Anti-STLV-IIImac reactivity in HIV seropositive individuals in Sweden

A microELISA system for the detection of both anti-HIV-1 and anti-HIV-2 antibodies

Current anti-HIV-1 screening tests combine an excellent anti-HIV-1 sensitivity with a sensitivity of only 28-93% for anti-HIV-2 positive plasma or serum samples. The reactivity of anti-HIV-2 sera in anti-HIV-1 screening tests is based mainly on the immunological cross-reactivity of the GAG and POL proteins of HIV-1 and HIV-2. We describe here a sandwich immunoassay, in which HIV-1 viral lysate is combined with an HIV-2 ENV synthetic peptide, corresponding to the immunodominant envelope epitope, as the coating antigens on microELISA plates. This immunoassay has a sensitivity of 100% for anti-HIV-1 (128 sera tested) and 100% for anti-HIV-2 (109 sera tested). Assay specificity with fresh human donor sera was 99.9% (2256 sera tested).

Comparison of 10 enzyme immunoassays for detection of antibody to human immunodeficiency virus type 2 in West African sera

The efficacies of nine enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (EIA) for antibody to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and one EIA for antibody to HIV-2 in detecting antibody to HIV-2 were studied. The competitive EIAs for antibody to HIV-1 were less sensitive than the indirect EIAs. The overall prevalence of positive results was between 28 and 51% with the competitive EIAs and between 70 and 93% with the indirect EIAs. Most of the EIAs were less sensitive in detecting antibody to HIV-2 in sera from people with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-like diseases than in sera from symptomless individuals. The results indicate that there is a high degree of cross-reactivity between HIV-1 and HIV-2 by EIA, indicating that serotype specificity must be determined by Western blot (immunoblot) with both sets of viral antigens. The results are relevant for discussing public health strategies, especially the screening of blood donors; competitive EIAs for antibody to HIV-1 are not sensitive enough to be used in areas where HIV-2 is prevalent (West Africa).

Specificities and sensitivities of three systems for determination of antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus by electrophoretic immunoblotting

Electrophoretic immunoblotting (EIB [Western blotting]) has emerged as the major method for verification of seropositivity for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and therefore needs to be thoroughly characterized. The specificities of three EIB systems, our own and two commercial systems, were studied with anticellular sera and serial dilutions of human sera. We demonstrated that in one system, anti-HLA classes I and II gave bands comigrating with viral proteins, which can be controlled by EIB with uninfected H9 cells. In addition, animal antisera, including anti-immunoglobulin enzyme conjugates, occasionally reacted with HIV gag proteins, necessitating appropriate controls. Whereas none of 10 blood donors reacted at the standard dilution in serum (1/100 or 1/400) in any of the three systems, 6, 1, and 2 of 10 donors reacted with p24, p55, or both at a dilution of 1/10 for the three systems tested. Thus, nonspecific reactions can arise in several ways and justify critical EIB interpretation. The sensitivity of the three systems was studied by comparative titrations and direct quantification of bound immunoglobulin G (IgG). In the titrations with all three, the minor anti-HIV bands p53 and p64, coded from pol, were often detectable in higher dilutions than were antibodies to any other HIV protein. The minimum visible amounts of IgG bound per HIV protein band estimated by extra- and interpolation in densitometric curves and liquid scintillation counting of radiolabeled patient IgG were approximately 0.1, 0.05, and 0.02 ng per band in the three systems. One of the commercial systems had both the highest sensitivity and highest specificity.

Quantification of immunoglobulin on electrophoretic immunoblot strips as a tool for human immunodeficiency virus serodiagnosis

Electrophoretic immunoblotting (EIB [Western blotting]), the main method for verification of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) seropositivity, needs thorough characterization and standardization. We explored the possibilities of quantifying immunoglobulin G (IgG) bound to EIB strips both by densitometry of the peroxidase-stained bands and by measurement of radioactivity with labeled anti-HIV IgG. The radioactivity method is inherently more exact but was more cumbersome. However, despite saturation phenomena at high IgG densities, the densitometric method was more convenient and yielded reproducible estimates of the amount of bound IgG. We found it useful primarily for documentation of changes in the relative abundance of antibodies to different HIV proteins from individual patients over time. To explore the potential usefulness of the method, we studied a small set of HIV-seropositive persons. The average p24/gp41 color yield ratios and standard deviations in 3 persons with recent seroconversion, 15 healthy subjects, and 6 diseased HIV-seropositive persons were 6.6 +/- 0.9, 2.3 +/- 1.9, and 1.3 +/- 0.5, respectively. These data are in accord with previous qualitative or semiquantitative observations but are too limited for any conclusions regarding the use of quantitative EIB for prognostic use with individual patients. Quantitative EIB is a valuable tool for comparative methodological studies and for research on the protective role of anti-HIV antibodies in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome pathogenesis. Its possible use in prognostication for individual patients must be evaluated in long-term studies.