Community-based treatment with ivermectin

Ivermectin-functionalized multiwall carbon nanotube enhanced the locomotor activity and neuropathic pain by modulating M1/M2 macrophage and decrease oxidative stress in rat model of spinal cord injury

Since the inflammation and oxidative stress is the main pathophysiological pathway of neural damage in spinal cord injury (SCI), we tried to evaluate the role of ivermectin (IVM) combined with multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) in the treatment settings of SCI and its underlying mechanism. Wistar rats with T9 vertebra laminectomy in five groups of: sham-operated, vehicle, IVM (0.1 mg/kg), IVM-MWCNT (0.1 mg/kg), and minocycline (90 mg/kg) were used. We evaluated the locomotor scaling and other behavioral tests for neuropathic pain. Also, tissue samples were obtained to evaluate the expression of M1 and M2 macrophage marker, concentration of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-1, and oxidative stress level to assess neuroinflammatory changes. Both IVM and IVM-MWCNT after induction of SCI significantly enhanced the experimental tasks’ outcomes, including locomotion and neuropathic tests. Also, decreasing in pro-inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-1 in the spinal cord and dorsal root ganglion tissues was also notable in both IVM and IVM-MWCNT-treated groups 28 days after induction of SCI in compared to the vehicle-treated SCI group. Both IVM and IVM-MWCNT significantly decreased oxidative stress, induced by SCI, based on the results of ROS and NADPH activity. IVM-MWCNT-treated animals indicated better outcome in every previous experiment in comparison to IVM-treated animals. The effectiveness of IVM-MWCNT was similar to minocycline treatment in all experimental task (as positive control group). IVM-MWCNT might be a novel treatment in spinal cord injury, which could act through decreasing the oxidative stress and increase the polarization of M1 in comparison to M2 macrophages.

Ivermectin for onchocercal eye disease (river blindness)

BACKGROUND

It is believed that ivermectin (a microfilaricide) could prevent blindness due to onchocerciasis. However, when given to everyone in communities where onchocerciasis is common, the effects of ivermectin on lesions affecting the eye are uncertain and data on whether the drug prevents visual loss are unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to assess the effectiveness of ivermectin in preventing visual impairment and visual field loss in onchocercal eye disease. The secondary aim was to assess the effects of ivermectin on lesions affecting the eye in onchocerciasis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 3), MEDLINE (January 1950 to April 2012), EMBASE (January 1980 to April 2012), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 2 April 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials with at least one year of follow-up comparing ivermectin with placebo or no treatment. Participants in the trials were people normally resident in endemic onchocercal communities with or without one or more characteristic signs of ocular onchocerciasis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. We contacted study authors for additional information. As trials varied in design and setting, we were unable to perform a meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

The review included four trials: two small studies (n = 398) in which people with onchocercal infection were given one dose of ivermectin or placebo and followed up for one year; and two larger community-based studies (n = 4941) whereby all individuals in selected communities were treated every six or 12 months with ivermectin or placebo, whether or not they were infected, and followed for two to three years. The studies provide evidence that treating people who have onchocerciasis with ivermectin reduces the number of microfilariae in their skin and eye(s) and reduces the number of punctate opacities. There was weaker evidence that ivermectin reduced the risk of chorioretinitis. The studies were too small and of too short a duration to provide evidence for an effect on sclerosing keratitis, iridocyclitis, optic nerve disease or visual loss. One community-based study in communities mesoendemic for the savannah strain of O.volvulus provided evidence that annual mass treatment with ivermectin reduces the risk of new cases of optic nerve disease and visual field loss. The other community-based study of mass biannual treatment of ivermectin in communities affected by the forest strain of O.volvulus demonstrated reductions in microfilarial load, punctate keratitis and iridocyclitis but not sclerosing keratitis, chorioretinitis, optic atrophy or visual impairment. The study was underpowered to estimate the effect of ivermectin on visual impairment and other less frequent clinical signs. The studies included in this review reported some adverse effects, in particular an increased risk of postural hypotension in people treated with ivermectin.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The lack of evidence for prevention of visual impairment and blindness should not be interpreted to mean that ivermectin is not effective, however, clearly this is a key question that remains unanswered. The main evidence for a protective effect of mass treatment with ivermectin on visual field loss and optic nerve disease comes from communities mesoendemic for the savannah strain of O.volvulus. Whether these findings can be applied to communities with different endemicity and affected by the forest strain is unclear. Serious adverse effects were rarely reported. None of the studies, however, were conducted in areas where people are infected with Loa loa (loiasis).

A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of the effects of ivermectin at normal and high doses, given annually or three-monthly, against Onchocerca volvulus: ophthalmological results

A three-year randomized, controlled, double-blind trial was conducted in Cameroon to determine whether ivermectin, given at three-monthly intervals and/or at high doses (800 microg/kg), had a greater effect on adult Onchocerca volvulus than standard doses (150 microg/kg annually). As several patients complained of transitory subjective visual problems after treatment, some of them being of an unexpected type, we organized two series of detailed ophthalmological examinations to evaluate whether they were associated with ocular lesions. Analysis showed that these complaints were significantly more frequent in the two groups treated with high doses of ivermectin than in the reference group. In the ophthalmological examinations, the only differences recorded between the groups were a lower prevalence and mean number of microfilariae in the anterior chamber in the groups treated three-monthly, and, at the first examination round, a higher prevalence of early lesions of the iris in the group treated at high doses annually. These findings do not allow us to explain the cause of the transitory ocular complaints, nor why they were more frequent in the groups treated at high doses. However, one may conclude that using doses of ivermectin higher than the standard one should be considered with caution.

Adverse reactions following annual ivermectin treatment of onchocerciasis in Nigeria

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to document and underscore the need to monitor adverse reactions following repeated ivermectin treatment under the current dispensation of the implementation of the Community-directed Treatment with Ivermectin (CDTI) Program. As communities are empowered to distribute ivermectin, monitoring of adverse reactions by health care professionals is important in achieving the onchocerciasis control objectives through mass ivermectin therapy.

METHODS

Eight hundred and ninety subjects from 204 randomly selected households (based on cluster of households) were interviewed using structured questionnaires and in-depth interviews. Responses concerning the adverse effects of ivermectin at the first and sixth rounds were obtained using self-report and treatment records.

RESULTS

Of the 890 individuals, 40.67% presented with adverse reactions at the first round of treatment (TX(1)). This was reduced to 15.06% at the sixth (TX(6)) round of treatment. Pains in joints were more frequently reported at TX(1) and TX(6), 22.7% and 8.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The relatively mild adverse reaction rates observed at TX(1) did not affect future participation in community treatment with ivermectin, due to adequate community mobilization with health education messages. The current CDTI program has a good chance of achieving the onchocerciasis control program's objectives in Shao, Kwara State, Nigeria.

Ivermectin for onchocercal eye disease (river blindness)

BACKGROUND

It is believed that ivermectin (a microfilaricide) could prevent blindness due to onchocerciasis. However, when given to everyone in communities where onchocerciasis is common, the effects of ivermectin on lesions affecting the eye are uncertain and data on whether the drug prevents visual loss is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review is to assess the effectiveness of ivermectin in preventing visual acuity and visual field loss in onchocercal eye disease. The secondary aim is to assess the effects of ivermectin on lesions affecting the eye in onchocerciasis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group specialised register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register - CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, the reference lists of identified trials, the Science Citation Index and we contacted investigators, experts and pharmaceutical companies to identify additional trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials with at least one year follow up, comparing ivermectin at a dose of 150 micrograms per kilogram of body weight with either placebo or no treatment. Participants were people normally resident in endemic onchocercal communities with or without one or more characteristic signs of ocular onchocerciasis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. Study authors were contacted for additional information. Trials varied in design and setting, so no meta-analysis was done.

MAIN RESULTS

This review includes five trials with data from 3810 participants. All the trials compared ivermectin with placebo and were judged to be of moderate risk of bias in terms of methodological quality. No statistically significant difference was observed in any trial (reporting visual acuity outcome) between ivermectin and placebo groups for visual acuity loss.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Questions about the effectiveness of ivermectin in preventing visual acuity loss have not been answered by best available evidence.

The effects of multiple doses of ivermectin on ocular onchocerciasis. A six-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Ivermectin has been shown to be a safe treatment for onchocerciasis and is now being distributed through mass treatment programs. Previous studies of up to 3 years of treatment have demonstrated that ivermectin improves anterior segment lesions and reduces the incidence of optic atrophy. The benefit of multiple doses of ivermectin on visual acuity and chorioretinitis has yet to be shown.

METHODS

A community-based, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial of ivermectin was started in Bo, Sierra Leone, in 1987. Two cohorts are reported in this study: (1) 214 subjects had received four 6-month doses of ivermectin followed by up to six additional 6-month treatments. The second cohort, with 185 subjects, had received four 6-month doses of placebo followed by up to four annual doses of ivermectin. All subjects received a full ophthalmic examination in 1989 and again in 1994. For both cohorts, there was an 18-month gap between the fifth and sixth rounds of treatment.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the prevalences of any ocular lesion nor of visual acuity categories between the cohorts at the second examination. Comparisons of the prevalences of anterior segment lesions for both cohorts combined between the first and second examinations show highly significant improvement (P < 0.001) for all lesions. Posterior segment lesions show a more variable pattern, with chorioretinitis showing highly significant deterioration (P < 0.001) and the emergence of new lesions in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The authors conclude that annual treatment with ivermectin is effective in controlling ocular onchocerciasis apart from chorioretinal lesions and that a 6-month treatment gives no additional benefit.

Adverse reactions after community treatment of onchocerciasis with ivermectin in Guatemala

Male and female residents on a Guatemalan coffee plantation where Onchocerca volvulus infections were hyperendemic were offered oral ivermectin (100-200 micrograms/kg) as part of a community-wide treatment programme for onchocerciasis. Forty-five persons were treated and then questioned daily for 28 d about changes in their health. Those with complaints were monitored until all signs and symptoms had resolved. Sixty-seven percent complained of some adverse event after treatment; 60% developed observable adverse reactions attributed clinically to ivermectin. No reaction was life-threatening; the most common were oedema (53%) and fever (47%). Expulsion of intestinal helminths was reported by 38%. Almost all reactions began 24-48 h after treatment; their mean duration was 5 d, despite treatment with acetaminophen and antihistamines. Three patients had oedematous changes lasting over 2 weeks. Incidence, but not severity, of reactions was related to the pretreatment density of microfilariae in skin.

Intramuscular onchocercoma. Case report

Onchocerciasis is characterized by the presence of numerous microfilariae in the skin, formation of subcutaneous nodules and eye lesions that can lead to blindness. We present a case, rather uncommon in our environment, in which an incomplete life cycle of the parasite, led to a single intramuscular nodule. The clinical symptoms and histological features are described, together with the treatment, using Ivermectin.

Effects of repeated doses of ivermectin on ocular onchocerciasis: community-based trial in Sierra Leone

Ivermectin seems to be a safe and effective treatment for onchocerciasis when given in a single dose, but less is known about the effects of repeated doses. Also, there seem to be differences in its effectiveness in anterior and posterior segment ocular disease. The ocular effects of ivermectin were studied in 586 villagers who were taking part in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial in Sierra Leone. Only those who had received four doses, with 6-month intervals, of ivermectin or placebo were eligible. The 296 ivermectin-treated subjects and the 272 who received placebo were comparable with respect to age, sex, Onchocerca infection, blindness, and visual impairment before treatment. After treatment, the ivermectin group had less anterior segment disease than the placebo group, with significantly lower prevalences of microfilariae in the anterior chamber and cornea, and punctate keratitis (all p less than 0.001), and iritis (p less than 0.05). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of sclerosing keratitis, optic atrophy, or chorioretinitis between the groups. Visual acuities tended to be better in the ivermectin group, but the difference was not significant. There was a small but significant (p less than 0.01) excess of vascular sheathing in the ivermectin group. These differences persisted when subjects who were blind or visually impaired at baseline were excluded from analysis. The long-term effects of ivermectin, particularly on posterior segment disease, need further evaluation. In the mean time, the mass distribution of ivermectin should be promoted for all communities with hyperendemic onchocerciasis at risk of anterior segment disease.

A community trial of ivermectin for onchocerciasis in Sierra Leone: adverse reactions after the first five treatment rounds

We have studied the adverse reactions reported after ivermectin in 1745 villagers in southern Sierra Leone, allocated at random to receive ivermectin or placebo and treated 'double-blind' with 4 doses at six-monthly intervals. Six months after the fourth dose all eligible villagers received ivermectin regardless of their previous treatment. At the first treatment round more adverse reactions were reported by villagers treated with ivermectin than by those who received placebo. Reactions occurred most often on the second day after treatment. There were significant correlations between an individual's skin microfilarial load and the risk of developing adverse reactions. On re-treatment there was no significant excess of reported adverse reactions in the ivermectin group compared to the placebo group. Unlike other adverse reactions, the risk of cutaneous reactions after the first dose of ivermectin was not correlated with skin microfilarial load. In addition, after re-treatment with ivermectin, cutaneous reactions were reported significantly more often than with placebo. We confirm that ivermectin is safe for mass distribution, but adverse reactions should be monitored and treated after the first dose. Throughout this study ivermectin was well tolerated, with significantly more villagers returning for re-treatment after ivermectin than placebo, and all adverse reactions were self-limiting or successfully managed with symptomatic treatment. We question whether strict clinical monitoring should be routine at re-treatment, when only cutaneous reactions were consistently reported. If clinical monitoring could be used more selectively, distribution campaigns might be easier to manage and more cost-effective.

A field study of the effect of ivermectin on intestinal helminths in man

A single stool specimen from each of 904 villagers participating in a placebo-controlled trial of ivermectin for onchocerciasis was examined for intestinal helminths by the formol-ether technique. Ivermectin had a significant effect on Ascaris infection, reducing prevalence and intensity for at least 3 months, but rapid reinfection occurred. There was no significant effect on Trichuris, Necator or Schistosoma mansoni infections. Incidental Strongyloides infections were not seen commonly in this population, but were significantly reduced in the ivermectin-treated group. Regular administration of ivermectin on a mass basis would reduce the prevalence of Ascaris infection and any attendant morbidity. This is a useful additional effect of the drug.

Knowledge, attitudes and perceptions (KAP) of onchocerciasis: a survey among residents in an endemic area in Guatemala targeted for mass chemotherapy with ivermectin

If ivermectin distribution programs are to have maximum impact on the morbidity and transmission of human onchocerciasis there must be broad and sustained acceptance within the endemic communities. Educational activities, developed with careful consideration of community attitudes, should promote positive treatment seeking behavior while simultaneously addressing local reservations about the control effort. To better understand the ambient knowledge, attitudes, and practices concerning onchocerciasis in the context of ivermectin use in Guatemala, we conducted a survey among 145 heads of households in five endemic communities. Given the country's long-standing nodulectomy program, it was not surprising that 100% of persons interviewed had heard of the disease 'la filaria', which they defined as a skin nodule that could cause blindness. Ninety-five percent of respondents identified surgery as the only cure for the condition. Relatively few (39%) knew that la filaria was caused by a worm, although slightly more (50%) knew that the condition was acquired by the bite of an insect. The term microfilaria was not broadly recognized. We also determined that onchocerciasis was not perceived as a serious health problem: few persons (12%) mentioned la filaria when requested to provide a complete list of illnesses that occurred in the community, and the gravity of infection (based on rank ordering of common illnesses) was similar to that of a bad cold. Recommendations were made which might assist long-term acceptance of a national chemotherapy initiative against onchocerciasis in Guatemala.

A community trial of ivermectin for onchocerciasis in Sierra Leone: clinical and parasitological responses to the initial dose

A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of ivermectin was started in 1987 in 6 villages in southern Sierra Leone. 1625 villagers, 93% of the total population, were surveyed before treatment and allocated at random to the trial. Onchocerciasis was hyperendemic and of moderate intensity in the area. Typical onchocerciasis skin lesions were seen in most cases; the blindness rate was 1.5% and a further 4.3% had visual impairment. Six months after treatment 988 subjects (80%) were reassessed and microfilarial loads in the ivermectin group were found to be 10% of control levels. Additionally, blood eosinophil concentrations were reduced by one-quarter. The severity, but not the prevalence, of skin lesions was significantly reduced in the ivermectin group, with a particularly marked effect on papular eruptions. There had been no reduction in the prevalence of itching, nor had markers of general health shown improvement after ivermectin. Ivermectin is an effective microfilaricidal agent and may improve Onchocerca-related skin lesions after a single dose. However, the lack of obvious benefit to a target population after the first dose of ivermectin may reduce compliance with subsequent doses. This has implications for planned mass treatment initiatives in onchocerciasis endemic regions.

Safety of and compliance with community-based ivermectin therapy

In a study of the safety, acceptability, and efficacy of ivermectin for community-based mass treatment of onchocerciasis, the drug was issued twice, one year apart, to the population of a rubber plantation (14,000 people) in Liberia, where over 80% of the adults have Onchocerca volvulus infection. The plantation microfilarial load in a sample of adults was reduced by 86% 6 months after initial treatment and by 78% after 1 year. Compliance was 97% with each round of treatment. After the initial treatment of 7699 people, 101 (1.3%) had moderate adverse reactions. After re-treatment only 37 (0.5%) people had moderate adverse reactions. No ivermectin-related death or severe adverse reactions occurred. The data show that community-based treatment with ivermectin is well accepted and effective in reducing microfilarial loads. Ivermectin is likely to provide the first realistic means of chemotherapy-based control of onchocerciasis on a mass scale.

Onchocerciasis

Onchocerciasis is a devastating blinding disease caused by the parasite Onchocerca volvulus that infects about 80 million people, causing blindness and visual impairment in 1-2 million people. In hyperendemic areas, more than half of the population will become blind from onchocerciasis before they die. Blindness is the most important effect of the disease and results, in part, from direct invasion of the eye by microfilariae. The recent development of ivermectin has revolutionized our ability to treat this disease. An annual oral dose of only 150 mg/kg completely suppresses the disease manifestations. Programs for the community-based mass distribution of ivermectin are now being conducted and promise to control this major blinding scourge.

Ivermectin: a long-acting microfilaricidal agent

Ivermectin is a macrocyclic lactone (fermentation) product and actinomycete (Streptomyces avermitilis) that possesses an unusually broad spectrum of potent activity against several species of nematodes, arachnids, and insects that parasitize domestic animals. From clinical trials in humans it has been found to be microfilaricidal, killing microfilariae of Onchocerca volvulus (the parasite causing onchocerciasis), and interrupting its transmission by the black fly vector. Dermal microfilariae density in patients are reduced to near zero levels for 6-12 months after a single oral dose of ivermectin 0.15-0.2 mg/kg. Its precise mechanism of action is unknown. It has a time to maximum concentration of 2.7-4.3 h, and an elimination half-life of 28 +/- 10 h. When compared with an oral solution the tablet dosage form has a relative bioavailability of approximately 60 percent. Not much is known about its metabolism in humans, and the unchanged drug is not detected in the urine. Controlled clinical trials have shown ivermectin to be associated with milder side effects than diethylcarbamazine, the current drug of choice for onchocerciasis therapy. It does not cause the severe Mazzoti-type (anaphylactoid) reactions that are associated with diethylcarbamazine use. Ivermectin is effective, safer, and more tolerable than diethylcarbamazine. It should, therefore, replace diethylcarbamazine as the drug of choice for onchocerciasis therapy.

Side-effects of ivermectin in treatment of onchocerciasis

In a prospective study to determine the tolerance for and safety of ivermectin therapy for onchocerciasis in a hyperendemic area in Sierra Leone, 28 (32%) of 87 patients had adverse reactions that required treatment with acetylsalicylic acid and antihistamines, but none of the observed adverse reactions were considered life-threatening. A significant relation was found between the frequency and severity of side-effects and the degree of parasite infestation, as quantified by the skin-snip counts. Free administration of ivermectin to severely infected onchocerciasis patients is not recommended without some form of medical supervision.