The kinase inhibitor STI571 reverses the Bcr-Abl induced point mutation frequencies observed in pre-leukemic P190(Bcr-Abl) transgenic mice

DNA Repair--A Double-Edged Sword in the Genomic Stability of Cancer Cells--The Case of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Genomic instability is a common feature of cancer cells, which can result from aberrant DNA damage reaction (DDR). We and others showed that the well-known BCR-ABL1 fusion oncogene, the cause of chronic myeloid leukemia, induced an increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and conferred therapeutic drug resistance by suppression of apoptotic signaling, prolonged G2/M arrest and stimulation of several pathways of DNA repair. However, to protect from apoptosis, cancer cells may tolerate some DNA lesions, which may increase genomic instability. Moreover, BCR/ABL1-stimulated DNA repair might be faulty, especially non-homologous end joining in its alternative forms. Normal DNA repair can remove DNA damage and prevent mutations, reducing genome instability, but on the other hand, due to its imprecise nature, it may increase genomic instability by increasing the ratio of mutagenic DNA lesions. The example of BCR-ABL1-expressing cells shows that DNA repair can both increase and decrease genomic instability of cancer cells and understanding the mechanism of the regulation of these opposite effects would be helpful in anticancer strategies.

Genetic mechanisms of chronic myeloid leukemia blastic transformation

The BCR-ABL1 oncogenic tyrosine kinase can transform pluripotent hematopoietic stem cells and initiate chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP), a myeloproliferative disorder characterized by excessive accumulation of mature myeloid cells. Patients in CML-CP usually respond to treatment with ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as imatinib, though some patients who respond initially may become resistant later. CML-CP leukemia stem cells (LSCs) are intrinsically insensitive to TKIs and thus survive in the long term. These LSCs or their progeny may at some stage acquire additional genetic changes that cause the leukemia to transform further, from CML-CP to a more advanced phase, which has been subclassified as either accelerated phase (CML-AP) or blastic phase (CML-BP). CML-BP is characterized by a major clonal expansion of immature progenitors, which have either myeloid or lymphoid features. CML-BP responds poorly to treatment and is usually fatal. This review discusses the role of genomic instability leading to blastic transformation of CML and proposes some novel therapeutic approaches.

Insights into the stem cells of chronic myeloid leukemia

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has long served as a paradigm for generating new insights into the cellular origin, pathogenesis and improved approaches to treating many types of human cancer. Early studies of the cellular phenotypes and genotypes represented in leukemic populations obtained from CML patients established the concept of an evolving clonal disorder originating in and initially sustained by a rare, multipotent, self-maintaining hematopoietic stem cell (HSC). More recent investigations continue to support this model, while also revealing new insights into the cellular and molecular mechanisms that explain how knowledge of CML stem cells and their early differentiating progeny can predict the differing and variable features of chronic phase and blast crisis. In particular, these emphasize the need for new agents that effectively and specifically target CML stem cells to produce non-toxic, but curative therapies that do not require lifelong treatments.

Chronic myeloid leukemia: mechanisms of blastic transformation

The BCR-ABL1 oncoprotein transforms pluripotent HSCs and initiates chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Patients with early phase (also known as chronic phase [CP]) disease usually respond to treatment with ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), although some patients who respond initially later become resistant. In most patients, TKIs reduce the leukemia cell load substantially, but the cells from which the leukemia cells are derived during CP (so-called leukemia stem cells [LSCs]) are intrinsically insensitive to TKIs and survive long term. LSCs or their progeny can acquire additional genetic and/or epigenetic changes that cause the leukemia to transform from CP to a more advanced phase, which has been subclassified as either accelerated phase or blastic phase disease. The latter responds poorly to treatment and is usually fatal. Here, we discuss what is known about the molecular mechanisms leading to blastic transformation of CML and propose some novel therapeutic approaches.

Contemporary pre-clinical development of anticancer agents--what are the optimal preclinical models?

The successful identification of novel effective anticancer drugs is largely dependent on the use of appropriate preclinical experimental models that should possibly mimic the complexity of different cancer diseases. The huge number of targets suitable for the design of new anticancer drugs is producing hundreds of novel molecules that require appropriate experimental models to investigate their mode of action and antitumour activity in order to select for clinical investigation the ones with higher chances of being clinically effective. However, our ability to predict the clinical efficacy of a new compound in the clinic based on preclinical data is still limited. This paper overviews the in vitro/in vivo preclinical systems that are currently used to test either compounds with an unknown mechanism of action or compounds designed to hit cancer-specific or cancer-related molecular targets. Examples of experimental models successfully used to identify novel compounds are provided. Xenografts are still the most commonly used in vivo models in drug development due to their high degree of reproducibility and because, in some cases, particularly when orthotopically transplanted, they maintain several biological properties of the human tumours they derive from. Genetic models are very useful for target validation, but are often not sufficiently reproducible to be used for drug evaluation. The variety of animal models can be effectively used to optimally test drugs that presumably act by a defined mode of action, but final success is highly dependent on the ability of drug development teams to integrate different expertises such as biology, chemistry, pharmacology, toxicology and clinical oncology into a clever and well orchestrated plan that keeps in consideration both the complexity of cancer diseases, involving alterations of different pathways, and the complexity of drugs whose pharmacological properties are crucial to obtain the desired effects.

Mathematical models of cancer stem cells

Human cancers are thought to be sustained in their growth by a pathologic counterpart of normal adult stem cells: cancer stem cells. This concept was first developed in human myeloid leukemias and is today being extended to solid tumors such as breast and brain cancers. A quantitative understanding of cancer stem cells requires a mathematical framework to describe the dynamics of cancer initiation and progression, the response to treatment, and the evolution of resistance. In this review, I use chronic myeloid leukemia as an example to discuss how mathematical and computational techniques have been used to gain insights into the biology of cancer stem cells.

The challenges of targeting chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is sustained by a clonally amplified population of Bcr Abl-positive pluripotent stem cells. Persistence of a large, functionally intact yet suppressed residual normal hematopoietic stem cell population in most patients with CML has made it possible to aim at the development of curative therapies. However, achieving this goal requires the identification of agents that will eradicate the leukemic stem cell population. Several potent Bcr-Abl-targeted drugs have now been introduced into clinical practice with remarkable effects. Nevertheless, accumulating data indicate that the leukemic CML stem cells in patients with chronic phase CML are less responsive to these agents than the bulk of the neoplastic cells. In this article, we review emerging evidence that CML stem cells have a number of unusual properties that underlie their relative insensitivity to treatment, including those that specifically target the Bcr-Abl oncoprotein. The biology of the neoplastic stem cells in patients with CML is clearly important to the future attainment of cures and might also prove a paradigm relevant to other types of malignancies that are sustained by transformed stem cell populations.

Murine models to evaluate novel and conventional therapeutic strategies for cancer

Animal models, by definition, are an approximation of reality, and their use in developing anti-cancer drugs is controversial. Positive retrospective clinical correlations have been identified with several animal models, in addition to limitations and a need for improvement. Model inadequacies include experimental designs that do not incorporate biological concepts, drug pharmacology, or toxicity. Ascites models have been found to identify drugs active against rapidly dividing tumors; however, neither ascitic nor transplantable subcutaneous tumors are predictive of activity for solid tumors. In contrast, primary human tumor xenografts have identified responsive tumor histiotypes if relevant pharmacodynamic and toxicological parameters were considered. Murine toxicology studies are also fundamental because they identify safe starting doses for phase I protocols. We recommend that future studies incorporate orthotopic and spontaneous metastasis models (syngeneic and xenogenic) because they incorporate microenvironmental interactions, in addition to confirmatory autochthonous models and/or genetically engineered models, for molecular therapeutics. Collectively, murine models are critical in drug development, but require a rational and hierarchical approach beginning with toxicology and pharmacology studies, progressing to human primary tumors to identify therapeutic targets and models of metastatic disease from resected orthotopic, primary tumors to compare drugs using rigorous, clinically relevant outcome parameters.

Chronic myeloid leukemia blast crisis arises from progenitors

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) progresses through three distinct clinical stages: chronic phase, accelerated phase, and blast crisis. The progression to accelerated phase and blast crisis is driven by activation of oncogenes, inactivation of tumor suppressor genes, and/or amplification of the BCR-ABL fusion gene, which causes the chronic phase of the disease. The cell of origin of blast crisis is a subject of speculation. Here, I develop a simple mathematical model of CML blast crisis to investigate whether blasts arise from leukemic stem cells or more differentiated leukemic cells. I use data of patients treated with imatinib and previous agents to estimate the effects of therapy on the rate of progression. Imatinib reduces the progression rate 10-fold as compared with previous (ineffective) therapies. If blasts were produced by leukemic stem cells, there would be no difference in the rate of progression between patients treated with imatinib and previous therapies, because imatinib seems to be incapable of depleting leukemic stem cells. Imatinib does, however, deplete leukemic progenitors. Therefore, CML blasts are likely to arise from leukemic progenitors. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.

Fusion tyrosine kinase mediated signalling pathways in the transformation of haematopoietic cells

The fusion tyrosine kinases (FTKs) are generated by chromosomal translocations creating bipartite proteins in which the kinase is hyperactivated by an adjoining oligomerization domain. Autophosphorylation of the FTK generates a 'signalosome', an ensemble of signalling proteins that transduce signals to downstream pathways. At the earliest stages of oncogenesis, FTKs can mimic mitogenic cytokine signalling pathways involving the GAB-2 adaptor protein and signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) factors, generating replicative stress and thereby promoting a mutator phenotype. In parallel, FTKs couple to survival pathways that upregulate prosurvival proteins such as Bcl-xL, so preventing DNA-damage-induced apoptosis. Following transformation, FTKs induce resistance to genotoxic attack by upregulating DNA repair mechanisms such as STAT5-dependent RAD51 transcription. The phenomenon of 'oncogene addiction' reflects the continued requirement of an active FTK 'signalosome' to mediate survival and mitogenic signals involving the PI 3-kinase and mitogen-activated protein stress-activated protein kinase pathways, and the nuclear factor-kappa B, activator protein 1 and STAT transcription factors. The available data so far suggest that FTKs, with some possible exceptions, induce and maintain the transformed state using similar panoplies of signals, a finding with important therapeutic implications. The FTK signalling field has matured to an exciting phase in which rapid advances are facilitating rational drug design.

BCR/ABL kinase induces self-mutagenesis via reactive oxygen species to encode imatinib resistance

Mutations in the BCR/ABL kinase domain play a major role in resistance to imatinib mesylate (IM). We report here that BCR/ABL kinase stimulates reactive oxygen species (ROS), which causes oxidative DNA damage, resulting in mutations in the kinase domain. The majority of mutations involved A/T-->G/C and G/C-->A/T transitions, a phenotype detected previously in patients, which encoded clinically relevant amino acid substitutions, causing IM resistance. This effect was reduced in cells expressing BCR/ABL(Y177F) mutant, which does not elevate ROS. Inhibition of ROS in leukemia cells by the antioxidants pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (PDTC), N-acetylcysteine (NAC), and vitamin E (VE) decreased the mutagenesis rate and frequency of IM resistance. Simultaneous administration of IM and an antioxidant exerted better antimutagenic effect than an antioxidant alone. Therefore, inhibition of ROS should diminish mutagenesis and enhance the effectiveness of IM.

Imatinib mesylate inhibits T-cell proliferation in vitro and delayed-type hypersensitivity in vivo

Imatinib mesylate (STI571, imatinib) inhibited DNA synthesis in primary human T cells stimulated with allogeneic mature dendritic cells or phytohemagglutinin (PHA) but did not induce apoptosis. The values for the concentration that inhibits 50% (IC50) of T-cell proliferation stimulated by dendritic cells and PHA were 3.9 μM and 2.9 μM, respectively, that is, within the concentration range found in patients treated with imatinib mesylate. Interestingly, imatinib mesylate did not inhibit expression of T-cell activation markers CD25 and CD69, although it reduced the levels of activated nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) and changed phosphorylation or protein levels of Lck, ERK1/2, retinoblastoma protein, and cyclin D3. When T cells were washed free of imatinib mesylate, they proliferated in response to PHA, demonstrating that inhibition is reversible. Treatment with imatinib mesylate led to accumulation of the cells in G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle. The in vitro observations were confirmed in vivo in a murine model of delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH). In mice treated with imatinib mesylate, DTH was reduced in comparison to sham-injected controls. However, the number of splenic T cells was not reduced showing that, similarly to in vitro observations, imatinib mesylate inhibited T-cell response, but did not cause apoptosis. These findings indicate that long-term administration of high-dose imatinib mesylate might affect immunity.

The BCR-ABL story: bench to bedside and back

The twenty-first century is beginning with a sharp turn in the field of cancer therapy. Molecular targeted therapies against specific oncogenic events are now possible. The BCR-ABL story represents a notable example of how research from the fields of cytogenetics, retroviral oncology, protein phosphorylation, and small molecule chemical inhibitors can lead to the development of a successful molecular targeted therapy. Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec, STI571, or CP57148B) is a direct inhibitor of ABL (ABL1), ARG (ABL2), KIT, and PDGFR tyrosine kinases. This drug has had a major impact on the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) as well as other blood neoplasias and solid tumors with etiologies based on activation of these tyrosine kinases. Analysis of CML patients resistant to BCR-ABL suppression by Imatinib mesylate coupled with the crystallographic structure of ABL complexed to this inhibitor have shown how structural mutations in ABL can circumvent an otherwise potent anticancer drug. The successes and limitations of Imatinib mesylate hold general lessons for the development of alternative molecular targeted therapies in oncology.

Imatinib mesylate (STI571) prevents the mutator phenotype of Bcr-Abl in hematopoietic cell lines

Progression of CML from chronic phase to blast crisis is accompanied by accumulating genetic alterations. To analyze whether this abnormality can be prevented by inhibition of Bcr-Abl, we measured the frequency of spontaneous and irradiation-induced HPRT mutations in cells treated with or without imatinib mesylate (Gleevec, STI571). Imatinib treatment of cells expressing Bcr-Abl reversed the mutation frequency to a value comparable to that of Bcr-Abl negative cells. Experiments with a Bcr-Abl deletion mutant indicate that in addition to the kinase activity, protein-protein interactions are required for induction of the mutator phenotype by Bcr-Abl.

Cisplatin-evoked DNA fragmentation in normal and cancer cells and its modulation by free radical scavengers and the tyrosine kinase inhibitor STI571

Cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (cisplatin, cis-DDP) is well studied anticancer drug, whose activity can be attributed to its ability to form adducts with DNA, but this drug can also form DNA-damaging free radicals, however this mechanism of cisplatin action is far less explored. Using the comet assay we studied cisplatin-induced DNA damage in the presence of spin traps: DMPO and PBN, Vitamins A, C and E as well as the tyrosine kinases inhibitor STI571 in normal human lymphocytes and leukemic K562 cells. The latter cells express the BCR/ABL fusion protein, which can be a target of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor STI571. A 20 h incubation with cisplatin at 1-10 microM induced DNA cross-links and DNA fragmentation in normal and cancer cells. Cisplatin could induce intra- and interstrand DNA-DNA cross-links as well as DNA-protein cross-links. DNA damage in K562 cells was more pronounced than in normal lymphocytes. In the presence of spin traps and vitamins we noticed a decrease in the DNA fragmentation in both cell types. Co-treatment of the lymphocytes with cisplatin at 10 microM and STI571 at 0.25 microg/ml caused an increase of DNA fragmentation in comparison with DNA fragmentation induced by cisplatin alone. In the case of K562 cells, an increase of DNA fragmentation was observed after treatment with cisplatin at 1 microM. Our results indicate that the free radicals scavengers could decrease DNA fragmentation induced by cisplatin in the normal and cancer cells, but probably they have no effect on DNA cross-linking induced by the drug. The results obtained with the BCR/ABL inhibitor suggest that K562 cells could be more sensitive towards co-treatment of cisplatin and STI571. Our results suggest also that aside from the BCR/ABL other factors such as p53 level, signal transduction pathways and DNA repair processes can be responsible for the increased sensitivity of K562 cells to cisplatin compared with normal lymphocytes.