Ocular safety of antiulcer drugs

Common systemic medications that every optometrist should know

Healthcare in the twenty-first century has witnessed an increased use of prescription drugs. As a member of a patient's health care team, optometrists should be aware of the pharmaceuticals taken by patients and their potential ocular complications. This paper will discuss the most prescribed medications in Australia today and their effects on the visual system. The paper will review the agents used to treat six common systemic conditions, their frequency of use, mechanism of action, clinical indications, and potential ocular manifestations. Literature has documented both positive and negative associations of systemic medications on the eye's health. Many associations documented here have shown conflicting evidence, thus warranting further investigation. Based on the frequency and severity of the ocular manifestations in the literature, recommendations for clinical care are given. Being familiar with the most common ocular side effects associated with common systemic medications aids in the correct and timely diagnosis of ocular complications to prevent permanent sequelae.

Proton-pump inhibitor use is associated with a broad spectrum of neurological adverse events including impaired hearing, vision, and memory

Proton-pump inhibitors, PPIs, are considered effective therapy for stomach acid suppression due to their irreversible inhibition of the hydrogen/potassium pump in the gastric parietal cells. They are widely prescribed and are considered safe for over-the-counter use. Recent studies have shown an association between PPI use and Alzheimer dementia, while others have disputed that connection. We analyzed over ten million United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System reports, including over forty thousand reports containing PPIs, and provided evidence of increased propensity for memory impairment among PPI reports when compared to histamine-2 receptor antagonist control group. Furthermore, we found significant associations of PPI use with a wide range of neurological adverse reactions including, migraine, several peripheral neuropathies, and visual and auditory neurosensory abnormalities.

Gastrointestinal safety of COX-2 specific inhibitors

Coxibs are a major advance in the therapy of patients with painful and inflammatory conditions. At present, the theoretical harm that derives from inhibiting vascular COX-2 has not emerged as a significant risk, although more research is needed. What has emerged is that some NSAIDs, particularly naproxen, may have an aspirin-like effect in reducing the risk of vascular disease, although more research is needed. Whether this finding is sufficient to recommend naproxen for the management of patients with arthritis who also require vascular protection is intriguing and worth further evaluation. It is widely believed and maintained that coxibs have the greatest potential value in patients with other risk factors for ulcer disease, and this seems likely to be the case for patients taking corticosteroids or anticoagulants and probably those who are elderly. Dosing should be [figure: see text] cautious in old patients, however, because of the ability of NSAIDs and coxibs to cause fluid retention, heart failure, and hypertension. It is less clear that coxibs reduce risk sufficiently in patients with previous ulceration (particularly recent) to make them a better strategy than acid co-therapy. This possibility requires further evaluation, as does the competing value of the 2 strategies for patients infected with H. pylori. If coxibs are used in patients with H. pylori-associated risks, there are grounds to recommend eradication. For patients taking aspirin or drugs [figure: see text] with an aspirin-like effect, the intrinsic risk of these drugs may mandate use of acid suppression and obviate the use of coxibs (Fig. 8). Available data suggest that the risk reduction in patients with no risk factors who use coxibs may be almost as great as in patients with risk factors, with the added advantage that patients may be taken to a state that is virtually free of any risk of ulcer complications that otherwise might require additional therapy. Contrary to current popular truisms, the greatest value of coxibs may be in patients without risk factors because it is in this unconfounded group that the ability of coxibs to free patients of ulcer risk appears to be delivered in full.