First trimester prenatal diagnosis: amniocentesis

Prenatal testing for Down syndrome: the perspectives of parents of individuals with Down syndrome

This exploratory, descriptive study examined the views and opinions of parents of individuals with Down syndrome (DS) related to prenatal testing for DS and the use of age-based criteria to determine eligibility for this testing. This survey-based study was designed in collaboration with parents of individuals with DS and the British Columbia-based Lower Mainland Down Syndrome Society (LMDSS). The survey was a 26-item, self-report questionnaire, which was distributed by the LMDSS. Out of the 246 potentially eligible individuals that were mailed surveys, 101 participants returned their completed surveys. The availability of prenatal screening and diagnostic testing for DS was perceived positively by 55.1% and 64.7% of parents, respectively. More than half (60.2%) of participants felt that prenatal diagnostic testing for DS should be available to all pregnant women, regardless of age. In this study, views of Canadian parents of individuals with DS aligned with the prenatal testing policy recently adopted in the USA (whereby any woman, regardless of age or risk factors, can opt for prenatal diagnostic testing) rather than with new Canadian policy (whereby eligibility for diagnostic testing is no longer offered on the basis of age, but on the basis of other risk factors).

Smoking, the xenobiotic pathway, and clubfoot

BACKGROUND

Isolated clubfoot is a common orthopedic birth defect that affects approximately 135,000 newborns worldwide. It is characterized by ankle equinus, hindfoot varus, and forefoot adductus. Although numerous studies suggest a multifactorial etiology, the specific genetic and environmental components have yet to be delineated. Maternal smoking during pregnancy is the only common environmental factor consistently shown to increase the risk for clubfoot. Moreover, a positive family history of clubfoot, in conjunction with maternal smoking, increases the risk 20-fold. These findings suggest that genetic variation in smoking metabolism (xenobiotic) genes may increase susceptibility to clubfoot. Based on this reasoning, we interrogated eight candidate genes from the xenobiotic metabolism.

METHODS

Twenty-two single-nucleotide polymorphisms and two null alleles in these genes (CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP1B1, CYP2A6, EPHX1, NAT2, GSTM1, and GSTT1) were genotyped in a dataset composed of non-Hispanic white and Hispanic multiplex and simplex families.

RESULTS

Only rs1048943/CYP1A1 had significantly altered transmission in the aggregate and multiplex non-Hispanic white datasets (p = 0.003 and p = 0.009, respectively). Perturbation of CYP1A1 can cause an increase in harmful, adduct-forming metabolic intermediates. A significant interaction between EPHX1 and NAT2 was also found (p = 0.007). Importantly, for CYP1A2, significant maternal (p = 0.03; relative risk [RR] = 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.44) and fetal (p = 0.01; RR = 1.33; 95% CI, 1.13-1.54) genotypic effects were identified, suggesting that both maternal and fetal genotypes can negatively impact limb development. No association was found between maternal smoking status and variation in xenobiotic metabolism genes.

CONCLUSION

Together, these results suggest that xenobiotic metabolism genes are unlikely to play a major role in clubfoot; however, perturbation of this pathway may still play a contributory role.

Association between congenital foot anomalies and gestational age at amniocentesis

OBJECTIVES

Our objectives were to confirm the reported association between early amniocentesis and congenital foot anomalies as well as to report, for the first time, on the outcome of amniocenteses performed during the 13th and 14th weeks of gestation.

METHODS

We conducted a triple cohort retrospective study of 4457 amniocenteses. Cohort definitions: early amniocentesis (EA), 11 weeks and 0/7 days to 12 weeks to 6/7 days; early midtrimester amniocentesis (EMA), 13 weeks and 0/7 days to 14 weeks and 6/7 days; and midtrimester amniocentesis (MA), 15 weeks and 0/7 days to 19 weeks and 6/7 days. Outcome measures were obtained by searching the Alberta Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System (ACASS) database for children born with foot anomalies represented by International Classification of Diseases version 9 (ICD-9) codes 754.5, 754.6 and 754.7.

RESULTS

Incidences of congenital foot anomalies were: EA 11/980 (1.1%), EMA 11/2515 (0.4%), and MA 1/962 (0.1%). There is a significant difference between the EA and EMA cohorts (p=0.019) and between the EA and MA cohorts (p=0.003); however, these data suggest there is no difference between EMA and MA cohorts (p=0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

Our incidence of congenital foot anomalies of 1.1% for women who underwent EA is similar to previously reported data, which further validates this association; however, our data also suggest that the foot anomaly risk may be limited to amniocenteses performed before the 13th week of gestation.

Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling

Invasive prenatal diagnosis continues to be the gold standard for pregnancies at increased risk of chromosomal aneuploidy or other genetic disease. Chorionic villus sampling is the procedure of choice for the first trimester. Early amniocentesis has been shown to carry increased risks of pregnancy loss, amniotic fluid leakage and talipes equinovarus. Mid-trimester amniocentesis continues to be the most common form of invasive prenatal diagnosis, with post-procedural loss rates of between 0.5 and 1%. This present review summarizes information on technique risks, looks at new technology applied to invasive prenatal diagnosis testing, and reports on new diagnoses that could be made either by amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling.