Comparison of the adsorption properties of a single-chain antibody fragment fused to a fungal or bacterial cellulose-binding domain

Enzymatic processing of lignocellulosic biomass: principles, recent advances and perspectives

Efficient saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass requires concerted development of a pretreatment method, an enzyme cocktail and an enzymatic process, all of which are adapted to the feedstock. Recent years have shown great progress in most aspects of the overall process. In particular, increased insights into the contributions of a wide variety of cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic enzymes have improved the enzymatic processing step and brought down costs. Here, we review major pretreatment technologies and different enzyme process setups and present an in-depth discussion of the various enzyme types that are currently in use. We pay ample attention to the role of the recently discovered lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (LPMOs), which have led to renewed interest in the role of redox enzyme systems in lignocellulose processing. Better understanding of the interplay between the various enzyme types, as they may occur in a commercial enzyme cocktail, is likely key to further process improvements.

Cellulose affinity purification of fusion proteins tagged with fungal family 1 cellulose-binding domain

N- or C-terminal fusions of red-fluorescent protein (RFP) with various fungal cellulose-binding domains (CBDs) belonging to carbohydrate binding module (CBM) family 1 were expressed in a Pichia pastoris expression system, and the resulting fusion proteins were used to examine the feasibility of large-scale affinity purification of CBD-tagged proteins on cellulose columns. We found that RFP fused with CBD from Trichoderma reesei CBHI (CBD(Tr)(CBHI)) was expressed at up to 1.2g/l in the culture filtrate, which could be directly injected into the cellulose column. The fusion protein was tightly adsorbed on the cellulose column in the presence of a sufficient amount of ammonium sulfate and was efficiently eluted with pure water. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was not captured under these conditions, whereas both BSA and the fusion protein were adsorbed on a phenyl column, indicating that the cellulose column can be used for the purification of not only hydrophilic proteins but also for hydrophobic proteins. Recovery of various fusion proteins exceeded 80%. Our results indicate that protein purification by expression of a target protein as a fusion with a fungal family 1 CBD tag in a yeast expression system, followed by affinity purification on a cellulose column, is simple, effective and easily scalable.

Cellulose-binding domains promote hydrolysis of different sites on crystalline cellulose

The cohesin-dockerin interaction in Clostridium thermocellum cellulosome mediates the tight binding of cellulolytic enzymes to the cellulosome-integrating protein CipA. Here, this interaction was used to study the effect of different cellulose-binding domains (CBDs) on the enzymatic activity of C. thermocellum endoglucanase CelD (1,4-beta-d endoglucanase, EC) toward various cellulosic substrates. The seventh cohesin domain of CipA was fused to CBDs originating from the Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolases I and II (CBD(CBH1) and CBD(CBH2)) (1,4-beta-d glucan-cellobiohydrolase, EC), from the Cellulomonas fimi xylanase/exoglucanase Cex (CBD(Cex)) (beta-1,4-d glucanase, EC), and from C. thermocellum CipA (CBD(CipA)). The CBD-cohesin hybrids interacted with the dockerin domain of CelD, leading to the formation of CelD-CBD complexes. Each of the CBDs increased the fraction of cellulose accessible to hydrolysis by CelD in the order CBD(CBH1) < CBD(CBH2) approximately CBD(Cex) < CBD(CipA). In all cases, the extent of hydrolysis was limited by the disappearance of sites accessible to CelD. Addition of a batch of fresh cellulose after completion of the reaction resulted in a new burst of activity, proving the reversible binding of the intact complexes despite the apparent binding irreversibility of some CBDs. Furthermore, burst of activity also was observed upon adding new batches of CelD-CBD complexes that contained a CBD differing from the first one. This complementation between different CBDs suggests that the sites made available for hydrolysis by each of the CBDs are at least partially nonoverlapping. The only exception was CBD(CipA), whose sites appeared to overlap all of the other sites.

Improved immobilization of fusion proteins via cellulose-binding domains

Cellulose-binding domains (CBDs) are structurally and functionally independent, noncatalytic modules found in many cellulose or hemicellulose degrading enzymes. Recent biotechnological applications of the CBDs include facilitated protein immobilization on cellulose supports. In some occasions there have been concerns about the stability of the CBD driven immobilization. Here we have studied the chromatographic behavior of variants of the Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I CBD belonging to family I. Both CBDs fused to antibody fragments and isolated CBDs were studied and compared. Tritium labeling by reductive methylation was used as a sensitive detection method. The fusion protein as well as the isolated CBD was found to leak from the column at a rate of 0.3-0.5% of the immobilized protein per column volume. However, the leakage could be overcome by using two CBDs instead of a single CBD for the immobilization. In this way leakage was reduced to less than 0.01% per column volume. The improved immobilization could also be seen as a decreased migration of the protein down the column in extended washes.

Characterization and affinity applications of cellulose-binding domains

Cellulose-binding domains (CBDs) are discrete protein modules found in a large number of carbohydrolases and a few nonhydrolytic proteins. To date, almost 200 sequences can be classified in 13 different families with distinctly different properties. CBDs vary in size from 4 to 20 kDa and occur at different positions within the polypeptides; N-terminal, C-terminal and internal. They have a moderately high and specific affinity for insoluble or soluble cellulosics with dissociation constants in the low micromolar range. Some CBDs bind irreversibly to cellulose and can be used for applications involving immobilization, others bind reversibly and are more useful for separations and purifications. Dependent on the CBD used, desorption from the matrix can be promoted under various different conditions including denaturants (urea, high pH), water, or specific competitive ligands (e.g. cellobiose). Family I and IV CBDs bind reversibly to cellulose in contrast to family II and III CBDs which are in general, irreversibly bound. The binding of family II CBDs (CBD(Cex)) to crystalline cellulose is characterized by a large favourable increase in entropy indicating that dehydration of the sorbent and the protein are the major driving forces for binding. In contrast, binding of family IV CBDs (CBD(N1)) to amorphous or soluble cellulosics is driven by a favourable change in enthalpy which is partially offset by an unfavourable entropy change. Hydrogen bond formation and van der Waals interactions are the main driving forces for binding. CBDs with affinity for crystalline cellulose are useful tags for classical column affinity chromatography. The affinity of CBD(N1) for soluble cellulosics makes it suitable for use in large-scale aqueous two-phase affinity partitioning systems.