the admission avoidance hospital at home group (adjusted HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.09; p=0.15), which reached significance at six months follow-up (adjusted HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.87; p=0.005). A non significant increase in admissions was observed for patients allocated to hospital at home (adjusted HR 1.49, 95% CI 0.96 to 2.33; p=0.08). Few differences were reported for functional ability, quality of life or cognitive ability. Patients reported increased satisfaction with admission avoidance hospital at home. Two trials conducted a full economic analysis, when the costs of informal care were excluded admission avoidance hospital at home was less expensive than admission to an acute hospital ward.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We performed meta-analyses where there was sufficient similarity among the trials and where common outcomes had been measured. There is no evidence from the analysis to suggest that admission avoidance hospital at home leads to outcomes that differ from inpatient hospital care.

Fear of falling: an emerging issue after stroke

PURPOSE

Qualitative data regarding stroke survivors' recovery experiences were used to describe factors important in the development of fear of falling (FoF) during the first 6 months after stroke.

METHOD

Stroke survivors were interviewed 1 and 6 months after stroke to obtain data on their experiences related to stroke recovery trajectory. Analyses identified FoF as a naturally occurring part of stroke survivors' descriptions of their everyday lives. Interviews were reexamined to identify and describe personal experiences related to FoF in this population.

RESULTS

Forty-two (32%) veterans who participated in the larger study discussed FoF during the first 6 months after stroke. Analyses indicate three important factors may be associated with the development of poststroke FoF: (a) the initial fall coinciding with stroke onset, (b) perception of poststroke body changes, and (c) a pervasive everyday fear of future falls.

CONCLUSION

These factors related to FoF need to be further studied in the poststroke population. It is possible that individualized interventions may be necessary to assist stroke survivors to manage FoF, decrease fear, and reduce falls after discharge home poststroke.

Hospital at home versus in-patient hospital care

BACKGROUND

Hospital at home is defined as a service that provides active treatment by health care professionals, in the patient's home, of a condition that otherwise would require acute hospital in-patient care, always for a limited period.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of hospital at home compared with in-patient hospital care.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group (EPOC) specialised register (November 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to 1996), EMBASE (1980 to 1995), Social Science Citation Index (1992 to 1995), Cinahl (1982 to 1996), EconLit (1969 to 1996), PsycLit (1987 to 1996), Sigle (1980 to 1995) and the Medical Care supplement on economic literature (1970 to 1990).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials of hospital at home care compared with acute hospital in-patient care. The participants were patients aged 18 years and over.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty two trials are included in this update of the review. Among trials evaluating early discharge hospital at home schemes we found an odds ratio (OR) for mortality of 1.79 95% CI 0.85 to 3.76 for elderly medical patients (age 65 years and over) (n = 3 trials); OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.29 to 1.17 for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (n = 5 trials); and OR 0.78; 95%CI 0.52 to 1.19 for patients recovering from a stroke (n = 4 trials). Two trials evaluating the early discharge of patients recovering from surgery reported an OR 0.43 (95% CI 0.02 to 10.89) for patients recovering from a hip replacement and an OR 1.01 (95% CI 0.37 to 2.81) for patients with a mix of conditions at three months follow-up. For readmission to hospital we found an OR 1.76; 95% CI 0.78 to 3.99 at 3 months follow-up for elderly medical patients (n = 2 trials); OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.55 to 1.19 for patients with COPD (n = 5 trials); and OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.63 to 1.45 for patients recovering from a stroke (n = 3 trials). No significant heterogeneity was observed. One trial recruiting patients following surgery for hernia or varicose veins reported 0/117 versus 2/121 patients were re admitted (Ruckley 1978); another that 2/37 (5%) versus 1/49 (2%) (difference 3%, 95% CI -5% to 12%) of patients recovering from a hip replacement, 4/47 (9%) versus 1/39 (3%) (difference 6%, 95% CI -3% to 15%) of patients recovering from a knee replacement, and 7/114 (6%) versus 13/124 (10%) (difference -4% 95% CI -11% to 3%) of patients recovering from a hysterectomy were readmitted. A third trial analysing surgical and medical patients together reported that 42/159 versus 17/81 patients were readmitted at 3 months (OR 1.34 95% CI 0.66 to 2.20). Allocation to hospital at home resulted in a small reduction in hospital length of stay, but hospital at home increased overall length of care. Patients allocated to hospital at home expressed greater satisfaction with care than those in hospital, while the view of carers was mixed.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Despite increasing interest in the potential of hospital at home services as a cheaper alternative to in-patient care, this review provides insufficient objective evidence of economic benefit. Early discharge schemes for patients recovering from elective surgery and elderly patients with a medical condition may have a place in reducing the pressure on acute hospital beds, providing the views of the carers are taken into account. For these clinical groups hospital length of stay is reduced, although this is offset by the provision of hospital at home. Future primary research should focus on rigorous evaluations of admission avoidance schemes and standards for original research should aim at assisting future meta-analyses of individual patient data from these and future trials.

Frequency of Depression After Stroke

Background and Purpose— Although depression is an important sequelae of stroke, there is uncertainty regarding its frequency and outcome.

Methods— We undertook a systematic review of all published nonexperimental studies (to June 2004) with prospective consecutive patient recruitment and quantification of depressive symptoms/illness after stroke.

Results— Data were available from 51 studies (reported in 96 publications) conducted between 1977 and 2002. Although frequencies varied considerably across studies, the pooled estimate was 33% (95% confidence interval, 29% to 36%) of all stroke survivors experiencing depression. Differences in case mix and method of mood assessment could explain some of the variation in estimates across studies. The data also suggest that depression resolves spontaneously within several months of onset in the majority of stroke survivors, with few receiving any specific antidepressant therapy or active management.

Conclusions— Depression is common among stroke patients, with the risks of occurrence being similar for the early, medium, and late stages of stroke recovery. There is a pressing need for further research to improve clinical practice in this area of stroke care.

Services for reducing duration of hospital care for acute stroke patients

BACKGROUND

Stroke patients conventionally receive a substantial part of their rehabilitation in hospital. Services have now been developed which offer patients in hospital an early discharge with rehabilitation at home (early supported discharge (ESD)).

OBJECTIVES

To establish the effects and costs of ESD services compared with conventional services.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group's trials register (last searched August 2004) and obtained further information from individual trialists.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials recruiting stroke patients in hospital to receive either conventional care or any service intervention which has provided rehabilitation and support in a community setting with an aim of reducing the duration of hospital care.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers scrutinised trials and categorised them on their eligibility. Standardised individual patient data was then sought from the primary trialists. Results were analysed for all trials and for subgroups of patients and services; in particular whether the intervention was provided by a co-ordinated multidisciplinary team (co-ordinated ESD team) or not.

MAIN RESULTS

Outcome data are currently available for 11 trials (1597 patients). Patients tended to be a selected elderly group with moderate disability. The ESD group showed significant reductions (P < 0.0001) in the length of hospital stay equivalent to approximately 8 days. Overall, the odds ratios (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)) for death, death or institutionalisation, death or dependency at the end of scheduled follow up were OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.27, P = 0.56, OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.96, P = 0.02 and OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.97, P = 0.02, respectively. The greatest benefits were seen in the trials evaluating a co-ordinated ESD team and in stroke patients with mild-moderate disability. Improvements were also seen in patients' extended activities of daily living scores (standardised mean difference 0.12, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.25, P = 0.05) and satisfaction with services (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.38, P = 0.02) but no statistically significant differences were seen in carers' subjective health status, mood or satisfaction with services.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Appropriately resourced ESD services provided for a selected group of stroke patients can reduce long term dependency and admission to institutional care as well as reducing the length of hospital stay. No adverse impact was observed on the mood or subjective health status of patients or carers.

Effectiveness of home rehabilitation after stroke in Israel

On discharge from an acute general hospital after a stroke, 191 patients were in need of, and were appropriate for, multidisciplinary rehabilitation. One-hundred-and-one patients (52.4%) received it in a rehabilitation institution as inpatients (the institutional rehabilitation group (IR) group) and 91 patients received it at home (the home rehabilitation (HR) group). Patients in the HR group had their mobility, activities of daily living (ADL), range of movements, tonus, coordination and sensation determined on admission to home rehabilitation and on discharge from it, 6 weeks to 2 months later. This group contained more women and more patients able to walk with devices and who were partially independent in ADL. The IR group consisted of more men and more patients with diabetes and marked difficulties in ADL and ambulation. In both groups the Barthel index and the Frenchay activities index were determined 1 year after the stroke by way of a telephone interview and no meaningful differences were found between the two groups. IR was considerably more expensive than HR. In Israel there exists a subpopulation of acute stroke survivors in need of, and appropriate for, multidisciplinary rehabilitation that can be provided at home; such rehabilitation was found to be effective in the short and long term, as well as cost effective.

Health care and social welfare costs in home-based and hospital-based rehabilitation after stroke

During the 1990s most western European and Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries experienced financial difficulties and were forced to cut back on or restrain health care expenditures. Home rehabilitation has received attention in recent years because of its potential for cost containment. Often forgotten, however, is the redistribution of costs from one caregiver to another. The aim of this study was to analyse whether a redistribution of costs occurs between health care providers (the County councils) and social welfare providers (the municipalities) in a comparison of home-based rehabilitation and hospital-based rehabilitation after stroke. The study population included 123 patients, 53 in the home-based rehabilitation group and 68 in the hospital-based rehabilitation group. The patients were followed up at 6 and 12 months after onset of stroke. Resource use over a 12-month period included acute hospital care, in-hospital rehabilitation, home rehabilitation and use of home-help service as well as nursing home living. The hospital-based rehabilitation group had significantly fewer hospitalization days after a decision was made about rehabilitation at the acute care ward and consequently the cost for the acute care period was significantly lower. The cost for the rehabilitation period was significantly lower in the home-based rehabilitation group. However, the cost for home help service was significantly higher in the home-based rehabilitation group. The total costs for the care episode did not differ between the two groups. The main finding of this study is that there seems to occur a redistribution of costs between health care providers and social welfare providers in home rehabilitation after stroke in a group of patients with mixed degree of impairment.

Services for reducing duration of hospital care for acute stroke patients

BACKGROUND

Stroke patients conventionally receive a substantial part of their rehabilitation in hospital. Services have now been developed which offer patients in hospital an early discharge with rehabilitation at home (early supported discharge, ESD).

OBJECTIVES

To establish the costs and effects of ESD services compared with conventional services.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Stroke Group Specialist Register of Controlled Trials was searched and supplemented with information from individual trialists. Searching was completed in December 2000.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials recruiting stroke patients in hospital to receive either conventional care or any service intervention which has provided rehabilitation and support in a community setting with an aim of reducing the duration of hospital care.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers scrutinised trials and categorised them on their eligibility. Standardised information was then obtained from the primary trialists. Results were analysed for all trials and for subgroups depending on whether the intervention was provided by a coordinated multidisciplinary team (coordinated ESD team) or not.

MAIN RESULTS

Outcome data are currently available for four trials. Patients tended to be a selected elderly group with disability. Overall, the odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for death, death or institutionalisation, death or dependency at the end of scheduled follow up were 0.87 (0.39-1.93), 0.69 (0.36-1.31) and 0.88 (0.49-1.57) respectively. Apparent benefits were more evident in the three trials evaluating a coordinated ESD team. The ESD group showed significant reductions (P<0.001) in the length of hospital stay equivalent to approximately nine days.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

ESD services provided for a selected group of stroke patients can reduce the length of hospital stay. However, the relative risks and benefits and overall costs of such services remain unclear.

A review of health-related quality-of-life measures in stroke

The objective of this review was to evaluate health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) measures for use with patients with stroke. HR-QOL measures are increasingly used for assessment in many health conditions; these measures may serve an important role in evaluating the impact of stroke and of stroke interventions. HR-QOL measures used in patients with stroke should: (i) cover the domains of HR-QOL that may be affected by stroke; (ii) have administration characteristics suitable for use in patients with stroke; and (iii) have undergone reliability and validity assessment in patients with stroke. The present study evaluates HR-QOL measures with reference to these requirements. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify and evaluate HR-QOL measures of potential use in studies of patients with stroke. Identified measures were assessed with regard to stroke-relevant domains covered, measure characteristics (e.g. self-administration versus administration by an interviewer, interviewer time to complete) and psychometric properties of reliability and validity. The measures evaluated vary widely on domains covered, and limited assessment of the performance of HR-QOL measures has been conducted in patients with stroke. No existing measure comprehensively covers all relevant domains or addresses fully the issues of obtaining and combining HR-QOL assessments in patients and proxies in many stroke populations. Additional psychometric testing in stroke populations is needed for existing HR-QOL measures. In addition, stroke-targeted HR-QOL measures need to be developed and evaluated with patients with stroke.

The effectiveness of community-based rehabilitation for stroke patients who remain at home: a pilot randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of community-based rehabilitation for stroke patients who were not admitted to hospital in South London.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Patients' homes in South London.

SUBJECTS

Stroke patients not admitted to hospital after a stroke.

INTERVENTION

Rehabilitation at home by rehabilitation team for up to three months or usual care.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was the Barthel score. Secondary measures included the Motricity Index, Rivermead ADL, Hospital Anxiety and Depression score and Nottingham Health Profile.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients who remained at home were randomized to rehabilitation team (23) or 'usual' care (20). The mean number of physiotherapy sessions was three (range 1-14) for the rehabilitation team group and two for the usual care group. Patients (with a deficit) in the rehabilitation arm of the trial were more likely to receive occupational, physical and speech therapy than those in the control arm (p = 0.03, 0.01 and 0.008, respectively). For those patients actually receiving therapy, there was no evidence that the amount received differed between the groups. However, the number of patients in each of these comparisons was very small. The outcome for patients in the rehabilitation team arm of the trial was nonsignificantly higher (0.05 < p < 0.2) than for those in the control arm for the areas of Nottingham Health Profile, anxiety, depression, caregiver strain and the proportion of patients living at home. Based on the data observed here, a trial with approximately 150 patients in each arm would be needed to have adequate power to detect a 33% difference between intervention and control groups in these outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Community therapy support for patients not admitted to hospital is feasible but to determine whether it is cost- or clinically effective would require trials of adequate size.

Benefit of an extended stroke unit service with early supported discharge: A randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Several trials have shown that stroke unit care improves outcome for stroke patients. The aim of the present trial was to evaluate the effects of an extended stroke unit service (ESUS), with early supported discharge, cooperation with the primary healthcare system, and more emphasis on rehabilitation at home as essential elements.

METHODS

In a randomized, controlled trial, 160 patients with acute stroke were allocated to the ESUS and 160 to the ordinary stroke unit service (OSUS). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who were independent as assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (RS) (RS </=2=global independence) and independent in activities of daily living (ADL) as assessed by Barthel Index (BI) (BI >/=95=independent in ADL) after 26 weeks. Secondary outcomes were RS and BI scores after 6 weeks; the proportion of patients at home, in institutions, and deceased after 6 and 26 weeks; and the length of stay in institutions.

RESULTS

After 26 weeks, 65.0% in the ESUS versus 51.9% in the OSUS group showed global independence (RS </=2) (P:=0.017), while 60.0% in the ESUS versus 49.4% in the OSUS group were independent in ADL (BI >/=95) (P:=0.056). The odds ratios for independence (ESUS versus OSUS) were as follows: RS, 1.72 (95% CI, 1.10 to 2.70); BI, 1.54 (95% CI, 0.99 to 2.39). At 6 weeks, 54.4% of the ESUS group and 45. 6% of the OSUS group were independent according to RS (P:=0.118), and 56.3% versus 48.8% were independent according to BI (P:=0.179). The proportion of patients at home after 6 weeks was 74.4% for ESUS and 55.6% for OSUS (P:=0.0004), and the proportion in institutions was 23.1% versus 40.0%, respectively (P:=0.001). After 26 weeks, 78. 8% in the ESUS group versus 73.1% in the OSUS were at home (P:=0. 239), while 13.1% versus 17.5% were in institutions (P:=0.277). The mortality in the 2 groups did not differ. Average lengths of stay in an institution were 18.6 days in the ESUS and 31.1 days in the OSUS group (P:=0.0324).

CONCLUSIONS

An ESUS with early supported discharge seems to improve functional outcome and to reduce the length of stay in institutions compared with traditional stroke unit care.

Alternative strategies for stroke care: a prospective randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Organised specialist care for stroke improves outcome, but the merits of different methods of organisation are in doubt. This study compares the efficacy of stroke unit with stroke team or domiciliary care.

METHODS

A single-blind, randomised, controlled trial was undertaken in 457 acute-stroke patients (average age 76 years, 48% women) randomly assigned to stroke unit, general wards with stroke team support, or domiciliary stroke care, within 72 h of stroke onset. Outcome was assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months. The primary outcome measure was death or institutionalisation at 12 months. Analyses were by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

152 patients were allocated to the stroke unit, 152 to stroke team, and 153 to domiciliary stroke care. 51 (34%) patients in the domiciliary group were admitted to hospital after randomisation. Mortality or institutionalisation at 1 year were lower in patients on a stroke unit than for those receiving care from a stroke team (21/152 [14%] vs 45/149 [30%]; p<0.001) or domiciliary care (21/152 [14%] vs 34/144 [24%]; p=0.03), mainly as a result of reduction in mortality. The proportion of patients alive without severe disability at 1 year was also significantly higher on the stroke unit compared with stroke team (129/152 [85%] vs 99/149 [66%]; p<0.001) or domiciliary care (129/152 [85%] vs 102/144 [71%]; p=0.002). These differences were present at 3 and 6 months after stroke.

INTERPRETATION

Stroke units are more effective than a specialist stroke team or specialist domiciliary care in reducing mortality, institutionalisation, and dependence after stroke.

The scope for community based intervention in stroke rehabilitation

The aftermath of stroke is commonly managed in the community, often exclusively by the GP. However, a significant proportion of community stroke patients have considerable impairments and disabilities which often go undetected and consequently untreated by the primary healthcare team. This article describes and quantifies the disabilities experienced by stroke patients living in the community and reviews the evidence for community rehabilitation. The roles of the occupational therapist and community nurse in the management of stroke rehabilitation are discussed. The authors conclude that an opportunity exists for better collaboration between the occupational therapist and the community nurse.

Services for helping acute stroke patients avoid hospital admission

BACKGROUND

Stroke patients are usually admitted to hospital for their acute care and rehabilitation. Services to help acute stroke patients avoid admission to hospital ("hospital-at-home") have now been developed.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to establish the costs and effects of such services compared with conventional services.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Stroke Group Specialist Register of Controlled Trials was searched and supplemented by discussion with colleagues and trialists. This was last updated in March 1999.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Controlled clinical trials recruiting stroke patients who have not been admitted to hospital and compare; a) services which provided support with an aim of helping prevent admission to hospital with b) conventional services (which could include hospital admission).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent reviewers determined the eligibility and methodological quality of trials. Trialists were then contacted to obtain standardised descriptive and outcome data.

MAIN RESULTS

Four trials are included in the review of which three currently have outcome data available (921 patients; 857 from one controlled trial, 64 from two randomised trials). There were no statistically significant differences between the patient and carer outcomes of the intervention and control groups either within individual trials or in pooled analyses. There was a trend toward greater hospital bed use and increased costs in the intervention groups.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

There is currently no evidence from clinical trials to support a radical shift in the care of acute stroke patients from hospital-based care.

Rehabilitation needs of community stroke patients

PURPOSE

The aim was to identify stroke patients not admitted to hospital, to assess their disabilities and the rehabilitation provided.

METHOD

Stroke patients were notified by General Practitioners, assessed a month after stroke on measures of impairment and disability and the rehabilitation received was recorded. There were 124 patients notified and 93 assessed.

RESULTS

Patients showed an average decline of 1.7 on the Barthel Index and 3.6 on the Extended Activities of Daily Living scale from before to after stroke. There were 27% with severe mobility problems and 47% with clinically relevant arm impairment. Many patients had cognitive impairment with only 9% having no deficit. Mood problems were less common with 26% anxious and 13% depressed. Significant stress occurred in 15% of carers. The provision of rehabilitation was low and there was poor correspondence between impairments and services provided.

CONCLUSION

There is an unmet potential for rehabilitation in stroke patients not admitted to hospital.

Reliability of stroke patients' reports on rehabilitation services received

OBJECTIVE

To compare stroke patients' reports with service providers' reports on the rehabilitation services patients receive.

SETTING

Community, predominantly urban.

SUBJECTS

Ninety-three stroke patients who had not been admitted to hospital.

METHOD

Between August 1994 and August 1996, 54 general practitioner practices in Nottingham (population 344 200) were requested to notify the Nottingham Community Stroke Project of all cases of stroke. Patients were visited one month after stroke and asked to report on whether they had received any hospital, social, community or voluntary services. Some departments were contacted and asked if the patients were known to them and whether they had been seen.

RESULTS

Patients reported having little contact with hospital or social services. Comparison of patients' reports with that of the appropriate service department showed poor agreement for community care assistants (kappa = 0.18), fair agreement for social workers (kappa = 0.59), speech therapy (kappa = 0.48), hospital outpatient appointments (kappa = 0.55) and admissions to hospital (kappa = 0.48) and good agreement for social services occupational therapists (kappa = 0.64).

CONCLUSION

Stroke patients' and service providers' reports on rehabilitation services may not always agree. Care should be taken when interpreting information on service provision.

Outcome of subacute stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Organized acute stroke treatment reduces mortality, functional deficits, and the need of institutionalization after stroke. It is largely unknown whether the effects of treatment are due to early or subacute efforts. The aim of this randomized, controlled study was to test the hypothesis that rehabilitation of stroke patients in the subacute phase in a hospital rehabilitation unit is beneficial in reducing death and dependency and increasing health-related quality of life.

METHODS

251 patients initially treated in the hospital were randomized to subacute rehabilitation in a hospital rehabilitation unit (n = 127) or to the health services in the municipality (n = 124) and were followed up for 7 months.

RESULTS

The combined outcome of patients being dead or dependent (Barthel Index score of < 75) was 23% in the hospital group and 38% in the municipality group (P=.01). Seven-month survival rates were 90.6% and 83.9% (P=.11), respectively. Dependency in activities of daily living was 12.6% in the hospital group and 25.0% in the municipality group (P=.07). Patients with a BI score of < 50 before rehabilitation had significantly better outcome in the hospital rehabilitation unit, with fewer patients becoming dependent (P=.005) and patients having higher Scandinavian Stroke Scale (P=.026) and BI scores (P=.005). No significant differences in health-related quality of life were found. Many patients treated in the municipalities (30%) did not receive any organized rehabilitation in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Subacute rehabilitation of stroke patients in a hospital-based rehabilitation unit improves outcome. Patients with moderate or severe stroke appear to benefit most.

A randomized controlled trial of rehabilitation at home after stroke in southwest Stockholm

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study describes the methodology, patient outcome, and use of hospital and rehabilitation services at 3 months of a population-based randomized controlled trial. The purpose was to evaluate rehabilitation at home after early supported discharge from the Department of Neurology, Huddinge Hospital, for moderately disabled stroke patients in southwest Stockholm.

METHODS

The patients were eligible if they were continent, independent in feeding, had mental function within normal limits, and had impaired motor function and/or aphasia 1 week after stroke. Patients were randomized either to early supported discharge with continuity of rehabilitation at home for 3 to 4 months or to routine rehabilitation service in a hospital, day care, and/or outpatient care. The home rehabilitation team consisted of two physical therapists, two occupational therapists, and one speech therapist; one of the therapists was assigned as case manager for the patient. The rehabilitation program at home emphasized a task- and context-oriented approach. The activities were chosen on the basis of the patient's personal interests. Spouses were offered education and individual counseling. A total of 81 patients were followed up for a minimum of 3 months. Patient outcome was assessed by the Frenchay Social Activity Index, Extended Katz Index, Barthel Index, Lindmark Motor Capacity Assessment, Nine-Hole Peg Test, walking speed over 10 m, reported falls, and subjective dysfunction according to the Sickness Impact Profile. Patient use of hospital and home rehabilitation service and patient satisfaction with care were studied.

RESULTS

Overall there were no statistical significant differences in outcome. Multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested a systematic positive effect for the home rehabilitation group in social activity, activities of daily living, motor capacity, manual dexterity, and walking. A considerable difference in resource use during such a 3-month period was seen. A 52% reduction in hospitalization was observed: from 29 days in the routine rehabilitation group to 14 days in the home rehabilitation group. Patient satisfaction was in favor of the latter group.

CONCLUSIONS

Early supported discharge with continuity of home rehabilitation services for the majority of moderately disabled stroke patients during the first 3-month period after acute stroke is not less beneficial than routine rehabilitation and can be a rehabilitation service of choice if follow-up at 6 and 12 months confirms the suggested effectiveness and considerable reduction in use of health care.

Stroke: non-motor sequelae, medical co-morbidity and patterns of intervention after referral to a special interest service

Stroke poses a considerable financial burden on the health services as well as contributing to enormous personal suffering. A study was undertaken in 100 patients over 65 years old in a geriatric unit. Neuro-radiology confirmed cerebral infarcts in 91 and 89 per cent had additional neuro-medical problems. Specific sequelae of stroke occurred in 53 per cent of which 21 per cent related to dysphagia. Among various treatments 61 per cent were referred for physiotherapy and occupational and speech/language therapy. Knowledge of the nature and timing of complications is important in planning stroke services and the input of early medical specialist assessment has been shown to influence mortality and rehabilitation outcome.

Nonmedical bed-days for stroke patients admitted to acute-care hospitals in Montreal, Canada

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Reducing the amount of nonoptimal time stroke patients spend in the hospital should be a priority because prolonged hospitalization is not only costly but may be detrimental for persons with stroke through deconditioning, social isolation, and the fostering of dependent relationships. The purpose of this study was to determine the amount of time spent by stroke patients in acute-care hospitals that was not justified for medical reasons and to identify mechanisms contributing to nonmedical bed-days.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed with 2232 persons admitted for acute stroke to one of 13 hospitals in Montreal, Canada, during 1991. Information was collected on the patient, the stroke, functional status, course in hospital, services, and discharge. Nonmedical bed-days were calculated as the difference between the time to meet specified criteria and time of discharge. Associations with nonmedical bed-days were estimated with adjustment for patient mix.

RESULTS

Acute-care stay averaged 27 days, yielding 60,279 bed-days. Almost 50% of the cohort remained in the hospital after meeting criteria for medical discharge, resulting in 43% of total bed-days not accounted for medically. Fifty percent of persons with delayed discharge did not go home but were discharged to another acute-care hospital or to rehabilitation or long-term care, accounting for 66% of the nonmedical bed-days. Hospital and discharge destination remained strongly associated with nonmedical days, even after adjustment for patient mix.

CONCLUSIONS

The single greatest contributor to excessive nonmedical stay appeared to be the need in Quebec for increased access to alternate levels of care, including skilled nursing facilities and rehabilitation centers.

Developing comprehensive stroke services: an evidence-based approach

The recent interest in the development of services for stroke patients reflects an increasing optimism about stroke management and the recognition that properly organised care can improve outcomes after stroke. A comprehensive stroke service should provide early assessment and investigation of stroke disease in both in-patient and out-patient settings, acute care for stroke in-patients to manage their medical and surgical problems, and rehabilitation for patients with persisting functional problems. Other components may include out-patient, day hospital or domiciliary rehabilitation facilities and continuing care and support facilities for patients discharged from hospital. This article discusses the evidence to support different components of a comprehensive stroke service and emphasises the need for flexible approaches to different local conditions.

Stroke patients' views on their admission to hospital

OBJECTIVE

To explore which components of care were valued by patients admitted to hospital following a stroke.

DESIGN

Qualitative study using in depth interviews 10 months after the stroke.

SETTING

Two adjacent districts in North Thames Regional Health Authority.

SUBJECTS

82 survivors of stroke taken consecutively from a stroke register, 40 of whom agreed to be interviewed.

RESULTS

Patients reported that during the acute stage of the stroke they wanted to put their faith in experienced and trusted experts who would help them make sense of the event, take all the actions necessary to ensure survival, and provide comfort and human warmth during the crisis. In addition to being reassured by the clinical tests and practical nursing help they received, patients valued feeling cared about by the staff. In most cases patients reported that their needs were met; however, the institutional nature of the hospital sometimes obstructed the fulfillment of their needs.

CONCLUSION

Patients have important psychosocial needs during the acute stage of the stroke, which are often met by hospital admission. Patients gained benefits from their admission over and above those measurable in terms of morbidity or function. They used a combination of criteria to evaluate their care, focusing on the process as well as the outcome of care. Researchers and clinicians should do likewise.

Stroke care in Europe. Can we learn lessons from the different ways stroke is managed in different countries?

Stroke is a major health care problem in the European Union and consumes significant resources. The mortality rates from stroke and treatment strategies vary significantly between member states. Only by comparison between centres in different member states with differing health care delivery can the effect of these varying approaches to the management of stroke on outcome be assessed. Conducting a study on a European wide basis in centres which are known to differ in terms of treatment strategies and outcomes allows an immediate analysis of the effectiveness, resource requirements and cost of different methods of managing stroke patients. This paper addresses the current burden of stroke and strategies for its management. An outline of a European Union project, assessing how stroke is managed in different countries, is provided with the aim of indicating a strategy for discovering and promoting more cost-effective services for stroke care in the future.

Stroke nursing care and management in the community: a survey of district nurses' perceived contribution in one health district in England

Little appears to have been written about how district nurses perceive their role in relation to the care and management of stroke patients in the community despite the high number of stroke patients on their case loads. A qualitative study using a semi-structured interview was undertaken with a convenience sample of 30 district nurses representing each locality in one health district in England. Findings suggest that district nurses do not have a major role in the rehabilitation of stroke patients in the community and generally become involved in their care once the patient's chronicity has reached the point of inability to meet self-care demand, or the carer is unable to cope.

Emergency department-based home care

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility of coordinating home care services from an inner-city emergency department.

INTERVENTION

In a preintervention survey, the home care needs of 650 consecutive patients being discharged from the ED were evaluated. A nurse-coordinator who arranged and managed rapidly deployed home care services then was assigned to the ED for eight months. Patients were referred, and home care services were provided regardless of insurance status.

SETTING

Teaching hospital serving a large indigent population.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients about to be discharged home from the ED.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty-five of 650 (7%) surveyed patients were not receiving home care services for which they were eligible. In the subsequent eight-month period, 670 patients were referred for home care on discharge from the ED (2% of all discharges). Seventy-six percent of these patients were women, and the average age was 73.5 years. Four hundred fifty patients (67%) received visits from home care providers managed by the ED coordinator. For 99 of these patients (22%), the availability of rapidly deployed home care services obviated the need for emergency admission to the hospital. Net billings to third-party payers exceeded the costs of the program.

CONCLUSION

A significant proportion of elderly patients being discharged from the ED need home health services. Access to rapidly deployed home care services can obviate the need for hospital admission for a select group of debilitated patients. The provision of home care services from the ED is economically feasible.