Prospective, randomised, double-blind study of radionuclide determination of left-ventricular ejection fraction in acute myocardial infarction

Early estimation of risk by echocardiographic determination of wall motion index in an unselected population with acute myocardial infarction

In a prospective series of 201 consecutive patients with creatine kinase-MB--documented acute myocardial infarction (AMI), postadmittance and predischarge echocardiographic wall motion indexes (WMI) were determined (median 45 hours vs 14 days after AMI). No significant change of left ventricular systolic performance was found between postadmittance and predischarge examinations in 179 survivors (WMI 1.3 +/- 0.4 vs 1.4 +/- 0.4, p greater than 0.05). Hospital mortality was 11% (22 of 201), cumulated 2-month mortality 15% (31 of 201) and cumulated 1-year mortality 26% (52 of 201). Mortality increased rapidly with decreasing left ventricular function as determined by WMI. When early WMI was less than 1.0, 1-year mortality was 51% (28 of 55) versus 8% (7 of 83) when WMI was greater than 1.3 (p less than 0.0001). Ventricular fibrillation (n = 24) and cardiogenic shock (n = 27) carried a much better prognosis when WMI showed good left ventricular function. When WMI was less than 1.0, 1-year mortality was 83% (10 of 12) versus 93% (13 of 14) in ventricular fibrillation and cardiogenic shock, respectively, whereas it was 0% (0 of 4) versus 33% (2 of 6) when WMI was greater than 1.3. In 15% of patients major discrepancies between early Killip class and WMI were noted. WMI showed much smaller fluctuations during the hospital course of AMI than did Killip class and appeared to be a more stable prognostic marker. Large-scale, early risk stratification by echocardiography has now become available and appears to facilitate a rational, individualized discharge policy in the coronary care unit and to provide an improved basis for randomization of patients in controlled studies aimed at tailoring new treatment in AMI.

Interobserver agreement and accuracy of bedside estimation of right and left ventricular ejection fraction in acute myocardial infarction

Ninety-eight patients with acute myocardial infarction were examined by 3 clinicians who, independently of each other, gave an estimate of left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) ejection fraction (EF) in each patient. Their estimates were based on physical examination, chest x-ray, electrocardiogram, patient history and clinical course during admission. Ejection fractions were estimated as belonging to 1 of 4 categories: normal (LVEF greater than or equal to 0.53, RVEF greater than or equal to 0.57), mildly reduced (LVEF 0.40 to 0.52, RVEF 0.45 to 0.56), moderately reduced (LVEF 0.30 to 0.39, RVEF 0.35 to 0.44) or severely reduced (LVEF less than 0.30, RVEF less than 0.35). Radionuclide ventriculography was carried out immediately after the physical examination. LVEF was correctly estimated in 43% of all examinations, deviated from radionuclide LVEF by 1 LVEF category in 45% and by 2 LVEF categories in 12%. The 3 clinicians agreed on estimated LVEF in only 32% of the patients. RVEF was correctly estimated in 67% of the examinations, but none of the clinicians identified greater than 43% of the relatively few patients with reduced radionuclide RVEF and they greatly disagreed as to who among the patients had a reduced RVEF. Previous myocardial infarction, electrocardiographic infarct location, Killip class, physical signs of left- and right-sided heart failure, radiographic pulmonary congestion and cardiomegaly were analyzed to determine which were the most helpful in predicting LVEF and RVEF. The results disclosed that several variables, traditionally believed to be reliable indexes of reduced ventricular function, were surprisingly poor predictors of LVEF and RVEF.