Raised serum lipoprotein during treatment with lovastatin

Therapeutic efficiency of lipoprotein(a) reduction by low-density lipoprotein immunoapheresis

This study was performed to investigate the effect of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) immunoapheresis on lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] reduction in patients with heterozygous and homozygous familial hyperlipidemia (N=16) and insufficient response to lipid-lowering agents. By desorption of approximately 5,700+/-500 mL of plasma, a mean reduction in total cholesterol of 62% (P < .001) and in LDL-cholesterol of 70% (P < .001) was achieved. Lp(a), which was elevated at study entry in seven of these patients (82.1+/-34.3 mg/dL; range, 48 to 148 mg/dL), was reduced during the initial LDL-apheresis procedure by 74.8%+/-14.1% (P < .001). Long-term apheresis treatment performed at weekly intervals resulted in an mean reduction in Lp(a) pretreatment values to 39.1+/-28.5 mg/dL (-54%; P < .001). Desorbed Lp(a) was measured at the waste of the columns for 31 apheresis treatments. Lp(a) concentration of the column waste was higher in patients with elevated serum Lp(a) pretreatment values as compared with those with Lp(a) serum values within the normal range (elevated Lp(a), 1,420+/-380 mg; without elevated Lp(a), 235+/-190 mg; P < .001). The rate of return of Lp(a) following apheresis treatment scheduled at weekly intervals was comparable to that of LDL-cholesterol.

The familial hypercholesterolemia regression study: a randomized comparison of therapeutic reduction of both low-density lipoprotein and lipoprotein(a) versus low-density lipoprotein alone

Lipoprotein (a) [Lp (a)] is a risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD), especially in the presence of a raised low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (LDL-C). To ascertain whether reduction of both LDL and Lp(a) is more advantageous than reduction of LDL alone, patients with heterozygous FH and CHD were selected randomly to receive either LDL apheresis fortnightly plus simvastatin 40 mg/day or colestipol 20 g plus simvastatin 40 mg/day. Quantitative coronary angiography was undertaken before and after 2.1 years. Changes in serum lipids were similar in both groups except for the greater reduction of LDL-C and Lp(a) by apheresis. There were no significant differences in primary angiographic endpoints, and none of the angiographic changes correlated with Lp(a). Although LDL apheresis plus simvastatin was more effective than colestipol plus simvastatin in reducing LDL-C and Lp(a), it was not more beneficial in influencing coronary atherosclerosis. Decreasing Lp(a) seems unnecessary if LDL-C is reduced below 130 mg/dl.

Effect of simvastatin on Lp(a) concentrations

The effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on Lp(a) concentrations is controversial, with some studies showing an increase and others showing no effect on Lp(a) concentrations. Many of these studies have been limited by small sample size and the lack of a prospective design. We evaluated the effect of four treatments: (1) placebo, (2) simvastatin 10 mg PO QPM, (3) simvastatin 20 mg PO QAM, and (4) simvastatin 20 mg PO QPM on Lp(a) concentrations in a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial of 24 weeks in 343 subjects in 28 clinical sites in the United States. Simvastatin was not associated with a change in Lp(a) concentrations relative to placebo. These results were not affected by controlling for race, initial Lp(a) level, or urinary albumin excretion. Simvastatin significantly reduced low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels (10 mg PO QPM: -27.6%; 20 mg PO QAM: -28.1%; and 20 mg PO QPM: -34.3%, all p < 0.001). It was concluded that in a large, randomized, controlled trial, simvastatin does not affect Lp(a) levels but markedly lowers LDL cholesterol levels.

Familial Hypercholesterolaemia Regression Study: a randomised trial of low-density-lipoprotein apheresis

Low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis has the theoretical advantage over anion-exchange resins and hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A inhibitors of decreasing lipoprotein(a) as well as LDL. To confirm this advantage, patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia and coronary artery disease were randomised to receive LDL apheresis fortnightly (with disposable dextran sulphate/cellulose columns) plus simvastatin 40 mg daily, or colestipol 20 g plus simvastatin 40 mg daily. Quantitative coronary angiography was repeated after a mean of 2.1 years in 20 patients undergoing apheresis and in 19 on combination drug therapy. Changes in serum lipoproteins were similar in both groups apart from greater lowering by apheresis of LDL cholesterol (3.2 vs 3.4 mmol/L in drug group, p = 0.03) and lipoprotein(a) (geometric means 14 vs 21 mg/dL, p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in primary angiographic endpoints per patient but lesion-based and segment-based secondary endpoints were biased in favour of the drug group (change in minimum lumen diameter of lesions 0.07 vs -0.004 mm, p = 0.046; change in mean lumen diameter of segments 0.02 vs -0.06 mm, p = 0.01). None of the angiographic changes correlated with lipoprotein(a) concentrations. Per patient changes in % diameter stenosis and minimum lumen diameter in the two groups were as or more favourable than those observed in five published trials that assessed lipid-lowering drug therapy by quantitative coronary angiography. Although LDL apheresis combined with simvastatin was more effective than colestipol plus simvastatin in reducing LDL cholesterol and lipoprotein(a), it was less beneficial in influencing coronary atherosclerosis and should be reserved for patients unresponsive to drugs. Decreasing lipoprotein(a) seems to be unnecessary if LDL cholesterol is reduced to 3.4 mmol/L or less.

Central nervous system effects of HMG CoA reductase inhibitors: lovastatin and pravastatin on sleep and cognitive performance in patients with hypercholesterolemia

Sleep disturbances and decrements of daytime performance have been attributed to HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. As a rule, lipophilic compounds more readily cross the blood-brain barrier and are more likely to affect central nervous system function. The authors compared the effects of lovastatin (40 mg), a lipophilic compound, to pravastatin (40 mg), a hydrophilic compound, in a 6-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, three-way Latin square design, cross-over study on 22 men with hypercholesterolemia. Patients had LDL cholesterol of more than 165 mg/dL and triglyceride of less than 350 mg/dL after 6 weeks of a low-fat (< 30%), low-cholesterol (< 300 mg/day) diet. Compared with placebo, there were no significant effects of lovastatin or pravastatin on the following subjective and polysomnographic sleep measures: changes in total sleep time, time in each sleep stage, sleep efficiency, sleep latency, REM density, REM activity, and number of arousals. Similarly, there were no effects of the two drugs on measures of cognitive performance. A significant increase in the duration of nocturnal tumescence (NPT) was observed after 2 weeks of treatment with both study drugs. This effect was not significant after 6 weeks of treatment. Both lovastatin and pravastatin caused significant (P < .05 compared with placebo) decreases in total cholesterol (by 20.9 and 20.6%, respectively), LDL cholesterol (by 27.8 and 29.9%), and triglycerides (by 13.6 and 3.7%). Subjects' HDL increased by 2.3% with lovastatin (NS) and by 3.1% with pravastatin (P < .05). Lipoprotein(a) increased by 20.5% with lovastatin and by 1.1% with pravastatin; these changes were not significantly different from placebo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Apolipoprotein(a) polymorphism predicts the increase of Lp(a) by pravastatin in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia treated with bile acid sequestration

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors effectively reduce the concentration of low density lipoproteins (LDL) in plasma. Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] may be as atherogenic as LDL. A few studies, only one of which was placebo controlled, suggest that the HMG CoA reductase inhibitors either do not affect Lp(a) or they increase Lp(a). The response of Lp(a) to HMG-CoA reductase inhibition has not been related to apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes in previous studies. We conducted a double-blind, placebo controlled study of pravastatin in 51 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) (n = 43) or probable FH (n = 8). All patients had LDL-cholesterol concentration above 4.1 mmol l-1 despite treatment with diet and bile acid sequestration. In patients assigned to pravastatin (n = 34), the mean concentrations of total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol fell significantly (P < 0.01) when compared to placebo. Lp(a) increased (P < 0.01) from a mean (+/- SD) of 33.6 +/- 40.8 mg dl-1 to 41.1 +/- 46.1 mg dl-1 on pravastatin but was unchanged during placebo treatment. The percentage increase in Lp(a) was the same in patients with different apo(a) phenotypes, and hence the absolute increase in Lp(a) was greatest in patients with the low molecular weight apo(a) phenotypes.

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor use in the aged. A review of clinical experience

While the benefit of cholesterol-lowering in the elderly has yet to be proven in clinical trials, individuals at high risk of coronary events who otherwise enjoy a good quality of life, should not be denied cholesterol-lowering therapy on the basis of age alone. Moreover, hypolipidaemic drugs are already extensively used in the aged. The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors lovastatin, simvastatin and pravastatin are potent well tolerated hypolipidaemic therapies in young subjects. Although there have been few studies on their use in elderly subjects, the available data suggest the efficacy and safety of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in similar to that established for younger age groups.

Serum Lp(a) concentrations are unaffected by treatment with the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor Pravastatin: results of a 2-year investigation

The concentration of lipoprotein (a) in plasma is under stringent genetic control and raised concentrations are strongly linked to coronary heart disease, in particular when low density lipoprotein levels are also increased. We serially monitored serum Lp(a) in 14 hypercholesterolemic patients who were treated with Pravastatin over a period of two years. C-reactive protein levels were also quantified to exclude a possible 'acute-phase' response as a reason for a sudden increase in the Lp(a) concentration. No significant changes were seen in mean Lp(a) levels after 24 months of therapy. Considerable fluctuations of serum Lp(a) levels occurred during the course of treatment. These were in some cases associated with raised C-reactive protein concentrations and might therefore be attributable to an 'acute-phase' response. We conclude that the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor Pravastatin has no long-lasting effects on Lp(a) levels in hypercholesterolemic patients suffering from coronary heart disease.

Simvastatin in severe hypercholesterolaemia: a placebo controlled trial

The effect of simvastatin in 27 patients with severe primary hypercholesterolaemia was assessed by a double-blind placebo controlled parallel group trial. Total serum cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and apoprotein B (ApoB) were significantly reduced by simvastatin 40 mg daily. Reductions in triglyceride and VLDL-cholesterol and an increase in HDL-cholesterol levels were only significant when calculated as a percentage of baseline, because of wide inter-individual variability. No changes in apoprotein A1, lipoprotein (a), fibrinogen, viscosity or blood pressure were observed. Leucocyte HMG-CoA reductase activity was unchanged after 4 weeks of active treatment but increased by 87% after 3 months (n = 21, P less than 0.05). No severe adverse effects or changes in CK or AST levels were noted. We conclude that simvastatin is effective in the treatment of severe and resistant hypercholesterolaemia, and well tolerated in the short term.

Short- and long-term effects of LDL-apheresis on lipoprotein (a) serum levels

The effect of two extracorporeal elimination procedures for LDL on lipoprotein (a) concentrations in serum was studied in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. During a single apheresis serum lipoprotein (a) levels fell by 45% and 58%. Over a long-term period with weekly elimination lipoprotein (a) concentrations were lowered significantly by 43% (after 10-50 treatments) and 30% (after 51-99 treatments) compared to pre-treatment values. The rise during the week following apheresis was comparable to the corresponding reincrease of LDL-cholesterol and apolipoprotein B. We conclude that both apheresis techniques are very effective in reducing lipoprotein (a) serum levels.

Gemfibrozil in hyperlipidaemic patients with peripheral arterial disease: some undiscovered actions

The effects of gemfibrozil were assessed in 27 hyperlipidaemic patients with stable peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Gemfibrozil (600 mg twice daily) was administered for 12 weeks after 2 weeks of placebo medication, thus enabling patients to act as their own controls. Serum cholesterol levels were reduced by a mean of 11.3%, triglycerides by 42.3% and low density lipoprotein cholesterol by 19.9%. Small but significant increases in HDL3 and apolipoprotein A-II also occurred. New findings included significant reductions in plasma lipid peroxides and Factor VIIc levels and a mean increase of 19% in antithrombin III concentrations. Furthermore, plasma fibrinogen levels increased by a mean of 17.6%, a potentially adverse effect of gemfibrozil that has not been previously reported.