Induction of mixed allogeneic chimerism for leukemia

Inflammation Control and Immunotherapeutic Strategies in Comprehensive Cancer Treatment

Tumor growth and expansion are determined by the immunological tumor microenvironment (TME). Typically, early tumorigenic stages are characterized by the immune system not responding or weakly responding to the tumor. However, subsequent tumorigenic stages witness the tumor promoting its growth and metastasis by stimulating tumor-protective (pro-tumor) inflammation to suppress anti-tumor immune responses. Here, we propose the pivotal role of inflammation control in a successful anti-cancer immunotherapy strategy, implying that available and novel immunotherapeutic modalities such as inflammation modulation, antibody (Ab)-based immunostimulation, drug-mediated immunomodulation, cancer vaccination as well as adoptive cell immunotherapy and donor leucocyte transfusion could be applied in cancer patients in a synergistic manner to amplify each other's clinical effects and achieve robust anti-tumor immune reactivity. In addition, the anti-tumor effects of immunotherapy could be enhanced by thermal and/or oxygen therapy. Herein, combined immune-based therapy could prove to be beneficial for patients with advanced cancers, as aiming to provide long-term tumor cell/mass dormancy by restraining compensatory proliferation of surviving cancer cells observed after traditional anti-cancer interventions such as surgery, radiotherapy, and metronomic (low-dose) chemotherapy. We propose the Inflammatory Prognostic Score based on the blood levels of C-reactive protein and lactate dehydrogenase as well as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio to effectively monitor the effectiveness of comprehensive anti-cancer treatment.

Clinically feasible and prospective immunotherapeutic interventions in multidirectional comprehensive treatment of cancer

INTRODUCTION

The immune system is able to exert both tumor-destructive and tumor-protective functions. Immunotherapeutic technologies aim to enhance immune-based anti-tumor activity and (or) weaken tumor-protective immunity.

AREAS COVERED

Cancer vaccination, antibody (Ab)-mediated cytotoxicity, Ab-based checkpoint molecule inhibition, Ab-based immunostimulation, cytokine therapy, oncoviral therapy, drug-mediated immunostimulation, exovesicular therapy, anti-inflammatory therapy, neurohormonal immunorehabilitation, metabolic therapy, as well as adoptive cell immunotherapy, could be coherently used to synergize and amplify each other in achieving robust anti-cancer responses in cancer patients. Tumor-specific immunotherapy applied at early stages is capable of eliminating remaining tumor cells after surgery, thus preventing the development of minimal residual disease. Patients with advanced disease stages could benefit from combined immunotherapy, which would be aimed at providing tumor cell/mass dormancy. Traditional therapeutic anti-cancer interventions (chemoradiotherapy, hyperthermia, anti-hormonal therapy) could significantly enhance tumor sensitivity to anti-cancer immunotherapy. It is important that lower-dose (metronomic) chemotherapy regimens, which are well-tolerated by normal cells, could advance immune-mediated control over tumor growth.

EXPERT OPINION

We envisage that combined immunotherapy regimens in the context of traditional treatment could become the mainstream modality for treating cancers in all phases of the tumorigenesis. The effectiveness of the anti-cancer treatment could be monitored by the following blood parameters: C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio.

Outpatient allografting in hematologic malignancies and nonmalignant disorders--applying lessons learned in the canine model to humans

The novel allogeneic transplant approach outlined in this chapter proposes the dual concepts that currently used intensive cytoreductive conditioning programs can be successfully replaced by nonmyeloblative immunosuppression and that stem cell grafts create marrow space for engraftment through subclinical GVH reactions. Immunosuppression can be conceptually divided into two parts, one targeted exclusively towards host cells before transplantation, and the other aimed at both host and donor T lymphocytes after transplantation. The resultant effect is to either establish mutual graft-host tolerance as reflected by stable mixed donor-host chimerism or accomplish complete donor chimerism. Preclinical studies have demonstrated the feasibility of this new approach in the context of MHC-identical transplants in young canines. Early data from the dog model of severe hereditary hemolytic anemia suggest that mixed chimerism can partially correct the phenotypic expression of disease, but that complete chimerism will be necessary to halt the continued hemolytic process of the host type minority red blood cell population. In contrast, mixed chimerism would be expected to correct disease manifestations of other severe hereditary red blood cell disorders such as sickle cell disease. The early results in human patients with hematological malignancies have demonstrated the feasibility of establishing hematopoietic engraftment using a nonmyeloblative conditioning regimen. Using this regimen, transplants were performed in the outpatient setting, and the need for transfusion support was minimal. Preliminary information suggests that mixed chimerism does not appear to be stable in this older patient population, with most patients progressing to full donor chimerism and a small minority rejecting. Complete disease responses and molecular remissions have been observed in a significant proportion of patients, suggesting that adoptive immunotherapy may not be necessary in most cases. However, in those patients that engraft with at least mixed chimerism and develop progression of the underlying malignancy, DLIs can be used for subsequent adoptive immunotherapy. The feasibility and safety of the outpatient approach for MHC-nonidentical transplantation has been demonstrated. Graft rejection appears to have been corrected by the addition of fludarabine to the nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen for the recipients of HLA-identical sibling allografts. Despite most recipients of MHC-nonidentical transplantation having sustained engraftment, some rejections have been observed. Studies are ongoing to identify the risk factors for rejection after unrelated HSCT to ensure uniform engraftment in future studies.