Hypermenorrhea associated with ritonavir

Therapy of HIV infection

HIV is a devastating disease caused by the human immunodeficiency virus. Symptoms of illness can manifest in every organ system, including the skin. Although there is no definitive cure, the creation of antiretroviral drugs and aggressive treatment regimens have dramatically altered disease morbidity and mortality. However, the precise drug selection is often difficult and intimidating given the sheer abundance of drug therapies available. In this article, the HIV disease course is reviewed and different classes of antiretroviral medications are presented with emphasis on initial drug regimens, potential adverse effects, particularly those of dermatologic nature, possible drug interactions, patient compliance, and the emergence of drug resistance.

Gynecologic care for women with HIV infection

The purpose of this article is to review the gynecologic conditions encountered among women with HIV and to outline elements of gynecologic care for these women. The most prevalent problems are vulvo-vaginal candidiasis and cervical dysplasia; however, other sexually transmitted diseases, pelvic inflammatory disease, genital ulcer disease, and menstrual abnormalities are also seen. Drug interactions may limit the effectiveness or increase the toxicities associated with hormonal contraception. Intrauterine devices are contraindicated.

Advances in HIV treatment and treatment toxicities

Among the different classes and complexities of antiretroviral regimens, maximal viral suppression, sustained durability, increased CD4 count, decreased evolving resistance, and fewer side effects combined with increased compliance resulting in decreased morbidity and mortality remain the goals of therapy. Serial viral load measurements help best guide the direction of therapy. According to the CDC 20% fewer people died of HIV in 1998 compared to 1997 in the United States. HAART, although expensive (sometimes exceeding $20,000 per year), is not readily available to 95% of the estimated 36 million HIV-infected people in the world. HAART therapy commonly consists of two NRTIs and a protease inhibitor, but other combination regimens exist. The disadvantage of HAART therapy is that antiretroviral agents are not virucidal, thus eradication with these drug cocktails cannot be achieved. When HAART therapy is stopped, viral loads return to pre-treatment levels. New drug classes under investigation may completely prevent fusion between the HIV virus and healthy cells. For now, the epidemic can only be controlled with good public awareness, such as education, condom use, or abstinence. Because a cure does not seem immediately foreseeable, an effective prophylactic vaccine may afford protection. Defined treatment regimens exist for occupational postexposure prophylaxis. Ultimately, an expert in the field should be involved in manipulating drug regimens; however, dermatologists remain an integral part of the health care team because most HIV patients experience cutaneous manifestations related either to their HIV or to their drug therapy.

Possible linkage of amprenavir with intracranial bleeding in an HIV-infected hemophiliac

The use of protease Inhibitors (PI) has been associated with many adverse effects including increased tendency to bleed, which is particularly problematic in individuals with congenital coagulation disorders. We report the occurrence of spontaneous intracranial bleeding in an human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected adolescent with hemophilia A who was receiving amprenavir (APV). The bleeding resolved on discontinuation of APV. This case report highlights a need for awareness of increased bleeding as a potentially serious complication associated with the use of all currently licensed PIs in individuals with hemophilia.

Protease inhibitor therapy and bleeding

Shortly after the introduction of protease inhibitor drugs (PIs) for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection an association between these drugs and an increased bleeding tendency in patients with hereditary bleeding disorders was observed. Not only do patients experience an increased bleed frequency in usual sites, but bleeds can also occur in unusual places such as the finger joints. Mucus membrane bleeding and haematuria are also common. Ritonavir appears to be associated with the highest risk of bleeding followed by indinavir. As yet there has not been enough experience with the newer PIs to assess fully their potential to induce increased bleeding, although nelfinavir seems to pose less of a risk than the original PIs. PI-associated bleeds tend to be more resistant to factor concentrate treatment and periods of prophylaxis may be required in individuals with frequent persistent bleeds. Patients continuing on PI therapy tend to develop a tolerance to this adverse effect with time. The mechanism of the bleeding tendency has not been elucidated. There is no consistent evidence of a disturbance of coagulation, fibrinolysis or platelet function which raises the possibility that PIs may exert a direct local effect on blood vessels. It is very important that this class-specific side-effect is recognized and understood by both treaters and patients.

Incidence of adverse reactions in HIV patients treated with protease inhibitors: a cohort study. Coordinamento Italiano Studio Allergia e Infezione da HIV (CISAI) Group

OBJECTIVE

To assess the probability that protease inhibitor (PI) therapy might be discontinued because of adverse events (AE) and to evaluate the incidence rate of adverse reactions during PI treatment.

DESIGN

A prospective cohort, multicenter study on HIV-positive patients starting treatment with at least one PI.

SETTING

Ten departments of infectious diseases in Northern Italy.

PATIENTS

A total of 1207 patients who started PI therapy in September 1997 and were consecutively observed up to April 1999.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Adverse reactions following initiation of PI therapy, and time to therapy discontinuation due to AE.

RESULTS

During the study period, 35.9% patients presented adverse reactions of any grade, whereas 9.7% presented at least one serious AE. After 12 months of treatment, the percentage of patients who had interrupted treatment was 36% of ritonavir-treated patients, 14.2% of those treated with indinavir, 13.6% of ritonavir-saquinavir hard gel capsules (HGC)-treated patients, and 8.5% and 2.1%, respectively, for those treated with nelfinavir and saquinavir HGC. Women and patients with hepatitis experienced a significantly greater number of adverse events compared with other categories. Gastrointestinal events were more frequently observed in patients treated with either ritonavir alone or in combination with saquinavir HGC, as well as in patients receiving nelfinavir, although in this group serious events were rare. Here again, neurologic, metabolic, and hepatic toxicity occurred more frequently in ritonavir and ritonavir-saquinavir HGC treated patients. Allergic reactions were more often observed in patients receiving nelfinavir. Indinavir-treated patients presented the highest incidence of renal toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Ritonavir is the drug associated with the largest number of reactions, which appear during the first few months of treatment. Saquinavir HGC and nelfinavir are the best tolerated drugs in a clinical setting.